Trump's tariffs and threats upend Canada's election
US President Donald Trump's trade war and annexation threats have upended Canada's election and improved the fortunes of the Liberal Party, which could win a fourth consecutive term in power.
The Liberals and the country's new prime minister, Mark Carney, looked headed for a crushing defeat in Monday's election until the American president started attacking Canada's economy and even threatening its sovereignty, including suggesting it should become the 51st state.
Trump's dumping on Canada has infuriated its people and stoked a surge in Canadian nationalism that has helped the Liberals flip the election narrative.
"Trump has immersed himself into our lives and has defined the ballot question," former Quebec premier Jean Charest said.
"What Trump has done is shed light on who we are."
Even separatists in French-speaking Quebec "are very much aligned with other Canadians in defending the country and responding very firmly to the fact that we're not going to be the 51st state", Charest said.
The opposition Conservative Party's leader, Pierre Poilievre, hoped to make the election a referendum on former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whose popularity declined toward the end of his decade in power as food and housing prices rose and immigration surged.
But Trump attacked, Trudeau resigned and Carney, a two-time central banker, became the Liberal Party's leader and prime minister.
"We were looking at a scenario where the Conservatives were going to rake in a huge majority," said Charest, a Conservative.
"Here we are months later in another world."
Trump's trade war and attacks have led Canadians to cancel trips to the US and refuse to buy American goods.
And it might have contributed to record early voting, with 7.3 million Canadians casting ballots before election day.
Carney said the 80-year period when the US embraced the mantle of global economic leadership and forged alliances rooted in trust and respect is over.
"The key question in this election is who is the best to respond that. Who will stand up to President Trump?" he said.
Poilievre, a career politician and firebrand populist, has campaigned with Trump-like bravado, even taking a page from the "America First" president by adopting the slogan "Canada First".
But his similarities in style to Trump might cost him.
In a mid-January poll by Nanos, Liberals trailed the Conservative Party by 47 per cent to 20 per cent.
In the latest Nanos poll that ended April 22, the Liberals led by five percentage points.
The January poll had a margin of error 3.1 points while the latest poll had a 2.7-point margin.
Until a few months ago, Poilievre was seen as a shoo-in to become the next prime minister and shepherd the Conservatives back into power for the first time in a decade.
Ian Brodie, a former chief of staff to Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, said it was frustrating that 2025's Conservative campaign plan had to change so drastically.
"At least 40 per cent of the electorate is just petrified about the continued existence of the country," Brodie said.
"In a sense, it is a once in a lifetime line-up of forces that works against everything Pierre been doing since he got himself into politics."
Brodie said a Conservative win will be tough and that the party's situation might not improve anytime soon, noting support for a small progressive party, the New Democrats, has been shrinking for years, making it a two-party struggle.
"If you are into two-party competition for the foreseeable future, then you have to be much closer to the centre of the political spectrum than the Conservatives have been," Brodie said, noting the party might need a new leader.
Whoever the next prime minister is will face challenges.
Both Carney and Poilievre said that if elected, they would accelerate renegotiations of the countries' free trade deal in an effort to end the uncertainty hurting both of their economies.
Carney, in particular, has notable experience navigating economic crises, having done so when he ran Canada's central bank and when he later became the first non-UK citizen to run the Bank of England since its founding in 1694.
"The problems are really inconceivable, worse than any Canadian prime minister has had to face, I think ever," said Robert Bothwell, a University of Toronto professor of Canadian history and international relations.
"Not only is Carney the luckiest guy alive and came in at absolutely the right moment, but once he actually starts having to administer the country, the Trump problem, the American problem, is just inconceivable.
"It's like being handed a sack full of rabid beavers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
40 minutes ago
- ABC News
America's economic and political chaos has implications for Australia
The gripping stoush between Donald Trump and Elon Musk was emblematic of America's slide into a kind of corrupt flakiness. Yesterday's decision to call in the National Guard to put down immigration protests in Los Angeles was equally gripping, but much more serious. Californian governor Gavin Newsom called it "purposefully inflammatory", which looks spot on. Remember Trump's use of emergency declarations to impose tariffs. Meanwhile, tanks were rolling into Washington DC ahead of the big autocracy-esque military parade on June 14, which happens to be the president's birthday. America has become a bewildering blend of the ridiculous and the deadly serious, and the implications of this for Australia are profound. The unserious nature of the place is reflected in the nation's president and richest person fighting in public: picture Anthony Albanese and Gina Rinehart abusing each other on social media. But that analogy falls well short because only two weeks ago Musk was a close adviser and effectively a member of cabinet, responsible for the closure of significant government programs, tens of thousands of retrenchments from the federal public service and a full re-ordering and centralising of government data on all Americans. Now, Musk is outside the tent, as they say, weeing in, except it's a torrent, including ferocious opposition to Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill". That 1,038-page bill with its ludicrous official title, and all sorts of unrelated things thrown in so it would be hard for Congress to reject each bit, was an earlier sign that the United States has become a bit of a joke and not a serious country anymore. What's not a joke is that the oligarch Musk obviously thought he had bought the presidency and is complaining now that having spent $US300 million getting Trump elected, the guy is not doing what he is told. "Such ingratitude," he posted on X. In response, Trump threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts, not because they're bad contracts but because he's "disappointed" with Musk. As economist Paul Krugman wrote on Substack: "The point is that both men start from the presumption that the US government is an entirely corrupt enterprise, with the president in a position to hand out personal favours or engage in personal acts of vengeance." Examples of America's unseriousness have been building to the point where the US isn't even a comprehensible ally, let alone a reliable one, or a safe place to invest — global investors are now steadily reducing their exposure to American assets. The tariffs on the ridiculously named "Liberation Day", April 2, were a hastily assembled mess. The ones other than the arbitrary 10 per cent "base tariff" were calculated with a simple sum using each country's trade deficit, which was plainly bonkers, and included uninhabited islands as well as tiny countries that had virtually no trade with the US. And then, a week later, they were replaced by a whole new set of tariffs. Then Trump complained that China won't do a deal, having been whacked with the threat of a 145 per cent tariff, which was reduced to 30 per cent for no apparent reason. Then Trump asked for a phone call with Xi Jinping, got it, and then meekly chickened out, confirming his TACO nickname (Trump Always Chickens Out). Trump met German Chancellor Friedrich Merz last week and, with cameras rolling, Merz noted that the following day, June 6, would be the 80th anniversary of D Day. "That was not a pleasant day for you," said Trump. "This is not a great day." Merz replied: "This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship." Oh, right. Last Wednesday, without warning, Trump banned citizens of 12 countries from travelling to the US. Before that, he posted that "Because of Tariffs, our Economy is BOOMING!", which is plainly divorced from reality. The Bureau of Economic Analysis had announced a week earlier that the US economy contracted by 0.2 per cent in the March quarter, and a few hours later, the OECD predicted that growth in the United States will decline from 2.8 per cent in 2024 to 1.6 per cent in 2025 and 1.5 per cent in 2026. At about the same time, the Congressional Budget Office released an assessment of the impact of the tariff policy, saying it would raise inflation and slow economic growth as consumers bear the cost of them. The CBO also produced an analysis of the "One Big Beautiful Bill", which it said would add $US2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade because the $US1.3 trillion in spending cuts won't fully offset the $US3.7 trillion in tax cuts. By the way, the Big Beautiful Bill also contains a "revenge" provision that would allow the US government to impose extra taxes on foreign investors whose home countries have policies America doesn't like, which is not the sort thing that's going to endear a country to foreign investors. As a result of all this, the "American exceptionalism" that was the foundation of global investment and finance for decades, is over. Does that mean the US dollar will lose its place as the world's reserve currency, a position it has held since 1944? Probably not, but its monopoly is under threat. As exceptionalism dims, there will be a shift towards other currencies, mainly the euro and, to some extent, the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan. The US dollar still accounts for 58 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves, and the euro is second at 20 per cent. The fact that gold is hitting new record highs, and the euro has appreciated 15 per cent this year, shows that central banks and global investors are looking for foreign exchange alternatives. The US dollar has about half of SWIFT transactions (it's the global banking communications network), with the euro second at 22 per cent. While the US dollar is used in 55 per cent of global trade, the euro is next at 30 per cent. There is no complete alternative for the US dollar in sight at this stage, but that could change, and even a 10 per cent reduction in its use in trade, foreign exchange and banking would have a meaningful impact on asset valuations in the US, including shares. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is due to meet Trump later this month, and like other heads of state who have ventured into the White House, he could quite easily take a beating in the Oval Office, on camera. Trump seems to think Australia has a ban on American beef, which isn't true, but the Australian PM could still find himself arguing biosecurity with an aggressively uncomprehending American president. Beyond that meeting, Australia needs to rethink its relationship with the United States. We've done quite well maintaining a wary, non-trusting trade relationship with China. We now need a wary, non-trusting security alliance with the US, if that's even possible. Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays
Flight Centre chief executive Graham Turner said business travel to the US was holding up, but fewer Australians were booking holidays there. 'Certainly compared to the pre-Trump era, everything that we see … is the leisure market in particular is down. There's no doubt that April and May have been down,' Turner said. 'US carriers have increased their capacity [to Australia] over the last six to 12 months, and there's no doubt they'll be suffering a bit. 'There's been cheaper airfares through sales and there will be [more] over the next few months unless things dramatically improve.' More than a million Australians visited the US last year. The country's latest official figures show 291,230 Australians visited the US from January to April, down 0.2 per cent on the same period last year. In April, Australian visitor numbers to the US grew 1 per cent year-on-year to 89,363. Meanwhile, 83,460 Americans arrived in Australia this March, making the US the second-largest source of visitors behind New Zealand. Australia's favourite destinations over the same period were New Zealand, Indonesia and Japan. Mitchell said young people most affected by the cost of living were choosing cheaper destinations such as Latin America or Asia, instead. He said the April slump in the Australian dollar sparked by Trump's tariff wars had 'spooked a lot of people' from booking trips to the US. 'The feedback we're getting is the US is an expensive destination to go to, with the service taxes and the tipping. And I think that word of mouth has honestly been getting around for a while now,' Mitchell said. He said even those who could afford to visit the US were cutting back on costs. 'I don't think it's stopping some people from going there, but it probably does change how they travel a bit. They might not go for 2½, three weeks; they might go for two weeks. They might not go five-star, they might go four-star or three-star,' he said. Qantas, which operates about 40 return flights a week between Australia and the US, said demand for US travel was holding up locally. Chief executive Vanessa Hudson recently said the airline was feeling optimistic about demand for the US, and 'business-purpose travel and business travel in premium cabins remains strong'. The airline said this year's sale for flights to the US had outperformed similar sales last year. Loading Michael Feller, an ex-diplomat and foreign policy adviser, said the second Trump presidency had caused enormous damage to US soft power and prestige. But he said it was difficult to trace that into consumer behaviour beyond unique cases like Canada. 'Boycotts are really tricky,' said Feller, who is now chief strategist at Geopolitical Strategy, which provides advice to companies around the world. 'US products are ubiquitous. And when you consume a quintessential US product like Coke, it's manufactured and bottled in Australia. And then there are other quintessential products like iPhones, which are manufactured and assembled in China. So, it's hard to disentangle 'Brand US'.' Despite gloom over Trump's trade wars, Feller said there were two silver linings for Australia. Loading 'The Australian consumer will probably benefit from Trump's trade wars insofar as cheap Chinese goods will be dumped on our shores, leading to lower costs,' he said. 'And if Trump cracks down on international students, those students will presumably look to a country like ours to study.'
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays
Flight Centre chief executive Graham Turner said business travel to the US was holding up, but fewer Australians were booking holidays there. 'Certainly compared to the pre-Trump era, everything that we see … is the leisure market in particular is down. There's no doubt that April and May have been down,' Turner said. 'US carriers have increased their capacity [to Australia] over the last six to 12 months, and there's no doubt they'll be suffering a bit. 'There's been cheaper airfares through sales and there will be [more] over the next few months unless things dramatically improve.' More than a million Australians visited the US last year. The country's latest official figures show 291,230 Australians visited the US from January to April, down 0.2 per cent on the same period last year. In April, Australian visitor numbers to the US grew 1 per cent year-on-year to 89,363. Meanwhile, 83,460 Americans arrived in Australia this March, making the US the second-largest source of visitors behind New Zealand. Australia's favourite destinations over the same period were New Zealand, Indonesia and Japan. Mitchell said young people most affected by the cost of living were choosing cheaper destinations such as Latin America or Asia, instead. He said the April slump in the Australian dollar sparked by Trump's tariff wars had 'spooked a lot of people' from booking trips to the US. 'The feedback we're getting is the US is an expensive destination to go to, with the service taxes and the tipping. And I think that word of mouth has honestly been getting around for a while now,' Mitchell said. He said even those who could afford to visit the US were cutting back on costs. 'I don't think it's stopping some people from going there, but it probably does change how they travel a bit. They might not go for 2½, three weeks; they might go for two weeks. They might not go five-star, they might go four-star or three-star,' he said. Qantas, which operates about 40 return flights a week between Australia and the US, said demand for US travel was holding up locally. Chief executive Vanessa Hudson recently said the airline was feeling optimistic about demand for the US, and 'business-purpose travel and business travel in premium cabins remains strong'. The airline said this year's sale for flights to the US had outperformed similar sales last year. Loading Michael Feller, an ex-diplomat and foreign policy adviser, said the second Trump presidency had caused enormous damage to US soft power and prestige. But he said it was difficult to trace that into consumer behaviour beyond unique cases like Canada. 'Boycotts are really tricky,' said Feller, who is now chief strategist at Geopolitical Strategy, which provides advice to companies around the world. 'US products are ubiquitous. And when you consume a quintessential US product like Coke, it's manufactured and bottled in Australia. And then there are other quintessential products like iPhones, which are manufactured and assembled in China. So, it's hard to disentangle 'Brand US'.' Despite gloom over Trump's trade wars, Feller said there were two silver linings for Australia. Loading 'The Australian consumer will probably benefit from Trump's trade wars insofar as cheap Chinese goods will be dumped on our shores, leading to lower costs,' he said. 'And if Trump cracks down on international students, those students will presumably look to a country like ours to study.'
