logo
China's electric vehicle industry is preparing to take on the world. Is America ready?

China's electric vehicle industry is preparing to take on the world. Is America ready?

CNN02-05-2025

This year's Shanghai auto show has a clear message for visitors: China is now a global leader in innovation, and it wants the world to know.
The massive, thrumming exhibition that took place in the country's financial capital over the past two weeks boasted over 60 football fields of floorspace, packed full of carmakers using the event to unveil a raft of new models with curtain-pulling reveals.
To a soundtrack of bass-thumping music, big brands showed off everything from electric batteries that can run for hundreds of miles on a five-minute charge to flying vehicles and cars with cutting-edge assisted driving, while armies of live streamers broadcast the specs to viewers across the country and crowds thronged to check out the new tech.
And unlike in decades past, when cars from legacy makers like GM, Volkswagen or BMW were the showpieces, this year it was China's electric vehicle (EV) vanguard that were the ones to watch.
Case in point: All eyes were on the reveal of a hotly anticipated electric sportscar from BYD, an EV giant that's also China's top carmaker. Its new Denza Z is 'a testament to pure emotional design' and 'extreme performance,' Wolfgang Egger, an ex-Audi and Lamborghini designer who now directs BYD's design, told a cheering crowd as he whisked off a covering to reveal the bright blue coupe. ('We love you,' some voices shouted back.)
In another hall, crowds waited in a line stretching outside the venue doors to see offerings from Chinese electronics giant-turned-carmaker Xiaomi. Others craned their necks to catch sight of Nio's sleek ET9 luxury sedan, a rival to BMW's 7-series or Porsche's Panamera, shimmy and shake to the music as it showed off its suspension and automatic doors.
The event is such a spectacle that visitors can be forgiven for forgetting, if for a moment, that the global auto industry is being roiled by President Donald Trump's tariffs on all cars imported into the United States — and that the US and China are locked in a seemingly intractable trade war that threatens to escalate into a decoupling.
But that's precisely why the rapid ascent of China's EV sector is so important to the country, as it squares off against the world's largest economy and leading innovator.
Once seen as a producer of clumsy knock-offs, Chinese carmakers have catapulted to the forefront of the growing global EV industry — a major coup for a country aiming to transform into a fully-fledged tech powerhouse in multiple industries.
Last year, China's privately-owned national champion BYD outsold US EV maker Tesla with its stable of hybrid and electric vehicles. BYD has also overtaken China market stalwart Volkswagen as the top seller of passenger cars domestically. (Tesla, which operates its Gigafactory in Shanghai, did not attend the auto show.)
That's because Chinese consumers, who no longer see homegrown brands as second rate, started consistently buying more vehicles from Chinese carmakers than foreign-backed ones in 2023. And, as of last year, the country controls more than 60% of the rapidly growing global EV market, according to energy analytics firm Rho Motion.
While Trump's trade war looms large over export strategies for global automakers, China's EV producers are relatively insulated, having already looked to other markets for growth after heavy duties and other curbs were imposed on their vehicles during the Biden administration.
And as Trump pushes to bring back an automobile industry that once symbolized American prosperity, alienating US trade partners and shunning efforts to boost a homegrown EV sector along the way, China's EV advantage is a potential soft power boon, and a chance to reshape its place in global trade and technology.
In China, though, the field is crowded and cutthroat, with competition sparking a fierce, yearslong price war. Domestic automakers are vying to one-up each other on tech and value for money — and fighting to capture market share around the world.
In March, BYD released a battery that takes just five minutes to give its latest models a range of 250 miles. That was already considerably faster than charging Tesla's batteries and seen as a technological marvel. But just weeks later, on the eve of the auto show, BYD was upstaged by Chinese battery giant CATL, which says it can offer some 320 miles of range in the same time.
On the smart driving side, meanwhile, tech firms like Huawei and Momenta are pushing forward their latest intelligent driving technology after BYD upped the ante earlier this year by pledging to roll out its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance system in most of its models, including those costing around $10,000, at no extra charge.
'The technology is very strong (in China), but the price is not luxurious,' Wang Qiguang, a recent graduate living in Shanghai, observed while checking out BYD's exhibit last week. 'Its formed a kind of technological equality that everyone can enjoy … this is the best part of it.'
Analysts say homegrown intelligent driving technology would have enjoyed an even greater spotlight in Shanghai had the government not tightened rules around the marketing and testing of driver-assistance features following a fatal crash in March involving a Xiaomi sedan.
For Chinese consumers, driving isn't just about function, it's also about fun. Carmakers are jostling to win customers by offering kitted-out entertainment systems with multiple screens that pair seamlessly with phones, vibrating massage seats that recline like La-Z-Boys and voice activated controls for everything – at bargain prices.
'We're in the back seat and there's heated seats, voice controls, moon roof all the way to the back, lots of leg room. And (we're looking at the price) and it's like, what is that in USD? And we find out that's like $28,000, but you can get the baseline at $20,000 – that's kind of a shock,' said one American businessman visiting the car show, who was not authorized to speak to media.
He and his colleagues, who sell automotive parts, had come over after their boss said they needed to 'see what was happening in the China market.'
The speed of China's advances has stunned even foreign carmakers with deep roots in the country, which shut its borders for years during the Covid-19 pandemic.
'We came back after the country reopened … (and we) immediately realized: Wow, China has changed so much,' Stephen Ma, who heads Japanese car giant Nissan's China business, told reporters at the auto show. 'I've worked in China for many years, and I knew things move faster here than in other countries, but I didn't expect it to be this fast – it really exceeded our expectations.'
And while the fierce competition is driving rapid innovation, it also creates major challenges. Dozens of Chinese EV players are vying for market share in a sector that's grappling with overcapacity. Many firms have yet to make a profit, and they're up against a Goliath: BYD occupies some 30% of China's 'new energy vehicle' market of battery powered cars and hybrids.
'It's just really difficult to differentiate yourself in this market,' said Tu Le, founder and managing director of the US-based consultancy firm Sino Auto Insights. 'That's why it's so important for a lot of these companies to export, because the competition is so intense here that the only breathing room that they're likely to get … is if they go somewhere where there's not as many Chinese competitors.'
Concerns about Chinese overcapacity and industrial policy prompted the US and Canada last year to impose 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs, while the European Union launched an investigation into what it called unfair subsidies and raised its levies to as high as 45%. (Beijing has denied its success depends on subsidies and last month said it will negotiate with the EU on EV price commitments.)
Those hurdles don't seem to be daunting Chinese carmakers, who exported 441,000 EVs, including hybrids, in the first quarter of this year, up more than 40% from the same period last year, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers.
BYD owner Julaluck Chanasri, a YouTube influencer from Thailand, told CNN many people in her country 'have changed from Toyota, Honda to BYD's electric cars.'
'If China can keep the cheap price then (its brands) will continue to grow,' added her husband, Didsakorn, as they checked out one of BYD's Denza brand SUVs in Shanghai.
Such is the momentum behind Chinese EVs that it's hard to remember when, just two decades ago, China had no car culture to speak of.
In the late 1970s, when China began opening its economy, there were few private cars in the country, which was then known as a 'kingdom of bicycles.'
It wasn't until the early 2000s, when rapid economic growth catapulted hundreds of millions into the middle class that ownership took off.
That's when a slew of foreign automakers, some of which dipped their toes into the market decades earlier in anticipation of growth, piled in, setting up joint ventures with domestic companies to manufacture in China. The government required the German, US and Japanese car giants to transfer tech and know-how to their local partners.
But even as China emerged as a major car manufacturer, its homegrown brands were still seen as second-rate. A dating show most infamously captured the zeitgeist when a contestant confidently declared that she'd 'rather cry in a BMW than smile on a bicycle.'
China's enthusiastic adoption of electric vehicles combined with hefty government support has flipped the script.
By 2009, around the same time Tesla received a nearly half billion-dollar loan from the US government, Beijing ramped up a concerted strategy to develop so-called 'new energy vehicles.'
That included showering the industry with support, such as awarding contracts for public taxi and bus fleets and building out charging infrastructure, as well as tax incentives and buyer rebates or subsidies.
Estimates for those subsidies vary widely, with Chinese state media citing 10 years' worth of such measures at roughly $20 billion. Analysts have suggested Chinese government support for the sector could be between more than $50 billion in a decade to as much as $200 billion between 2009 and 2023. Meanwhile, Beijing has aggressively sought out the raw materials needed to produce EV batteries and now dominates those supply chains.
But longtime observers say it wasn't industrial policy alone: Visionary entrepreneurs were pouring into the sector.
Among them was Wang Chuanfu, an engineer with a Dickensian backstory who founded his battery company, BYD, in 1995 and moved into car production in 2003. The company got global notice in 2008 when it received a $230 million investment from Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway.
Fifteen years later, after BYD produced its 5 millionth car, Wang was overcome by emotion on stage where he declared that despite challenges and ridicule 'the era of Chinese cars has arrived.'
And China's success, also partly spurred by Tesla's move to manufacture in Shanghai, has in turn shaped the global industry, experts say.
'For a very long time, Western automakers were looking at EVs as not a realistic option because the prices were outrageous,' according to John Helveston, an assistant professor of engineering management and systems engineering at George Washington University in the US.
'The exponential decline in cost (has) all been driven by the Chinese industrial ecosystem … a lot of it is primarily due to scaling up the production of every aspect of that supply chain.'
Today, roughly half of new cars sold in China are battery EVs or hybrids. By comparison, sales of such vehicles made up just over 20% of total vehicles sales in the US in the third quarter of last year, according to the most recent data cited by the US Energy Information Administration.
The success of the industry has been hailed by Chinese state media and propagandists as an example of the country's contributions to the global energy transition and its 'technological prowess.'
There's a lot to play up. This spring, American Youtuber iShowSpeed, who has nearly 40 million subscribers, went viral on Chinese social media for featuring BYD's luxury Yangwang brand, showing off how its U9 sportscar can 'dance' and yelling 'these China cars got it' as he drove the water-equipped U8 SUV through a river.
Now, it's the foreign brands losing revenue and market share that are looking to partner with Chinese companies to make use of homegrown innovation and win back customers. In Shanghai, Volkswagen has played up its 'in China, for China' approach.
'This means more local development, new tech partnerships and greater speed of implementation,' Ralf Brandstätter, CEO of Volkswagen Group China, said in a statement last month. 'At the same time, we are accelerating our electric offensive with additional products for new segments.'
Recent years have seen a flurry of new EV partnerships between foreign and Chinese companies, like VW's 2023 $700 million investment in XPeng; European auto giant Stellantis launched a venture to sell Leapmotor's budget EVs outside China; Toyota linked up with Chinese intelligent driving firm Momenta and in 2019 announced a partnership with BYD; GM brand Buick is working with Momenta, as well as CATL on batteries.
That's all part of what industry expert Lei Xing called a 'counterattack' from the foreign firms still competing in China.
'They have the products, they have the Chinese tech inside (those products) that they are able to show and say: 'We've learned … and now we are showing what we think is needed in order to be relevant in the Chinese market,'' he said, adding that 'the jury is still out' on how successful such efforts will be.
The fight to stay relevant is playing out during a deeply uncertain moment in the global auto industry, following Trump's imposition of 25% tariffs on cars and, as of this weekend, 25% levies on auto parts imported into the US — not to mention his general ratcheting up of trade conflict with China. (On Tuesday, Trump tapped the brakes on automakers with some limited measures of relief.)
Tariffs from both the US and China on each others' goods now stand at well over 100%, with some limited exceptions, sending US automakers and their suppliers scrambling to shift parts of supply chains away from China.
In the other direction, US auto giant Ford stopped shipping vehicles to China last month, with its China CFO Ryan Anderson telling CNN in Shanghai that it 'brought as many' as possible of their select imported models into China ahead of the tariffs, but 'the supply that we've got in the country now is basically all we'll have until the tariffs relax.'
For many Chinese EV makers, their strategy is still focused on markets outside the US, while preparing for the potential impact of further trade escalation, including if Washington further tightens export controls on semiconductor technology.
James Peng, the cofounder and CEO of Pony.AI, a Chinese autonomous driving firm with roots in Silicon Valley, told CNN he thought it was unlikely the chips from US firm Nvidia that it relies on would come under export controls, but the company was sourcing backups and alternatives, because 'we don't know what's coming (down) the pipe.'
And while the company, which is pioneering robotaxi services in major Chinese cities, carries out some research and development in the US, doing that at a larger scale or commercializing it there is 'going to be tough.'
'We'll see if there's a way when the situation permits,' Peng said.
For some observers of the rapacious innovation on show in Shanghai, like Helveston in Washington, the US-China showdown and American policy direction sets up the potential for a split future.
On one side, China's carmakers become increasingly dominant in a world transitioning to electric vehicles, and one the other, he said, the US cuts its support for EVs and remains 'an island of tailpipes.'
CNN's Marc Stewart, Martha Zhou, Hazel Pfeifer, Hassan Tayir, Fred He and John Liu contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other
How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other

What happens when the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man - both accomplished attention-seekers - clash on the internet? We're finding out in real time. This week, billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump took to their respective social platforms to sling mud at the other after a fallout over federal spending. What started as a volley of barbs snowballed into a feud involving multiple social platforms and millions of onlookers, as everyone from big-name politicians to no-name meme accounts hurried to offer their takes and declare their allegiances. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The split could have profound real-world consequences, as both men show their willingness to leverage financial and political power to hit back at the other. It also illustrates how quickly a conflict can escalate when it is fanned by algorithmic feeds and the demands of the attention economy, which prizes outrage and relishes a high-profile feud. While Trump and Musk circle their wagons, drumming up support and smearing the other through posts on X and Truth Social, millions of smaller content creators stand to capitalize on the attention the feud generates. On Thursday afternoon, the number of active users on the X and Truth Social mobile apps both reached 90-day highs, according to preliminary estimates by Sensor Tower, a market intelligence firm. Between 2 and 6 p.m. Eastern time that day, the firm estimates that X usage was up 54 percent compared with the previous seven days, while Truth Social was up more than 400 percent, albeit from a much lower baseline. 'Public feuds like this drive social media engagement like crazy,' said Casey Fiesler, a professor of information science at the University of Colorado at Boulder who studies social media ethics. 'It's high-octane content because it's easy to meme and very algorithmically rewarded.' Musk, whose business empire includes X as well as Tesla, rocket company SpaceX and artificial intelligence start-up xAI, kicked off the fight on Tuesday when he posted on X to criticize a congressional spending bill backed by the president: 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote. The post was viewed more than 141 million times and sparked a flurry of commentary on X and elsewhere online. Gen Z internet personality Lil Tay, known for over-the-top posts flaunting luxury goods, got 2.8 million views on a reply clapping back at Musk for his former support of Trump, while far-right commentator Charlie Kirk referenced Musk's 'tweet heard around the world' in a post funneling viewers to Apple Podcasts to stream his talk show. Over the next two days, Musk continued to take shots at Trump on X, at one point posting a poll asking whether America needed a new centrist political party, while Trump told White House reporters that his and Musk's relationship was on the rocks. Then on Thursday, Musk escalated the back-and-forth by claiming in a post on X that Trump is implicated in the Epstein files, documents that allegedly contain the names of people who consorted with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein to sexually assault minors. The post exploded, drawing almost 200 million views in a day and stoking a second wave of content from politicians, creators and meme-makers. A post from an anonymous X user, liked by 192,300 people, mused: 'Who gets JD Vance in the divorce?' The vice president soon provided an answer, posting that Trump has 'earned the trust of the movement he leads.' On X, where Musk's changes to the platform's verification feature have blurred the lines between real public figures and paid subscribers, fake politicians joined the fray. 'Every time I smell a movement, I know you'll be next to it,' came a reply to Vance from an account for Rep. Jack Kimble - a fictitious congressman with more than 93,000 followers whose posts have often fooled social media users. Former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon seized the moment to make headlines with his podcast, in which he called for Trump to seize SpaceX and perhaps even deport Musk. Politics creators such as Philip DeFranco took to TikTok with beat-by-beat breakdowns of the feud, while Musk's estranged daughter Vivian Wilson posted to her Instagram stories a clip of herself laughing, with the caption, 'I love being proven right,' possibly in reference to past comments criticizing her father and Trump. In the Reddit community r/politics, self-styled sleuths conducted deep dives into Epstein-related court filings, at times linking to books and YouTube series that claim to investigate Epstein's celebrity accomplices. Far-fetched conspiracy theories floated around X as users speculated whether Trump and Musk could be secretly working together toward some noble end. Critics of Musk and Trump delighted in the affair. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), who at 35 is a social media star in her own right, was stopped by a reporter outside the U.S. Capitol on Thursday and asked for her reaction to Trump and Musk's war of words. She was quick to spit an online catchphrase: 'Oh man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' The clip spread quickly on TikTok, where it was boosted by left-leaning talking heads and news accounts. Academic research on online algorithms has shown that social feeds often prioritize content that elicits fear or rage. High-profile fights can boost the power and profiles of people involved, as with the infamous internet feuds between Kim Kardashian and Kanye West or influencers Trisha Paytas and Ethan Klein, said Fiesler. But trending conflicts are also a boon to the second-order creators, who jump to offer 'side takes,' playing off the argument of the day to drive traffic to their own products and profiles. A divisive court battle between actress Amber Heard and her ex-husband Johnny Depp, for instance, spawned its own media ecosystem, with creators and channels dedicated entirely to dissecting the feud - at times even falsifying or exaggerating information to keep viewers hooked. 'This [Musk-Trump feud] is half my TikTok feed right now,' Fiesler said. 'The more that people talk about it, the more people feel obligated to talk about it and take sides.' It's a dynamic the principals in this fight have long since mastered. Vance posted on X on Thursday a picture of himself with the popular podcaster and comedian Theo Von, with the tongue-in-cheek caption, 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Musk reposted it, adding a 'laughter' emoji. Under Musk's ownership, X has lost advertisers and users turned off by his politics and lax approach to hate speech, with rivals such as Bluesky and Meta's Threads siphoning left-leaning users in particular. Now he risks alienating Trump loyalists. But in the meantime, even critics of his leadership of X acknowledged Thursday that it seemed to have 'the juice' - that is, it was driving the conversation - at least for the moment. 'A public blowup between the world's richest man and the president of the U.S. is hard for people to resist witnessing first-hand, even for those that may not regularly use X,' said Jasmine Enberg, vice president and principal analyst at eMarketer, a market research firm. 'That said, our media usage is so fragmented and we're being bombarded with the news from every channel that it's not likely to be significant or sustainable.' Truth Social, meanwhile, has become an increasingly important component of Trump's communication strategy, with the self-styled influencer-in-chief firing off a steady stream of posts - at times dozens a day - lauding his own actions or taking aim at rivals. White House employees and right-leaning creators then spread the posts to other platforms, broadening Truth Social's reach and influence even as the platform underperforms compared with X, Threads or Bluesky. (Sensor Tower estimates X has about 100 times more active users.) The Trump-Musk brouhaha exemplifies how online influencer culture has permeated politics, said Renée DiResta, a professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy and the author of 'Invisible Rulers.' 'Online beefing is not about winning - it's a kind of performance,' she said. The interactive nature of social media allows the audience to get in on the action. 'We pick sides, cheer for our champion and keep the fight going. We make memes - we can grab some attention for ourselves and help shape the fight if we make good ones.' But what might be harmless fun in the case of celebrity gossip, she said, has a darker side when the warring parties are among the world's most powerful people. In a striking example, a threat from Trump on Thursday to cancel government contracts with SpaceX prompted Musk to reply that the company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately' - a move that would have severed NASA's only means of transporting astronauts to the International Space Station. A pseudonymous X user who had fewer than 100 followers at the time replied to Musk's post, urging him to 'take a step back' and reconsider. Within hours, Musk responded: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' The online bedlam prompted sports commentator Darren Rovell to revisit a tweet he posted in 2016 that has since become a meme: 'I feel bad for our country. But this is tremendous content.' Related Content To save rhinos, conservationists are removing their horns Donald Trump and the art of the Oval Office confrontation Some advice from LGBTQ elders as WorldPride kicks off amid fears

Trump Threatens Musk with ‘Very Serious Consequences' if He Funds Democrats
Trump Threatens Musk with ‘Very Serious Consequences' if He Funds Democrats

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Trump Threatens Musk with ‘Very Serious Consequences' if He Funds Democrats

Trump draws a line. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump seems to have gone from a full boil to a simmer over the weekend, but don't rule out the possibility of the heat getting turned up again. In a conversation with NBC News, Trump said he has no interest in making nice with Musk right now, but did make it clear that if the billionaire decides to switch parties and back Democratic candidates, 'he'll have to pay consequences for that.' Trump being Trump, he didn't explain what those potential retaliatory actions might be, just told NBC they will be 'very serious consequences.' Of course, it's not terribly hard to imagine the levers Trump might pull. He has already threatened to cancel the billions of dollars worth of government contracts that Musk's companies currently count on, and his close ally and former advisor, Steve Bannon, has encouraged Trump to investigate Musk as an 'illegal alien,' deport him, and seize control of his companies under the Defense Production Act. So, he's got some ideas to work with. Trump's threat of action against Musk certainly feels like a line drawn in the sand, but the President has otherwise not really escalated the beef since Musk threw the kitchen sink at him. In a series of now-deleted posts, Musk claimed that Trump appears in the Epstein files and has been withholding information in order to protect himself and supported the idea of impeaching the president whom he spent nearly $300 million trying to get into office. Musk took those posts down, but has continued to be critical of Trump. Trump rebuked the attacks in his conversation with NBC, calling the Epstein angle 'old news' and that he had 'nothing to do with' Epstein. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' he said. Other than that, Trump has basically just decided to wash his hands of Musk—at least for the time being. When asked if his relationship with the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla is over, Trump told NBC, 'I would assume so, yeah.' He also reiterated that he has no intention of speaking with Musk directly and said, 'I'm too busy doing other things' and 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' That remains pretty mild for a guy who is certainly capable of being a bomb thrower, but Trump might have a sense that he will come off better by easing off after Musk flew off the handle. A YouGov poll found that among Republicans, 71% would take his side compared to just 6% who said they would throw their backing behind Musk. Even if you expand the survey sample to include Democrats and Independents, Trump comes out ahead with 28% of support compared to just 8% for Musk (though notably, 52% said 'Neither,' so the 'a pox on both your houses' demographic is strong). Politico reported Sunday that aides representing both sides have spoken, and there is something of a mutual truce at the moment to stop the bomb-throwing—though it noted that neither Musk nor Trump wanted to stop. Seems like they are locked in a battle of restraint at the moment, which is not exactly a skill either of them is known to possess. We'll see who breaks the truce first.

Mike Johnson downplays Musk's influence and says Republicans will pass Trump's tax and budget bill
Mike Johnson downplays Musk's influence and says Republicans will pass Trump's tax and budget bill

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

Mike Johnson downplays Musk's influence and says Republicans will pass Trump's tax and budget bill

With an uncharacteristically feistiness, Speaker Mike Johnson took clear sides Sunday in President Donald Trump's breakup with mega-billionaire Elon Musk. The Republican House leader and staunch Trump ally said Musk's criticism of the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill will not derail the measure, and he downplayed Musk's influence over the GOP-controlled Congress. 'I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world,' Johnson said on ABC's 'This Week.' 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' Johnson insisted. Johnson said he has exchanged text messages with Musk since the former chief of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency came out against the GOP bill. Musk called it an 'abomination' that would add to U.S. debts and threaten economic stability. He urged voters to flood Capitol Hill with calls to vote against the measure, which is pending in the Senate after clearing the House. His criticism sparked an angry social media back-and-forth with Trump, who told reporters over the weekend that he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. The speaker was dismissive of Musk's threats to finance opponents — even Democrats — of Republican members who back Trump's bill. 'We've got almost no calls to the offices, any Republican member of Congress,' Johnson said. 'And I think that indicates that people are taking a wait and see attitude. Some who may be convinced by some of his arguments, but the rest understand: this is a very exciting piece of legislation.' Johnson argued that Musk still believes 'that our policies are better for human flourishing. They're better for the US economy. They're better for everything that he's involved in with his innovation and job creation and entrepreneurship.' The speaker and other Republicans, including Trump's White House budget chief, continued their push back Sunday against forecasts that their tax and budget plans will add to annual deficits and thus balloon a national debt already climbing toward $40 trillion. Johnson insisted that Musk has bad information, and the speaker disputed the forecasts of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that scores budget legislation. The bill would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, cut spending and reduce some other levies but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the CBO's analysis. The speaker countered with arguments Republicans have made for decades: That lower taxes and spending cuts would spur economic growth that ensure deficits fall. Russell Vought, who leads the White House Office of Budget and Management, said on Fox News Sunday that CBO analysts base their models of 'artificial baselines.' Because the 2017 tax law set the lower rates to expire, CBO's cost estimates, Vought argued, presuming a return to the higher rates before that law went into effect. Vought acknowledged CBO's charge from Congress is to analyze legislation and current law as it is written. But he said the office could issue additional analyses, implying it would be friendlier to GOP goals. Asked whether the White House would ask for alternative estimates, Vought again put the burden on CBO, repeating that congressional rules allow the office to publish more analysis. Other Republicans, meanwhile, approached the Trump-Musk battle cautiously. 'As a former professional fighter, I learned a long time ago, don't get between two fighters,' said Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin on CNN's 'State of the Union.' He even compared the two billionaire businessmen to a married couple. 'President Trump is a friend of mine but I don't need to get, I can have friends that have disagreements,' Mullin said. 'My wife and I dearly love each other and every now and then, well actually quite often, sometimes she disagrees with me, but that doesn't mean that we can't stay focused on what's best for our family. Right now, there may be a disagreement but we're laser focused on what is best for the American people.' —- Associated Press journalist Gary Fields contributed from Washington.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store