Elon Musk's Tesla launches bid to supply electricity to British households
The Texas-based company formally submitted its request for an electricity license to the British energy regulator Ofgem at the end of last month, according to a notice on the watchdog's website.
If approved, the move could pave the way for Tesla to compete with the big firms that dominate the U.K. energy market from as soon as next year.
The application, first reported by the Sunday Telegraph, came from Tesla Energy Ventures and was signed by Andrew Payne, who runs the firm's European energy operations.
Tesla, which is best known as one of the world's leading EV manufacturers, also develops solar energy generation systems and battery energy storage products.
Musk's company already has an electricity supplier in Texas, called Tesla Electric. The service, which was launched in 2022, allows customers to optimize energy consumption and pays them for selling excess energy back to the grid.
Tesla's push for a license to supply electricity to British households comes as the company endures a protracted European sales slump.
Data published last week by the U.K.'s Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) showed Tesla's new car sales dropped by nearly 60% to 987 units last month, down from 2,462 a year ago.
In Germany, meanwhile, Tesla car sales fell to 1,110 units in July, down 55.1% from the same month in 2024.
The latest sales figures underscored some of the challenges facing the company, which continues to face stiff competition, particularly from Chinese EV manufacturers, and reputational damage from Musk's incendiary rhetoric and relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
a minute ago
- Associated Press
Fusion Fuel Signs Non-Binding Letter of Intent to Enter Joint Venture for Specialized Fuel Project in South Africa
DUBLIN, Ireland, Aug. 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fusion Fuel Green PLC (NASDAQ: HTOO) ('Fusion Fuel' or the 'Company'), a provider of integrated energy solutions, today announced the signing of a non-binding Letter of Intent ('LOI') to form a joint venture ('JV') with a privately-held South Africa-based specialized fuel company (the 'Partner') aimed at delivering a specialized fuel solution for a project in South Africa. The first project for the JV has been awarded to the Partner by a subsidiary of a multinational food and beverage corporation. The proposed transaction aligns with Fusion Fuel's strategic focus on near-term, revenue-generating, integrated energy investments. The project utilizes the Partner's proprietary boiler technology. The first energy solution as part of the JV is planned for deployment at a South African commercial facility and is expected to provide immediate commercial use and strong visibility on cash flow. Key terms of the LOI include: The LOI is non-binding and remains subject to satisfactory due diligence, finalization of definitive agreements, and customary closing conditions. The parties are targeting execution of definitive agreement and closing during the third quarter of 2025. 'The LOI signifies a significant milestone in our commercial strategy,' said John-Paul Backwell, CEO of Fusion Fuel. 'Not merely a development opportunity, it would allow us to invest in an awarded and contracted project with immediate revenue implications. The Partner's technology aligns well with our diverse and integrated energy platform, and we are excited to introduce this innovation to the market as we accelerate our international expansion. This potential transaction complements our previously-announced non-binding Heads of Terms to acquire a UK-based energy distribution company, thereby boosting our portfolio value, contingent upon the successful completion of both transactions. ' About Fusion Fuel Green PLC Fusion Fuel Green PLC provides integrated energy engineering, distribution, and green hydrogen solutions through its Al Shola Gas and BrightHy Solutions platforms. With operations spanning LPG supply to hydrogen solutions, the Company supports decarbonization across industrial, residential, and commercial sectors. Forward-Looking Statements This press release includes 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or the Company's future financial or operating performance. In some cases, you can identify these statements because they contain words such as 'may,' 'will,' 'believes,' 'expects,' 'anticipates,' 'estimates,' 'projects,' 'intends,' 'should,' 'seeks,' 'future,' 'continue,' 'plan,' 'target,' 'predict,' 'potential,' or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology that concern the Company's expectations, strategy, plans, or intentions. Forward-looking statements relating to expectations about future results or events are based upon information available to the Company as of today's date and are not guarantees of the future performance of the Company, and actual results may vary materially from the results and expectations discussed. The Company's expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize, and actual results in future periods are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, including, without limitation, the Company's ability to enter into definitive agreements with the Partner and the Target (as defined in the Company's press release issued on May 27, 2025), the ability of the parties to each of the LOI and the Heads of Terms (as defined in the Company's press release issued on May 27, 2025) to complete their due diligence and all other closing conditions prior to the closing of such definitive agreements, the ability of the parties to the LOI and the Heads of Terms to obtain all necessary regulatory, shareholder, and other consents and approvals in connection with the contemplated transactions, the ability of the Company to satisfy its financing commitments for the project contemplated by the LOI and the acquisition contemplated by the Heads of Terms, the ability of the project contemplated by the LOI and the Target to generate the expected free cash flows or net income necessary for the Company to generate the anticipated returns on its contemplated financial commitments or consideration in connection with these transactions, and the risks and uncertainties described under Item 3. 'Key Information – D. Risk Factors' and elsewhere in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') on May 9, 2025 (the 'Annual Report'), and other filings with the SEC. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions about the Company's business and the commercial markets in which the Company operates prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described as anticipated, estimated or expected in the Annual Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning the Company or other matters and attributable to the Company or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date hereof, except as required by law. Investor Relations Contact [email protected]
Washington Post
a minute ago
- Washington Post
A pause on higher tariffs for China is due to expire Tuesday. Here's what to know.
TAIPEI, Taiwan — A 90-day pause on imposing higher tariffs on China is due to expire on Tuesday and it is unclear if it will be extended. After the most recent round of China-U.S. trade talks, held late last month in Stockholm, Chinese and U.S. officials said they expected the deadline to be extended for another 90 days. The U.S. side said the decision was up to President Donald Trump. So far there has been no formal announcement about whether he will endorse an extension or push ahead with the higher tariffs.
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Jellycat Cuts U.K. Stockists Amid Brand Control Debate
Jellycat, the British-born viral soft toy company, sparked a social media backlash when it dropped approximately 100 independent stockists in the U.K. Disgruntled retailers, some of which had supported the brand for over twenty years, took to social media to share how devastated they were to receive nonpersonalized letters informing them that Jellycat had dropped them. The public backlash was severe, with Jellycat receiving numerous negative comments on its Trustpilot account and across social media. A Jellycat spokesperson said via email, 'We have been humbled by our recent growth and are working hard to supply our stockists of all sizes – small and big - in a way that is fair and reasonable'. Will this backlash cause the brand lasting damage? And with other viral toys on the scene, how long will Jellycat's growth last? The Rise Of Jellycat Jellycat was founded in 1999 by two brothers, Thomas and William Gatacre. In 2008, the Amuseables range launched, featuring inanimate objects with smiling faces and dangly limbs. The Amuseables' success sparked intense growth, with Jellycat turning over an estimated £200 million by 2023. The brand also enjoyed immense popularity on social media, with fan accounts springing up especially on TikTok. 'Jellycat hunts,' where fans would go from store to store to discover rare or limited edition characters, became a trend in their own right. The brand took a distinct move towards more premium positioning with the launch of themed pop-ups in late 2023. Partnering with FAO Schwarz in the US to create a diner experience, Galeries Lafayette in Paris with a patisserie, and Selfridges in London to offer fish and chips, the pop-ups combined exclusive Jellycats with fun and theatre to create experiences that sold out months in advance, showcasing the brand's creativity and Darker Side Of Jellycat's Growth With rapid growth and soaring popularity came new issues. Along with the growing issue of Jellycat thefts, current and former stockists cited that stock began to become a significant issue at the beginning of 2025. Jellycat also made other significant changes to its wholesale model at the beginning of the year, replacing independent sales agents with an in-house team. Stockists had to order stock from a list sent by email, and if they didn't open the email in time, they missed their chance. Several former and existing stockists gave comments via email for this article, many speaking anonymously, mindful of their relationship with the brand. Stock availability was a common theme that came up in almost every conversation. They mentioned issues such as 'no stock', 'no information as to when the stock might be coming in,' and 'backorders cancelled without notice'. Letters That Cut 100 U.K. Jellycat Stockists Then came the letters. These were not personalized, but addressed to 'Dear Jellycat Stockist'. Jellycat divided the stockists into three camps. Some received an 'official Jellycat' stockist letter and accompanying window sticker. Others were informed that Jellycat would help them attain 'official stockist' status in 2026 by working on their 'Jellycat experience', yet the letters gave no clear criteria for what a 'good' experience looked like. The letters informed others, including Georgie Stewart, co-founder of Stewarts of Bakewell, a gift, card, and party shop in the Peak District, England, that they were no longer stockists and should not place any more orders as Jellycat would not fulfill them. Stewart, who had stocked Jellycat for over twenty years, was devastated. 'We have cried over this,' she said. A Jellycat spokesperson said via email: 'We are big supporters of small business stockists and today there are over 1,200 independent stores across the UK stocking Jellycat. They've been the backbone of our business for over two decades… Our hope is that slightly reducing our stockists by 8% will help us to give better service to the remaining 92%, so they can offer their customers the best possible Jellycat experience. We are very sorry about this and the hurt it has caused… we just did not feel we had a better option.'Jellcat's Strategy The message from Jellycat is clear - this shift was all related to stock. 'With the constant increase in demand for our soft toys continuing to mean there is limited supply, unfortunately, we're not able to support every shop that wants to stock Jellycat… We are also increasing supply as fast as we can without compromising our high quality and production standards.' However, it seems likely that there is also an element of brand positioning at play. In 2022, during rapid growth, Jellycat appointed a new CEO, Arnauld Meyselle, from Ren Skincare. At Ren Skincare, he focused on establishing the brand as more sustainable, away from mass-market beauty, and towards a more premium positioning. The Jellycat moves, and recent marketing activities such as the viral pop-ups suggest that the brand wants to position itself as more premium and consolidate its retailer base. The fact that Jellycat brought the sales team in-house and changed the way orders are placed also speaks to its aim of driving efficiencies and managing costs as the business continues to grow. As Therese Oertenblad, a wholesale expert, shares, 'in my 17 years, I've never seen a brand reshuffle its stockists in this way. It's undoubtedly a short-sighted attempt to cut costs by having fewer people to deal with.'Jellycat's Communication Style Ultimately, controlling costs, improving efficiencies, and protecting the brand are solid and understandable business decisions. The issue with Jellycat is partly what they did, but mostly how they did it. Jellycat is a brand known for spreading joy and fun, as one stockist put it, 'a little bit of fluffy joy to lighten my customers' day.' By sending nonpersonalized letters to people who had spent thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of dollars over the years, the brand acted inconsistently with its joyful, fun image. PR expert Fiona Minett adds, 'There was no empathy, no transparency, and that erodes trust.' While Jellycat has issued public apologies, as of the time of writing, no direct apologies have been made to the cut businesses. The treatment of these stockists has caused a negative backlash and bad feelings on social media from people who feel that the brand is turning its back on the shops that helped build the business to where it is next for Jellycat Ultimately, the Jellycat story is a stark reminder that even a fast-growing, viral product will not make a brand immune to a negative backlash. It highlights the importance of the relationship between brands and the small independent stockists championing them. It also reminds those stockists that they cannot rely too heavily on any one brand when, ultimately, that relationship is not in their control. The question remains whether Jellycat has permanently damaged its relationship with the indie retail world that built it up or whether it can move beyond this chapter to a renewed era of growth and efficiency.
