India reels from US tariff hike threat
"At 50 percent tariff, no product from India can stand any competitive edge," said economist Garima Kapoor from Elara Securities.
India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, has until August 27 to find alternatives to replace around a third of its current oil supply from abroad.
While New Delhi is not an export powerhouse, it shipped goods worth about $87 billion to the United States in 2024.
That 50 percent levy now threatens to upend low-margin, labour-intensive industries ranging from gems and jewellery to textiles and seafood.
The Global Trade Research Initiative estimates a potential 60 percent drop in US sales in 2025 in sectors such as garments.
Exporters say they are racing to fulfil orders before the deadline.
"Whatever we can ship before August 27, we are shipping," said Vijay Kumar Agarwal, chairman of Creative Group. The Mumbai-based textile and garment exporter has a nearly 80 percent exposure to the US market.
But Agarwal warned that is merely triage.
Shipping goods before the deadline "doesn't solve" the problem, he said.
"If it doesn't get resolved, there will be chaos," he said, adding that he's worried for the future of his 15,000 to 16,000 employees.
"It is a very gloomy situation... it will be an immense loss of business."
Shifting production abroad
Talks to resolve the matter hinge on geopolitics, far from the reach of business.
Trump is set to meet Vladimir Putin on Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between the two countries' presidents since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
New Delhi, with longstanding ties with Moscow, is in a delicate situation.
Since Trump's tariff threats, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spoken to both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, urging a "peaceful resolution" to the conflict.
Meanwhile, the US tariff impact is already being felt in India.
Businesses say fresh orders from some US buyers have begun drying up -- threatening millions of dollars in future business and the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands in the world's fifth biggest economy.
Among India's biggest apparel makers with global manufacturing operations, some are looking to move their US orders elsewhere.
Top exporter Pearl Global Industries has told Indian media that some of its US customers asked that orders be produced in lower-duty countries such as Vietnam or Bangladesh, where the company also has manufacturing facilities.
Major apparel maker Gokaldas Exports told Bloomberg it may boost production in Ethiopia and Kenya, which have a 10 percent tariff.
'Standstill'
Moody's recently warned that for India, the "much wider tariff gap" may "even reverse some of the gains made in recent years in attracting related investments".
India's gems and jewellery industry exported goods worth more than $10 billion last year and employs hundreds of thousands of people.
"Nothing is happening now, everything is at a standstill, new orders have been put on hold," Ajesh Mehta from D. Navinchandra Exports told AFP.
"We expect up to 150,000 to 200,000 workers to be impacted."
Gems, and other expensive non-essential items, are vulnerable.
"A 10 percent tariff was absorbable -- 25 percent is not, let alone this 50 percent," Mehta added.
"At the end of the day, we deal in luxury products. When the cost goes up beyond a point, customers will cut back."
Seafood exporters, who have been told by some US buyers to hold shipments, are hoping for new customers.
"We are looking to diversify our markets," says Alex Ninan, who is a partner at the Baby Marine Group.
"The United States is totally out right now. We will have to push our products to alternative markets, such as China, Japan... Russia is another market we are really looking into."
Ninan, however, warns that is far from simple.
"You can't create a market all of a sudden," he said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump warns Alaska summit with Putin has '25 percent chance' of failing
US President Donald Trump on Thursday, August 14, acknowledged his high-stakes summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin may fail, and said any Ukraine deal would come through a future three-way meeting with Kyiv to "divvy things up." Putin flies to Alaska on Friday at the invitation of Trump on his first visit to a Western country since he ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine that has killed tens of thousands of people. The Kremlin said that the two presidents planned to meet one-on-one, heightening fears by European leaders that Putin will cajole Trump into a settlement imposed on Ukraine. Trump, on the eve of the summit, insisted that he would not finalize any deal with Putin and that he would include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in any decisions. "This meeting sets up the second meeting, but there is a 25 percent chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting," Trump told Fox News Radio. "The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term," Trump said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said any future deal needed to ensure Ukraine's security. "To achieve peace, I think we all recognize that there will have to be some conversation about security guarantees," Rubio told reporters in Washington, saying he was "hopeful" about the summit. Shifting tone Trump had boasted that he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January. But his calls to Putin – and intense pressure on Zelensky to accept concessions – have failed to move the Russian leader and Trump has warned of "very severe consequences" if Putin keeps snubbing his overtures. Putin on Thursday welcomed US efforts to end the conflict and said that talks could also help yield an agreement on nuclear arms control. "The US administration... is making quite energetic and sincere efforts to end the fighting," Putin told a meeting of top officials in Moscow. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia. "This conversation will take place in a one-on-one format, naturally with the participation of interpreters," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters in Moscow. He said that delegations would continue discussions over a working lunch and that Putin and Trump would hold a joint news conference. The White House has not confirmed any plans for a joint press appearance. Zelensky, who will not attend Friday's summit in Alaska, met Thursday with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, after talks a day earlier in Berlin. Starmer greeted the Ukrainian leader with a warm hug and handshake on the steps of his Downing Street residence and later voiced solidarity. European leaders expressed relief after a call with Trump on Wednesday, saying he appeared focused on a ceasefire rather than concessions by Ukraine.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU urges China to drop sanctions on two Lithuanian banks
The European Union called on China to revoke sanctions imposed on two Lithuanian banks in retaliation for EU penalties on Chinese lenders linked to Russia's war in Ukraine. Beijing announced the measures this week against Urbo Bank and Mano Bank despite the fact that these Lithuanian banks do not operate in China, giving Beijing's move a largely symbolic character. Nonetheless, the tit-for-tat measures underscore the deepening divide between Brussels and Beijing over China's support for Russia in its war on Ukraine. At EU headquarters in Brussels, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill defended the bloc's sanctions on Chinese banks. China 'must respect the problems we have identified,' Gill said. 'Our sanctions are the centrepiece of our efforts to minimise the effectiveness of the Russian war machine.' He said the Commission does not believe that the Chinese countermeasures 'have any justification or are evidence-based, and therefore we call on China to remove them even now.' EU sanctions on Russia's war in Ukraine The EU's latest Russia sanctions package, adopted in July and effective 9 August, included Heihe Rural Commercial Bank and Heilongjiang Suifenhe Rural Commercial Bank. The bloc accused them of providing crypto-asset services that help Moscow evade restrictions. In explaining its sanctions on the Lithuanian banks, the Chinese Ministry said the EU sanctions on Chinese firms had "a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations and financial cooperation.' The banks and the government in Lithuania said the sanctions were not expected but would likely have little practical impact. 'According to the preliminary assessment, this decision will not have a significant impact on either the country's financial system or the activities of the banks themselves, since the business models of the mentioned banks are focused on the local market,' the Bank of Lithuania said on Wednesday in a statement. Marius Arlauskas, the head of administration at Urbo Bank, also said that 'since we do not have any business partnerships with Chinese individuals or legal entities, the sanctions will have no impact on the activities of Urbo Bank and the implementation of prudential regulations." Why has China targeted Lithuania? The Baltic nation has drawn China's ire for years. Beijing expelled Lithuania's ambassador in 2021 in response to Lithuania allowing Taiwan to open a liaison office in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital. China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province and prohibits other countries from having formal ties with Taipei. Taiwan has long sought closer relations with the Baltic states, citing their past experiences under authoritarian rule and embrace of multiparty democracy and liberal values. In 2024, Lithuania expelled Chinese diplomats after a Chinese ship came under suspicion during an investigation into the severing of two undersea data cables. One runs under the Baltic Sea between Lithuania and Sweden.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
US producer inflation highest in three years in July
The rise in services costs exceeded that in goods, contributing to a markedly larger advance than analysts expected. But economists noted that the headline increase might be overstated -- boosted by a range of volatile factors -- even as there are also price gains in goods exposed to tariffs. The producer price index (PPI) rose 0.9 percent on a month-on-month basis after a flat reading in June, said the Department of Labor. A analyst consensus forecast expected a much smaller jump of 0.2 percent. The PPI measures changes in prices that producers pay, and the report is seen by some as a bellwether for what consumers could face in the months ahead if firms choose to pass on more costs. Businesses have been grappling with Trump's sweeping tariffs after he targeted most trading partners with a 10-percent levy this year, alongside steeper levels on sectors like steel and aluminum. The latest numbers took the overall PPI figure to 3.3 percent, said the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The cost uptick in goods was 0.7 percent while that of services was 1.1 percent -- marking the biggest such jump since March 2022 as well. While the advance was "broad-based" in July, more than three-quarters can be traced to services, the Labor Department said. Much of this was due to trade services, relating to changes in margins for wholesalers and retailers. Economists noted this was a sign that trade disruptions are hitting supply chains, though trade services are also a volatile component. Prices for final demand goods made a big advance too, with 40 percent of the July increase traced to foods. Fed dilemma All of this complicates the Federal Reserve's job as it seeks to balance inflation risks with the health of the labor market in mulling the right time for the next interest rate cut. Fed policymakers have been monitoring the impact of tariffs on consumer inflation, with some officials arguing the hit will be one-off and others cautious about more persistent effects. "Input costs for producers jumped in July as price pressures for businesses build from compounding tariff impacts," said Nationwide senior economist Ben Ayers in a note. "While businesses have assumed the majority of tariff costs increases so far, margins are being increasingly squeezed by higher costs for imported goods," he added. He said that tariff price hikes were most obvious within metal and food categories, with readings for steel and aluminum -- both targeted with 50-percent levies -- jumping in recent months and adding to cost concerns for manufacturers. Ayers expects more of the tariff burden borne by companies so far to pass through to consumer prices in the coming months. "Tariff-exposed goods are rising at a rapid clip, indicating that the willingness and ability of businesses to absorb tariff costs may be beginning to wane," added Matthew Martin, senior US economist at Oxford Economics. The effects of Trump's tariffs on consumer inflation have been limited for now, with a key gauge -- the consumer price index -- steady at 2.7 percent in July. This, combined with government employment data showing that recent hiring numbers were significantly weaker than estimated, has raised the odds of a September rate cut by the central bank. Martin said the PPI data "provides a counter-balance to these reports" and highlights the Fed's dilemma. "The big picture remains that inflation is further away from the Fed's target than the unemployment rate and is likely to climb further over the coming months," he said. "The path forward will have to traverse a tight rope between the next employment and price reports," Martin added.
