5 top hangouts for Wall Street interns as summer analysts descend on New York City
Brass Monkey
This bar was mentioned most among BI's sources. Four industry insiders, from newly anointed bankers who were interns last summer to more senior professionals, said Brass Monkey was popular among finance interns. It's in the trendy Meatpacking District on Manhattan's west side, and offers three indoor bars plus a rooftop terrace.
An incoming investment banker who interned last summer in NYC described it as a popular place to begin a night out "for people going to and from dinner in the West Village" and other nearby hot spots.
"The first Friday and Saturday night, the line is crazy long. It's so funny," said an incoming intern who lives in New York.
The food menu offers standard American bar fare like nachos, chicken tenders, and buffalo wings, while the drink list features a ton of beers and $16 cocktails with names like "Summer Stock" and "Swizzle Me Timbers."
Phebe's Tavern
Four people told us about Phebe's, an East Village spot that's been around since 1968. It's an eatery during the day, offering standard bar fare, but also pasta and steak. (It also randomly claims itself as the top bar for Cincinnati Bengals fans in NYC.) But it's open until 4 a.m. on the weekends, when it turns into a "known intern bar," according to a former junior banker who works in private equity.
Indeed, this spot has been featured in plenty of memes on Wall Street social media pages and online forums, including Instagram account Overheard on Wall Street.
"It's an early-in-the-night spot that just fills up with interns," said the person who previously worked at a bulge bracket investment bank. "It's right next to the Bowery Hotel and always full of early-20s people running around everywhere."
Hair of the Dog
Established in 2012, Hair of the Dog describes itself as a place "where old school watering hole meets big time sports bar" on Manhattan's Lower East Side.
"It's a pub slash spots bar vibe for all the finance bros to hit," said a person who previously worked at a bulge bracket investment bank.
The incoming investment banker described it as a late-night spot for interns and people in their early 20s, saying it's "small, crammed, loud," with "old/new music mixes in a grungy location."
Blue Bottle & Black Fox coffee chains
Networking is a must for Wall Street interns, who are eager to make a lasting impression in an effort to score a full-time job. That tends to lead to 1-1 coffees with employees and managers during the work day. The people who spoke to BI said there are two go-to networking hotspots for the finance ilk, both of them coffee chains.
Black Fox Coffee is a New York company with three Manhattan locations — one of which is particularly popping with bankers.
"For midtown/Park Ave people, Black Fox Coffee at 550 Madison is popular for chats," said the former junior banker who works in private equity.
This person also mentioned Blue Bottle Coffee, a cafe chain that got its start in California, but which now has about 20 locations in the New York metro area. This chain is more ubiquitous, but you'll find the most finance folks at the ones closest to office hubs — like in Midtown on 52nd Street. (It's even been a standout for this Business Insider reporter to catch up with industry sources across Manhattan.)
Swingers & Spin sports venues
While their names may conjure up images of promiscuous night clubs, Swingers is an indoor mini golf course and Spin is a "ping pong social club," according to its website. The people who spoke to BI said they're spots for team events (the kind that companies will put on and pay for) in the summer.
"We would just have random intern social events there," said the former junior banker who works in private equity.
Some honorable mentions
Honorable mentions included Mr. Purple, another rooftop bar on the Lower East Side that a former junior banker who works in private equity described as a "classic meme-y NYC club." It's "a place for interns to feel like they can see and be seen," added the person who previously worked at a bulge-bracket investment bank.
Pianos, yet another Lower East Side bar, "has live music and usually a line out the door of people who are way too young," said the person who previously worked at a bulge bracket investment bank.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
One of the most attractive — and sometimes secretive — ways the wealthy donate money could soon get even more popular
A provision in Trump's tax bill could make donor-advised funds an even more popular form of giving. DAFs are especially attractive to the ultrawealthy because of big tax advantages. Some experts told BI they're seeing DAF donations among the wealthy change in the post-Trump era. As President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" moves through Congress, a provision hiking taxes on private foundations could make another form of philanthropy even more attractive: donor-advised funds. Donor-advised funds, or DAFs, are accounts where donors can contribute funds, immediately get a tax deduction, and "advise" on where to donate — and they are becoming increasingly popular. As Daniel Heist, a professor at Brigham Young University and a lead researcher on the 2025 National Survey of DAF Donors, put it, "they're growing like crazy." Donors can contribute non-cash assets, like appreciated securities or crypto, to DAFs, and the funds grow over time. BI spoke with academics, DAF sponsors, and nonprofits about why major donors use DAFs, how the tax bill and Trump are changing the calculus, and the risks of the "opaque" form of philanthropy. Sponsoring organizations, which are themselves public charities, operate DAFs. Some of the largest are connected to investment firms like Fidelity, Vanguard, and Schwab, though others include community foundations or religious organizations. Technically, donors don't control the funds in their DAF, but practically speaking, they can direct the money to any accredited charity. "As long as you're following the rules of the DAF provider, you should always have those recommendations honored," Mitch Stein, the head of strategy at Chariot, a technology company focused on DAFs, said. Private foundations have to distribute at least 5% of their assets annually for charitable purposes, but DAFs don't have payout requirements. Donors also don't report their gifts to individual organizations on their taxes, and instead report that they gave to the DAF. If Trump's fiscal agenda passes in the Senate (it has already passed in the House of Representatives), it would raise the current 1.39% tax on private foundations' investment incomes. The rate would rise to 10% on foundations worth $5 billion or more, to 5% for those worth between $250 and $5 billion, and to 2.8% for those worth between $50 million and $250 million. It wouldn't change for foundations worth less than $50 million. "There already was a substantial amount of momentum toward donor-advised funds, and a bill like this would only magnify that," Brian Mittendorf, a professor at Ohio State University who has studied DAFs, told BI. Though people across net worths use DAFs — Heist called them a common "mid-range philanthropic tool" — they're particularly attractive to the rich. The 2025 survey of DAF donors found that of 2,100 respondents, who were surveyed between July to September 2024, 96% had a net worth of more than $1 million. "I definitely see a trend away from private foundations," Heist said. Rebecca Moffett, the president of Vanguard Charitable, a prominent DAF provider, said she's seeing the same pattern. The main draw has to do with taxes, according to data and the experts. In the 2025 survey, 62% of donors said tax advantages were a strong motivation for opening a DAF account. Jeffrey Correa, Senior Director of US philanthropy at the International Rescue Committee, told BI that there's been an "explosion" of major donors giving through DAFs. The ability to contribute non-cash assets is also a big factor. Donating appreciated assets lets the donor avoid paying capital gains taxes (in the 2025 survey, 51% of respondents said reducing capital gains taxes was a big consideration). Convenience is another benefit, experts said, since DAFs are more streamlined and cheap than private foundations. Then there's the question of privacy, beyond how DAF donations show up on tax filings. Donors can choose varying levels of anonymity when donating to recipient nonprofits. Only 4% of donors in the 2025 survey opted to be totally anonymous to the recipient organizations, most commonly to avoid public recognition or solicitation. Just 24% said they wanted to avoid scrutiny. Generally, the experts BI spoke with said they don't see confidentiality as the primary appeal of DAFs. Moffett and Correa said they haven't seen more major donors opt for anonymity or express concerns about confidentiality. Most of those BI spoke to were enthusiastic about DAFs, but some flagged risks. Mittendorf and Helen Flannery, an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, found through a study that DAFs distribute grants to politically engaged organizations 1.7 times more than other funders. "They can be great conduits for dark money because they're completely opaque," Flannery said, adding that the public doesn't always know where donors' DAF funds go. Risks aside, the wealthy seem as interested as ever in using DAFs — and in turn slowly eroding the private foundations that once defined the philanthropic world. Have a tip or something to share about your giving? Contact this reporter via email at atecotzky@ or Signal at alicetecotzky.05. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Huckabee: If France wants a Palestinian state, build it in the French Riviera
Hamas condemned Huckabee's statement in the Fox News interview, calling it a "flagrant disregard for the legitimate national rights of our people." US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee criticized on Saturday France's decision to organize a UN conference that would see the recognition of a Palestinian state within a two-state solution. "It's incredibly inappropriate in the midst of a war that Israel is dealing with to go out to present something that Israelis are steadfast against," he told Fox News in an interview. "If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them: carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state. "They're welcome to do that, but they're not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation. I find it revolting that they think they have a right to do that sort of thing. I hope they reconsider. But the United States will not be part of this. The Hamas terrorist organization condemned Huckabee's statement in the Fox News interview, calling it a "flagrant disregard for the legitimate national rights of our people" and "reaffirms the full American bias towards the Zionist occupation and its expansionist colonial approach." The terror organization then called on the UN to "take a serious stand to support our Palestinian people in their legitimate struggle to obtain their freedom." Huckabee's Fox interview comes days after French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot delivered a speech on Wednesday that reiterates the country's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, urging "the implementation of a two-state solution." The following day, the US spoke against France at the UN Security Council that it firmly rejected "any attempt to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state." French President Emmanuel Macron said in April that France could recognize a Palestinian state in June, adding that, in turn, some countries in the Middle East could recognize the state of Israel. Regarding Saturday's Fox News interview, Huckabee said that "pro-Israel Americans need to be concerned that there is a rift between the US and Israel," but noted that there are disagreements between the two countries in how to end the Gaza war and bring back the remaining 58 hostages still in the Palestinian enclave. He emphasized the relations between the two countries are not "at risk, splintered, or fractured." "It's critically important that the United States maintain its partnership - I use that word very deliberately - it's not a friendship nor is it an alliance, it's a partnership, which means that we are yoked together in our intelligence sharing and military." He continued the Fox News interview by referring to the yellow ribbon pin on his suit, saying, "one of the happiest days of my life is when I can take this pin off, permanently put it away, never to wear it again - because that will mean that all the hostages will have come home." Speaking on the Abraham Accords, the ambassador said he was unsure which countries could join the agreements next, but noted that he was confident that there would be an expansion of the accords under Trump's second term.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What will it take to run America's biggest county?
LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles is waiting for its George Washington. Last year, voters across an area more populous than all but ten states decided to create a new office to oversee their government. Now comes the hard part: determining the scope of a position that will, by representing the nearly 10 million people of Los Angeles County, become perhaps the most powerful in American local government and immediately reshape California politics. Now it is time to decide how much unchecked authority should be vested in an office being designed from scratch. Many of the tricky issues concern the interplay between the new executive — who will have the final say over the county's nearly $50 billion budget and the ability to hire and fire heads of dozens of county-wide departments — and the existing Board of Supervisors, who have long held those powers for themselves. 'It's a fundamental change to the culture of county government because it's pulling the executive authority out of the Board of Supervisors. And the question is, how do you do that?' said Raphael Sonenshein, who headed a Los Angeles city charter reform commission in the 1990s and is now executive director of the Haynes Foundation. 'People are only now beginning to think about what an important design question it is.' Members of a 13-member task force met for the first time Friday to begin the three-year process of redrawing how the county is governed, which will also include creating an ethics commission and adding four new supervisors' districts. But their biggest challenge revolves around setting up the county executive role in time for it to be filled by voters in November 2028 in an election that is likely to draw a slew of ambitious politicians, civic figures and business leaders from the country's second-largest metropolitan area. Elected county executives are common around the country — helping to administer areas encompassing such major cities as Chicago, Houston, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Miami and Seattle — but remain a novel concept in California. Since the mid-19th century, local governments across the state's 58 counties have been led by five-member boards of supervisors without an elected role above them. 'It doesn't take rocket science to know how politicized [the county executive role] will be,' said Drexel Heard, a former executive director of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party. 'That person will absolutely become the most powerful person in Southern California.' For decades, reformers have been looking to reshape the Board of Supervisors, which has long faced criticism for its lack of accountability. Known as the 'five little kings' — or more recently, the 'five little queens' — each member now represents around two million constituents, the size of approximately three congressional districts. But reform efforts either fizzled out before making it to the ballot or were rejected by voters. Things changed last summer, when three of the current five supervisors moved forward with Measure G, a charter amendment that rode a wave of public concern about corruption in the region's local government to win a narrow victory in November. 'LA County has long been governed under a system that I believe no longer reflects the realities that we face today,' Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, who spearheaded the drafting of Measure G and campaign to pass it, said at the task force's inaugural meeting on Friday. 'I want to thank the voters of Los Angeles County who decided that this reform was necessary and made it happen, because all of us want to see change in how we do this work.' During last fall's campaign, the main critics of Measure G noted that it wasn't clear what kind of meaningful checks and balances there would be on the new executive. LA County already has an appointed CEO who manages the budget, a professional administrator who serves at the board's pleasure. The new post, however, would be directly elected by voters to a four-year term. (The CEO job will likely disappear.) 'Until now, you had a culture where the board could give the executive as much authority as they wanted to give the executive,' said Sonenshein. 'With the elected executive, they're not going to have that option. It'll be an office that stands on its own.' Measure G laid out many of the new executive's responsibilities, including to approve the budget and oversee county departments that run health clinics, jails, parks, foster-care services, beaches, libraries and more. In unincorporated areas of Los Angeles, county government also provides police and fire services and sets land-use policy. But much about the executive's role has yet to be determined. 'They couldn't write every single thing into the charter amendment — it would have been a mistake to try to do that, because they would have left something out,' said former Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who served on the board from 1994 to 2014 and is now the director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. 'So they did the broad-brush stuff ... but they still need to address the details. And there are a lot of details.' That responsibility falls to a task force of 13 members, a motley bunch that includes West Covina's former mayor, the president of an SEIU local, a North Long Beach pastor, a Pomona College political scientist and a digital-marketing executive who has worked on influencer campaigns for Google Play and Taco Bell. Five of the task force's members were appointed by the current board (one from each sitting supervisor) and three by labor unions, with five at-large members chosen from among residents who applied. They will have to decide how much authority individual supervisors retain over services within their districts and how much is transferred to the executive. It will also determine how many jobs and appointments the new office will control, from the hundreds of staffers currently working for the CEO, to board seats — on everything from the LA Metro transit authority to the regional air quality board — currently filled by supervisors. The biggest looming constitutional question may involve the executive's veto power. While the text of the measure states that the executive can reject any motion or legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors, it doesn't specify whether the board has the ability to override that veto. 'Let's say you had a vote on county-wide renter protections, and you've got a board that is in favor of it but a county executive who is not,' said Mike Bonin, director of the Pat Brown Institute at Cal State LA and former member of the LA City Council. 'Let's say it's an 8-to-1 vote in favor of it — does the county executive get to veto that and nullify it?' When the new task force met on Friday at the county's Hall of Administration in downtown Los Angeles, members laid out their big-picture plans for moving forward on different aspects of implementation, starting with the ethics commission. Nothing concrete was decided at the meeting, including even how frequently to convene or meet next. 'It kind of feels like the first day of class,' said David Phelps, a city planning commissioner in the San Fernando Valley who also owns a comic book and collectibles shop, in his introduction at Friday's meeting. 'Thank you for putting that trust in us. I feel the weight and the gravity of this moment — I did not take this lightly.' During the public-comment period, one commenter said he had opposed Measure G because the executive role did not have a listed term limit. 'That's pretty much dictatorship,' he said. 'We don't want somebody in the CEO's position that has higher power than anybody else in the land.' A county executive will be inaugurated in December 2028, and much about the new office will be shaped by how its first occupant chooses to wield the potential symbolic power that accompanies it. Bonin likened it to George Washington setting important precedents for the American presidency, like voluntarily serving just two terms and refusing honorifics like 'His Excellency.' 'I have a hard time imagining that anybody who is going to go through the time, the effort and the indignity of running for office — for an office that represents more people than most governors — is not going to want to assume as much power as possible and make the role as big as possible,' said Bonin. Being able to mold the new office is likely to be a significant draw for plenty of ambitious LA-area politicians and officials who see a post representing one quarter of Californians as a natural stepping stone to a statewide office. Real estate developer Rick Caruso would have the money and name ID to be a formidable contender, although he is known to also be considering a run for governor or mayor, both of which will be on the 2026 ballot. Miguel Santana, the president of the California Community Foundation who has held roles in LA city government overseeing the budget and helping chart homelessness strategy, is also seen as a potential candidate. Members of Congress (like Janice Hahn) and former Cabinet secretaries (like Hilda Solis) have already returned from Washington to run for seats on the Board of Supervisors. Given the partisan gridlock in the U.S. Capitol — and the fact that, with Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff settling in in the U.S. Senate, that it's unlikely either seat would open up any time soon — other Los Angeles-area members of the California delegation might consider coming home for a far more powerful role. Then there are the members of the current board, three of whom are in their final terms. Horvath, a first-term Democrat who led the charge for Measure G, says she 'has given it some thought' but is currently running for reelection and focused on Measure G's implementation. 'There's not a lot of people who run for office who would shy away from the capacity to be the second most powerful elected official in the state of California, just behind the governor,' said Bonin. Regardless of who runs, the new executive role will be a boon for California's political industry. Between that race and those to fill the expanded Board of Supervisors races in 2032, it means a flurry of big, expensive campaigns. 'If you are an LA-based political consultant,' observed Mike Trujillo, an LA-based political consultant, 'you are going to be a kid in a candy shop.'
