A new era in housing: The Department of Human Settlements' essential shift from housing builder to settlement enabler
Image: Tracey Adams / IOL
The challenge for the Department of Human Settlements (DHS) is to move from being a housing builder to a settlement enabler, ensuring that delivery is not just about numbers, but about equity, dignity and inclusion.
This is according to Dr Uduak Johnson and Dr Thandile Ncwana, who are Academic Programme Leaders at the Management College of Southern Africa (MANCOSA) School of Public Administration, in response to an enquiry by "Independent Media Property".
They described the first year of South Africa's 7th Administration, which came into office about a year ago following the 29 May 2024 elections, as being marked by cautious optimism and necessary institutional realignment.
They said while progress has been uneven, key reforms such as governance strengthening, spatial policy recalibration and targeted investments in vulnerable groups signal a shift toward developmental governance.
'What remains now is for the 7th Administration's plans to be translated into tangible, community-centred outcomes.'
Delivering the 2025 Budget Vote on Wednesday, DHS Minister Thembi Simelane said over the next five years, the Department's delivery efforts will be driven by a focused agenda that seeks to consolidate past investments, respond to urgent needs, and deepen our impact.
'Therefore, as we begin to lay the foundation of the recently approved 2024-2029 MTDP, we have committed to deliver the following during the 2025/2026 financial year: 41 944 housing units, 32 250 fully serviced sites with water, sewer, electricity, and roads, 4 282 units through the First Home Finance programme, originally known as FLISP (Financially Linked Individual Subsidy Programme), 3 000 social housing units and eradicate 8 047 mud houses,' Simelane said.
Dr Johnson and Dr Ncwana said that despite the intent of policies such as Breaking New Ground (BNG) and the Comprehensive Plan for the Development of Sustainable Human Settlements, delivery has often occurred at the urban periphery, reinforcing marginalisation.
They said by the time the 7th Administration took office last year, the backlog had grown to over 2.3 million housing units, with 2 700+ informal settlements nationwide and slow progress in land release and infrastructure upgrades.
The academics said, despite severe budget constraints and inflationary pressures, the DHS has made incremental progress with highlights that include the Special Housing Needs Programme (launched March 2025), targeting vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities, elderly persons, and survivors of domestic violence.
Another one is the Housing Assistance Programme for Military Veterans, fast-tracked, with 4 560 beneficiaries confirmed. They said it also brought Institutional Stabilisation as boards were appointed to five of six DHS entities, thereby improving governance oversight.
With regards to policy advancements, the academic programme leaders mentioned the approval of a new Human Settlements White Paper in December last year, outlining integrated and sustainable development frameworks.
They said with regards to Social Housing Expansion, the Social Housing Regulatory Authority (SHRA) approved 1 898 units in FY2024/25, while the SHIP 15A pipeline continues to grow.
Additionally, they said digitalisation efforts have begun to improve beneficiary tracking and reduce fraudulent housing allocations, although their implementation is still partial.
The MANCOSA academics said persistent and emerging challenges for the department included systemic constraints.
'Informal Settlement Growth: Upgrading initiatives remain underfunded and inadequately implemented. Although the Informal Settlements Upgrading Partnership Grant (ISUP) exists, the number of informal settlements continues to grow beyond 2 700.'
They said there were also governance failures with reports from the Auditor-General (AGSA) and Special Investigating Unit (SIU) pointing to irregular expenditure, ghost beneficiaries, and project mismanagement, especially at provincial and municipal levels.
The other challenge was the spatial disconnect as settlements remained far from transport, economic nodes, and services, continuing the apartheid legacy.
The academic leaders said the budgetary pressures with reduced allocations to the Human Settlements Development Grant (HSDG) and the impact of inflation have constrained delivery.
'Provinces such as Gauteng and the Western Cape underspent and had portions of their HSDG reallocated to better-performing provinces like the Eastern Cape (99% expenditure).'
To meet its long-term mandate, Johnson and Ncwana said the DHS must pivot from mass delivery alone to an enabling developmental role that prioritises spatial justice through the release of well-located urban land, upgrading over displacement in informal settlements, inclusive and participatory urban planning, including People's Housing Processes (PHP), blended finance models, combining public subsidies, private investment, and concessional loans as well as performance-based budgeting, where provinces are rewarded for efficient delivery.
Independent Media Property
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
ActionSA snubs National Dialogue, sends MPs to monitor spending
As criticism mounts over the National Dialogue, ActionSA refuses participation but commits to oversight. Two MPs will observe and report on whether the dialogue delivers reform or political theatre. ActionSA has announced that it will not formally participate in the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, citing unresolved concerns over the process and the legality of its funding. The party revealed it will instead send two senior Members of Parliament, Dr Kgosi Letlape and Lerato Ngobeni, to attend in an observation capacity only. IOL previously reported that several legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group, withdrew from the dialogue last Friday. In a joint statement issued on Friday, the group said the decision was made with 'deep regret' but was necessary to protect the process's credibility and integrity. They accused the organisers of shifting the initiative away from its citizen-led origins towards government control. 'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control,' the statement read. AfriForum, the Solidarity union, and the Freedom Front Plus have also pulled out.

IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Palestine's Murdered Children: 18,000 Names We Must Never Forget
A child in Palestine has been killed by Israel every hour for the last 700 days. Israel has murdered 18,000 children in 700 days. That's roughly 1 child every hour for 700 days. Let that sink in. 18,000 young lives ended by a ruthless genocide of Palestinians by an Israeli regime hellbent on exterminating a people through bombs, bullets and barricades. Just this week five journalists were assassinated by Israel's Zionist regime, bringing to over 270 the number of journalists and media workers killed in this latest escalation of conflict since October 7, 2023. No human should turn a blind eye to the atrocities committed by the apartheid state of Israel. It is morally reprehensible, cruel and savage. This is why we have chosen as a media organisation to honour the murdered children of Palestine. When you visit IOL today, you will see the names of these children appearing on your screen. There is also a special report – – where you will find the names listed of all 18,000 children killed since then. This list of names is not just Israel's shame, but the shame of everyone who continues to turn a blind eye to this genocide. The fact that children continue to be counted among the murdered Palestinians as this genocide drags on is an indictment on the collective humanity of the world. These are their names. We dare not forget.

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics