Jacqueline Fernandez approached for docu-series on Sukesh Chandrashekhar by 'OTT giant': Report
According to a report in Mid-Day, a source in the know said, 'She is the only star who can speak firsthand about what really went down. Her candour could make or break the storytelling. They are mapping out a narrative that's part psychological thriller and part a societal case study. Their plan is to juxtapose Sukesh's courtroom drama with his alleged methods like wiretapping, high-end bribes, and shadowy real estate deals.'
Has Jacqueline accepted, though? The report says that the actor is 'weighing the opportunity' but is cautious about 'how her narrative will be framed'. She has not yet said yes to the makers of the docu-series.
The report adds that the makers are targeting to go on floors by mid-2026 after extensive research all year. The entire pre-production is being monitored by legal teams due to 'complex clearances and ongoing court cases'.
Sukesh Chandrashekhar, an alleged conman, has been behind bars since 2015, facing charges of a massive multi-crore fraud. During the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) investigation into his alleged crimes, a connection to Jacqueline Fernandez emerged. Sukesh has claimed that he is dating the actor. A few pictures of the two together also emerged online following the claims. However, Jacqueline has denied Sukesh's claims, alleging that he deceived her into believing he was a legitimate businessman. Furthermore, she has accused Sukesh of using intimidatory tactics to threaten her, leaving her shaken and disturbed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
33 minutes ago
- India.com
ED Conducts Raids In Goa And Pune In Rs 10 lakh Land Grabbing Case
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Panaji Zonal Office, carried out search operations at eight locations across Goa and Pune on July 4 in connection with an illegal land grabbing case. The raids were conducted under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The action was taken based on an FIR registered by Porvorim Police Station in North Goa, which alleged a criminal conspiracy to fraudulently acquire an ancestral property measuring 5,000 sq. meters at Survey No. 210/5 in Socorro, North Goa, said the press release of the ED. The property belongs to the complainant, Jeronimo Oliveiro Desouza, said a release. The ED is investigating the role of John Paul Valles, Sandeep Vazarkar, and their associates in allegedly orchestrating the conspiracy. According to officials, the accused allegedly fabricated inventory proceeding No. 134/2019/C, falsely claiming that the father of two women, Sandra De Sa and Maureen Saldanha, were the same person as the complainant's late father. This fraudulent declaration enabled the transfer of ownership to the two women. John Paul Valles subsequently secured a Power of Attorney (POA) from the women in Pune and proceeded to subdivide the property, selling multiple plots to different buyers. Sandeep Vazarkar, who accompanied Valles to Pune for the execution of the POA, admitted during the investigation to have received Rs 10 lakh as brokerage, said the agency. Authorities also detected large, unexplained cash deposits in his bank accounts. During the searches, ED officials seized multiple electronic devices and a significant volume of documents, including Deeds of Sale, POAs, and inventory proceeding records. A diary listing cash transactions was also recovered. The seizures were made from premises linked to Sandeep Vazarkar, John Paul Valles, Sandeep Manjrekar, and Avinash Naik. Officials say the recovered evidence is expected to yield key leads in tracing the proceeds of crime and advancing the probe into the land-grabbing conspiracy. Further investigation is underway.
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
ED case unprecedented: Abhishek Singhvi defends Gandhis in National Herald case
At Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Friday, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi defended Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the Enforcement Directorate's money laundering case linked to the National it a 'strange' and 'unprecedented' case, Singhvi questioned the very foundation of the ED's prosecution. 'This is a case of alleged money laundering without any money being moved, without any property changing hands, and without any personal gain,' he said, arguing that a non-profit entity like Young Indian could not be used for such a properties have remained where they were for decades. Not an inch has changed ownership,' Singhvi told the court. He defended the Congress party's decision to write off its loan to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), calling it a standard corporate step to make the company debt-free. Linking the case to historical continuity, Singhvi said, 'Having National Herald without the Congress is unwarranted. It is a legacy.'He also raised questions about the timing of the ED's action. 'From 2010 to 2021, the ED did nothing. Suddenly, they wake up, pick up a private complaint, and file a chargesheet. No FIR, no proper complainant, and no jurisdiction. The case is not even maintainable,' Singhvi to Singhvi, the ED's case is not maintainable under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) since there is no FIR or complaint by any authorised person as required under the proviso of Section 5 of the Act.'In political cases, emotional tones often overtake the law,' Singhvi the ED's actions selective and politically motivated, Singhvi said, 'Thousands of complaints are filed daily. One morning, the ED picks one, filed by a person with no authority, and decides to prosecute. This has never happened before.'The court, meanwhile, posed sharp questions to both sides. It sought clarity on whether Congress had the legal right to write off the loan extended to AJL, noting, 'If it's their money, can they not decide what to do with it?'Drawing a comparison, the court referred to another case filed by the same complainant and asked whether a company selling a large asset to recover a smaller amount automatically amounts to foul the logic behind the prosecution, Singhvi asked, 'Why would anyone on earth launder money through a non-profit? Is anyone that stupid?'He urged the court to uphold legal safeguards, arguing that courts have consistently said that interpretation of draconian laws must favour the accused even when there is the slightest also maintained that the registration of an FIR is a condition precedent for the ED to intervene. He pointed out that the ED itself has taken a consistent stand in diverse cases that it cannot investigate without an FIR.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Rahul Gandhi#Sonia Gandhi
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mumbai businessman accused in bank fraud and money laundering case denied bail
Mumbai: Observing that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) collected sufficient material to prima facie conclude that the applicant was actively involved in the offence of money laundering, a special PMLA court on Friday rejected the bail plea of businessman Vijay Gupta. He is accused in a Rs 764.44 crore fraud involving the State Bank of India (SBI). Gupta, founder of the Vindhyavasini Group of Companies, which operates in steel manufacturing, real estate development, and infrastructure services, remains in judicial custody. The ED strongly opposed the bail, submitting that Gupta is a "habitual economic offender" actively involved in money laundering. Given the gravity and seriousness of the offences, the court concluded that Gupta is not entitled to bail. While the defence claimed that the accused was in jail for over 12 months, the court noted that he was arrested in the money laundering case only in March this year. The court said that the period of custody in the predicate offence cannot be considered since the offence under section PMLA is a different and distinct offence. The ED's case stems from six FIRs registered by the CBI and EOW, Mumbai, against six companies of the Vindhyavasini Group. It is submitted that these companies, promoted and managed by Gupta, are accused of defrauding the SBI's Eastern Express Highway Branch in Thane of approximately Rs 764.44 crores. According to the ED, the accused used 57 shell entities and 117 bank accounts for the placement, integration, and layering of the proceeds of crime. The ED detailed a systematic scheme of fraud, including the submission of fabricated and inflated Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs), Technical Economic Viability (TEV) reports, and highly inflated valuation reports of mortgaged properties to secure maximum loan sanctions from SBI. It was further alleged that the accused colluded with Vishwas Kadam, a then relationship manager for Medium Enterprises (RMME) at SBI, Thane branch, and loan consultant Vijay Patil, to process and approve loans based on these forged documents. The ED claims Gupta paid a bribe of Rs 59 lakh to Vishwas Kadam. It was further submitted that there was a diversion of approximately Rs 164 crore from cash credit limit accounts of group companies to Gupta's personal accounts and shell entities owned by him and his brothers, Ajay Gupta and Sanjay Gupta. These funds were allegedly routed multiple times for unauthorised purposes. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The ED also submitted that around Rs 42.77 crore were withdrawn in cash from August 2010 to July 2013 from the bank accounts of the Vindhyavasini Group, shell entities, and personal accounts of family members. Allegations include the purchase of flats in Borivali and Kandivali using illicit funds, with one flat reportedly purchased in the name of his children's caretaker. It was also alleged that Gupta siphoned off a significant portion of Rs 13.20 crore received as compensation from NHAI for land acquisition, some of which was already mortgaged with SBI. Gupta's lawyer argued that he was falsely implicated and that the case was lodged with ulterior motives. It was also contended that the transactions are civil in nature, with recovery proceedings already initiated by SBI pending before civil courts. It was also submitted that sufficient collateral was provided to the bank, and the remaining dues of Rs 321 crores (out of a total loan of Rs 805 crores, with Rs 486 crores already recovered) could be covered by auctioning mortgaged properties, including the Solaris Building at Powai, valued at approximately Rs 400 crore in 2013. The defence highlighted Gupta's incarceration of over 12 months and the unlikelihood of a speedy trial given hundreds of witnesses and over fifty thousand pages of documentary evidence.
