Plans to cut uni jobs and courses lead to 'toxic culture'
A "toxic" culture has been created by Cardiff University's plan to cut 400 jobs and axe courses, according to a former education minister.
Leighton Andrews, a professor at Cardiff Business School, said there was a "climate of fear in the university about speaking out" with staff morale " through the floor" since it announced plans in January to address a £31m budget gap.
He has said the university had millions in cash and investments which could be used instead of adopting a "slash and burn programme".
The university has been asked to comment, but previously said the proposals are subject to a 90-day consultation.
Bangor University to cut 200 jobs amid £15m savings
'Welsh universities are not going bust'
'Land of song silenced if university axes arts'
"What they have done is, frankly, destroy trust and good will within the university," Prof Andrews told BBC Radio Wales' Sunday Supplement.
"And these are the people you need, academics here to boost the university in the future, to do the ground-breaking research that is needed.
"But, at the moment, everybody's focus is on their own jobs."
Cardiff University announced plans to make job cuts and axe courses including nursing, music and modern languages on 28 January.
The proposals would amount to a 7% reduction in the academic workforce if signed off.
Some academic schools would be merged under the plans and staffing levels cut in areas including medicine, the business school and Welsh.
"I think it feels very toxic," the former politician added.
"I think there is a climate of fear in the university about speaking out."
The university has said its proposals are subject to a 90-day consultation, with final plans decided in June.
Meanwhile, the University and College Union is balloting members for strike action to fight compulsory redundancies.
The professor, who said he has voted for industrial action, has suggested the university use some of its cash and investments - estimated at over £100m - to offset its planned cuts.
"That could spread the pain over a longer period, and it could, I think, protect the future of the university," said Prof Andrews, who was in charge of education at the Welsh government from 2009 to 2013.
Last month, Bangor University and the University of South Wales confirmed plans to cut 200 and 90 jobs respectively.
In February, Vikki Howells, the minister responsible for higher education in Wales, pledged a further £19m for the higher education sector but asked universities to "consider all options", including using its financial reserves, to prevent job losses.
Less than a third of 18-year-olds apply for uni
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wales is overhauling its democracy – here's what's changing
Next May's Senedd (Welsh parliament) election won't just be another trip to the polls. It will mark a major change in how Welsh democracy works. The number of elected members is increasing from 60 to 96, and the voting system is being overhauled. These changes have now passed into law. But what exactly is changing – and why? When the then assembly was first established in 1999, it had limited powers and just 60 members. Much has changed since then and it now has increased responsibility including primary law-making powers over matters such as health, education, environment, transport and economic development. The Wales Act 2014 also bestowed a number of new financial powers on the now Senedd, including taxation and borrowing powers. But its size has stayed the same. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. This led to concerns about capacity and effectiveness. In 2017, an independent expert panel on electoral reform concluded that the Senedd was no longer fit for purpose. It warned that 60 members simply weren't enough to scrutinise the Welsh government, pass legislation and respond to constituents. A bigger chamber, it argued, would improve both the quality of lawmaking and democratic accountability. Wales also has fewer elected politicians per person than any other UK nation. Scotland has 129 MSPs, while Northern Ireland has 90 MLAs. Even with next year's changes, Wales will still have fewer elected members per citizen compared with Northern Ireland. It's a similar picture when Wales is compared with other small European nations. More Senedd members could ease workloads, improve local representation and importantly, may encourage a more diverse pool of people to stand for office. Alongside expansion will be a change in how Senedd members are elected. Since its inception, Wales has used the 'additional member system', which is a mix of first-past-the-post for constituency seats and proportional representation for regional ones. From 2026, that system will be replaced by a closed list proportional system, using the D'Hondt method. It's a system which is designed to be fairer, ensuring that the proportion of seats a party wins more closely reflects the votes they get. But it also means voters will have less say over which individuals get elected. Wales will be divided into 16 constituencies, each electing six MSs. Instead of voting for a single candidate, voters will choose one party or independent candidate. Parties will submit a list of up to eight candidates per constituency. Seats will then be allocated based on the overall share of the vote each party gets, with candidates elected in the order they appear on their party's list. For example, if a party wins a percentage share of the vote equating to three seats, the top three people on their party list will be elected. The calculation for this is defined by the D'Hondt formula. The decision to adopt this method in Wales was one of the recommendations of the special purpose committee on Senedd reform in 2022. Several countries across Europe use this system for their elections, including Spain and Portugal. In countries with small constituency sizes, D'Hondt has sometimes favoured larger parties and made it harder for smaller parties to gain ground. That's something observers in Wales will be watching closely. An alternative method, Sainte-Laguë, used in Sweden and Latvia, is often seen as more balanced in its treatment of small and medium-sized parties, potentially leading to more consensual politics. But it too has its downsides. In countries which have many smaller parties, it can lead to fragmented parliaments and make decision-making more difficult. In sum, no system is perfect. But D'Hondt was chosen for its balance between proportionality, simplicity and practicality. One concern is the growing differences between electoral systems across the UK, and even within Wales itself. At the UK level, first-past-the-post (FPTP) is the method used for Westminster elections. Meanwhile, some Welsh councils are experimenting with the single transferable vote method, which lets voters rank candidates in order of preference. So, some people in Wales could find themselves navigating three different voting systems for three different elections. Obviously, this raises the risk of confusion. Voters who are used to one vote and the 'winner takes all' nature of FPTP may be confused by how seats are allocated in Wales come 2026. With numerous different systems, the risk is that people do not fully understand how their vote translates into representation. In turn this risks undermining confidence and reducing voter turnout. Read more: Voters will need clear, accessible information on how their vote works – and why it matters. But this is particularly challenging when UK-wide media often defaults to FPTP-centric language and framing surrounding debates, which can shape public expectations. News about Wales often barely registers beyond its borders, while news about politics in Wales barely registers within. Electoral reform often prompts broader conversations. As Welsh voters adjust to the new proportional system, some may begin to question Westminster's FPTP model, especially if the Senedd better reflects the diversity of votes cast. FPTP is frequently criticised for producing 'wasted votes' and encouraging tactical voting, particularly in safe seats. Under a more proportional system, tactical voting becomes less necessary, which has the potential to shift voter habits in Wales. If the 2026 reform leads to a more representative and effective Senedd, it may not only reshape Welsh democracy, but reignite debates about electoral reform across the UK. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Stephen Clear does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Family business to close for weekend as Parklife festivalgoers come to town
A family business will be closed for the weekend as thousands of visitors head to Prestwich for Parklife music festival this weekend. Heaton Park Garden Centre, which also hosts the Hidden Gem café inside, announced that the centre and coffee shop will be closed on June 13, 14 and 15, with "normal service" set to resume on Monday, June 16. The business apologised for any inconvenience and thanked customers for their 'ongoing support'. As Greater Manchester's biggest festival brings thousands of visitors to town on Saturday, June 14 and Sunday, June 15, several roads around Prestwich will be closed, along with temporary parking restrictions in place. Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox by signing up to the Bury Times morning newsletter as well as our breaking news alerts. Welsh indie band Catfish and The Bottlemen are set to headline a show at Heaton Park on Friday, June 13. It is not the only business impacted by the festival, with an Italian eatery across the road from the park saying this week that it has been 'left with no option' but to close their doors temporarily while crowds pass through. Prestwich restaurant L'Aquila told customers that it would 'not be sustainable' for them to stay open following 'a significant number of cancellations' due to Parklife road closure and 'dramatically reduced footfall'. READ NEXT: Council denies wrongdoing around building sale after claims from artist READ NEXT: Community centre to stop providing children's services after more than 20 years A statement from the garden centre said: 'Unfortunately both the garden centre and the coffee shop will be closed June 13, 14 and 15. 'Normal service will resume on Monday, June 16. 'Sorry for any inconvenience, and as always we thank you for your continued support.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Spending review could mean cuts in Wales
Some public services are likely to face cuts if the NHS swallows extra funding announced for Wales in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review, experts have said. There is a warning that "tough choices loom", even though the budget is expected to grow over the next three years. Labour said it was investing in public services by boosting the Welsh government's budget. But Plaid Cymru accused Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan of "asking for very little and getting exactly that". The Welsh government can raise taxes, but most of what it spends comes in a grant from the Treasury. Its funding will be £22.4bn a year on average over the next three years as a result of the spending review. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review New stations in £445m 10-year Wales rail plan Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), an independent think tank, said funding for the day-to-day running of public services would grow about 1.2% above inflation. "While an increase overall, that will likely require tough choices and indeed real terms cuts for some services," the IFS's David Phillips said. "Increases in funding for the Welsh NHS could easily absorb most, if not all, of this increase." He said Welsh Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will "have to decide carefully which areas to prioritise and which to cut back". About half the Welsh government's budget is already spent on healthcare. Waiting times for hospital treatment have risen to record highs in recent years. On Wednesday, the chancellor announced a real-terms increase of 3% to day-to-day funding for the NHS in England. That will result in extra funding for Welsh ministers to spend as they wish. However, Guto Ifan from the Wales Governance Centre warned: "If the Welsh government decided to transfer that money to the health service in Wales, which would still be below the historical growth in health spending, it would mean difficult settlements for everything else in the budget. "I would imagine that the Welsh government would have to make cuts to services outside health under this settlement." Reeves' spending review reveals how much funding will be available after next May's Senedd election. She also announced £445m for new rail projects in Wales, following years of complaints that Wales has not had a fair share of spending. She backed plans for five new stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire, and rail upgrades in north Wales. First Minister Eluned Morgan said: "Wales will see significant extra investment in rail infrastructure, coal tips safety and Welsh communities will see real benefits that improve lives and create opportunities." Treasury minister Torsten Bell said there would be "record levels of spending happening in the Welsh government" and said previous Conservative governments "consistently let down Wales" on capital spending which pays for infrastructure. Opponents said the cash fell short of what Wales needed and criticised a ten-year timeline for the scheme - Labour sources said most of the cash would be spent much sooner. Plaid Cymru finance spokesperson, Heledd Fychan, said: "Public services, already teetering on the brink in Wales under Labour face further cuts as a consequence of Labour's First Minister asking for very little and getting exactly that." Welsh Conservative Senedd leader Darren Millar said the amount of rail funding was "shameful". "Today's rail spending announcement is an insult to the people of Wales," he added.
