NGT directs Assam govt to clear 4200 ha of encroached forest land in Kamrup (M)
In the order issued last week, judicial member justice B Amit Sthalekar and expert member Arun Kumar Verma directed the Assam chief secretary and the principal chief conservator of forest (PCCF) to ensure expeditious compliance of the order and submit an action taken report on complete clearing of the area by December 31, 2026.
'Take expeditious steps for the removal of the encroachments and ensure that the entire area of 4240.04 hectare of encroached forest land in Kamrup (M) is cleared of all encroachments,' the order stated.
The New Delhi bench of NGT had filed a suo motu application in November last year based on a news item that appeared in a Guwahati-based newspaper on this matter. It was later transferred to the eastern zone branch of NGT in Kolkata the same month.
The news report mentioned that a substantial portion of forests in the district had been encroached upon, adding that the encroached area includes ecologically important hills such as Fatasil, South Kalapahar, Jalukbari, Gotanagar, Hengrabari, Sarania, and Garbhanga, which are within and the periphery of Guwahati, the largest city in the northeast.
In March this year, Assam's principal chief conservator of forest and head of forest force filed an affidavit, stating that Kamrup (M) district has 12 reserved forests covering an area of 28,380.09 hectares, of which about 4,240.40 hectares is under encroachment.
It mentioned that the encroachments are mainly in South Kalapahar, Fatasil, Hengrabari, Gotanagar, Garbhanga, Marakdola, West Apricola and Matapahar reserved forests. The affidavit added that from 2022-23 to 2024-25 a total of 21 eviction drives were conducted in those areas and around 3.5 hectares of forest land were cleared.
'Certain encroachment drives are stated to have been carried out, but the land which has been recovered from the encroachers comprises a minuscule percentage of the total land under encroachment, which renders such anti-encroachment drives completely futile,' the NGT observed in its order.
Citing previous Supreme Court orders on such issues, the NGT bench directed the Assam government to clear the entire encroached area by the end of 2026 and disposed the application.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rajpura BDPO suspended for ‘recommending' subscription of specific newspaper to panchayats
The Punjab government on Thursday suspended block development and panchayat officer (BDPO), Rajpura, for his order reportedly directing all the sarpanches and panchayat secretaries to subscribe to a specific 'Punjabi newspaper'. The sarpanches and panchayat secretaries were asked to send their photographs after subscribing to the said newspaper.(Pixabay/ Representational) The order had apparently mentioned the name of the newspaper to which the panchayats in Rajpura block had to subscribe to. To ensure the compliance, the sarpanches and panchayat secretaries were asked to send their photographs after subscribing to the said newspaper. In the order dated August 13, which the HT has copy of, the BDPO has mentioned that the orders were issued on the directions of the Patiala deputy commissioner. However, the Patiala DC, Dr Preeti Yadav, denied any such directions. Additionally, Yadav added that she had already issued a show-cause notice to the BDPO over this matter. The ADC said that when such a letter came to his notice, it was immediately withdrawn. He added that BDPO Bundeep Singh had been suspended with immediate effect. The matter came to light when RTI Activist Manik Goyal raised the issue.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Russia Claims New Ukraine Gains Ahead Of Putin-Trump Summit
Russia said on Thursday its troops had captured two new settlements in eastern Ukraine on the eve of a summit between President Vladimir Putin and US counterpart Donald Trump. The defence ministry said Russian forces captured the village of Iskra and the small town of Shcherbynivka in Ukraine's Donetsk region, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. Shcherbynivka is near the mining town of Toretsk, captured by Russian troops in February, and Kostiantynivka -- one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Russian army has accelerated its gains in recent months. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday conceded that Russian forces had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) in a narrow section of the front line near the coal mining town of Dobropillia. The Russian army's gains on Tuesday were the biggest for a single 24-hour period in over a year, according to an AFP analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW). In southern Russia, 13 people, including two children, were injured Thursday in a Ukrainian drone attack that damaged around 10 residential buildings in Rostov-on-Don, regional governor Yuri Sliusar said on Telegram. The Russian military claimed to have shot down 268 Ukrainian drones and four glide bombs in 24 hours. In Ukraine, the air force said Russia had fired two missiles and 45 drones at Ukrainian territory overnight. Two people were injured in the northern Sumy region and one in the Kherson region, according to local authorities. Putin and Trump are to meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit which the Kremlin said would focus on "the resolution of the Ukraine crisis".
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Free speech clash: Supreme Court allows Mississippi's law requiring age verification for minors; tech giants oppose mandate
US Supreme Court (AP image) The US Supreme Court on Thursday declined to temporarily block a Mississippi law that requires age verification and parental consent for minors to use social media platforms. The law, aimed at protecting young people from potential online harm, will remain in effect while legal challenges continue. It is one of several measures passed by US states to curb the influence of social media on children. NetChoice – a group representing companies including Facebook, Instagram , Reddit, X and YouTube had asked the Supreme Court to halt the law after the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals allowed its enforcement. A lower court had earlier blocked the law, ruling it likely violated the First Amendment. US District Judge Sul Ozerden said the measure was overly broad and that parents already have other ways to monitor their children's online activity. The Supreme Court did not explain its decision. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that while the law may be unconstitutional, NetChoice had not proven that enforcing it during the court battle would cause enough harm to justify halting it. NetChoice attorney Paul Taske called the ruling a 'procedural delay' and expressed confidence the group would ultimately prevail in protecting free speech rights. 'Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment − not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," Taske said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Mississippi officials defended the law, saying it targets platforms that allow predators to contact minors. They cited a case in which a 16-year-old boy took his own life after he met someone on Instagram who threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. The state also argued that blocking the law conflicted with the Supreme Court's earlier decision to uphold a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites. NetChoice maintains the law infringes on free speech by forcing all user, including adults to provide personal information to access online platforms. "Social media is the modern printing press − it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives,' Taske said. 'Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online.'
