
Yazidi survivor says ISIS banned Kurdish language
Erbil court issues warrant for ex-MP
President Barzani worked for years to facilitate Ankara-PKK peace process: Spox
Explosive-laden drone intercepted near Erbil airport
Duhok forest catches fire
A+ A-
A young Yazidi man who was reunited with his extended family on Sunday after spending more than a decade in Islamic State (ISIS) captivity, told Rudaw earlier this week that the extremist group banned him and other captives from speaking in their mother tongue, Kurdish.
'They wouldn't allow us to speak our language, Kurdish. They also forced us to speak Arabic,' Rawand N.H., who is no longer able to speak Kurdish, said in an interview on Tuesday.
Speaking fluent Arabic, Rawand said ISIS forced him and other Yazidi captives to perform prayers, recite the Quran and do other Islamic practices. Those who did not follow the rules would be punished, including having their feet whipped with a stick.
Rawand, now 18, was rescued from ISIS captivity in the Syrian city of Raqqa by the Office of Rescuing Abducted Yazidis, which is affiliated with the Kurdistan Region Presidency.
Officials and his uncle say 77 members of Rawand's extended family were abducted by ISIS when the group attacked Shingal in 2014. Thirty-nine of them remain unaccounted for.
Rawand said he was never happier than the moment when he saw his family members after nearly 11 years of ISIS captivity.
The following is the transcript of the interview with Rawand:
Rudaw: Rawand, welcome back. How were you freed?
Rawand N.H.: The way I was rescued from ISIS was that a person came and took me to his family, as if they adopted me. I stayed with them for about seven years. The search for me began and they learned I was alive. I told someone, who in turn passed the news to another, and someone from there contacted me and learned I was alive. He told me: 'Don't worry, you have nothing to do with anything. I'll get you to your relatives.' At first I didn't believe him, I told him: 'You're lying.' But after he called my uncle and talked to him, I recognized my uncle and he recognized me. I said: 'Thank God.' After that I came with him and stayed with him for about a month, then he brought me to my relatives.
Do you remember the day ISIS attacked Khansour [and captured you]?
I remember we were in our house. We were several families together. They came and took us. When they took us, they put us in a school, I don't know where it was. After the school, they moved us and separated each of us from the other.
When was the last time you saw your parents and siblings?
The last time I saw my father and siblings they were all together, but I don't remember the details well when that was.
In Khansour or somewhere else?
No, it wasn't in Khansour. After they took us from Khansour and put us in a school, we stayed together for a while, then they separated them from us.
You don't remember where it was?
No, honestly, I don't remember the areas.
Tell us about the rest of your story. After Khansour where did they take you, for example Mosul?
After they took us from Khansour, they isolated the fathers, separated the young men, and separated children our age. My brother and I were together, and they took us separately. They taught us prayer and Quran recitation. You had to learn, and if you didn't, they would beat you. They kept moving us from place to place, until the [Iraqi] state surrounded them. Then they no longer knew where to take us. That man came and took me. He took me to his family and I stayed with them for about seven years. After seven years, I said I want my family.
Did you participate in any training or battles?
No, no battles, no training because I was a child.
So they didn't ask you to participate in training and battles?
No, they only took the older ones for training and other things. I was young, so they didn't take me. I was about nine or ten years old then. They said I couldn't.
Do you remember how many years you stayed in Iraq before they took you to Syria?
No, I just guess I was in Iraq for about ten years, something like that.
During that period, did you see any other Yazidi youth in Iraq or Syria?
We were many, we were in a mosque, and our number was very large.
And after that…
After that, everyone went in a different direction. One escaped, another fled, I don't know what. And this person came and took me, as if he adopted me.
Do you remember who was the last Yazidi youth you saw?
The last person I saw was my brother.
Your brother? Is he older or younger than you?
Older than me.
Where was that? Do you know where?
I don't know, I don't remember. He came, I saw him and he saw me and left. I don't know where he went.
When you were with ISIS, did you have any information about your family? Where they were and where they went?
No, they wouldn't tell me. They would take us to the mosque and house and leave us.
Do you remember them beating you once for something specific that still hurts in your memory?
Something specific, if I was a little late for prayer, they would whip our feet, meaning they would beat us with sticks.
With sticks?
Yes.
This was the punishment for being late to prayer?
Yes.
What were the other punishments and what were their reasons?
It was mostly beatings and things like that. If you didn't follow their rules, you would be beaten.
How were their rules, were they only about prayer or other things?
Prayer, Quran recitation, study, then training.
Was the punishment only with sticks or other things?
No, all punishments were with sticks.
Only with sticks?
Yes, those who were with me, I knew what happened to them, but the others who were separated from us I don't know anything about them.
How many times were you punished? Was the beating strong or light?
By God, how many times shall I count for you. I was punished about five or six times. They wouldn't allow us to speak our language, Kurdish. They also forced us to speak Arabic.
So you didn't speak Kurdish for more than ten years?
Yes, I haven't spoken Kurdish for ten years.
Do you know some Kurdish words now?
Yes, I'm learning bit by bit, like "bashi?' (How are you?). 'Hale ta?" (Are you fine?).
During the period you were in Iraq or Syria, was there anyone who spoke Kurdish with you?
Never. If you spoke Kurdish with your friend in the mosque, they would beat you.
So the Kurdish language was forbidden?
Speaking Kurdish was forbidden.
Was there a punishment for speaking Kurdish?
Yes, there was a punishment.
When you returned and saw your relatives, they were all happy. How did you feel?
Thank God, in these 11 years of my life, this is the first time I felt all this happiness.
Do you miss your parents and siblings? Are they in your memory?
I don't remember my parents very clearly, but my uncle is like my father, and my aunt is like my mother. Thank God, my cousins are still here, thank God.
Do you now have any information about your family?
No, I have no information.
Who told you that your parents and siblings are missing?
Here they told me that my siblings and parents are missing like me.
Before you returned, did you have any information about them?
No, before I came here, many people like me were waiting.
When coalition planes came and bombed the area, what did you do?
They would tell us don't be afraid, don't be afraid. But there was a bombing. They would move us from house to house. We could feel the situation. Sometimes they would manipulate our minds and go blow themselves up.
How did you feel when someone told you: 'I know your relatives and family and I came to rescue you'?
My feeling was that I should go with him, but at first we had to communicate to make sure he was an acquaintance and not someone else who wanted to kidnap me.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Rudaw Net
an hour ago
- Rudaw Net
Baghdad says ‘unacceptable' for KRG to blame drone attacks on PMF
Also in Iraq KRG accuses Baghdad of evading responsibility on drone attacks Sadr reaffirms boycott of Iraqi election Kurdish farmer disappears in Kirkuk, ISIS suspected Iraq installs speed cameras, records 10,000 violations in first day A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The Iraqi government on Saturday said it was 'unacceptable' for Erbil to accuse the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi) of being complicit in a string of drone attacks in the Kurdistan Region. 'The accusation issued by the Ministry of Interior in the Kurdistan Regional Government [KRG] against an official Iraqi security institution is unacceptable, condemned, and impermissible under any pretext, especially since it was issued in the absence of evidence,' the prime minister's spokesperson Sabah al-Numan said in a statement. On Friday, the KRG's Interior Ministry blamed the PMF for recent drone attacks that it said were carried out 'with the intention of creating chaos.' It called on Baghdad to bring the perpetrators to account. Baghdad said that such accusations risk undermining the country's stability and instead urged 'cooperation and coordination through official channels.' Multiple explosive-laden drones have crashed or been downed in the Kurdistan Region since a US-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel went into effect on June 24. Most recently, a drone was intercepted near Erbil International Airport on Thursday, but 'did not cause any casualties or material damage,' said the Directorate General of Counter Terrorism (CTD), which is part of the Kurdistan Region Security Council (KRSC). Iraqi militia groups have denied involvement and blamed the Islamic State (ISIS). During the 12-day Iran-Israel war, numerous drones and rockets flew through the airspace of Iraq and the Kurdistan Region. Several of them fell or were intercepted.


Rudaw Net
an hour ago
- Rudaw Net
KRG accuses Baghdad of evading responsibility on drone attacks
Also in Iraq Baghdad says 'unacceptable' for KRG to blame drone attacks on PMF Sadr reaffirms boycott of Iraqi election Kurdish farmer disappears in Kirkuk, ISIS suspected Iraq installs speed cameras, records 10,000 violations in first day A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The Interior Ministry of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on Saturday accused Baghdad of evading its responsibility to investigate and prevent repeated drone attacks in the Kurdistan Region. "There is an expectation from the relevant parties of the federal government that when there are threats against the Kurdistan Region or any other area of Iraq, necessary measures should be taken to reveal the truth and prevent the recurrence of threats and punish the perpetrators. However, unfortunately, we feel there is a kind of cover-up and evasion of responsibility regarding those security breaches that are carried out against the Kurdistan Region,' the ministry said in a statement. Multiple explosive-laden drones have crashed or been downed in the Kurdistan Region since a US-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel went into effect on June 24. No group has claimed responsibility. On Friday, the KRG's Interior Ministry said the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi) were complicit in the attacks. The Iraqi government responded on Saturday, saying such accusations against a federal force were 'unacceptable.' Iraqi militia groups have denied involvement and blamed the Islamic State (ISIS). In its statement on Saturday, the KRG's Interior Ministry said that in the past Baghdad has never taken action against the perpetrators of drone and missile attacks on its territory. 'Although the direction and source of the missiles and drones were clear, and several times joint committees were formed between the regional government and the federal government to reveal the truth, unfortunately again neither were the results of the investigations disclosed to the public opinion, nor was anyone punished for those apparent crimes and illegal actions, and no measures were taken against any party,' it said. Iran and Iran-backed Iraqi militia groups have carried out multiple attacks on targets in the Kurdistan Region in recent years. The Interior Ministry said that safeguarding people's lives and national sovereignty is the responsibility of both the federal and regional governments, regardless of political differences.


Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Elections stir ghosts of Iraq's sectarian past
Shafaq News Sectarian rhetoric is re-emerging in Iraq's political discourse ahead of the legislative elections scheduled for November 11, 2025. Once synonymous with civil strife and foreign interference, its renewed intensity has alarmed officials, lawmakers, and religious leaders. Many now warn that its return threatens Iraq's already fragile social cohesion, prompting urgent calls for swift legal reforms and firm institutional action before deeper divisions take hold. The resurgence is not viewed as coincidental. Analysts and observers draw a direct line between the rise in sectarian discourse and the looming elections, accusing certain political factions of deliberately weaponizing identity politics to galvanize fractured constituencies. Critics argue this approach revives the wounds of Iraq's darkest periods and threatens renewed fragmentation. As MP Thaer al-Jubouri told Shafaq News, 'Politicians without achievements resort to inflaming sectarian divisions to stay in power. They appeal to those who lack national and religious understanding—using sectarianism as a tool of power, not unity.' Al-Jubouri urged the Council of Representatives to pass legislation criminalizing sectarian incitement and pressed the Independent High Electoral Commission (IHEC) to disqualify candidates who engage in such rhetoric. 'Sectarianism is something we only overcame with great difficulty,' he remarked, 'and it remains a tool of occupation to divide the country.' Broader Electoral Context and Democratic Implications Iraq's post-2003 political structure has operated under an informal ethno-sectarian power-sharing system known as Muhasasa. This arrangement typically assigns the Prime Minister's post to a Shia, the Parliament Speaker to a Sunni, and the Presidency to a Kurd. Political parties are generally organized along sectarian and ethnic lines. Shia factions such as the Sadrist Movement (now the Patriotic Shiite Movement) and Fatah Alliance participated primarily within Shia constituencies. Sunni parties like Taqaddum and Azm competed in Sunni-majority areas. Kurdish representation was led by the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). Demographic Tensions and Political Calculations Iraq's population, which now exceeds 46 million according to the Ministry of Planning, is ethnically and religiously diverse. Based on estimates from the US Department of State's 2023 Report on International Religious Freedom, the majority of Iraq's Muslim population is Shia, comprising 55 to 60%, while Sunnis represent about 40%—roughly 24 % Arab, 15 % Kurdish, and 1 % Turkmen. Minority communities include Christians—Chaldeans, Assyrians, Syriacs, and Armenians—whose numbers have dropped to fewer than 150,000 from around 1.5 million before 2003, largely due to conflict and displacement. Other religious minorities include Yazidis and Sabean-Mandaeans. Ethnically, the population is primarily Arab, followed by Kurds in the north, with smaller communities such as Turkmen, Assyrians, Shabaks, and Armenians. Historical grievances and longstanding power imbalances between these groups have often been exploited by political actors. This divisive legacy continues to provide fertile ground for sectarian rhetoric, particularly during moments of electoral vulnerability. A Painful History Rekindled After the 2003 invasion, Iraq descended into years of bloodshed between Sunni and Shia communities, marked by bombings, assassinations, and ethnic cleansing. Baghdad and other mixed cities were flashpoints, while extremist groups such as al-Qaeda in Iraq—and later ISIS—exploited these fractures for recruitment and domination. The civil war of 2006–2007 represents a tragic peak, with tens of thousands killed and millions displaced. While estimates vary, it is believed that hundreds of thousands of civilians lost their lives during this period. UNAMI (United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq) reported civilian casualty rates in the thousands per month at the time. This violence left deep scars and entrenched distrust, making today's revival of sectarian narratives especially dangerous. State Measures and Legal Ambiguity The Iraqi government has recently taken visible, though arguably overdue, steps to confront sectarian incitement. The Ministry of Interior 's Offensive Content Committee announced 'firm and decisive' action against instigators of division, and on June 30, launched proceedings against mosque preacher Uday al-Ghariri and poet Abdul Hussein Hayal al-Hatimi for promoting hateful content online. Earlier this year, journalist Salam Adel was also prosecuted for allegedly insulting the Sunni community. Momentum is also building for legislative reform. On June 28, MP Hamid al-Shiblawi initiated a signature campaign to draft a law explicitly criminalizing sectarianism. This echoes a March proposal by Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, who advocated for legislation and called for the removal of online content promoting division. In a public statement, al-Mashhadani warned of the dangerous intersection between electoral campaigns and the mobilization of sectarian sentiment amid broader regional volatility. While legislative efforts are advancing, Iraq's existing legal framework already addresses sectarian incitement. Article 200 of the amended Penal Code criminalizes sectarian or ethnic hate speech as a threat to state security, with penalties of up to seven years in prison. Article 372 allows for imprisonment or fines for insulting religious beliefs or symbols. However, legal experts argue that implementation remains flawed. Mohammed Jumaa, a legal analyst speaking to Shafaq News, criticized the misuse of Article 372 for sectarian cases. 'These are not misdemeanors,' he contended. 'They should be prosecuted under Article 200 as felonies. Iraq needs deterrent action against anyone who incites sectarianism.' Inconsistent application, he warned, fuels impunity and undermines state efforts to contain the phenomenon. Religious Authorities Push Back Prominent religious leaders have added their voices to the campaign against sectarianism. Sheikh Muhammad Khalil Ibrahim, representing the religious establishment in Baghdad, emphasized to Shafaq News that sectarianism remains a tool of foreign domination. Stressing Islamic principles, he underscored the obligation to protect any person who proclaims the shahada (the Islamic declaration of faith) and urged unity across the Muslim world. Meanwhile, Sheikh Mustafa al-Bayati, head of the Association of Imams and Preachers of Al-Adhamiya, underlined that Islamic ethics demand respect—even for non-believers—and condemned sectarianism as both 'religiously forbidden and nationally harmful.' He implored the state and judiciary to take firm action against offenders, reaffirming the role of religious institutions in promoting unity.