logo
Punjab moves SC to retain 1158 asst profs, librarians whose recruitment was quashed

Punjab moves SC to retain 1158 asst profs, librarians whose recruitment was quashed

Indian Express2 days ago
The Punjab government has moved a petition in the Supreme Court urging it to reconsider its July 14 order by which recruitment of 1,158 assistant professors and librarians in the state-run colleges in 2021 was quashed.
In its plea, the government has sought permission to allow the appointed assistant professors to continue their services on a temporary basis until a fresh recruitment process is completed, Punjab education minister Harjot Singh Bains Monday said.
'Punjab government has moved the Supreme Court seeking modification of its 14 July 2025 orders — requesting that 1158 Assistant Professors and Librarians be allowed to continue for the time being in the interest of students in our government colleges. Meanwhile, the State is also exploring all other legal possible remedies,' Bains said on X.
The recruitees, who are now on the verge of being unemployed, meanwhile demanded they do not merely expect a 'modification' in the order, but 'complete justice.'
'Harjot bains ji, we expect a strong defence and complete justice — not mere modification. We are victims of system failure, not our own fault. It is about restoring merit, saving government colleges revived after three decades & honouring Punjab's vote for education,' they said in a post on X.
Quashing the appointment of 1,158 assistant professors and librarians, the Supreme Court on July 14 had also directed the Punjab government to initiate the fresh recruitment process as per the 2018 UGC regulations. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K Vinod Chandran, setting aside the September 2024 decision of a division bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court, which upheld the appointments, had said that though they were aware that 'the quashing of the entire recruitment process will cause hardships for the selected candidates, but at the same time, there is no equity in the favour of selected candidates as challenge to the recruitment was made during the pendency of the process and appointments were subject to the Court orders.'
'A gross illegality like the present recruitment cannot be ignored,' the top court had said, while rapping the Punjab government for failing to explain why UGC norms were not followed. 'In the present case, the State has miserably failed to justify the departure from the standard norms of the recruitment process. It has failed to give any valid reason for not adopting the UGC Regulations and avoiding the Public Service Commission in the recruitment in question. Moreover, as discussed earlier, the reasons for this departure were narrow political and clearly arbitrary.'
The issue goes back to October 2021, when then Punjab Director of Higher Education issued a public notice inviting online applications for 1,091 assistant professor posts for various subjects and for 67 librarians ahead of the 2022 Assembly elections. Then Congress government had announced that these vacant posts would be filled 'within 45 days'
The recruitment later came under legal scrutiny after several candidates filed petitions alleging irregularities in the merit-based selection process. They alleged that the entire process was done in haste for political reasons and that department flouted UGC guidelines and also 'bypassed' the Punjab Public Service Commission (PPSC), whose approval was mandatory for these recruitments. The petitions demanded quashing of the entire exercise.
On August 8, 2022, High Court bench of Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu, while quashing the entire recruitment process, said: '..It cannot be ignored that the entire exercise has been conducted in total disregard of the rule of law and in case, the same is allowed to remain alive, that would be travesty of justice.'
In October 2023, Balwinder Kaur, one of the recruited assistant professors allegedly died by suicide while protesting against the ruling Aam Aadmi Party government for failing to give them postings despite recruitment. Later on September 23, 2024, a division bench of the high court reversed the 2022 decision of single bench and upheld the recruitments after the Punjab government challenged it in favor of 1158 recruitees.
However, the aspirants led by Mandeep Singh then moved the Supreme Court against the government alleging that the entire recruitment procedure was done by flouting the UGC norms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sharmila Tagore REACTS to Supreme Court ruling on relocating Delhi-NCR stray dogs: 'The decision is like door closing on voiceless...'
Sharmila Tagore REACTS to Supreme Court ruling on relocating Delhi-NCR stray dogs: 'The decision is like door closing on voiceless...'

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sharmila Tagore REACTS to Supreme Court ruling on relocating Delhi-NCR stray dogs: 'The decision is like door closing on voiceless...'

Sharmila Tagore and Randeep Hooda expressed worries about the Supreme Court's order to move stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelters. They advocated for a humane, balanced approach. Tagore called the decision a closure for the voiceless. Hooda welcomed the court's reconsideration. Both stars suggested long-term solutions like neutering and adoption. Tagore recently starred in 'Puratawn'. Hooda's latest film is 'Jaat'. Sharmila Tagore and Randeep Hooda have voiced their concerns over the Supreme Court 's recent directive to relocate all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelter homes. Both stars urged a more humane and balanced approach, calling for long-term solutions that protect both people and animals while addressing the so-called 'dog menace. ' 'Decision is like a door closing on the voiceless' In a video shared by Anish Gawande, National Spokesperson of the NCP, on X, the veteran actress said, 'Today, we are facing a crisis of conscience. The recent Supreme Court decision is like a door closing on the voiceless and defenceless of our society. I wish the safety and sanctity of life was at the heart of the judgement.' Calling for a more balanced response, she added, 'I wish a more nuanced and calibrated approach had been taken towards the systemic flaws that are at the root of the so-called dog menace. In silencing those who cannot protect themselves, we risk losing something essential within ourselves.' Appeal to reconsider the order She urged the government to reconsider the order, saying, 'This need of experience over sympathy has caused tremendous harm. I hope and pray the Supreme Court will try and find a fine balance embedded in justice.' Responding to the widespread criticism, Chief Justice Gavai agreed on 13 August, to review the Court's order. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo Randeep Hooda weighs in Reacting to this development, actor Randeep Hooda welcomed the reconsideration, tweeting: "So glad to hear that the Honourable CJI has agreed to look into the ruling about stray dogs in NCR. Passing a law and implementing a law should be, firstly, humane — and secondly, the infrastructure and sensitivity need to be taken care of." He acknowledged the complexity of the issue, "Are stray dogs our collective community humanitarian responsibility? Yes. Can they be a menace? Yes. I love animals — but will I be able to justify it to a family that has lost a loved one to rabies or serious injuries? No." Long-term solutions recommended Randeep warned that mass impounding is neither practical nor humane. He recommended long-term measures such as large-scale, repeated neutering, relocating aggressive dog packs, and encouraging adoption. Sharmila Tagore recently returned to Bengali cinema with Puratawn, released in April and directed by Suman Ghosh, marking her first Bengali film in 14 years. Randeep Hooda's latest release is the action thriller Jaat (April 10), where he plays the antagonist opposite Sunny Deol .

Animal lovers demand withdrawal of SC order on relocating stray dogs
Animal lovers demand withdrawal of SC order on relocating stray dogs

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Animal lovers demand withdrawal of SC order on relocating stray dogs

New Delhi, Aug 13 (PTI) Animal lovers on Wednesday demanded the withdrawal of a Supreme Court order on shifting all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelter homes in view of rising dog bites and rabies cases. Holding placards reading 'Independence Day, for Whom?", the demonstrators included activists, volunteers, NCP (SP) spokesperson Anish Gawande, activist Rai Manvi, and Ambika Shukla, founder of People for Animals and sister of former Union minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi. Stating that there are divisions everywhere over religion, language, and now even between 'animal lovers and animal haters", Shukla urged people to understand 'how cruel" the top court order is. Another protester, Vidhya Pandey, said her family had been feeding stray dogs for over a decade. 'We were scratched once while playing with them and took rabies injections, but never faced any health issues. There are no shelter homes in Delhi. Where will they take these dogs," she asked. The protesters raised slogans such as 'Save our dogs" and 'Delhi government, roll back the order", and sang the song 'Hum Honge Kamyaab", displaying posters of dogs alongside images of Lord Shiva. On Monday, the Supreme Court directed the Delhi government and the civic bodies in Gurugram, Noida, and Ghaziabad to remove all stray dogs from the streets and place them in shelters. The bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan observed that there was an 'extremely grim" situation caused by dog bites leading to rabies, especially among children. PTI SHB ARI view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

ISL Saga: AIFF Calls For Meeting Between Legal Counsels Of Federation & Clubs
ISL Saga: AIFF Calls For Meeting Between Legal Counsels Of Federation & Clubs

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

ISL Saga: AIFF Calls For Meeting Between Legal Counsels Of Federation & Clubs

The AIFF asked legal counsels of the federation and ISL clubs to discuss concerns about the upcoming season's uncertainty after 11 ISL clubs urged AIFF to inform the Supreme Court. The All India Football Federation (AIFF) on Wednesday requested that the legal counsels of the federation and the ISL clubs 'hold discussions" regarding the teams' concerns about the uncertainty of the upcoming season of the top-tier league. Last week, 11 Indian Super League clubs urged the AIFF to urgently bring the 'current situation" of Indian football to the attention of the Supreme Court, in light of the uncertainty over ISL's future. The case concerning the constitution of the national federation is pending before the Supreme Court. In a letter, the ISL clubs stated they would seek judicial recourse independently if the AIFF did not act on their request. The national federation has now responded to this appeal. 'The AIFF, on the evening of Friday, August 8, 2025, received a letter from 11 Indian Super League clubs collectively requesting that the Supreme Court be apprised of the current uncertainty surrounding the ISL. On August 13, the AIFF responded and requested that the legal counsels of the clubs and the federation meet to hold discussions on the matter and decide on further action," the AIFF tweeted. The clubs requested the AIFF to approach the top court a day after the national federation proposed the Super Cup in September to ensure sufficient competitive matches for the clubs. This proposal was made after ISL organisers FSDL put a 'pause" on the league due to uncertainty over the renewal of the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) signed in 2010. Following the July 11 decision of ISL organisers FSDL to put the 2025-26 season 'on hold" due to the uncertainty surrounding the renewal of the MRA, three clubs have either paused first-team operations or suspended salaries of first-team players and staff. (With PTI Inputs) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store