Trump: World tariff would be somewhere in 15-20% range
'I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20% range,' Trump told reporters, sitting alongside British PM Keir Starmer at his golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland.
'Probably one of those two numbers.
'
Trump has said his administration will send out letters soon to some 200 countries notifying them of their expected tariff rate on exports to the US. Trump imposed an additional 10% tariff on most countries from April, with many others slated to see their tariff rates rise from Aug 1.
(This is a Reuters story)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says
By Daphne Psaledakis Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says WASHINGTON -The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to accept up to 250 migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump's administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration. The agreement, first reported by Reuters, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted. "Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation," said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo. "Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade." The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect basic human rights. In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States. The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public. Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. US TO PROVIDE GRANT TO RWANDA Rwanda will be paid by the United States in the form of a grant, the official said, adding that the grant letter was finalized in July. The official declined to say how much the grant was for. The U.S. and Rwanda could extend the agreement beyond 250 people by mutual consent, the official said, adding that those deported to Rwanda do not have to stay in the country and can leave anytime they choose. Kigali will only accept those whose prison terms are complete or who have no criminal case against them, as there is no agreement with Washington that would allow people to serve out their U.S. sentence in Rwanda, the official said. No child sex offenders will be accepted. The Trump administration has pressed other countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Western and regional leaders have praised President Paul Kagame for transforming Rwanda from the ruins of the 1994 genocide that killed more than 1 million people into a thriving economy. Rights groups have accused him of abuses and of supporting rebels in neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo, accusations that he denies. Rwanda has also engaged in peace talks led by the Trump administration to bring an end to fighting in eastern Congo. The two African nations signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement in Washington in June, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year. The agreement to accept migrants deported from the U.S. is not the first such agreement Rwanda has reached. Kigali signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. reverses pledge to link disaster funds to Israel boycott stance
The Trump administration on Monday (August 4, 2025) reversed course on requiring U.S. cities and States to rebuke boycotts of Israeli companies in order to receive disaster funds, according to a statement, and deleted the earlier policy from its website. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed its statement that said States must certify they will not sever 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to qualify for the funding. Reuters reported on Monday that the language applied to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems, among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. This is a shift for the administration of President Donald Trump, which has previously tried to penalise institutions that don't align with its views on Israel or antisemitism. Economic pressure on Israel The disaster funding requirement took aim at the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests,' said DHS Spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement on Monday afternoon. DHS oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA in grant notices posted on Friday said states must follow its 'terms and conditions' to qualify for disaster preparation funding. Those conditions required that they not support what the agency called a 'discriminatory prohibited boycott,' a term defined as refusing to deal with 'companies doing business in or with Israel.' The new terms, posted later on Monday, do not include that language.
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Javed Akhtar recommends these books to rethink India's past and politics
In an interview, Javed Akhtar, one of India's most influential lyricists and public intellectuals, revealed he is simultaneously engrossed in two books. Far from light reading, Akhtar's selections are a testament to his ongoing engagement with the country's political and historical tensions. At a time when public memory is fiercely contested, Akhtar, in an interview with Lallantop, revealed that he has turned to two works: Muslims Against Partition of India by Shamsul Islam and The New Icon: Savarkar and the Facts by Arun Shourie. One excavates the erased history of Muslim leaders who resisted Partition; the other critically reexamines the contested legacy of VD Savarkar, the Hindu ideologue. This account that brings to light the largely forgotten Muslim individuals and organisations who opposed the creation of Pakistan before 1947. Drawing on archival records, Urdu poetry, and political speeches, the book challenges the dominant narrative that portrays the Partition as a unanimously Muslim demand. It documents the efforts of leaders and groups who actively fought for a united India. It also revisits significant events like the 1857 War of Independence and the Azad Muslim Conference of 1940, offering evidence of a secular, inclusive Muslim nationalism that was ultimately sidelined by both colonial policies and dominant communal politics. The second edition of the book includes rare photos and newly unearthed material from the National Archives of India, offering a nuanced counter-history of the independence movement. The books is a critical investigation into the life and legacy of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, one of the most controversial figures in India's nationalist history. Shourie examines Savarkar's writings, statements, and actions, as well as British government archives, to question the mythology that has built up around him. The book looks into claims such as Savarkar's escape attempt in Marseilles, his alleged friendship with Mahatma Gandhi, and the controversial mercy petitions he submitted during his incarceration in the Andamans. It also explores his ideological stances on Hindutva, Hinduism, and the kind of state he envisioned. With sharp analysis and a historian's skepticism, Shourie raises pressing questions about Savarkar's role in the freedom struggle, his cooperation with the British, and his influence on current political narratives. The book seeks to separate fact from fiction at a time when Savarkar's image is being revived and rebranded in Indian politics.
