&w=3840&q=100)
Kerala's 'Cancer free Kannapuram' programme gets recognised by WHO
What is the Kannapuram model?
The model integrates over a decade of community engagement, mobilising local stakeholders under the Gram Panchayat's leadership alongside technical support from a Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre (CCCC).
Phase 1: Sensitisation workshops were held, uniting local self-government representatives, primary health staff, and self-help groups with doctors, to raise awareness and form grassroots committees. A comprehensive door-to-door survey followed, identifying high-risk individuals while also exposing deep-rooted fear and misinformation about cancer.
Phase 2: This phase included distributing information, education, and communication (IEC) materials, hosting health exhibitions at community events, organising 'winners meets' where survivors shared experiences to reduce fear. It also featured literary competitions, panel discussions on diet and cancer prevention, kitchen garden promotion, and school campaigns on cancer and tobacco with Parent-Teacher Association support.
Phase 3: The gram panchayat launched a breast cancer screening project, starting with a single-day registration drive covering 3,800 homes. A 10-day mega camp followed, screening healthy women over 30 with no breast cancer history. Trained female technicians examined 200–500 women daily. Participants received pamphlets and training on self-examination. Women with positive results were counselled and referred to the CCCC for further tests, supported by a dedicated team that coordinated appointments, travel, and follow-ups, ensuring smooth access to care.
Impressive outcomes
A staggering 96 per cent of eligible women participated in the screening camp, and the detection rate was 0.96 per 1,000.
More tests were required for 6.2 per cent of women, according to the positivity in the screening test and findings of the CBE.
The majority of them, making up 84 per cent, had no symptoms.
Further assessment participation rate either at the CCCC or elsewhere was 66.5 per cent due to continuous intervention and motivation by the volunteers despite having no symptoms.
Why the model succeeded
Continuous awareness drives, women-led leadership, and community trust were key to the programme's success. As noted in the WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health paper on the initiative, 'In our study, the continuous awareness campaigns led by female members, acceptable and cost-free screening methods, well-organised screening camps with female providers, and the geographically accessible campsite led to increased screening participation. The involvement of the community helped to overcome most of the barriers at large, address the possible mistrust between the health system and the public, and sustain the interventions to achieve the goal.'
Kannapuram gram panchayat president Rethi K told Deccan Herald that the initiative's success lay in removing the stigma around cancer and ensuring regular screening camps. "We initiated the programme after it came to our notice that many people in the panchayat were suffering from cancer, especially women, and many were reluctant to rule out suspicions owing to fear and stigma. The awareness camps really helped in addressing these issues. As a result, 96 percent of women above the age of 30 could be screened," she said.
The Kannapuram model exemplifies how community-driven health initiatives can transform cancer screening and outcomes. It aligns with the WHO's Global Breast Cancer Initiative, which identifies three key pillars for reducing breast cancer mortality: health promotion and early detection, timely diagnosis, and comprehensive cancer management.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Probiotics for preterm babies may lower antibiotic-resistant bacteria in gut: Study
Preterm babies with very low birth weight who received a probiotic alongside antibiotics had fewer multidrug-resistant bacteria and a more typical gut microbiome, according to a study. The study, published in the journal Nature Communications, is based on a trial testing probiotics among a group of 34 preterm babies born with a very low birth weight, under 1,500g, representing around 1-1.5 per cent of babies born around the world. Researchers from the University of Birmingham in the UK sequenced gut bacteria from the babies during the first three weeks after birth. They found that among babies who received a probiotic treatment of a certain strain, including Bifidobacterium, alongside antibiotics -- the typical bacterial strains associated with early-life gut microbiota -- were at levels typical among full-term babies. This helped reduce both the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes and the number of multidrug-resistant bacteria in the gut. There were also lower levels of drug-resistant pathogens, including Enterococcus, associated with risks of infections and longer hospital stays. "We have already shown that probiotics are highly effective in protecting vulnerable preterm babies from serious infections, and this study now reveals that these probiotics also significantly reduce the presence of antibiotic resistance genes and multidrug-resistant bacteria in the infant gut,' said Professor Lindsay Hall from the University of Birmingham. Babies who received probiotics also saw higher levels of certain positive bacteria found naturally in the gut. Among babies who didn't receive probiotics, analysis of the gut bacteria found that while some differences occurred between those receiving antibiotics or not, both groups saw a dominant microbiome develop that included key bacteria (pathobionts) that can cause health problems, including life-threatening infections during the crucial period after birth, as well as in later life. "In the context of the global AMR crisis, this is a major finding, especially for NICUs where preterm infants are especially vulnerable. Probiotics are now used in many neonatal ICUs around the UK, and the WHO has recommended probiotic supplementation in preterm babies,' Hall said. "Our paper shows how beneficial this intervention can be for babies born prematurely to help them give their gut a kickstart, and reduce the impact of concerning pathogens taking hold," she added. The study showed that probiotic Bifidobacterium rapidly replicates in the preterm gut during the first three weeks of life, driving the maturation of the gut microbiota. It is also linked to a noticeable reduction in multidrug-resistant pathogens -- pointing to its pivotal role in improving neonatal health.


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Why US budget cuts could derail future mRNA vaccine progress
mRNA vaccines are credited with helping to end the COVID-19 pandemic and save millions of lives. Since then, researchers have been developing the technology to prevent a variety of infectious diseases and cancer. But experts warn this progress has been severely impacted after US health secretary Robert F Kennedy announced cuts to mRNA technology research. In total, the US health department will cancel contracts and withdraw $500 million (€427 million) of research funding, it announced on August 8. The announcement was the latest in a series of anti-science policies brought in by President Trump's second term in office, including a political take-over of federal research grants and withdrawing from the World Health Organization. What does this mean for the future of mRNA vaccine development? We take a look. mRNA vaccines have a long history of safety and efficacy mRNA vaccines were first tested in mice to vaccinate against flu in the 1990s, then first tested in humans in 2013 to vaccinate against rabies . It was thanks to these decades of research and testing that mRNA vaccine technology was ready and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kennedy has been a longtime critic of the technology, saying in a video posted to social media platforms that mRNA programs are "troubled'. "We're prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate," Kennedy said in the video. What other types of vaccine are in development? There are many types of vaccines in development that have different methods of helping the body to fight a virus. Each technology has advantages and limitations which depend on the disease, the target population, and practical considerations like production speed and costs. Vaccine technology platforms include live (but weakened) and deactivated "whole" pathogen vaccines. The polio vaccine is available in both forms, for example. There are also toxoid-based vaccines, which use inactivated bacterial toxins. Then there are viral vector vaccines, which train the immune system by introducing tiny viral pathogenic fragments into the body. DNA-based therapies are also being considered as another way to provide an accurate target for a human immune response. Luka Cicin-Sain, a viral immunologist at Germany's Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, is leading the development of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine. The RSV vaccine is a viral vector product, which uses a low-risk mouse virus to deliver the RSV spike protein to the human immune system. Though still being tested, Cicin-Sain is hopeful that his platform will provide long-lasting immunity against RSV with a single immunization dose. Are other types of vaccines as good as mRNA vaccines? Despite the promise these other vaccine technologies have shown, they haven't had the same impact as their mRNA cousin. That's because the benefit of using mRNA technology as vaccines is the ability to quickly adapt their use for new pathogens. "Once you know the structure of the virus, the genetics of the virus, then you can produce a vaccine extremely rapidly," said Penny Ward, a pharmaceutical physician at Kings College London, UK. In some cases, mRNA vaccines can be more effective at training the body's immune response to a pathogen. "We don't seem to produce the same immune response to a DNA vaccine as we have to a [m]RNA vaccine," said Ward. Will a loss for mRNA research be a gain for other vaccines? There is no guarantee the $500 million funding will flow to other vaccine research. Kennedy is a longtime vaccine critic — he has fired the panel that makes vaccine recommendations and shared anti-vax sentiment, including during a measles outbreak in the US in May. Cicin-Sain worries that defunding one branch of vaccine science hinders overall progress in the research field. "I'm not saying that mRNA vaccines can solve everything, but why deny yourself a tool in your toolkit?" Cicin-Sain said. Kennedy's funding cuts will slow down RNA technology development, Cicin-Sain said, and drive American scientists to compete for funding outside the US, diminishing ongoing vaccine science. Will others step in to fund mRNA vaccine research ? While other private and philanthropical research funds do exist to fund mRNA vaccine technologies, it's unlikely they can fill the $500 million gap left by the Trump administration's cuts. There's also no guarantee other national governments will step in to fill the US void. "The funding in Europe has been stagnant," said Cicin-Sain. "And there are not so many [private] investors out there who think that vaccines are the best way to put their VC [venture capital] at work," he added. Ward highlighted another problem with cuts to publicly funded vaccine research — governments who fund vaccine research get first access to successful products, which is why Brits were among the first to get the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. "Government funding secures access for countries that are part funders for those products," Ward told DW. If private funders step in to fund mRNA vaccine research, it could reduce people's access to those vaccines at an affordable price. "If progress is to be made, and there's no source of government funding, the industry will fund [research] if they believe there's a market, but that will be reflected in the price of the eventual product,' Ward said. "No matter how you slice or dice, the net effects are going to be negative," Cicin-Sain said.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Kerala's 'Cancer free Kannapuram' programme gets recognised by WHO
The Cancer-Free Kannapuram initiative, launched in 2016 in Kerala's Kannapuram gram panchayat, has been officially recognised by the World Health Organization (WHO) for its remarkable impact on early detection and control of cancer. This model, rooted in community participation and effective local leadership, has emerged as a replicable template for similar efforts worldwide. What is the Kannapuram model? The model integrates over a decade of community engagement, mobilising local stakeholders under the Gram Panchayat's leadership alongside technical support from a Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre (CCCC). Phase 1: Sensitisation workshops were held, uniting local self-government representatives, primary health staff, and self-help groups with doctors, to raise awareness and form grassroots committees. A comprehensive door-to-door survey followed, identifying high-risk individuals while also exposing deep-rooted fear and misinformation about cancer. Phase 2: This phase included distributing information, education, and communication (IEC) materials, hosting health exhibitions at community events, organising 'winners meets' where survivors shared experiences to reduce fear. It also featured literary competitions, panel discussions on diet and cancer prevention, kitchen garden promotion, and school campaigns on cancer and tobacco with Parent-Teacher Association support. Phase 3: The gram panchayat launched a breast cancer screening project, starting with a single-day registration drive covering 3,800 homes. A 10-day mega camp followed, screening healthy women over 30 with no breast cancer history. Trained female technicians examined 200–500 women daily. Participants received pamphlets and training on self-examination. Women with positive results were counselled and referred to the CCCC for further tests, supported by a dedicated team that coordinated appointments, travel, and follow-ups, ensuring smooth access to care. Impressive outcomes A staggering 96 per cent of eligible women participated in the screening camp, and the detection rate was 0.96 per 1,000. More tests were required for 6.2 per cent of women, according to the positivity in the screening test and findings of the CBE. The majority of them, making up 84 per cent, had no symptoms. Further assessment participation rate either at the CCCC or elsewhere was 66.5 per cent due to continuous intervention and motivation by the volunteers despite having no symptoms. Why the model succeeded Continuous awareness drives, women-led leadership, and community trust were key to the programme's success. As noted in the WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health paper on the initiative, 'In our study, the continuous awareness campaigns led by female members, acceptable and cost-free screening methods, well-organised screening camps with female providers, and the geographically accessible campsite led to increased screening participation. The involvement of the community helped to overcome most of the barriers at large, address the possible mistrust between the health system and the public, and sustain the interventions to achieve the goal.' Kannapuram gram panchayat president Rethi K told Deccan Herald that the initiative's success lay in removing the stigma around cancer and ensuring regular screening camps. "We initiated the programme after it came to our notice that many people in the panchayat were suffering from cancer, especially women, and many were reluctant to rule out suspicions owing to fear and stigma. The awareness camps really helped in addressing these issues. As a result, 96 percent of women above the age of 30 could be screened," she said. The Kannapuram model exemplifies how community-driven health initiatives can transform cancer screening and outcomes. It aligns with the WHO's Global Breast Cancer Initiative, which identifies three key pillars for reducing breast cancer mortality: health promotion and early detection, timely diagnosis, and comprehensive cancer management.