Orbán and Le Pen cheer Karol Nawrocki's election as Polish president
Far-right leaders in Europe have welcomed the victory of the nationalist opposition candidate, Karol Nawrocki, in Poland's presidential elections, a result that deals a huge blow to the centre-right prime minister Donald Tusk's reform and pro-EU agenda.
Nawrocki, a conservative historian and former amateur boxer, won Sunday's election with 50.89% of the vote, final figures showed on Monday, ahead of his rival, Rafał Trzaskowski, the liberal Warsaw mayor and an ally of Tusk, who secured 49.11%.
'Congratulations to President @NawrockiKn on his fantastic victory,' Hungary's illiberal prime minister, Viktor Orbán, posted on social media, adding that he was 'looking forward to working' with the 42-year-old, who has never held elected office.
France's far-right National Rally leader, Marine Le Pen, said Nawrocki's win was 'good news' and marked a 'disavowal of the Brussels oligarchy' trying to impose its 'authoritarian policies and federalist ambitions … in defiance of the democratic will'.
Nawrocki was backed by the right-populist Law and Justice (PiS) party, which ruled Poland until Tusk's parliamentary election victory in late 2023.
While the presidential role is largely ceremonial, it has some influence over foreign and defence policy, as well as the critical power to veto new laws. This can only be overturned with a 60% majority in parliament, which Tusk's coalition does not have.
Nawrocki's veto means it will be hard for the prime minister to pass big changes before the next elections in 2027.
Nawrocki's win was a reversal of early exit polls, which suggested that Trzaskowski would edge the contest by less than a percentage point. Both candidates subsequently claimed victory, with Nawrocki's win officially confirmed at about 8am on Monday.
default
Trzaskowski later conceded, congratulating Nawrocki on a victory 'that comes with great responsibility, especially in such challenging times'. He thanked his supporters for voting for a 'strong, safe, honest and empathetic' Poland.
During a bitterly fought and often bad-tempered campaign in recent weeks, the two men offered very different visions of Poland, and the result will have enormous implications for the country's political future and for its role in Europe.
Trzaskowski, a pro-EU progressive, backed abortion law liberalisation and civil partnerships for LGBTQ+ couples. Nawrocki, who espouses conservative Catholic values, would probably veto any government attempt to implement such moves.
Related: Populist Nawrocki's triumph threatens Poland's place at Europe's top table
He is fiercely critical of the EU and likely to ally himself wherever he can with other nationalist, Eurosceptic leaders such as Orbán, fuelling divisions within the bloc at a time when it faces major challenges, including US tariffs and the war in Ukraine.
Nawrocki replaces the outgoing president and PiS ally, Andrzej Duda. Tusk's time as prime minister has been marked by difficulties bringing his broad coalition into line, a situation made harder by having an ideologically opposed president in office.
Nawrocki's win will probably prolong deadlock, turning's Tusk's government into 'a lame-duck administration for the next couple of years', said Prof Aleks Szczerbiak, an expert on east and central European politics at the University of Sussex.
'And it will be worse than with Duda, as Nawrocki will come in with a new mandate from what effectively turned into a referendum on the government,' he added It will also boost PiS, which clashed heavily with Brussels over the rule of law when in power.
A senior PiS lawmaker, Przemysław Czarnek, suggested his party could soon start trying to pick off members of Tusk's broad and already fractured coalition, with the eventual aim of creating a new rightwing majority in parliament.
'I can reassure you that maybe not starting tomorrow, but from Tuesday, we will begin very energetic work in order to give the Polish people another gift – the end of Tusk's government,' Czarnek said.
Borys Budka, an MEP from Tusk's Civic Platform, said he believed PiS would now seek to 'overthrow the legal government'. He said this would be 'a big challenge for the government, which will be blocked when it comes to good initiatives'.
Nawrocki has headed the Institute of National Remembrance, a state research body often accused of pushing a politicised version of history, since 2021.
Trzaskowski, the Oxford-educated mayor of Warsaw since 2018, previously held ministerial posts and served in the European parliament. He sought to project himself as a safe pair of hands to work with the government on progressive reforms.
Nawrocki's campaign was openly backed by the US president Donald Trump's Maga movement and his victory means 'Trump will have more to say in Polish politics', said Krzysztof Izdebski, the policy director at the Stefan Batory Foundation thinktank.
The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, congratulated Nawrocki on Monday: 'The Polish people have spoken and support a stronger military and securing their borders.'
EU leaders put a brave face on the result, which came two weeks after Romania's presidential election was won by the centrist mayor of Bucharest, Nicuşor Dan, in a setback for the continent's nationalist forces.
The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said on Monday she was convinced the EU could continue its 'very good cooperation' with Poland, while Germany's president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, sent 'warm congratulations'.
Steinmeier offered close cooperation 'on the foundation of democracy and the rule of law', in order 'to ensure a future for Europe in security, freedom and prosperity', adding: 'A strong Europe needs good German-Polish cooperation.'
But the result is likely to weaken Poland's newfound position at the heart of EU mainstream decision making and could boost the Czech Republic's Eurosceptic opposition leader, Andrej Babiš, before elections in October.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Hits Columbia With Big New Threat Even After It Caved
Surrender wasn't enough to spare Columbia University from Donald Trump's wrath. The Department of Education issued a new threat against Columbia Wednesday, this time targeting its accreditation. The department alleged that the elite New York City school was 'in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws' for failing to stamp out antisemitism on campus. The DOE's press release revealed that it had notified the organization responsible for ensuring that Columbia is in compliance with accreditation standards of the alleged violation. 'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' said Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary. 'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful. Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid.' The move is an escalation in Trump's war on top universities. Since March, the president's administration has frozen $400 million in federal funding to Columbia. The university acquiesced to Trump's list of demands that month—including a ban on face masks and a vow to harshly protest pro-Palestinian student protesters. Losing accreditation would strip the university of state and federal financial funding, such as Pell Grants for low-income students. It could also inflict damage to Columbia's reputation and make its undergraduates ineligible for many graduate programs. Columbia's accreditor, Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE), requires that it follow relevant laws. The Education Department is alleging that the university has violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to 'meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment on Columbia's campus.' While the Department of Education plays a role in setting accreditation standards, the organizations that determine whether a university is following them, like the MSCHE, operate independently. The MSCHE told the Daily Beast in a statement that it had received the letter from the Education Department but declined to comment further. Columbia did not immediately return a request for comment. Last week, Trump praised Columbia's deference and said that the school had earned a reprieve from his attacks. 'You know, Columbia has been really—they were very, very bad, what they've done. They're very antisemitic and lots of other things,' he said. 'But they're working with us on finding a solution, and, you know, they're taken off that hot seat.' In the months since Columbia gave into Trump's demands, one of its peers, Harvard University, has fought a fierce legal battle to avoid following suit. Harvard's defiance has earned it an escalating series of punishments—$2.5 billion in frozen funds, a threat against its tax-exempt status, and a push to strip its ability enroll international students. Despite suffering losses in court, Trump has declared that he is winning the war. 'But Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they're getting their a-- kicked,' the president said. Harvard's president, Alan Garber, has urged other colleges and universities to fight back against Trump. 'I would say that we need to be firm in our commitments to what we stand for,' he told NPR.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
North America takes the bulk of AI VC investments, despite tough political environment
Despite what some experts have characterized as an environment increasingly hostile to AI R&D, North America continues to receive the bulk of AI venture dollars, according to data from investment tracker PitchBook. Between February and May of this year, VCs poured $69.7 billion into North America-based AI and machine learning startups across 1,528 deals. That's compared with $6.4 billion that VC firms invested in European AI ventures across 742 deals across the same period. Asia-based startups have fared a bit worse than their European counterparts, according to PitchBook. Between February and May, VCs invested just $3 billion in Asia-based AI startups across 515 deals. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. has dramatically cut funding to scientific grants related to basic AI research, made it more difficult for foreign students specializing in AI to study in the U.S., and threatened to dismantle university-housed AI labs by freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The administration's trade policies, meanwhile, including its retaliatory tariffs, have led to a chaotic market unfavorable for risky new AI ventures. In a post on X in March, AI pioneer and Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton called for billionaire Elon Musk, who until recently advised Trump's cost-cutting group, the Department of Government Efficiency, to be expelled from the British Royal Society "because of the huge damage he is doing to scientific institutions in the U.S." One might expect that Europe, which has pledged to become a global leader in AI, would attract more venture capital in light of Trump's controversial policies in the U.S., which have created uncertainty and confusion for founders, investors, and researchers alike. Moreover, the EU has committed hundreds of billions of euros to support the development of AI within its member countries and already has a number of successful, well-funded AI startups in its ranks (see Mistral, H, and Aleph Alpha, to name a few). But that anticipated shift in global investment hasn't come to pass. There isn't any sign of a mass VC exodus to the bloc, or of significant upticks in AI funding overseas — at least not yet. The same is true for China, which has spawned high-profile AI startups like DeepSeek and Butterfly Effect — the company behind the agentic platform Manus — but where VC activity in the country and the broader Asian region remains relatively austere. (Export controls impacting the ability of certain Asian countries to procure AI chips are almost certainly a factor.) In 2024, North American startups secured 75.6% of all VC AI funding — $106.24 billion. That share has only increased this year. So far in 2025, North American AI investments represent 86.2% ($79.74 billion) of all VC funding for AI globally. It paints a somewhat surprising picture. Even amid mounting political and regulatory headwinds under Trump's second term, the U.S. remains the undisputed center for AI capital, meaning investors, fatigued as they may be by the administration's unpredictability, are still counting on U.S. innovation to deliver the biggest returns, at least for now. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
North America takes the bulk of AI VC investments, despite tough political environment
Despite what some experts have characterized as an environment increasingly hostile to AI R&D, North America continues to receive the bulk of AI venture dollars, according to data from investment tracker PitchBook. Between February and May of this year, VCs poured $69.7 billion into North America-based AI and machine learning startups across 1,528 deals. That's compared with $6.4 billion that VC firms invested in European AI ventures across 742 deals across the same period. Asia-based startups have fared a bit worse than their European counterparts, according to PitchBook. Between February and May, VCs invested just $3 billion in Asia-based AI startups across 515 deals. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. has dramatically cut funding to scientific grants related to basic AI research, made it more difficult for foreign students specializing in AI to study in the U.S., and threatened to dismantle university-housed AI labs by freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The administration's trade policies, meanwhile, including its retaliatory tariffs, have led to a chaotic market unfavorable for risky new AI ventures. In a post on X in March, AI pioneer and Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton called for billionaire Elon Musk, who until recently advised Trump's cost-cutting group, the Department of Government Efficiency, to be expelled from the British Royal Society "because of the huge damage he is doing to scientific institutions in the U.S." One might expect that Europe, which has pledged to become a global leader in AI, would attract more venture capital in light of Trump's controversial policies in the U.S., which have created uncertainty and confusion for founders, investors, and researchers alike. Moreover, the EU has committed hundreds of billions of euros to support the development of AI within its member countries and already has a number of successful, well-funded AI startups in its ranks (see Mistral, H, and Aleph Alpha, to name a few). But that anticipated shift in global investment hasn't come to pass. There isn't any sign of a mass VC exodus to the bloc, or of significant upticks in AI funding overseas — at least not yet. The same is true for China, which has spawned high-profile AI startups like DeepSeek and Butterfly Effect — the company behind the agentic platform Manus — but where VC activity in the country and the broader Asian region remains relatively austere. (Export controls impacting the ability of certain Asian countries to procure AI chips are almost certainly a factor.) In 2024, North American startups secured 75.6% of all VC AI funding — $106.24 billion. That share has only increased this year. So far in 2025, North American AI investments represent 86.2% ($79.74 billion) of all VC funding for AI globally. It paints a somewhat surprising picture. Even amid mounting political and regulatory headwinds under Trump's second term, the U.S. remains the undisputed center for AI capital, meaning investors, fatigued as they may be by the administration's unpredictability, are still counting on U.S. innovation to deliver the biggest returns, at least for now. Sign in to access your portfolio