logo
India-UK trade deal may cushion blow of UK visa curbs on students: Experts

India-UK trade deal may cushion blow of UK visa curbs on students: Experts

On May 6, 2025, India and the United Kingdom concluded talks for a free trade agreement (FTA). Less than a week later, the newly elected Labour government under Keir Starmer released a white paper proposing sweeping immigration reforms.
The timing has stirred discussion on what these parallel developments could mean for Indian students, who have been one of the largest international student groups in the UK. The country has long been seen as a top choice due to its post-study work opportunities, prestigious universities, and clear education-to-employment pathways.
Can the FTA support Indian students in the UK?
Aritra Ghoshal, founder and director at One Step Global, believes the FTA could help, but only if education is explicitly included.
'Such agreements often go beyond goods and services; they open the doors for mobility of talent and recognition of qualifications,' said Ghoshal. 'If education is treated as a service under the FTA, we may see smoother visa norms, better mutual understanding of degrees, and maybe even work-integrated pathways for Indian students.'
Rahul Subramaniam, co-founder of Athena Education, said the FTA could make it easier for Indian graduates to work in the UK if it leads to mutual recognition of professional qualifications.
'It could lead to more exchange programmes, joint research projects, and potentially better visa arrangements,' he said.
Christopher Abraham, head of SP Jain School of Global Management in Dubai, said the agreement might even encourage UK institutions to increase collaboration with Indian universities. 'It could also encourage fewer financial or regulatory constraints, enabling Indian students to access better quality education in the UK,' he added.
But others are more cautious. Mamta Shekhawat, founder of Gradding.com, pointed to the government's shift in tone on immigration.
'The white paper establishes whole new approaches to migration, be it for education, work, or family. The pathway to permanent residency for students will become longer and more competitive,' she said.
Graduate route under review
One of the most discussed proposals in the immigration white paper is a review of the Graduate Route, which allows international students to remain in the UK for work after finishing their studies.
Key proposals include:
Shortening the Graduate visa from 2 years to 18 months
Limiting eligibility to graduates entering RQF level 6 and above jobs
Reviewing the long-term future of the route altogether
'The shortening of the Graduate Route period, coupled with heightened employment criteria, may be detrimental to perceived return on investment,' said Abraham.
New rules for sponsoring universities
The white paper proposes stricter oversight of institutions hosting international students. Changes include:
< Raising the Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) threshold by 5 percentage points
< Introducing a red-amber-green rating system to classify universities by compliance levels
< Enforcing improvement plans and recruitment caps for poorly performing universities
< Requiring institutions to sign up to the Agent Quality Framework if they use international agents
Concerns have also been raised around asylum claims by international students nearing visa expiry, particularly from countries where conditions haven't changed. Students from lower-ranked institutions have shown the sharpest rise in visa grants, the white paper said.
Financial and visa restrictions
Among other proposals, a new levy on international student tuition fees is being considered, with proceeds going to the UK's higher education and skills system. The short-term English study visa is being reviewed due to a high refusal rate of 48% in 2024
Study visa grants peaked at 498,000 in the year ending June 2023, with student net migration at 262,000 in June 2024. Dependants of students rose sharply from 16,000 in 2019 to 143,000 in 2023, according to the white paper.
Indian students reconsidering options
'The recent tightening of post-study visa norms and immigration scrutiny has understandably made some students cautious,' said Ghoshal.
He added that while students haven't entirely turned away from the UK, many are comparing it more closely with countries like Australia and New Zealand, where the path to work or residency may seem more predictable.
'It's not about the UK becoming 'less attractive', but about students wanting greater clarity and assurance before making such a big decision,' he said.
Akshay Chaturvedi, founder and CEO of Leverage Edu, said the white paper proposals were expected and reflect a balance between different interests.
'From an India lens, with the UK-India FTA in the backdrop, we're likely to see prioritisation of talent in sectors like healthcare, technology, environment, culinary arts, and retail,' he said. 'I wouldn't read too much into the 24 to 18-month change on the Graduate Route.'
He also noted that the new English requirements were long due and welcomed stronger compliance through frameworks like the Agent Quality Framework. 'At least in India, we saw the British Council, BUILA and others drive this for a while now,' he said.
FTA could soften impact of immigration clampdown
Experts said the FTA could become a counterbalance to the tightening immigration rules, depending on how it is framed.
'If strategically leveraged, the UK-India FTA could restore confidence by promoting greater institutional collaboration, clearer qualification recognition, and smoother pathways for professional integration,' said Subramaniam.
Abraham agreed. 'Balanced policies that align immigration with talent branding will enable the UK to remain competitive,' he said.
Ghoshal added that a dedicated India-UK talent corridor, focused on education, tech, or research, could help regain lost ground—'but it needs to be more than lip service,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association
Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association

Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association

In a major relief to lawyers practising in the Capital amidst the scorching heat, the Delhi Bar Association (DBA) has decided that advocates will be exempt from wearing black coats, their usual dress code, from May 16 to September 30. Rules framed under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act, 1961, prescribe a dress code for all practising advocates. This comprises a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (a knee-length upper garment with long sleeves, side slits and a standing collar), black sherwani and white bands with advocate's gown for men advocates. Women advocates have to wear a black and full or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, and white bands with advocates' gowns or sarees and long skirts (white or black without any design). 'All the members are hereby informed that advocates are exempted from wearing a black coat during summer (from May 16 to September 30) as per amendment in rules under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act,1961,' DBA said in a circular dated May 24. 'Therefore, the members are at liberty to appear in the Courts subordinate to the Delhi High Court without wearing a black coat… The members are, however, advised to adhere to other rules of the dress code…,' the circular issued by Vikas Goyal, Secretary, DBA, said. DBA also said the district and sessions judges of various court complexes across Delhi have been informed of this decision. 'This is a very good step. The weather is very erratic and humid. In June, the heat will be way worse. This should be done by all Bar Associations and Councils across North India,' said Advocate Dhir Singh Kasana, former Saket Bar Association secretary. 'Indian district courts lack proper infrastructure in terms of fans, air conditioners, unhygienic washrooms, and sitting rooms, coupled with rising temperatures, it has become a daily physical and mental challenge for the advocates to wear black coats during court hours, especially in summer…This move is a welcome step towards the welfare of the advocates practising at district courts,' Advocate Paras Jain, who practices in Delhi, said. On February 27 this year, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) issued a circular stating that advocates need not wear black coats from March 1 to June 30 every year. Similarly, Bhopal's Bar Council gave a similar exemption to lawyers from April 15 to July 15, 2025.

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

Hans India

time26 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.

Indian-origin CEO who bought his first apartment at age 12 is Singapore's youngest billionaire
Indian-origin CEO who bought his first apartment at age 12 is Singapore's youngest billionaire

Hindustan Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Indian-origin CEO who bought his first apartment at age 12 is Singapore's youngest billionaire

Kishin RK was born with the proverbial silver spoon. The sole heir to Indian-origin real estate tycoon Raj Kumar Hiranandani, he is Singapore's youngest billionaire with $1.6 billion to his name. But the 42-year-old founder and CEO of RB Capital Group has not relied on his family name alone - he has drawn on his immense privilege to carve his own path to success. According to a report in SCMP, when he was 18, Kishin sold an apartment given to him by his parents. He then used the funds from this sale to start RB Capital Group. Kishin is one of just six Singaporeans on Forbes' 2025 billionaire list who are under the age of 50. He is the only one to have inherited his wealth, according to a VN Express report. Kishin is the son of Raj Kumar Hiranandani, a prominent real estate mogul and co-founder of Royal Holdings. Together, they are among Singapore's leading landlords, managing a property empire worth billions. A powerful father-and-son team in Singapore's real estate scene, Raj runs Royal Holdings, while Kishin started his own company, RB Capital, in 2006. In 2011, Raj and his brother Asok split their property business, and since then, Raj has been focused on building his own empire, reported Forbes. Born Kishin Hiranandani in 1983, Kishin RK was introduced to the world of real estate early on. In an 2021 interview with Tatler, he revealed that he bought his first apartment when he was just 12 years old. He was guided, of course, by his father. But the exercise of purchasing an apartment gave Kishin valuable insights into the world of real estate. Around the same time, he began accompanying his father to important business meetings. 'I realised that my interest was actually real estate. There was no need to do anything else,' he told Tatler Asia. 'I was really getting to understand the ins and outs of not just the family business, but the larger landscape of real estate and how it worked as an industry. And I wanted to go deeper.' Unlike his family business of acquiring properties, RB Capital also focuses on real estate development.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store