&w=3840&q=100)
US support for Israel's Gaza campaign drops to all-time low, Gallup finds
According to a recent Gallup poll, just over one-third of US adults now support Israel's military action in Gaza, a significant decrease from the start of the war with Hamas, when roughly half of Americans supported Israel's operation.
Additionally, according to the latest survey, Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, is now seen negatively by around half of US citizens, the lowest percentage since he was initially included in Gallup polls in 1997. The survey was carried out between July 7 and July 21, just before President Donald Trump voiced worry over the deteriorating humanitarian situation and before reports of famine in Gaza prompted worldwide condemnation of Israel's decision to limit food deliveries.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The findings highlight the Israeli government's significant loss of support in the United States. However, not everyone is changing; rather, the conflict has widened the political divide. The increased dissatisfaction is being led by Democrats and independents, who are considerably less inclined to support Israel's conduct than they were in November 2023, shortly after Israel expanded its ground attack in Gaza.
In contrast, Republicans continue to back Netanyahu and Israel's military efforts.
The majority of Americans now oppose Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
According to a recent survey, roughly 60% of American adults now oppose Israel's military action in Gaza, up from 45% in November 2023.
Support for the war has been dwindling in Gallup's polling for some time. In March 2024, about half of US adults disapproved of Israel's military action in Gaza, which fell slightly as the year wore on.
In a new low, only 8% of Democrats and one-quarter of independents say they now approve of Israel's military campaign. Some of that decline may be attributed to the change in administration. While former President Joe Biden faced significant pushback from fellow Democrats on his handling of the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, they may be even more frustrated by the approach of Trump, a Republican.
Young adults are also much more likely to disapprove of Israel's actions. Only about 1 in 10 adults under age 35 say they approve of Israel's military choices in Gaza, compared with about half of those who are 55 or older.
Gallup senior editor Megan Brenan says the latest figures reflect the enduring partisan divide. Even as Democrats grow increasingly unhappy with Israel's military campaign, Republicans remain supportive.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We've seen this drop in approval since last fall, and it's really driven by Democrats and independents,' Brenan says. 'Republicans are still willing to be in this for the time being.'
Netanyahu's favorability among US adults is historically low
Views of Netanyahu have also grown less favorable over the past few years, with more viewing him negatively than positively in measurements taken since the war in Gaza began.
About half of US adults, 52%, now have an unfavorable view of Netanyahu in the new poll, which overlapped with Netanyahu's recent visit to the US Just 29% view him positively, and about 2 in 10 either haven't heard of him or don't have an opinion.
That's a change — although not a huge one — since December 2023, when 47% of US adults had an unfavorable view of Netanyahu and 33% had a favorable opinion. But it's a reversal from as recently as April 2019, when more US adults viewed him positively than negatively.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Republicans have a much more positive view of Netanyahu than Democrats and independents do. About two-thirds of Republicans view him favorably, which is in line with last year. About 1 in 10 Democrats and 2 in 10 independents feel the same way.
'This is the first time we've seen a majority of Americans, with an unfavorable view of him,' Brenan says. 'All of these questions in this poll show us basically the same story, and it's not a good one for the Israeli government right now.'
Trump is unlikely to face the same pressure on his approach to Israel
More than half of US adults, 55%, disapprove of Trump's handling of the situation in the Middle East, according to a July AP-NORC poll.
But the conflict has not weighed as heavily on Trump as it did on Biden, who watched Democrats splinter on the issue. That's because of Trump's solid support from his base on this issue, further reflected in Republicans' continued approval of Israel's military action. About 8 in 10 Republicans approve of Trump's handling of the situation in the Middle East. By contrast, only about 4 in 10 Democrats approved of Biden's handling of the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians last summer, shortly before he dropped out of the presidential race.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In an AP-NORC poll from March, Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats and independents to say they sympathized more with the Israelis than with the Palestinians in the conflict.
And while Americans overall were more likely to say it was 'extremely' or 'very' important for the United States to provide humanitarian relief to Palestinians in Gaza than to say the same about providing aid to Israel's military, Republicans said the opposite — more saw military aid to Israel as a higher priority than providing humanitarian relief to the Palestinians in Gaza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's tariff may seem severe, but India not worse-off than nations that signed trade deal: GTRI
Despite US President Trump's proposed tariffs on Indian goods, GTRI suggests India isn't worse off than nations that made trade deals with Washington. These countries conceded significantly, while India refused to compromise on key areas like agriculture. India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, and its relationship with Russia has aided in managing inflation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff and penalty on Indian goods may seem severe but the country is not in a worse position than nations that signed trade deals with Washington, think tank GTRI said on Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said the UK, the EU, Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam now face elevated tariffs, and in return, have given sweeping concessions --zero tariffs on US farm goods, massive investment pledges, and purchases of American oil, gas, and has made no such concessions, it added."While Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff plus penalty on Indian goods appears harsh, a closer look shows that India is not significantly worse off than countries that did sign deals with the US," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava added that India did not walk away from the deal and it negotiated in good faith but refused to cross its red lines particularly on agriculture, where over 700 million livelihoods are at justification for India's tariffs, trade barriers, and ties with Russia does not stand up to scrutiny, he said, adding that India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, non-tariff barriers are common globally, and discounted Russian oil has helped India manage inflation during global volatility."India is not alone; over 90 countries face similar US pressure. A deal may still emerge, but only on fair terms. For now, India's principled stand has avoided the trap of a one-sided deal -- and that's a success," he added.


Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Nationwide Walmart, McDonald's boycotts to begin from August 1: Here's all you need to know
The People's Union USA will launch a nationwide boycott of Walmart and McDonald's that is set to start on August 1 and run the entire month. The group is urging Americans to stop spending money at the retail behemoths. Walmart, McDonald's boycott: John Schwarz, the founder of The People's Union USA, announced on Instagram that a boycott of McDonald's and Walmart was planned for August.(Representative Image/AFP) This comes after a string of boycotts initiated by consumers that occurred after President Donald Trump was re-elected in January. Progressive organizations have taken the lead in this campaign, voicing disapproval of firms' retraction of their diversity employment pledges as well as worries about worker rights and corporate tax evasion. People's Union USA founder announces Walmart, McDonald's boycotts John Schwarz, the founder of The People's Union USA, announced on Instagram that a boycotts of McDonald's and Walmart were planned for August. In the past, this grassroots campaign has led nationwide 24-hour 'economic blackouts' and coordinated boycotts against Amazon, Walmart, and Target. Schwartz has over 360,000 TikTok fans and over 500,000 Instagram followers. The goal of the August campaign is to prevent customers from spending money at McDonald's for the whole month. Walmart and Lowe's will also be the targets of comparable measures. The People's Union has advised customers to postpone unnecessary purchases at the Walmart during the period of the boycott or, if possible, reroute purchases to small, independent firms. 'We are not a political party,' The People's Union USA's mission said in a statement. 'We are not a protest. We are a movement of people, organizing to take back control of our economy, government and future of our country.' Also Read: What happened to Laura Dahlmeier? German Olympic champion dies in tragic incident in Pakistan What we know about McDonald's boycott With an estimated 68 million patrons every day, McDonald's is the biggest restaurant chain in the world. McDonald's has been facing boycotts from the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement since 2023. Last year, McDonald's decision to reduce its diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has drawn criticism. A list of the main complaints with each targeted corporation was posted on the website of The People's Union USA earlier this year. The grievances inlcuded tax evasion, labor conditions, and general monopolistic conduct. McDonald's landed on the list due to alleged 'tax avoidance and known lobbying against wage increases.' What we know about Walmart boycott The People's Union USA launched Walmart boycott in April as well, with Schwartz saying, 'We're boycotting Walmart because they've become the symbol of everything that's wrong with corporate power in this country... Our mission is simple, we want these corporations to start paying their fair share of taxes so the American people can finally be relieved of the burden of federal income tax.' Boycott of Lowe's is also planned for August. Moreover, Amazon, Uber, and Pepsi Co. will face boycotts in September.


Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
No one is defying Trump like Brazil's President
NYT News Service Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva at the Alvorada Palace in Brasília, Brazil, July 29, 2025. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil is outraged. President Donald Trump is trying to push around his nation of 200 million, dangling 50% tariffs as a threat, Lula said in an interview. And yet, he added, the U.S. president is ignoring his government's offers to talk. "Be sure that we are treating this with the utmost seriousness. But seriousness does not require subservience," the Brazilian president said. "I treat everyone with great respect. But I want to be treated with respect."Lula granted his first interview to The New York Times in 13 years Tuesday, in part because he wanted to speak to the American people about his frustration with Trump. Trump has said that, starting Friday, he plans to impose 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods, in large part because Brazilian authorities have charged former President Jair Bolsonaro with trying to hold on to power after losing the 2022 election. Trump has called the case a "witch hunt" and wants it dropped. Lula said that was not up for negotiation. "Maybe he doesn't know that here in Brazil, the judiciary is independent," he the interview, Lula said the U.S. president is infringing on Brazil's sovereignty."At no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country," he said. "We know the economic power of the United States; we recognize the military power of the United States; we recognize the technological size of the United States."But that doesn't make us afraid,'' he added. "It makes us concerned."There is perhaps no world leader defying Trump as strongly as president of Brazil -- a leftist in his third term who is arguably this century's most important Latin American statesman -- has been hitting back at Trump in speeches across Brazil. His social media pages have suddenly become filled with references to Brazil's sovereignty. And he has taken to wearing a hat that says "Brazil belongs to Brazilians."On Tuesday, he said he was studying retaliatory tariffs against American exports if Trump carries through with his threats. And he said that if the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on the U.S. Capitol had happened in Brazil, Trump would be facing prosecution just like Bolsonaro."The democratic state of law for us is a sacred thing," he said in a lofty room draped in a colorful tapestry in the modernist presidential palace, where emus roam the lawns. "Because we have already lived through dictatorships, and we don't want any more." The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has gone after Brazil to come to the aid of his ally, Bolsonaro. His proposed 50% tariffs would be among the highest levies he has issued against any country, and they appear to be the only ones driven by overtly political reasons and not economic has said that he sees his own legal fight in the criminal trial against and Bolsonaro -- two politicians with strikingly similar political styles -- both lost reelection and then both denied having lost. Their subsequent efforts to undermine the vote culminated in mobs of their supporters storming their nations' capital buildings, in failed bids to prevent the election winners from assuming the stark difference is that four years later, Trump returned to power, while Bolsonaro is now facing prison. This month, Alexandre de Moraes, the Brazilian Supreme Court justice overseeing Bolsonaro's criminal case, ordered the former Brazilian president to wear an ankle monitor before his upcoming trial on coup charges. Moraes said Bolsonaro's efforts to lobby Trump suggested he might try to flee the country. Bolsonaro could face decades in prison if convicted. In an interview with the Times in January, Bolsonaro said that to avoid prosecution in Brazil, he was pinning his hopes on intervention from Trump. At the time, the wish seemed unrealistic. Then, this month, Trump a July 9 letter to Lula, Trump called the criminal case against Bolsonaro "an international disgrace" and compared it to his own past charges. "It happened to me, times 10," he also criticized Moraes for his rulings on social media content. And he said Brazil was an unfair trading partner, claiming incorrectly that the United States had a trade deficit with Brazil. The United States had a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil last year on about $92 billion in trade. Lula, 79, said it was "disgraceful" that Trump issued his threats on his social media site, Truth Social. "President Trump's behavior strayed from all standards of negotiations and diplomacy," he said. "When you have a commercial disagreement, a political disagreement, you pick up the phone; you schedule a meeting; you talk, and you try to solve the problem. What you don't do is tax and give an ultimatum." He said Trump's efforts to help Bolsonaro are going to be paid for by Americans who will face higher prices for coffee, beef, orange juice and other products that are significantly sourced from Brazil. "Neither the American people nor the Brazilian people deserve this," he said. "Because we are going to move from a 201-year-old diplomatic relationship of win-win to a political relationship of lose-lose."On Tuesday, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that imports of some goods not plentiful in the United States could be exempt from tariffs, citing coffee as an example. Thirty percent of U.S. coffee imports come from Brazil, according to U.S. trade data. Lutnick recently spoke to Vice President Geraldo Alckmin of Brazil, whom Lula has tapped as Brazil's chief negotiator in the trade dispute, Brazilian officials openly rooted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump's opponent, in the 2024 election. He said he sent a letter to Trump before his inauguration in January, but the two men have never spoken. Lula said Trump is the only U.S. president since Bill Clinton with whom he hasn't had a good relationship and that he was ready to open dialogue. But he said he felt that Trump was not."What's preventing it is that no one wants to talk," he said. "Everyone knows that I have asked to make contact."On July 11, Trump told reporters, referring to Lula: "Maybe at some point I'll talk to him. Right now I'm not."A week later, Trump posted a letter he wrote to Bolsonaro, saying his trial "should end immediately!"Trump said the tariffs are also meant to target Brazil's Supreme Court for what he says are "censorship orders" against U.S. tech has ordered tech companies to take down thousands of accounts and posts that he says threaten democracy. Yet he has largely kept his orders under seal and declined to explain why certain accounts are dangerous. He has also jailed several people for posting threats against Brazil's institutions has been cast as Brazil's guardian of democracy by many on the left, but his growing power has also raised concerns about whether he poses his own threat to Brazil's he has become a target of the White State Department announced July 18 that it had revoked the visas of Moraes, other Brazilian Supreme Court justices and their families for "censorship" and a "political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro."Eduardo Bolsonaro, the son of the former president, has been in Washington lobbying for what are known as Global Magnitsky Act sanctions against Moraes, which would represent a severe escalation in the feud. The Magnitsky Act is designed to punish foreigners accused of serious human-rights violations or corruption. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told Congress that there "is a great possibility that will happen." When asked about the potential sanctions, Lula said: "If what you're telling me is true, it's more serious than I imagined. The Supreme Court of a country has to be respected not only by its own country, but it has to be respected by the world."