Brewers serve payback to Mets, Dodgers getting help from IL & deflated Cubs fall to rival Cardinals
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Heading into the weekend, the Milwaukee Brewers had revenge on their minds for the last time they played the New York Mets at home. The Mets staged a dramatic comeback in the 2024 postseason and knocked out the Brew Crew. However, things were a little different this time in Milwaukee, with the Brewers dishing out a sweep of the Amazin's.
Jordan Shusterman is joined by guest host Lance Brozdowski of Marquee Sports Network to break down whether what the Brewers are doing is truly sustainable and to analyze the remarkable season from Brandon Woodruff thus far. They then recap all the other sweeps, including the Philadelphia Phillies beginning to pull away from the Mets and the Seattle Mariners starting to nip at the heels of the Houston Astros in the AL West.
Also on this episode of the Baseball Bar-B-Cast, Jordan and Lance talk about the Chicago Cubs looking deflated in their series loss to the St. Louis Cardinals, the New York Yankees continuing to struggle as former champions were celebrated during Old Timers' Day in the Bronx and the Los Angeles Dodgers getting much-needed help with players coming off the injured list. They also recap all the other action from around the league this weekend.
1:48 – How Sweep It Is: Brewers stay hot
17:10 – Mariners getting close to AL West top spot
28:51 – Around the League: What's wrong with the Cubs?
38:05 – Yankees' struggles continue
46:01 – Dodgers getting some help on the way
1:00:10 – Turbo Mode weekend recap
🖥️
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Lakers will unveil a new statue of another team legend this season
Over the years, the Los Angeles Lakers have erected a number of statues honoring team legends outside of Arena. This coming season, another one will be added to the collection. Early this past season, the Lakers announced that former coach Pat Riley would be getting a statue. Now, the date that his statue will be unveiled has been set. Riley's statue will be revealed to the public on Feb. 22, which is when the Boston Celtics make their annual trip out West to face the Lakers. That is fitting, given that Riley's defining moments as the team's coach were those battles against the Celtics in the NBA Finals. Riley became the Lakers' head coach early in the 1981-82 season after serving two years as an assistant coach and five and a half seasons as a bench player with them in the 1970s. They blew the 1984 NBA championship against the Celtics, but with Riley emphasizing defense, rebounding, physicality and overall toughness, the Lakers beat the Celtics in the finals for the first time in eight attempts in 1985, then got another ring against the men in green in 1987. Overall, Riley won four world titles in nine seasons as the Lakers' head coach. He guaranteed they would repeat as champions following their victory over Boston in 1987, and they delivered, making them the first NBA team to win back-to-back championships in 19 years. This season's Lakers-Celtics matchups won't have that much intrigue since star forward Jayson Tatum will miss the entire year due to a torn Achilles. But older fans who were around for the Showtime era will certainly be looking forward to Feb. 22. This article originally appeared on LeBron Wire: The Lakers will unveil a new statue of another team legend this season
New York Times
40 minutes ago
- New York Times
A La Liga game in Miami is a grim prospect, but it's not FIFA's job to stop it
Should FIFA, football's global governing body, allow domestic matches to be played overseas? What appears a simple question is actually fairly complex. Many football fans, particularly the so-called 'legacy fans' who regularly attend matches, are naturally appalled by the idea of Villarreal and Barcelona playing their La Liga match at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, rather than in Spain. Advertisement Real Madrid are unhappy, too, releasing a statement that objects on the grounds of a fair league competition. 'The integrity of the competition requires that all matches take place under the same conditions for all teams,' the club said, referring to the risk of 'affecting sporting integrity' and saying this could be 'a turning point in the world of football'. They argue that FIFA should not approve the match if every club in La Liga has not also approved it, presumably partly worrying that what would have been a tough away game for Barcelona would now, instead, be a match played in a neutral (and more lucrative) venue. But should we expect FIFA to intervene at all in this situation? In these times of polarisation and knee-jerk reactions, it's sometimes worth considering that just because you strongly dislike something, it doesn't necessarily mean it should be prohibited. Is it the job of FIFA to determine whether this proposed fixture should take place? The current legal situation takes some unravelling. Back in October 2018, when La Liga first declared its intention to hold a match in Miami, the FIFA Council debated the issue and subsequently announced it 'emphasised the sporting principle that official league matches must be played within the territory of the respective member association'. Then, in February 2020, a FIFA press release stated it had 'endorsed the principle set out by the FIFA Council that official domestic matches should take place on the territory of the member association concerned'. But after a challenge from Relevent, a U.S.-based company that organises friendly matches, later in 2020, FIFA clarified that 'endorsement' had never become official policy. 'No such regulations were ever submitted to the FIFA Council or approved by the FIFA Council, and no such regulation is pending for consideration,' said FIFA chief legal and compliance officer Emilio Garcia Silvero. The October 2018 announcement, it transpired, was merely 'guidance' rather than 'policy'. Advertisement Then, last year, FIFA formed a working group to 'review and recommend potential changes to the FIFA Regulations governing international matches'. Matches like the one being proposed in Miami involving two foreign sides are classified by FIFA as an international match and approval is required from the association the clubs belong to (Spain), the association of the country where the game will be played (United States), and FIFA itself, as is the case for all international matches. To approve this match, then, FIFA would be going against its own council's guidance, but not against its official policy. Really, this all comes back to what FIFA is actually all about. It was formed in 1904, but it didn't actually get around to organising anything of particular substance for another quarter of a century when the World Cup was formed. Until then, as David Goldblatt wrote in his seminal history of the game, The Ball Is Round, 'its work was overwhelmingly concentrated on the necessary paper shuffling of regulating international football… deciding who could play with who, and when.' And now we can add a third 'w': where? FIFA's main job, like that of every comparable global governing body, is developing and promoting the sport. Sure enough, in Gianni Infantino's 'strategic objectives' for the 2023 to 2027 term, he outlined his three main focuses as 'to organise competitions, to develop football, and to expand FIFA's presence across the world'. Whatever problems one might have with Infantino, there are few quibbles to be had there. FIFA is, ultimately, a body dedicated to the internationalisation of football. And let's not forget there have been several previous debates where the internationalist approach in football was deeply unpopular. For long periods, associations — including those in England, Spain and Italy — had a strict ban on foreign players participating in domestic league competitions. Other national sides banned their own players if they played their club football overseas (a rule which is still in place, as it happens, in English rugby union). These debates are from a bygone era, but national borders have become increasingly less important in the structure of football. And if the core problem here is that matches will be taken away from clubs' traditional locations — and more pertinently, their traditional fans — that is on the clubs themselves and, in the case of Villarreal versus Barcelona, the Spanish federation. And really, the issue — and Real Madrid's objection — is not simply that the match would be played overseas, it's that it wouldn't be played at the Estadio de la Ceramica. If Villarreal and Barcelona had decided that they could generate more revenue by playing the match in, say, Seville, it would also compromise the integrity of the league structure. But it probably wouldn't be an issue for FIFA. However, FIFA does have a duty to protect individual nations from their own domestic football matches being overshadowed by the travelling circus of La Liga matches, and it is right that its current rules insist the relevant association must approve any matches being played on its soil. And that is the most important thing here: if FIFA changes its rules and takes away the notion that a 'host nation' would have to give its explicit approval for a match like this to take place in its country, that would completely undermine its members, and that should prompt a huge backlash. But if Barcelona, Villarreal, La Liga and the United States Soccer Federation are all happy for this match to take place in Miami, there is no particular reason FIFA — by its very nature an internationalist body — should stand in their way. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
New York Times
40 minutes ago
- New York Times
Connections: Sports Edition hints for Aug. 15, 2025, puzzle No. 326
Need help with today's Connections: Sports Edition puzzle? You've come to the right place. Welcome to Connections: Sports Edition Coach — a spot to gather clues and discuss (and share) scores. A quick public service announcement before we continue: The bottom of this article includes one answer in each of the four categories. So if you want to solve the board hint-free, we recommend you play before continuing. Advertisement You can access Friday's game here. Game No. 326's difficulty: 2.5 out of 5 Scroll below for one answer in each of the four categories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yellow: PATRIOTS Green: GRIND Blue: HAMBY Purple: COLLEGE The next puzzle will be available at midnight in your time zone. Thanks for playing — and share your scores in the comments! (Illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
