logo
Flooded Texas County Turned Down Funds for Warning System From Biden Admin in 2021: 'We Don't Want to Be Bought'

Flooded Texas County Turned Down Funds for Warning System From Biden Admin in 2021: 'We Don't Want to Be Bought'

A Texas county devastated by deadly flooding earlier this month rejected federal funds in 2021 that could have helped install a flood warning system, with local officials and residents arguing they didn't want to be "bought" by the Biden administration.
As far back as 2016, officials considered a $1 million siren and gauge system to warn both locals and the flood-prone region's many visitors, the Texas Tribune reported. But despite multiple meetings and FEMA grant applications, funding efforts repeatedly stalled, first due to missing mitigation plans, then due to shifting priorities after Hurricane Harvey.
In 2021, the Biden administration awarded Kerr County $10.2 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, which could have been used for flood prevention infrastructure. But commissioners, facing political pressure from conservative residents, opted not to pursue a warning system.
At an April 2022 meeting, one citizen called the White House a "criminal treasonous communist government," urging the county to reject the money altogether. Others echoed that sentiment, saying they didn't want the federal government's help.
"We don't want to be bought by the federal government, thank you very much," a resident said. "We'd like the federal government to stay out of Kerr County and their money."
While the county ultimately kept the funds, they allocated the majority, about $8 million, to sheriff's department upgrades and public employee stipends.
Just $600,000 went to staffing and community amenities. No money was set aside for a flood alert system. On July 4, 2025, the region was hit by flash flooding that raised the Guadalupe River by over 32 feet, killing more than 100 people. Now, survivors and local leaders are demanding accountability.
Ingram City Council member Raymond Howard, who spent the night of the flood knocking on neighbors' doors, has pledged to install a local siren himself. "It's the thing I could do even if it's the last thing I do," said Howard, who is battling stage four cancer.
Originally published on Latin Times
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France Says It Cannot Save Contraceptives US Plans To Destroy
France Says It Cannot Save Contraceptives US Plans To Destroy

Int'l Business Times

time2 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

France Says It Cannot Save Contraceptives US Plans To Destroy

France said Friday it could not seize women's contraception products estimated to be worth $9.7 million that the United States plans to destroy, after media reports suggested the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives -- intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa -- were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told AFP Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane". The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. "Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks," it added. The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now -- or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasised that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot become the scene of such operations -- a moratorium is essential," an opinion piece in the French daily Le Monde said Friday. Signed by five NGOs, it condemned the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse". A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed". The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule", was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive. A Belgian warehouse where US-funded contraceptives have been stored -- and which the US intends to destroy AFP

Bill O'Reilly Fact Checked on Live TV After Falsely Claiming Epstein Was 'Convicted' by Biden Admin: 'Yeah, So?'
Bill O'Reilly Fact Checked on Live TV After Falsely Claiming Epstein Was 'Convicted' by Biden Admin: 'Yeah, So?'

Int'l Business Times

time15-07-2025

  • Int'l Business Times

Bill O'Reilly Fact Checked on Live TV After Falsely Claiming Epstein Was 'Convicted' by Biden Admin: 'Yeah, So?'

Journalist and conservative commentator Bill O'Reilly was fact-checked on live TV after falsely claiming that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019, was "convicted" by the Biden administration. The former Fox News host's mix up came while he was rallying against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies during a Monday appearance on NewsNation's "On Balance." Jeffries had questioned if the Trump administration was "hiding" something following the latest report on the Epstein files. "Jeffries knew the Biden administration had exactly the same thing the Trump administration has on Epstein. Exactly, because Epstein was convicted during the Biden administration," O'Reilly declared. Moments after O'Reilly's assertion, NewsNation anchor Leland Vittert jumped in and interrupted the journalist. "Wait, hold on, hold on, hold on Bill," the anchor started. "Bill, hold on, you said Epstein was convicted during the Biden administration. Epstein committed suicide during the Trump administration." "Yeah, so? Am I wrong on that?" O'Reilly questioned, leading Vittert to eagerly nod. "He was arrested in 2019, and committed suicide in 2019. He died August 10, 2019. So, the Biden administration was not involved in a conviction or a trial of him. They were [with] Ghislaine Maxwell," Vittert clarified. O'Reilly went on to insist that Epstein was arrested and indicted under Merrick Garland, who served as U.S. attorney general during the Biden administration, which Vittert quickly declared was false. "Epstein was arrested, indicted and committed suicide under Trump. In 2019, Trump was president. Merrick Garland was not the attorney general," the anchor reiterated. The Department of Justice and FBI have come under intense scrutiny over the last week after a memo released July 6 concluded that Epstein killed himself, had "no client list" and that there was no evidence of blackmail. Critics on both sides of the aisle have called for continued review and increased clarity into how officials came to the conclusion. In addition to Jeffries, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin and California Rep. Ro Khanna have also called for the full release of the files, questioning if the administration was "covering up" for anyone. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Department of justice Joe biden

Trump Now Claims Biden 'Wasn't for Open Borders,' Blames 'Radical Left' Politicians for Using Autopen
Trump Now Claims Biden 'Wasn't for Open Borders,' Blames 'Radical Left' Politicians for Using Autopen

Int'l Business Times

time14-07-2025

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Now Claims Biden 'Wasn't for Open Borders,' Blames 'Radical Left' Politicians for Using Autopen

President Donald Trump claimed that former President Joe Biden was not in favor of open borders, directly contradicting allegations he made for years in which he accused the Biden administration of not sufficiently securing the nation's borders. The 47th President spoke to reporters during a press conference at the White House on Monday, during which he questioned Biden's use of an autopen during his presidency. "An autopen is supposed to write to a young, 7-year-old boy that writes to the president and wants to be president someday and he loves America," Trump said. "That's what the autopen is supposed to be. It's not supposed to be for signing major legislation and all other things." "I doubt he knew. I doubt they even spoke to him about it," Trump said. "Biden was never for open borders. Biden was never for transgender for everyone." "I think the radical left people took over the White House, and if I didn't win, our country was finished," he added. However, Trump's statements directly contradict previous claims he has made, in which he accused Biden and his administration of implementing an open border policy. Most recently, Trump blamed the horrific terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, on Biden's "open border" policy just last month. "Yesterday's horrific attack in Boulder, Colorado, WILL NOT BE TOLERATED in the United States of America. He came in through Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy, which has hurt our Country so badly. He must go out under 'TRUMP' Policy," the president wrote on Truth Social. Social media users quickly took to online platforms to contradict Trump's statements. "Hey @grok like how many times a day does Trump mention Biden or blame him for his incompetence?" one user asked X's AI chatbot Grok. Hey @grok like how many times a day does Trump mention Biden or blame him for his incompetence? — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) July 14, 2025 "What the f--k does 'transgender for everyone' even f--king mean. Everyone who is transgender is transgender. No one who is not transgender is transgender. Also, there haven't been 'Open borders' since the 1920s," said another frustrated user. What the fuck does "transgender for everyone" even fucking mean. Everyone who is transgender is transgender. No one who is not transgender is transgender. Also, there haven't been "Open borders" since the 1920s. — Machine Pun Kelly 🇺🇦 (@KellyScaletta) July 14, 2025 "For a guy that auto penned 1600 J6 pardons, he sure seems tone deaf," added a third user. For a guy that auto penned 1600 J6 pardons, he sure seems tone deaf. — Kimberly 🇺🇸 🏕️ 🌲⛰️🐶🍷🧢 💙 (@KimberlySuth) July 14, 2025 "What happened to the Epstein files? Why is he trying to distract?" noted a fourth. What happened to the Epstein files? Why is he trying to distract? — Terrance. (@ExscapeVelozity) July 14, 2025 This is not the first time Trump has hinted that the former president was being manipulated. In May, Trump declared on Truth Social, "Joe Biden was not for open borders." "It wasn't his idea to open the border... It was the people that knew he was cognitively impaired and that took over the autopen," he continued. "He never talked about Open Borders, where criminals of all kinds, shapes, and sizes, can flow into our Country at will." Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Joe biden White house © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store