logo
Texas Democrat stays behind to battle Republican redistricting push

Texas Democrat stays behind to battle Republican redistricting push

Most of Raymond's Democratic colleagues left Texas in an attempt to bust the quorums needed for the legislature to pass the measure. But he stayed behind, trying to cajole, convince, pressure or plead his way out of the crisis.
For Raymond, it's deja vu all over again.
In 2003, when Texas Republican lawmakers again tried to redraw districts outside the norms of the once-a-decade process that follows each new Census, Raymond was on the redistricting committee and became an ardent voice of the opposition. When the measure passed, he was named as a plaintiff in a lawsuit that ultimately ended in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
This time, he said, the stakes are even higher.
"Two-thousand-three was a big deal. We went through a lot," Raymond, 64, told USA TODAY from his first-floor office at the Capitol. "I could see that that was history making and what's going on right now will be history making."
Midterm battle prompts Texas showdown
The current showdown began when President Donald Trump and White House officials urged Texas Republican leaders to redraw voting maps to add five new Republican-friendly seats to the U.S. House of Representatives. State Democrats traveled to Illinois - some even to New York and Massachusetts - to prevent Republicans from reaching the two-thirds quorum in the 150-member legislature needed to conduct business.
If Texas Republicans succeed in adding five GOP seats to the U.S. House, the Trump-friendly chamber could allow the president to continue one of the most aggressive and disruptive agendas in modern presidential history. A Democratic majority in January 2027 opens the door to Congressional investigations, legislative paralysis - even a third impeachment.
Gov. Greg Abbott has threatened to arrest the absent lawmakers and the U.S. Justice Department has said it will also try to track down the AWOL representatives. And on Aug. 8, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the state Supreme Court to oust 13 Democratic lawmakers from office over their absence from the Capitol, arguing they abandoned their seats when they fled the state.
The GOP's Texas power play has set off a redistricting arms race as blue state leaders move to create more Democratic-leaning House seats to counter Texas, and lawmakers in other red states, including Indiana and Missouri, consider joining the fray. Vice President JD Vance met with Indiana lawmakers on Aug. 7 reportedly to urge them to redraw maps and Florida Republican leaders have said they, too, will form a committee to begin redrawing districts.
In 2003, Texas Republicans also tried to redraw maps three years after Census data was released, prompting state Democrats to retreat to a Holiday Inn in Oklahoma, just over the state line from Texas and out of reach of troopers who could force them to return.
'Pack a toothbrush. Pack hair spray.' How the Texas Democrats are living on the run
Raymond fought the bill in committee then joined his colleagues in Oklahoma. During committee hearings, he was at times the lone Democrat, objecting to Republican motions and grilling witnesses about the legality and fairness of gerrymandering maps for partisan gain. His goal was to get his comments and questions - and their replies - on the official record.
"Just really putting them through the ringer to build the court record," he remembered. "I was very, very involved in it, from the beginning to the end."
Lawmakers ultimately approved the new maps. But lawsuits were filed and the case wound up in the U.S. Supreme Court. A 5-4 decision upheld the Texas redistricting plan but ruled part of it violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting power of Latino voters. A proposal to split Laredo, Raymond's hometown, in half was removed.
"It was a 50-50 victory, but a victory nonetheless," he said.
'Try to talk to everybody'
On Aug. 8, Raymond walked the short distance from his first-floor office to the second-floor House chamber. He wound his way around desks, chatting with fellow lawmakers, both Democrat and Republican, patting others on the back, joking with others.
There's a saying, he said, that's popular in the Spanish-speaking border city where he's from: Hablando se entiende, or "Speaking to each other, you're able to understand each other."
"I have always tried my whole career to try to talk to everybody, get to know everybody, all 149 other members," he said. "That hasn't changed."
Raymond, a state lawmaker since 2001, is one of the more tenured Democrats in the legislature. Known as a moderate, he represents a heavily Latino district that fans out for several square miles from Laredo along the U.S.-Mexico border and is home to about 183,000 residents.
Last year, Trump managed a near sweep of Texas border counties, traditionally a Democratic stronghold, winning 14 of the 18 counties on or near the border, including Webb County, which includes Laredo.
Trump's wins along the border were the biggest for a presidential candidate in three decades, outpacing those by native Texan George W. Bush when he won the governorship in 2004.
The border's shifting allegiances make it politically risky for representatives of those districts to align too closely with national Democratic figures, such as Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who is essentially harboring the Texas Democrats, said Mark Jones, a Rice University political scientist.
It's no coincidence, Jones said, that five of the six Democrats who stayed behind last week were from border districts in South Texas. Raymond, who is up for reelection next year, also likely prefers to keep his distance, he said.
Republicans in Texas appear to be razor-focused on keeping the new redistricting maps unchanged, Jones said, despite the efforts of Raymond or anyone else.
"The idea you can stay behind and get maps drawn to be less impactful on Democratic representation is very unlikely," he said.
Raymond acknowledged he's faced with a herculean task - not unlike Sisyphus rolling the boulder up the hill at Tartarus in Greek mythology. His deepest fear, he said, is that the issue will again end up before the Supreme Court - this time with a court much more malleable to the GOP agenda.
Still, he'll keep trying. When it gets to feel overwhelming, he said, he tries to remind himself that other members equally love their country and state - and are trying to make it better.
"I recognize that we won't always agree on how we get there, but I don't ever doubt that," Raymond said. "I always start from that common place."
The session on Aug. 8 was brief: Eight minutes gavel to gavel. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, recognized there still wasn't a quorum, chastised the missing members and adjourned until Monday, Aug. 11.
Moments after Burrows gaveled the meeting to a close, Raymond began talking to other lawmakers.
Follow Jervis on Twitter: @MrRJervis.
Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour is going to have to leave the ECHR
Labour is going to have to leave the ECHR

Spectator

time12 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Labour is going to have to leave the ECHR

The Home Secretary's extension of the list of countries covered by the 'deport now, appeal later' scheme for foreign criminals, announced this morning, doesn't actually add to the number of undesirables that we can deport. But it could lubricate the process of getting rid of them. For criminals from the new countries just added, which include a number of African and Asian states, India, Canada and Australia, it means that once the Home Secretary rejects an objection based on human rights grounds, physical removal can be automatic. The deportee can still appeal, but any appeal has to be pursued from abroad. This not only saves us the cost of supporting and detaining them here but reduces the possibility of them either disappearing into the black economy, or arguing that the passage of time has itself created of a link with this country so strong as to make their removal inhuman. This is a step in the right direction. But it is a pretty limited one. There are 700-odd prisoners from the new countries in our jails who will be subject to the new rules; but this is around half the number who come from Albania alone, which tops the list of foreign suppliers of convicts to our penal system and which was already part of the scheme even before its extension. One doubts whether extended human rights claims against removal by, say, unwanted Canadians or Australians are a serious problem. By contrast, we have large numbers of Polish, Romanian, Lithuanian, Jamaican, Pakistani and Somali jailbirds on our hands whom we would love to be summarily rid of, but are still not covered. Tough-sounding measures of this kind are all very well. But they have a history of coming unstuck. We have been here before. Legislation in 2014 would have allowed all deported criminals to be put on the first plane out and then appeal from abroad. Unfortunately this very salutary provision was declared non-human-rights-compliant three years later by a liberal Supreme Court unhappy about the difficulties faced by criminal deportees forced into long-distance litigation. The present scheme aims to sidestep this by requiring provisions for pursuing effective online appeals from abroad: countries are not added unless and until these have been agreed. But it would be foolish to rule out a UK court, or the European Court of Human Rights, saying that an applicant has not had a chance to put his case. We also cannot exclude a court staying physical expulsion on the basis that the trauma of immediate removal, say of a criminal with alleged mental health issues, is itself a breach of human rights. This is, in other words, largely an exercise in tinkering. Furthermore, even if it works it will not make a serious dent in the numbers of foreigners who successfully demand to stay despite having grossly abused our hospitality. To do this, the government knows perfectly well about the migrant elephant in the room. In the last resort something must be done about the European Convention on Human Rights. Whether litigation takes place in the Strand or in the legal ether over a Zoom link from abroad is largely beside the point: even where a person otherwise fulfils the criteria for removal, it always remains open under the Convention to argue that if removed their family life would be destroyed, or that they would face ill-treatment abroad. (Some, indeed, have successfully, if impudently, resisted removal precisely because of the hostility they would face at home as a result of their having committed a heinous crime here.) This cannot go on. I can quite legitimately eject someone from my house who has taken sanctuary there if they start smashing up my furniture, even if I know a baying mob outside will brutalise them as a result. The same should go for a country: the right to refuge, even from those out for blood, should be able to be lost as a result of serious misbehaviour. Unfortunately this is what Strasbourg, with its almost religious view of human rights, will not accept. In the end, there is only one way out. Barring a Damascene conversion of the Strasbourg court, something pretty inconceivable (witness its petulant brush-off three months ago of a suggestion from a number of countries including Denmark, Poland and Italy that it should soften its line on migrants' rights), withdrawal is fast becoming not only an option, but the only option. A number of Red Wall MPs, painfully aware of public opinion, are already making noises along these lines. For the moment this is anathema to Yvette Cooper, and even more so to Keir Starmer and Lord Hermer. But sooner or later Labour, if it wants to avoid electoral irrelevance, will have to think seriously about it.

Trump is ‘a bit of a chauvinist', says Reform's first female MP
Trump is ‘a bit of a chauvinist', says Reform's first female MP

Telegraph

time13 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump is ‘a bit of a chauvinist', says Reform's first female MP

Donald Trump can come across as 'a bit of a chauvinist', Reform UK's only female MP has said. Sarah Pochin, the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, said the US president 'clearly does respect women', but he can 'certainly' appear prejudiced at times. She also distanced her party from the Republican leader, insisting Reform is 'not aligned with Donald Trump '. Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, is a long-standing friend of Mr Trump, having helped him campaign for the US election last year. However, he recently said the pair were in a 'slightly awkward position' for diplomatic reasons, with the president bound to deal with Sir Keir Starmer as leader of the UK. Ms Pochin made the remarks about Mr Trump in an interview following a press conference on Monday morning, at which she discussed women's safety in Britain. Asked about whether Reform had found itself 'aligning' with the president, she told the PA news agency: 'This party is not aligned with Donald Trump. Donald Trump does what he does over the pond, and we do what we do.' She added: 'The other thing I would say is, Donald Trump certainly comes across at times, when I look at him through the television or the media, as possibly a bit of a chauvinist, or whatever. 'But look at his team. I mean, his press secretary [ Karoline Leavitt ] is awesome – can't remember her name – but he has a lot of very senior women in his team. 'So actually, he clearly does respect women and promotes women in his team, as Nigel is very much doing, as you've seen today, with four senior women hosting this press conference.' Mr Trump has come under fire in the past for his remarks about women, having been recorded in 2005 boasting about 'grabbing [women] by the p----' and stating that 'when you're a star, they let you do it'. He went on to apologise for the comments, saying: 'Anyone who knows me knows these words don't reflect who I am. I said it, I was wrong and I apologise.' Ms Pochin was elected as Reform's first female MP at the by-election to replace Mike Amesbury, the disgraced former Labour MP, in May. She described herself as a 'clean candidate', with no big scandals to speak of besides her expulsion from her local Tory group over a mayoral row in 2020. However, she has since emerged as an outspoken voice in Reform, most notably butting heads with Zia Yusuf, the party's then chairman, when she urged Sir Keir Starmer to ban the burka in June. Mr Yusuf resigned over the remarks but rejoined the party in a new role shortly afterwards. Ms Pochin's comments about Mr Trump risk putting her at odds with Mr Farage, who recently said his relationship with the president had 'always been one of friendship'. The Runcorn MP was one of four female Reform politicians hosting the press conference on Monday. She was joined by Dame Andrea Jenkyns, the mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, who described herself as one of 'Farage's fillies', as well as Linden Kemkaran, the leader of Kent county council, and Laila Cunningham, a Westminster City councillor. During her speech, Ms Pochin claimed that illegal migrants from 'predominantly Muslim' countries put women 'at risk of sexual assault'. 'The inconvenient truth for the Left is that the culture of men from predominantly Muslim countries like Afghanistan is one that holds a medieval view of women's rights,' she said. 'It is fundamentally alien to the centuries of progress made by our own western culture and attitudes. 'Women are at risk of sexual assault and rape from these men, hundreds of young men who arrive in this country, housed in our communities, who undoubtedly become sexually frustrated, have a warped view of their right to sexually assault women.' During her speech, Ms Kemkaran stressed the need to protect single-sex spaces, saying: 'It is a fact that allowing biological men into women's spaces has made women and girls in the UK less safe.' However, Reform was forced to defend its own policies after it emerged that men attending the event at the party's headquarters had been asked to use the women's lavatories for security reasons. It came days after Reform was caught in a row over trans rights, with Mr Farage distancing himself from his new justice adviser over the issue of trans women in female prisons. I have never supported men in women's prisons. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 5, 2025 Asked why men were using the women's lavatories at the press conference, a Reform source said: 'Due to operational security, it's the press toilets when we have a press conference or use the event space. They're individual lockable cubicles.' By the end of the event, the sign on the door to the women's lavatories had been covered by a piece of paper saying 'press toilet'.

Azerbaijan, Armenia publish text of initialed peace agreement
Azerbaijan, Armenia publish text of initialed peace agreement

Reuters

time13 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Azerbaijan, Armenia publish text of initialed peace agreement

TBILISI, Aug 11 (Reuters) - Armenia and Azerbaijan published the text of a U.S.-brokered peace agreement on Monday, pledging to respect each other's territorial integrity and formally put an end to nearly four decades of conflict. The deal was struck in Washington last Friday, when Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met with U.S. President Donald Trump in the White House. The text of the agreement, published by both countries' foreign ministries, says Yerevan and Baku will relinquish all claims to each other's territory, refrain from using force against one another and pledge to respect international law. "This agreement is a solid foundation for establishing a reliable and lasting peace, the result of an agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan that reflects the balanced interests of the two countries," Pashinyan wrote on Facebook. Armenia and Azerbaijan, neighbours in the South Caucasus region, have been locked in conflict since the late 1980s over Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous region at the southern end of the Karabakh mountain range, within Azerbaijan. Baku took back full control of the region in 2023, prompting almost all of the territory's 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. Since then both sides have said they want peace, but talks have largely stalled until this month. At the White House meeting on Friday, the United States gained exclusive development rights to a strategic transit corridor through the South Caucasus that the Trump administration said would boost bilateral economic ties and allow for greater exports of energy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store