Minister Tim Ayres says job fears shouldn't hold Australia back on Artificial Intelligence, productivity
Australia must embrace the opportunities of artificial intelligence in the job market or risk falling behind in the global race to adopt digital technology, says new Industry and Innovation Minister Tim Ayres.
In an exclusive interview with The Nightly, Senator Ayres said that eschewing the advantages of cutting-edge AI in the workplace over job fears would be more detrimental to the employment market overall, urging the country to adapt with the times to boost productivity.
Investing in technology was 'not a zero-sum game' for the labour market, he said, calling for a 'big national conversation' between institutions, trade unions, business groups and the research and development sector to set objectives in the country's best interests.
In wide-ranging comments, he spruiked his ambition to make Australia a top-shelf destination for data centres and to invest in infrastructure that would shape the nation's digital future rather than leave it 'at the end of someone else's technological supply chain.'
He also hinted at a lighter touch approach to regulating rapidly advancing technology while stressing the urgency of finding the right safeguards.
Senator Ayres had just moved into his new ministerial office in Parliament House when The Nightly spoke with him, but Toby Walsh's The Shortest History of AI was already one of two books sitting prominently on his desk.
It offers a glimpse into the daunting challenges he faces to maximise the benefits of artificial intelligence while protecting the country from its risks.
This includes concerns about how to weigh up technological progress with the impact of AI on jobs in manufacturing and other sectors.
Senator Ayres, who had a long career as a senior official in the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union before entering parliament, acknowledged the hurdles but underscored the potential for more job creation.
'The only thing that would be more disruptive in terms of employment and job opportunities is stepping back, having economies that pass us by,' he said.
'I'm absolutely seized of the importance of investment and economic growth and good jobs and productivity in terms of leaning into the challenge.
'That's not without risks, and we need to work together in an Australian formulation, working collectively across the economy to make sure we get the best outcome for the country.'
Every wave of technological change involved reshaping the labour market, Senator Ayres argued.
'My experience in manufacturing, as automation stepped up, as adoption of digital technology stepped up, is that involved jobs changing, some jobs going and investment in new jobs and capability,' he said.
Senator Ayres said he was seeking a 'pragmatic' path between 'artificial intelligence boosters' promoting a utopian approach and 'artificial intelligence doomsayers.'
The Minister said he was determined to put the tech sector and investment in new industrial capabilities at the centre of the debate as the Government prepares to host a productivity roundtable on August 19 to 21.
The meeting in the Cabinet room will draw together senior politicians with business, union and civil society representatives to find common ground on long-term economic reform.
Australia's challenges in tackling sluggish productivity growth were not unique among Western nations, argued Senator Ayres.
'Australia can't afford to step backwards in technological terms, because that will be one of the key drivers of productivity growth over the coming decade,' he said.
But beyond the roundtable and ongoing productivity debate, the Senator must also help set the direction for major Government decisions on a national strategy for safety standards for AI and the digital economy, whether through regulation or voluntary codes.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers set the tone of the approach earlier this month at a speech at the National Press Club outlining his ministry's priorities for the new term.
Dr Chalmers said he would work with Senator Ayres and Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economy Dr Andrew Charlton to 'capitalise on the huge gains on offer, not just set guardrails'.
'We want to get the best out of new technology and investment in data infrastructure in ways that leverage our strengths, work for our people and best manage impacts on our energy system and natural environment,' Dr Chalmers said.
Landing on a risk-based model for regulating AI is unfinished business from Labor's first term, and an issue where the Government is coming under increasing pressure to act and to more clearly define its policy.
Senator Ayres' predecessor Ed Husic last term launched a 'mandatory guardrails' consultation to moot an Australian AI Act that would impose minimum standards on high-risk AI models across the economy.
Mr Husic backs the proposal of an AI Act to provide certainty about how to mitigate the risks in what he describes as the current 'Swiss cheese landscape' of regulation.
But Senator Ayres indicated he was going to take a cautious path, and said he was not yet ready to commit to major policy decisions without further consultation.
'I'm going to work carefully through that set of issues and talk to colleagues before I reach a final view about the right approach on the regulatory front and the legislative front,' he said.
As a new Minister, he wanted to evaluate work already underway 'before I shoot my mouth off about where we land on these precise sort of regulatory architecture questions,' he said.
He insisted would reach the 'right outcome in short order' to give guidance to industry and the public.
'My instinctive response is leaning into the opportunity. That's the overall setting here, and that's my starting point,' he said.
Senator Ayres stressed that no country on Earth believed there should be a completely unregulated approach to artificial intelligence development or adoption and signalled he was assessing the models and approaches of partner economies.
But less than two months into the job, the Minister already faces rising calls from industry bodies, experts and civil society groups to better define policies to allow AI to boost innovation, living standards and productivity and also to mitigate the risks.
A landmark report by the Business Council of Australia (BCA) released in early June outlined a blueprint to make the nation a global leader in AI by 2028, and called among multiple recommendations for 'clear, practical and risk-based AI regulations that encourage innovation'.
The BCA report warned that without immediate action, Australia risked falling behind competitor nations racing ahead in AI capability and adoption.
Senator Ayres said he was acting on the 'urgency' of the issues.
'I don't want to set a timeframe but I am absolutely seized of the urgency of it, absolutely engaged with the tech sector and the investment community where there is a very consistent message about the sense of urgency about these questions,' he said.
'I'm absolutely seized as well of aligning this line of effort with the other lines of effort that the Government has on the productivity and investment side.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
32 minutes ago
- West Australian
Michelle Grattan: Bold reform a taxing journey
Next week will be the 40th anniversary of the Hawke government's tax summit. Dominated by then treasurer Paul Keating's unsuccessful bid to win support for a consumption tax, it was the public centrepiece of an extraordinary political and policy story. That story was about the possibilities for, but constraints on, bold reform; how a determined treasurer can muster a formidable department to push for change, and the way the ambitions of a minister can clash with the pragmatism of a prime minister. Ken Henry, later secretary of the treasury, was then part of what they dubbed the 'treasury tax reform bunker'. He kept a timesheet, averaging 100 hours work a week for a three-month period. Officials brought sleeping bags and their small children (Henry's were aged three and five) into the office. Before the summit, the government produced a comprehensive draft white paper. Keating battled to keep the conflicting interests 'in the cart' for his blueprint. But the four-day summit, attended by business, unions, premiers and community groups, was inevitably divided by stakeholders' self-interests. In particular, the unions couldn't wear Keating's consumption tax, and Bob Hawke kyboshed it unceremoniously. Keating, who had to settle for a more limited but still very significant set of reforms, was furious with Hawke, and it left a fracture in their relationship. Jim Chalmers was aged seven in 1985. But he's a student of Keating (he did his PhD on his prime ministership) and you can be sure he's boned up on what went right and wrong in that tax reform exercise. Now he is preparing for the Government's August 19-21 'roundtable' and his own bid at major tax reform. The roundtable, as first announced, focused on 'productivity', and that will be central. After all, a fit-for-purpose tax system is one key to improving productivity. The roundtable (for which invitations to business and the union movement are now going out, with more to follow) is nothing like on the scale, in size (the summit had about 160 attendees, the roundtable will have about 25) or preparation, of the elaborate 1985 conference. And crucially, while that summit was the culmination of a process, Chalmers is using the roundtable to kick off a process. Chalmers is lowering expectations in regard to specific outcomes on tax from the roundtable. While those might be obtainable on some productivity issues, on tax he is likely to look for broad support for a direction of reform. For instance, is there a general appetite for reshaping the tax system towards lower personal and company tax, offset by higher taxes on certain investments and savings? ` Most tax experts argue Australia's system is too skewed towards taxing income rather than spending. This leads to calls to increase or broaden the GST, financing cuts to personal income tax. Chalmers has been a long-term opponent of changing the GST, but he says he is not ruling the GST out for discussion at the roundtable. (That's a contrast to when prime minister Kevin Rudd, commissioning Henry to lead a major tax review, excluded the GST from its terms of reference.) Almost certainly, however, it would not be possible to get 'consensus' from business and unions for GST changes. Not least of the constraints is that compensating the losers in such a change is very expensive and there is not the money to do so these days. That immediately limits the extent of reform. Henry tells The Conversation's podcast that if he were designing a tax reform package 'I'd be looking at opportunities to broaden the GST and maybe to increase the rate as well'. But 'I do think it is possible to achieve major tax reform … without necessarily increasing the (GST) rate or extending the base'. Henry's (non-GST) wish list includes getting rid of the remaining State transaction taxes, such as stamp duty on property conveyancing. Notably, he argues for extracting more revenue from taxing natural resources and land, and also from taxing pollution from various sources. 'We're going to need to tax those things more heavily if we're going to relieve the tax burden on young workers through lower personal income tax and introducing tax indexation.' Henry is particularly focused on the unfair burden at present put on these younger taxpayers. He has come around to the idea of income tax indexation as one means of assisting them. A system more geared to younger workers raises immediate questions about the present generous treatment of superannuants. Chalmers is already caught in that hornets' nest with his proposed changes for those with balances more than $3 million. To what extent will the roundtable tax debate revive the issues of negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount? The Government hosed down before the election the prospect of any changes to negative gearing this term. Chalmers, however, had work done on this last term and he would likely favour reining it in. But would this be a bridge too far for the Prime Minister? Indeed, where will Anthony Albanese's limits be when it comes to reform? Would he only support changes that had strong consensus? And how far would he feel constrained in going beyond what he considers he has a mandate for? If Chalmers stays serious about the tax push, it is going to take many months of intense work. It can't be rushed, but nor can it be delayed. If it ran for much over a year it would likely find the Government's political capital had been eroded. The size of its capital store can appear deceptive because so much of it is thanks to Peter Dutton and Donald Trump. In 2022, the Liberals boycotted Labor's jobs and skills summit (although Nationals leader David Littleproud attended). This time, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien has accepted Chalmers' invitation and will participate in the roundtable. It will be a tricky gig for O'Brien, new to this shadow portfolio. He has to avoid being too negative, but nor can he endorse things the Opposition might later reject. The Coalition will not have a tax policy against which to judge what's said. The occasion will be a chance for O'Brien to make contacts and get more insight into stakeholders' views on the key economic debates, much wider than just tax. Importantly, however, O'Brien will need to remember judgments will be being made about him by other participants in the room. Business in particular will be seeking to get a fix on whether Opposition Leader Sussan Ley's declarations about wanting to be constructive where possible are fair dinkum. Michelle Grattan is a professorial fellow at the University of Canberra.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
'No other option': desperate plea from stranded Aussies
Australians stranded in Iran say government advice to escape by crossing international borders is not feasible for the most vulnerable, amid fears a fragile truce between Israel and Iran could break. Efforts to bring Australians home from the region have been complicated by border restrictions and flight path closures. Perth engineer Vahid said his sister Azam and their parents Ezat, 70, and Hossein, 86, had travelled to Iran in June 2024 so his father could undergo health checks before returning to Australia as their permanent residency application was being processed. But the family has been left stranded after airports were shut down and borders closed following the outbreak of fighting. To make matters worse, his parents' visas have expired, making a return even more difficult. "Dad is 86 years old and cannot travel long distances by car to the Azerbaijani border or Turkey to get to the Australian consulate because the consular office in Tehran is closed," he told AAP on Friday. He is pleading with the federal government for guidance after the only advice provided was to cross the border into Azerbaijan or to shelter in place. The trip, which Azam, Ezat and Hossein would have to organise, would take at least 12 hours by car. "There is no other option except to go through the border by car," said Vahid, who asked for his surname not to be used. "This solution is not feasible for them - for people like my parents at that age - it's not feasible for them to travel long distances." The family is under immense stress, fearing the "fragile" ceasefire could shatter, and is unable to escape the capital Tehran to a safer location due to Hossein's age. "I experience lots of stress, maybe double the stress, over here because I can see the situation and I don't have any options to help them," Vahid said. He urged authorities to issue his parents with new visas and to help his sister, an Australian citizen, return to her son in Sydney, saying the situation was "out of their hands". About 3200 Australians wanting to leave Iran have registered with the Department of Foreign Affairs. Iranian Community of Western Australia president Mohammad Bahar said those he had spoken with were happy with the advice and felt the government "never forgot them". DFAT says it is supporting Australians secure seats on commercial flights that are starting to resume out of Iran. Australians can leave Iran using border crossings into Azerbaijan, Turkey, Armenia or Turkmenistan, with the Smartraveller website adding those who can't or don't want to leave should monitor local developments and follow local advice. A ceasefire was reached after 12 days of war, which erupted when Israel launched attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites. The assault triggered waves of retaliatory strikes before the US president intervened to put an end to the escalating violence.
Canberra Times
an hour ago
- Canberra Times
'No other option': desperate plea from stranded Aussies
He urged authorities to issue his parents with new visas and to help his sister, an Australian citizen, return to her son in Sydney, saying the situation was "out of their hands".
