Bigger may be better: Late advice shake-up forces councils to rethink water reform plans
The three-council proposal remains on the table, but Rangitīkei unanimously resolved to progress 'newly ignited conversations' with Palmerston North City Council and Horowhenua District Council.
The surprise move comes after new guidelines from the Department of Internal Affairs, the Local Government Funding Agency, and the Commerce Commission on achieving economy of scale and financial sustainability requirements.
Rangitīkei Mayor Andy Watson said the Rangitīkei, Ruapehu and Whanganui councils were newly approached in early May about collaborating with the Palmerston North and Horowhenua councils to form a larger entity.
A key element of the new guidance was that a WS-CCO servicing 50,000 connections would achieve the greatest cost efficiencies for bill payers.
'The understanding that 50,000 connections would unlock greater savings for all those involved has absolutely contributed to other councils re-entering discussions about a wider model,' Watson said.
A three-council entity with Rangitīkei, Ruapehu, and Whanganui councils would service about 31,000 connections.
Rangitīkei consulted with residents in March on three models for the future of water services delivery:
A multi-CCO with Whanganui and Ruapehu district councils (the preferred model).
Keeping the status quo of in-house delivery.
A multi-CCO with as many councils in the Manawatū-Whanganui region as possible.
At the time, the third option was not viable because other councils had indicated they preferred alternative models.
Following the latest advice, talks have reopened on a wider regional approach.
Rangitīkei was now awaiting the decisions of its potential partners, Watson said.
Staff would finalise the water services delivery plan by September 3.
'We will inform Rangitīkei residents as soon as the final grouping of councils is clear,' Watson said.
'This is one of the biggest decisions councils will make for their communities in decades.'
A decision in Whanganui was deferred on Tuesday to an extraordinary council meeting in early July.
Mayor Andrew Tripe said four viable delivery options remained on the table: a multi-CCO with Ruapehu and Rangitīkei, a Whanganui District Council CCO, a multi-CCO with as many councils as possible, and an in-house business unit.
Most community feedback showed residents felt Whanganui had invested well in its water assets and did not want to 'cross-subsidise' other councils.
'However, we are looking at a joint council proposal which could include a non-harmonised model, ring-fencing costs for each council but giving the benefits of scale – otherwise known as local pricing.'
The council was continuing to back a three-council model as the best level of scale to achieve cost benefits, but Tripe said the possibility of achieving 'greater scale' would be investigated.
Under local pricing, residents within each district would be charged on the same basis as currently, but any savings were shared.
Advertise with NZME.
'All three councils' customers in this case benefit from these savings, while paying costs that relate only to the delivery of services in their district. So customers pay less than they would have if councils were to go on their own.'
The cost benefits could be around $18,000 per Whanganui connection over 30 years, or $588 a year.
'Local pricing may also offer further savings to Whanganui if there is a greater scale, something which requires further investigation.'
Tripe said councils took their preferred options to consultation before the new guidelines were received.
'It is pertinent that we consider them now, as considerations such as public liability and ring-fencing of assets, even with an in-house model, do come at a cost.
'The adoption of a water services delivery plan for our district is one of the most significant changes to local government in decades.
'It is vital that we do not rush this process.'
On Wednesday, Ruapehu district councillors decided to ditch a standalone option in favour of the three-council CCO and investigating a wider regional entity to reach the 50,000-connection threshold.
The decision brings potential collaboration with Waikato back to the table.
The Ruapehu council will engage with its community on the new information and options available. No new preferred option will be offered.
The council will meet on June 25 to make a final decision.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Water Services To Be Managed And Delivered By Council Controlled Organisation
Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) has confirmed a Water Services Council Controlled Organisation (WSCCO) will be specifically created to deliver water services in the district, after the matter was considered at the Full Council Meeting on Thursday 31 July 2025. The decision follows a proposal put before the community in May and June 2025 to manage and deliver drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater services, as part of central government's Local Water Done Well plan to address Aotearoa New Zealand's water infrastructure challenges. Mayor of the Queenstown Lakes District, Glyn Lewers said the decision reflected analysis that a WSCCO would be the most effective at providing these services under the new legislative and regulatory regime, and enabled Council to begin preparing to create an organisation to deliver future water services. 'Key themes arising from feedback centred around the costs to households, costs to implement and operate a potential WSCCO compared with the in-house model, along with comments around accountability, transparency, and managing a separate entity effectively,' said Mayor Lewers. 'The decision to progress with a WSCCO last week was undeniably a challenging one to make, but considered that this model will provide a range of advantages in accountability, independence, and lower household costs in the long term when compared with the in-house model.' Now decided on, the future WSCCO will be fully owned by QLDC, but the organisation will be governed by its own independent specialist board and management. QLDC will be the only shareholder and will appoint board members based on the skills and experience needed for proper governance of the new organisation. Intended legislation by central government will prevent any WSCCO from being privatised which means that the WSCCO will remain wholly owned by QLDC. Council will set the organisation's strategic priorities and establish measures to ensure it performs to expectations, while the Commerce Commission will use various regulatory tools to ensure water charges are fair, cost-reflective, and transparent. The other shortlisted option evaluated was for QLDC to continue to deliver water services in-house, recognising that changes would need to be made to enable Council to respond to the new regulatory environment if such a model was progressed in-house model would have been similarly subject to the Commerce Commission regulatory requirements. Letters and emails were sent to all ratepayers in the Queenstown Lakes District, along with supporting communications material shared in local papers and on a range of online platforms, all detailing the opportunity to share feedback on the WSSCO and in-house models. Over 120 submissions were received during the consultation period, the majority of which were in favour of the option to retain water services in-house. Mayor Lewers said given drinking water, stormwater, and wastewater services all cost ratepayers a significant amount of money that would increase regardless of which approach to water services was taken, it was imperative Council took a long-term view to ensure those services were reliable, sustainable, and future-proofed. 'I acknowledge that while the majority of submitters opposed a change to how water services are delivered, Council's role is to consider community views alongside legal and technical perspectives, and many of the genuine concerns raised have since been addressed by evolving legislative changes,' said Mr Lewers. 'Any potential WSCCO must consult with the community on matters of significance, and proposed changes in the resource management space will require the integration of urban development and infrastructure planning between Council and WSCCO – both of which address potential disadvantages of proceeding with this model,' added Mr Lewers. 'Ultimately, after careful assessment of the two models, public input, the recent legislative changes, and debate on the matter, we can now provide certainty to residents of the Queenstown Lakes District around how their water services will be delivered in the future.' QLDC will now begin to establish a WSCCO under new water legislation. Responsibility for the district's water services, along with ownership of QLDC's water assets and associated debt and liabilities, will be transferred to the WSCCO once established. The WSCCO will be responsible for planning, funding, and delivering water services in accordance with new legislative and regulatory requirements. A Water Services Delivery Plan (WSDP) will be prepared and submitted to Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) by Wednesday 3 September, describing the current state of QLDC's water assets and services as well as the future arrangements for delivery of water services.
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mayor's vote seals decision to go with CCO
Queenstown mayor Glyn Lewers. PHOTO: ODT FILES A mayoral casting vote was needed to decide how Three Waters services will be delivered in the Queenstown Lakes district. After nearly three hours' debate at a full council meeting yesterday, Mayor Glyn Lewers used his vote to ensure council staff's recommended option of a council-controlled organisation (CCO) won the day. Councillors were evenly split on the issue, despite 77% of the 118 submissions received during community consultation favouring the retention of Three Waters services in house. In her report for councillors, strategy and reform manager Pennie Pearce said submitters' main concerns about a CCO had either already been addressed by her original analysis, or would be dealt with by amendments to the government's "Local Water Done Well" reforms. Since submissions had opened in June, amendments had been made to the Local Government (Water Services) Bill that strengthened the case for a CCO, Ms Pearce said. Asked by Cr Esther Whitehead whether the council's recommendation showed a disregard for the consultation process, chief executive Mike Theelen said it was not a "game of numbers". He urged councillors to make their decisions "based on the information and evidence before you". The decision means the council will transfer the district's drinking water, wastewater and stormwater assets — and associated liabilities — to a CCO, but will be its sole shareholder. Ms Pearce's analysis projects average annual water charges for households to be 10% lower under a CCO in the long term, compared with the in-house model. The CCO will operate independently from the council, with its own specialist board and management, although amendments to the Bill will require CCOs to consult with the community on matters of significance. The council's debt is expected to significantly decrease, giving it more headroom for other capital spending. Property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery told councillors a CCO would be "singular in its purpose", faster to respond to changing circumstances and better placed to secure debt and expertise. Cr Lisa Guy said the small number of submissions — about 100 from a population of more than 50,000 — did not represent a mandate for keeping the status quo. Many submitters had opposed a CCO, but also criticised the existing model for its delivery of Three Waters services. "If we're in agreement the status quo isn't delivering, how can we not be open to a model that might provide us with hope of doing it better?" Cr Niki Gladding said they were making their decision in a "fear and pressure environment" arising from repeated staff warnings of how central government might react if they chose the in-house model. "Neither option is the status quo. Both are an improvement. "I don't see why we can't achieve the benefits of a CCO — bar losing the debt — with an excellent in-house model." Cr Matt Wong said he was wary of basing his decision on cost, because he was sceptical about the accuracy of financial projections over such a long time period. They were under pressure from the government to make a decision based on highly complex information and a great deal of uncertainty, and he joked he would "need a coin" to make his. "I hope the public listening today is not going to judge any one of us on which way we vote."
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Major rates increase forecast for district
It was a case of more bad news for Waitaki ratepayers this week, with suggestions big rates rises could be coming sooner and more often than first thought, as the district tries to fund a financially sustainable in-house water services unit. There was also bad news for those who might be elected to Waitaki District Council in the October elections. As part of the government's Local Water Done Well reforms, councils throughout New Zealand must submit a Water Services Delivery Plan (WSDP) to the Department of Internal Affairs by September 3. The Waitaki District Council last month voted that would be done through an in-house business unit, rejecting three other options including a joint council-controlled organisation (CCO) with the Central Otago, Clutha and Gore district councils. On Tuesday, it held a second weekly workshop to refine a draft plan to be put to Internal Affairs for initial feedback this week. Following the first workshop, councillors heard a rates rise of 25.61% in the 2028 LTP year would be needed to fund the in-house plan (it might also rise to about 30% if depreciation of water assets was included in the WSDP). This week, the council's chief financial officer Amanda Nicholls told the meeting if depreciation was included the 2028 rates rise would need to be 42.55%, with another "significant" increase needed in 2035. However, Mayor Gary Kircher suggested including the depreciation earlier than 2028. Doing so would ease the needed rates rise but bring it forward, Ms Nicholls said. Mr Kircher said he did not think there was a choice. It would mean a 25% rates increase for next year, followed by a 30% hike the following year. He recognised that also meant leaving it to the new council (following the local body elections in October) to redo the long-term plan and try to reduce the rates rise by cutting capital projects. "There's a lot of stuff that council has to do between now and agreeing on that annual plan to cut costs elsewhere," Mr Kircher said. The existing long-term plan was put together under the understanding that the council would adopt a joint CCO water services model, as it had previously said that was its preferred choice of model.
