Metro fare fixation committee report to be made public soon: BMRCL Managing Director Maheshwara Rao
The Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL) broke its silence on the fare fixation committee (FFC) report, with the BMRCL managing director confirming to The Indian Express on Thursday that the report will be made public soon.
Maheshwara Rao, Managing Director, BMRCL, however, avoided questions over the delay in publishing the report and did not clarify when the report would be published.
The fare fixation committee that hiked Bengaluru metro fares comprised Justice (Retd) R Tharani, former judge of the Madras High Court, along with Satyendra Pal Singh, Additional Secretary, Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, and E V Ramana Reddy, retired IAS officer and former additional chief secretary to the Government of Karnataka.
Rao's response came after parliamentarians, including P C Mohan and Tejasvi Surya, repeatedly requested that the report be made public. Earlier, BMRCL had declined to submit the fare fixation report under the Right to Information Act.
Surya sent a second letter to Rao on Thursday on the issue. He had earlier written on the matter on April 28. In the letter, he stated, 'In the wake of the steep hike in the metro fares, public interest demands that the FFC report be made available immediately to ensure transparency and accountability. Despite the passage of considerable time and my formal request almost 10 days ago, the report has neither been published on the BMRCL website nor made accessible through any official channel. This delay stands in sharp contrast to the practices followed by other metro organisations and goes against the interest of openness and informed discourse.'
He added, 'I once again urge you to promptly release the FFC report in full, without further delay. Transparency in public service delivery is essential for building trust and credibility, especially when fare decisions directly impact lakhs of daily commuters.'
The FFC was constituted in 2024 following a request from BMRCL to the Union Government for a fare revision, as metro fares had not been revised since 2017. The Union Government directed the committee to begin functioning on September 16, 2024, with a three-month deadline to submit recommendations.
The committee studied fare revision structures of other metro systems by visiting Singapore and Hong Kong, with FFC and BMRCL officials incurring expenses of approximately Rs 12.97 lakh and Rs 12.88 lakh, respectively, for these foreign tours. The FFC visited the national capital, given Delhi Metro's status as a leading metro system in India. The committee also consulted with Chennai Metro authorities.
The committee recommended an average fare increase of 46 per cent (after a 5 per cent discount for smart card users), though BMRCL had requested a 105.15 per cent hike, equivalent to a 14.02 per cent year-on-year increase. The FFC's recommendation translated to a 6.87 per cent year-on-year increase. As a result, the maximum fare increased from Rs 60 to Rs 90 for distances exceeding 25 km, making it the costliest metro in India.
Following public backlash and a directive from Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on February 13 this year, BMRCL capped the maximum stage-wise fare increase at 71 per cent (down from 105.15 per cent for certain slabs). The revised fares took effect on February 14, addressing anomalies where fares had doubled for short distances.
BMRCL cited a 42 per cent increase in staff salaries, a 366 per cent rise in maintenance and administration costs, and a 34 per cent increase in electricity bills from 2017 to March 2024. Security costs alone amount to Rs 7 crore per month (14 per cent of the Rs 50 crore monthly operational cost). BMRCL also faces significant loan repayment commitments, with Rs 770.60 crore (including Rs 647.66 crore in loans and Rs 122.94 crore in interest) due in 2024-25, projected to rise to Rs 2,776.58 crore by 2029-30.
The fare hike also led to a 4 per cent drop in ridership (from 8.6 lakh to 8.29 lakh on February 10, 2025). By the end of February, BMRCL recorded a ridership of 2.09 crore, a 40 lakh drop from January's 2.49 crore.
Sanath Prasad is a senior sub-editor and reporter with the Bengaluru bureau of Indian Express. He covers education, transport, infrastructure and trends and issues integral to Bengaluru. He holds more than two years of reporting experience in Karnataka. His major works include the impact of Hijab ban on Muslim girls in Karnataka, tracing the lives of the victims of Kerala cannibalism, exploring the trends in dairy market of Karnataka in the aftermath of Amul-Nandini controversy, and Karnataka State Elections among others. If he is not writing, he keeps himself engaged with badminton, swimming, and loves exploring. ... Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
36 minutes ago
- United News of India
Calcutta High Court reserves verdict on petition against state's aid to dismissed non-teaching staff
Kolkata, June 9 (UNI): The Calcutta High Court on Monday reserved its judgment on a petition challenging the West Bengal government's recently introduced scheme that offers monetary assistance to non-teaching staff dismissed following a Supreme Court verdict. Justice Amrita Sinha reserved her decision on the petition, which opposes the state's plan to pay ex-gratia amounts of Rs 25,000 to Group C and Rs 20,000 to Group D employees. During the case hearing, Justice Singh questioned the state as to why the decision to grant the allowance was taken so hastily, without any discussion or scrutiny, following the Supreme Court's verdict. Justice Sinha also raised questions about the allowance amount. Addressing the state, she asked, "Why were the amounts set at Rs 15,000 and Rs 20,000? On what basis were these figures determined?" The West Bengal government had launched the scheme to provide temporary financial relief and social security on humanitarian grounds to families affected by the dismissals. The scheme applies to Group C and D non-teaching staff who were recruited through the 2016 selection process conducted by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) and have lost their jobs because of Supreme Court order. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, announcing the ex-gratia payments had said that the aid was a one-time measure aimed at supporting those left jobless after the Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in connection with the cash-for-jobs scam. The crisis began on April 3 when a Supreme Court bench led by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar upheld a Calcutta High Court order dismissing 25,753 teaching and non-teaching staff from state-run and aided schools. The apex court concluded that the entire 2016 recruitment process had been tainted by large-scale fraud and manipulation. While the court later allowed secondary school teachers (Classes IX–XII) to return to classrooms temporarily, it made no such concession for Group C and D employees. It also ordered the state to complete a fresh recruitment process by December 31. Meanwhile, the state has filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's ruling. 'Since a review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court, how long will the allowance continue to be paid?,' Justice Sinha asked. She also asked the state whether Group C and Group D employees would keep receiving the allowance without doing any work. UNI XC SSP
Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gaza-bound aid ship carrying Greta Thunberg arrives at Israeli port; activists likely to be held at detention facility
Greta Thunberg, and 11 other activists, arrived at the Ashdod port on Monday evening after Israeli forces seized the Gaza-bound aid ship 'Madleen' they were travelling on and detained them. Israel's foreign ministry confirmed the boat's arrival, with the Israeli navy's company, at the port of Ashdod on Monday evening. The ministry added that the 12 activists are undergoing a medical check-up to ensure their good health. The 12 people are likely to be held at a detention facility in Israel's Ramle city before their deportation. Meanwhile, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which operates the Madleen, alleged that the activists were "kidnapped by Israeli forces" while trying to deliver the desperately needed aid to war-torn Gaza. 'The ship was unlawfully boarded, its unarmed civilian crew abducted, and its life-saving cargo — including baby formula, food and medical supplies — confiscated,' it said in a statement. FFC added that the ship was seized in international waters about 200 kilometres from Gaza. Israel's foreign ministry, meanwhile, labelled the voyage as a "public relations stunt" and said in a post on X that "the 'selfie' yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel". The ministry added that the activists would be sent back to their homelands and the aid would be transferred to Gaza via established channels. Notably, Thunberg and the other activists set sail from Italy on the Madleen a week ago. In a pre-recorded message released after the aid ship's halt, Thunberg said, "I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible." Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard, however, said in a statement that the crew and passengers of the Gaza-bound aid ship were aware of the risks involved. She added that the ministry has advised against travel to Gaza for a decade, noting that people who disregard this advice have a clear personal responsibility. Rights group Adala said in a statement that Israel had "no legal authority" to take over the aid ship, because it was in international waters and it was headed not to Israel but to the 'territorial waters of the state of Palestine.' 'The arrest of the unarmed activists, who operated in a civilian manner to provide humanitarian aid, amounts to a serious breach of international law,' Adalah added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC slams NIA's ‘casual approach' in Darivit case
1 2 Kolkata: Criticising NIA's "casual approach" for not submitting a report in the 2018 Darivit school firing case, Calcutta High Court on Monday directed the agency to file it by July 9. On Sept 20, 2018, two youths were killed at North Dinajpur's Islampur when cops fired on people protesting against appointment of teachers at Darivit High School. The deceased were Tapas Barman and Rajesh Sarkar. Told that the informal report had not been signed yet and would take three more weeks to be submitted, a division bench of justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Reetobroto Kumar Mitra said: "I will give appropriate remarks against your officer. They have become very strong and are thinking what will the high court do. It is a casual approach. Do not justify your conduct. In 2024, you were asked to come with a report." The bench asked the NIA counsel when the charge sheet would be filed. The counsel said: "After the probe is over. It will take some time." Asked for an exact time, the counsel added: "It's a faulty probe by the state authorities. No evidence was collected." The bench also asked the victims' families why they had not accepted the Rs 2 lakh compensation. Their counsel said that the state had initially agreed to pay Rs 20 lakh to each family.
