NS&I Premium Bond winners for June 2025 announced including two £1million prizes
Premium Bonds are a savings product run by National Savings & Investment (NS&I) but instead of getting interest on your money, you're entered into a monthly prize draw
Premium Bond results for June 2025 have been release today - including the winners of two £1million prizes. The first person who is now £1million richer lives in Stockport and they hold the maximum of £50,000 in Premium Bonds.
Their winning bond 103FE583469 was purchased in November 2005. The second £1million prize has gone to one Premium Bond holder living in Edinburgh with the bond number 352AC359547.
This person also holds £50,000 in Premium Bonds and they bought their winning bond in February 2019. A total of 5,974,465 prizes worth £416,221,075 will be paid out in the June 2025 prize draw. There were 131,438,233,006 bond numbers eligible for the draw.
Have you won big on Premium Bonds and want to share your story? Let us know by emailing: mirror.money.saving@mirror.co.uk
Andrew Westhead, NS&I Retail Director, said: "A huge congratulations to our winners in Edinburgh and Stockport. It's particularly exciting to see Edinburgh celebrate its first jackpot win in eight years, while Stockport marks its second jackpot winner in Premium Bonds history.
'It's not just about the jackpot winners though. This month, ERNIE awarded over 5.9 million prizes worth more than £416 million, giving many Premium Bonds holders across the country an exciting summer boost.'
Premium Bonds are a savings product run by National Savings & Investment (NS&I) but instead of getting interest on your money, you're entered into a monthly prize draw.
The prizes start at £25 and go up to £1million - but some months, you may not win anything at all. You get a unique bond number for every £1 invested, and the maximum you can have saved in Premium Bonds is £50,000.
The odds of a bond winning each month are 22,000 to 1 for every £1 bond - but most prizes are for smaller amounts. The prize fund rate - which is described as the the nearest thing Premium Bonds has to an interest rate - is currently 3.80%
You can use the NS&I online prize checker tool, or the Premium Bonds prize checker app, to see if you've won. If you're a winner, you can have the money paid into their bank account, or reinvest it into new Premium Bonds.
You should be emailed or sent a text message from NS&I if you win. Premium Bonds are held by around 22.7 million people.
Premium Bond prizes June 2025
The below shows how much of each Premium Bond prize was distributed to winners in June 2025.
£1,000,000 - 2
£100,000 - 79
£50,000 - 159
£25,000 - 317
£10,000 - 792
£5,000 - 1,585
£1,000 - 16,649
£500 - 49,947
£100 - 1,853,552
£50 - 1,853,552
£25 - 2,197,831
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves hands herself ‘dangerous' powers to control pension pots
Rachel Reeves has granted herself 'dangerous' new powers to direct where millions of savers' pension cash is spent. The Government's Pensions Bill includes sweeping provisions that will allow the Chancellor to force pension funds to invest in private equity, debt and land in an attempt to boost the UK economy. Details of the new legislation were published on Thursday. The Government has insisted that savers' interests will always be put first, with mandating powers only serving as a backstop to ensure investment in British assets. However, Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, said: 'Legislating to allow governments to tell pension schemes how to invest is a very dangerous precedent. 'Whilst ministers offer assurances that this is just a backstop power that they hope not to use, the precedent has been set. This Government or a future government could use a power of this sort to promote their own political agendas, potentially to the detriment of pension savers.' Sir Steve, who is now a partner at Lane, Clark and Peacock (LCP), said the law left the door open to sweeping changes that could destabilise the market. The former Liberal Democrat MP said the powers could be used by a future Reform government to instruct funds to abandon 'woke' investments, including net zero, for example. Sir Steve said: 'We already have trustees whose job is to make sure that the member interest is protected, based on expert advice over things like investment strategy, and these decisions should be beyond the reach of politicians – of whatever party'. 'Very bad precedent' A so-called sunset clause in the Bill means the power to mandate investment expires at the end of 2035. However, Sir Steve pointed out that this still left the door open for a new government to instruct pension funds to invest in a whole range of assets. While a separate clause suggests a review of the powers 'must be conducted before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which the regulations come into force', Sir Steve said this would still be well into the next Parliament. 'As long as the sunset clause hasn't set, as it were, it is a power sitting there on day one. So a new government could come in, it doesn't need to consult, it doesn't need to draft legislation, and it doesn't need to spend nine months getting it through parliament. It's there and ready to run,' he said. The Bill, published on Thursday, hands the Government powers to 'prescribe' investments in 'private equity', 'private debt', 'venture capital' and 'interests in land', which it continues to say are just 'examples' of asset classes. The Government can also instruct whether those investments 'link an asset to economic activity in the United Kingdom' or even more directly are 'located in the United Kingdom'. Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform, has repeatedly said he will scrap 'net stupid zero' policies if the party forms the next government. Sir Steve said the party could use the Pensions Bill to partly reshape the investment landscape in the UK. He said: 'The Government has just given themselves powers to tell pension schemes how to invest. And these powers appear to run for at least five years from the passing of the Bill. So Nigel Farage may get to use them, right? 'So just imagine we have a Reform government that's not big on woke. And they say: oh we've got an act of parliament that already allows us to tell pension schemes they can't invest in net zero. 'The Government giving itself power to tell schemes how to invest, is just a very, very bad precedent.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Wise goes to the US. Will its founder's supercharged voting rights follow?
Back in 2021, the arrival on the London stock market of Wise, a rapidly expanding money transfer company, generated a feelgood factor at a useful moment. It came a month after overhyped Deliveroo flopped on debut. And, since Wise was a pure fintech business, as opposed to a pizza delivery outfit with an app, there was reason to think the UK might be getting its act together in the sector that politicians swoon over. Shoreditch's finest, and its Estonian founders, would show the way in UK fintech. Wise sported a £9bn valuation. Now the company wants to switch its primary listing to New York in search of a wider pool of investors, more active trading in its shares and 'a potential pathway to inclusion in major US [stock market] indices'. A secondary listing will be retained in London, but we know what usually happens. Nine-tenths of the share trading gravitates to the primary location. The obligatory description on these occasions – 'a fresh blow for London' – applies. Wise, with revenues of £1.2bn and underlying pre-tax profits of £282m, is a bad one to see succumb to the temptations of New York. Rachel Reeves may take note. The chancellor is cajoling UK pension funds to shove cash into private markets (at a moment when even private equity insiders worry that the golden years for returns could be over) but it is the public markets that are more in need of love and affection from No 11. She won't do it (almost certainly), but the first step would be to cut the UK's uncompetitive 0.5% rate of stamp duty on share purchases. There is plenty of evidence that a reduction would pay for itself in increased trading. Yet let's not overlook a weirdness about Wise's move – and an unanswered question. The oddness is that the company, now so keen on getting into a US index, never tried to enter a UK one. At flotation, its dual-class share structure meant it could not be included in FTSE indices. Why not now join the grown-ups? With a £12bn valuation these days, Wise would rank halfway up the Footsie. It would be a big fish. The danger in having the main listing in New York is that the firm will be a relative minnow in a tech pond populated by the trillion-dollar likes of Nvidia. But that's a risk its founder, Kristo Käärmann, is clearly prepared to take in pursuit of greater US visibility for 'major US growth opportunities'. Or perhaps the dual voting structure is a bigger part of the story. Wise's statement described the US listing as having 'a structure that aligns with US market practices including those of our US-listed tech peers, which we believe allows us to remain laser-focused on delivering our mission'. That sounds suspiciously like a reference to the enhanced voting rights that now allow Käärmann to own 18% of the shares but have 50% of the votes. Such unequal arrangements cause little fuss in the US, but they remain controversial in the UK, even if they are now allowed for index-inclusion purposes after a change in the rules a couple of years ago. A key point about Käärmann's supercharged rights, however, is that they are due to expire next summer under a 'sunset clause' agreed at listing. Wise could, if it wished, ask its UK shareholders for an extension but that may cause a row in itself – a sunset is meant to mean what it says. Perhaps the company thinks it is easier to wrap continued enhanced rights into a package where the main element is the change of main listing. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Käärmann offered zero clarity on whether he wants to keep his supercharged rights. 'It depends on the structure we are going to land on,' he said, adding that all would be clear in the formal circular later this month. Curious. London's acceptance of dual rights – but, critically, only with a five-year sunset clause – was meant to be a way to entice UK tech founders to list in London. It was a pointless change if it just encourages them to leave when the sun is about to set.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Young's invests to beat headwinds - as boss vows no 'blanket' hikes in price of a pint
Young's will 'invest its way out of' headwinds currently facing the hospitality sector after a major acquisition helped rapidly accelerate growth last year, according to the pub group's boss. The FTSE 250-listed group saw total revenues soar by nearly a quarter to £485.8 million in the year to 31 March, largely thanks to the £162million takeover of City Pub Group late in 2023. Young's also invested £47million developing and refurbishing its 277 pub estate, helping to drive like-for-like sales 5.7 per cent higher, while slashing net debt by £19.5million to £248.3million. Boss Simon Dodd told This is Money: 'We're not acquiring at the moment - the [City pubs takeover] accelerated our growth by about five years. 'But with the National Insurance hike and other costs that are hitting our sector, we think we should invest our way out of it; invest in our people, invest in our pubs and invest in technology.' Young's, which typically invests £50million a year, has 'a number of exciting investments' currently being rolled-out, according to Dodd, including a click-and-collect service and a loyalty platform for its growing bedroom business. Dodd has previously criticised decisions made in last year's Autumn Budget, which will see the group's cost base grow by £11million a year. 'A tough macroeconomic environment for the industry seems to have been par for the course since I became CEO and Government changes coming into effect in April make life no easier,' he told shareholders. Synergies achieved from the City Pub Group takeover have helped address some of those issues, while Young's has been able to limit the need for price hikes by utilising its own staff agency in addition to other cost savings. Dodd had previously highlighted research that suggested Autumn Budget changes could result in the price of a pint rising by 20p. But he said on Wednesday the group would continue to avoid 'blanket' price hikes across its estate and maintain an annual increase of 2 to 2.5 per cent in total. Dodds added: 'We will do it on a pub-by-pub basis, some pubs won't see an increase and some pubs will charge a little bit more. 'We don't believe you can price your way out of this in terms of volume, we grew our drinks business by about 3.5 per cent in volume – we're one of the only pub companies to grow volumes. 'We have to take a cautious approach to both value and volume.' Young's 'scale and size' and 'more importantly' its strong presence in the South East of England are crucial factors in weathering the storm currently facing the sector, according to Dodd, with central London sales alone up 16 per cent on a like-for-like basis last year. He added: 'London continues to lead the way in terms of growth, West London was up 10 per cent and, our heartland, South West London, was up 6 per cent. 'London is definitely alive and kicking and is driving phenomenal growth for us as a business.' Asked how the Government could improve conditions for the sector, Dodd said: 'The one ask we will continue to ask from the Government is business rate reform. 'We bang on about it every year, but it hasn't happened yet, and that could be a real stimulus for the sector.'
