May Is Over, The Mayhem Is Not, And Markets Are Muddled
Tariff volatility continues to dominate financial markets. The RBNZs latest statement alone mentioned the word uncertain, or some or a form of it, 164 times across their 60 or so page statement.
Tariff volatility continues to dominate markets and the outlook. We're far from any resolution. And the fragility of the global economy poses significant risk to our recovery here at home.
Aware of all the risks, the RBNZ cut the cash rate to 3.25% last week. And despite the uncertain path ahead, there's more cuts coming. That's the key takeaway from the May MPS.
Our COTW takes a look at the curious sell off in Kiwi rates following the RBNZ policy decision.
Here's our take on current events
After a hectic month marked by a whirlwind of trade escalations and de-escalations, the Government's budget release, and last week's RBNZ Monetary Policy Statement, May has officially come to a close. The mayhem, however, is far from over. Tariff volatility continues to dominate financial markets. Whether it's the ongoing legal battle between the Trump administration and the courts over the legality of the 'Liberation Day' tariffs, or the renewed tensions between the US and China – with each side accusing the other of violating their trade truce – or the proverbial (not literal!) shots aimed at the European Union, the economic landscape remains incredibly fragile.
There's a lot of noise right now. And it's hard for everyone, including policymakers, to make sense of it all. The RBNZ's latest statement alone mentioned the word uncertain, or some or a form of it, 164 times across their 60 or so page statement. That's about 3 mentions a page…
Nevertheless, the RBNZ delivered on expectations and delivered another 25bps cut. The cash rate sits at 3.25%. And there's more cuts coming. That's the key takeaway from the May MPS. Although the path from here is highly uncertain.
The OCR track was lowered from a flat lined bottom of 3.10% to a 2.85% trough in March 2026. So now another 25bps cut to 3% is fully baked into the cake. And from there, there's a 60% chance of another 25bps cut to 2.75%. Once again, we would love to have seen a bit more. We're still of the view that a 2.5% cash rate is what the Kiwi economy needs. And an OCR track bottoming anywhere below 2.75% would have signalled what we had hoped to see.
But with each MPS, the terminal OCR has moved closer to our 2.5% view. Give them time, and they just might get there. But for now, such heightened uncertainty is making it harder for all policymakers to navigate. So, it's not surprising to see the committee err on the side of caution. The fact the RBNZ 'voted' 5-1, with one member opting for a pause to assess, throws some doubt on the timing of the next move, but not the direction. They are not on a 'pre-set course', and always data dependent. We think there's enough for them to cut again in July, but they may wait until August to cut again. It depends… on what? Everything.
All in all, we think there was a bit in the May MPS for everyone, dove or hawk. The RBNZ's forecasts were markedly revised lower. The expected Kiwi economic recovery is forecast to be slower than projected in the February MPS with the RBNZ now forecasting 0.7% growth this year, down from 1%. And greater spare capacity than previously modelled also sees unemployment stay higher for longer. You can't ignore that. And that's the dovish part.
The hawkish part lies in the dissenting 5-1 vote and the accompanying hawkish tone in post MPS media conferences. Comments from Hawkesby including the statement that the Committee will have 'no clear bias' heading into the July meeting, injected a dose of uncertainty. And together, these seeds of doubt gave markets something to run with. Rates, particularly in the short end saw a sizeable jolt higher (see our COTW for move on the move in markets). But we think markets, as they so often do, have gotten a bit carried away. Time will tell.
Charts of the Week: A less dovish, highly uncertain, RBNZ bias generated a mixed reaction in markets.
If you just read the statement, the RBNZ's easing bias was strengthened. The economic forecasts were cut, and another 25bp rate cut was inserted into the OCR track (from a low of 3.1% to 2.85%). The track shows a clear bias to cut to at least 3% and there's a 60% chance of a cut to 2.75%. That's dovish. Because they're still cutting. Our first chart shows with each MPS over the last year, the terminal OCR has moved closer to our 2.5% view. Give them time, and they just might get there.
The FX market read the statement. The Kiwi currency barely moved. The Kiwi currency reacted exactly as you'd expect. It fell. It rose. And then it fell again. It looked like a heart rate monitor around .5950. There wasn't much change at all. There are bigger issues offshore for currency traders to grapple with.
If you listened to the press conference, the RBNZ's top brass were crystal clear in their clouded uncertainty. Heightened uncertainty is making it harder for all policymakers to navigate. So, it's not surprising to see the committee err on the side of caution. The fact the RBNZ 'voted' 5-1, with one member voting for a pause to assess, throws some doubt on the timing of the next move, but not the direction. They are not on a 'pre-set course', and always data dependent. We think there's enough for them to cut again in July, but they may wait until August to cut again. It depends… on what? Everything.
It was the 'vote', the first time in two years, that got interest rate traders (re)thinking. That seed of doubt caused a bit of a jolt, especially short end interest rates. The pivotal 2-year swap rate rose 10bps, from 3.16% to 3.26% (now 3.32%), as the implied terminal cash rate lifted from 2.85% to 2.95% (now 3%). See the second chart. It's not a big move… but it was one Governor Christian Hawkesby pushed back on. The telling comment from Hawkesby, when asked about the market reaction, was his reference to the new OCR track matching market pricing prior to the announcement. The RBNZ's OCR track matched market pricing of 2.85%. So they would not have expected much reaction at all.
We believe we are seeing some profit taking in wholesale rates markets. Hedge funds would have placed some bets that the RBNZ may have come out a lot more dovish.
We think the market will settle down, and end up moving back down to 2.85%, in time (and depending on what happens in offshore markets). And then, we expect another move by markets and the RBNZ down to 2.5%.
Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
33 minutes ago
- Techday NZ
Exclusive: ServiceNow calls for bold AI adoption to boost national productivity
Kate Tulp, New Zealand Country Manager for ServiceNow, is calling on Kiwi businesses to embrace generative AI and automation at an enterprise level, warning that having a "watch and wait" mindset is no longer a viable strategy. During a recent interview with TechDay, Tulp highlighted how partnerships and AI-powered tools can help both government and enterprise unlock productivity in a tight economic climate. "It's a core part of the strategy," she said, when asked about ServiceNow's recent partnership with Datacom. "Datacom absolutely is somebody that you should be talking to, we managed to bring them on as a partner at the start of last year and it's going really well." The partnership marks a strategic expansion for ServiceNow, which has quadrupled the size of its local team over the past four years. "We've gone from very small to averagely sized, and we will keep growing," she added. Two ends of the AI mindset According to Tulp, businesses in Aotearoa are currently split between early adopters and more cautious observers when it comes to AI. "There's one end which is like, 'Whoa, let's go, I've jumped in the pool,'" she said. "And then there's the other side, like, 'This is scary, I'm going to watch nine other people swim.'" She acknowledged New Zealand's traditionally risk-averse culture and strong governance frameworks, but argued this "should be seen as a strength." "We've already got the guardrails here. We've got legislation, regulation, privacy laws, we've got great governance," she said. "Now we've got this incredible technology moment that we can have as a country. I cannot be more excited for New Zealand taking advantage of this." AI as disruption, not transformation While many in the tech industry continue to tout "digital transformation," Tulp prefers to frame the shift in terms of disruption - and not in a negative sense. "We should really think about, how can I disrupt my own business in a really positive way that generates greater productivity, greater profit, helps me engage in markets that I haven't been in before, helps me scale up when I need to without risk." She cited one insurance customer's real-life example during Cyclone Gabrielle. Faced with thousands of flood claims over a weekend, one employee built an AI-powered solution that helped the business triage and process claims in record time. "It was literally one dude who went home and decided to try to do something over the weekend to make a difference for customers," she said. "I'm pretty sure we'd give them a national parade in New Zealand, right?" Are digital employees here? With AI agents now widely integrated into ServiceNow's platform, Tulp sees them not as tools but as digital workers that need to be managed like any other employee. "Everything that you would provide to your employee to make sure they're awesome and happy and effective, you should definitely think about that for digital agents as well." That includes onboarding, training, performance feedback, and compliance. "If they don't play well with others, if you don't know how they're engaging, you're going to get clunkiness, dissatisfaction, customers leaving - same thing with agents." To support this, ServiceNow has built tools like Agent Orchestrator and Agent Control Tower, allowing enterprises to manage multiple AI agents across platforms and maintain visibility over operations. AI maturity slipping Recent data from ServiceNow's Data Maturity Index - while focused on Australia - paints a cautionary picture that Tulp believes applies to New Zealand as well. "Our AI maturity is actually dropping year on year," she said. The reason? Too much experimentation and not enough enterprise-grade implementation. "We definitely need to stop thinking that we're in the trial or the demo or the experiment phase," she explained. "This is full-fledged, out-in-production, running enterprise stuff." The alternative, she warned, is irrelevance. "It's no longer optional. It's an actual market-driven, board-driven imperative to crack on with this stuff." Automation still a major opportunity While AI is making headlines, Tulp noted that billions of dollars in value remain in "straight-out automation" - including streamlining routine IT processes. She described how ServiceNow's platform can already handle common support issues like a slow laptop, automatically troubleshooting, ordering a replacement, and shipping it to where the user is working - all without human intervention. "It knows what kind of worker you are, how much you can spend, asks if you need a keyboard or a mouse or a bag, that is all entirely possible today," she said. A call for ambition "There's a massive weight given to risk and fear as opposed to opportunity and excitement," Tulp said. "Could we shift it up for ourselves and put the good news up front?" She believes New Zealand's size, governance, and collaborative nature are strengths - if the country is bold enough to act. "There's an actual moment here where everyone's learning at the same time," she said. "If you leap in and get back into it, then I think that could be very cool for New Zealand."
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Countries are making promises to Trump, while leaving the difficult to achieve detail for later
'This is new, and generally that's because in trade agreements you want things that are clear and enforceable,' said David Goldwyn, a former US diplomat and Energy Department official. 'These energy commitments are neither clear nor necessarily enforceable. They're more aspirational, political encouragements.' The European Union, for example, committed to purchase US$750 billion in US energy products — including crude oil, natural gas and other petroleum derivatives — over three years. On an annual basis, that would amount to more than three times the amount the bloc bought last year from the US. The EU has been buying more American gas since Russia, previously a big supplier, attacked Ukraine in 2022, and there is appetite to buy more. But purchasing US$250b a year would require the bloc to use the US as essentially its only supplier. 'They would have to not buy from anybody else, and that would just be an enormous amount of dependency on one country, whether it's us or anybody else,' said Jason Feer, an analyst at the energy and ship brokerage Poten and Partners. 'And the whole premise of modern energy systems, energy supply, is you always want some diversity.' Conversely, US$250b is around 80% of the total amount that the US exported to the entire world in 2025, according to a ClearView Energy Partners analysis of federal data. Plants are coming online that will double the country's natural gas export capacity by 2030, and stocks in export companies like Cheniere and Venture Global climbed after the deal was announced. In the near term, sending significantly more to the EU may mean sending less to customers elsewhere in the world. Even if these quantities made economic sense, the EU cannot compel private companies in its member countries to buy so much. And the US Government doesn't have the power to tell its oil and gas companies where to sell. The challenge of holding a government to a purchase commitment made in a trade deal became apparent in Trump's first term. He persuaded China, an economy tightly steered by the Government, to agree to buy certain amounts of energy and agricultural goods. Most of those targets were not met, and there were no consequences. Typical trade pacts have protocols that allow either side to enforce pledges like commitments to buy energy; they usually even lay out remedies for violations. None of those exist in Trump's agreements. When asked how the US would react if the EU didn't meet its energy purchase target after three years, a White House official said that the response would be higher tariffs. It is not yet clear what the trade agreement with the US will mean for the EU's ability to meet its climate targets. A 2021 law requires member nations to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions 55% below 1990 levels by 2030. In the short term, more gas could help with that by supplanting coal. Purchasing too much gas could end up squeezing out clean power sources such as wind and solar. Before the trade deal, the continent's overall gas demand was expected to decline in the coming years. 'It is possible that it would displace some deployment of renewables,' said Joseph Majkut, director of the energy security and climate change programme at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. 'But the reality is that the EU has very firm climate commitments enshrined in law.' The parties could, potentially, hit US$750b with tricky accounting. The EU members could purchase tankers full of oil or gas but not use it all and instead resell it to other buyers around the world. They could also make long-term purchase commitments that look like very large numbers when they're announced, but in practice are realised over, say, 20 years. 'To do that involves using something we respectfully call political maths,' said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners. 'Some of the best tools of diplomacy involve ambiguity.' So far, the EU's energy purchase commitment is as specific as Trump's trade deals have got. The framework for Japan, for example, is much more vague. That leaves even more room for interpretation. A White House fact sheet on the Japan deal trumpets a 'major expansion' of US energy exports, and says the US$550b in US investment that Japan pledged would be partly focused on 'energy infrastructure and production'. That is probably a reference to the proposed US$44b infrastructure project that would bring gas from the North Slope of Alaska to an export terminal. From there, it could be shipped to Asia. Right now, however, there are cheaper sources available on America's gulf coast that are connected to gas fields with many years of supply left. It's also not clear how much value there is in signing multidecade purchase agreements when Japan has also committed to reducing its consumption of fossil fuels. The same logic applies for South Korea. It began to buy natural gas from the US in 2017, when the country was trying to phase out nuclear energy. Signing long-term agreements didn't work out as well as hoped: An explosion at a gas terminal in Texas in 2022 interrupted supply, leaving less gas available to buy and raising prices sharply. That's why Michelle Kim, an energy specialist at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, argues that buying gas as needed, rather than committing to a multiyear deal with US exporters, would give South Korea more flexibility as it managed declining demand for gas. 'It's not a good and wise decision to make another long-term contract,' Kim said. If the US presses ahead to drastically increase its exports, there could also be ramifications for America's own energy market. As long as enough infrastructure exists to move it around, fuel generally flows to the highest bidder. With more gas going overseas and powering data centres for artificial intelligence, domestic prices are likely to rise, said Aneesh Prabhu, a managing director at S&P Global Ratings. That impact could worsen in the coming years, since Trump and congressional Republicans cut subsidies for wind and solar deployment passed during the Biden Administration. 'Because of the loss of tax credits, or at least a significant erosion of it, you could have a slowdown in renewables, which means there would be more draw on gas,' Prabhu said. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Lydia DePillis and Rebecca F. Elliott Photograph by: Tierney L. Cross ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Demand for supermarket beauty products is growing, here's what Kiwi shoppers are adding to their trolley
While in New Zealand to tour his stage show, the host of The Graham Norton show staged a surprise tasting of his wine range at Woolworths Mt Roskill. Video / Alyse Wright Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Demand for supermarket beauty products is growing, here's what Kiwi shoppers are adding to their trolley With inflation on the rise it seems like everything is costing more at the shops, retailers say it's impacting what we're buying, but also where we're buying from. New Zealand's leading supermarkets report a growth in their beauty sales, with more people picking up mascara alongside their macaroni. A spokesperson for Foodstuffs, the grocery co-operative behind New World, Pak'nSave, and Four Square told the Herald while the grocery category remains flat year on year across both North and South co-ops, it has seen slight growth in the beauty and personal care category of its North Island co-op over the past year, driven mainly by sales from Pak'nSave stores. Their purchasing patterns show shoppers are actively seeking out value, 'buying in bulk, opting for mainstream brands, and using unit pricing to stretch their budgets further'. A Woolworths spokesperson said to meet demand for its beauty products the supermarket chain is 'bringing more variety into our stores, offering customers more choice in our personal and beauty care categories'.
