‘Freedom Of Speech Not Absolute': SC's Message Went Beyond Samay Raina, Hemant Malviya, Wajahat Khan
Comic Samay Raina, cartoonist Hemant Malviya, Wajahat Khan hearings: Over the past two days, SC heard three cases related to freedom of expression, giving one clear message
Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, allowing citizens to freely express their ideas and opinions. However, then comes Article 19(2) which reminds that the freedom is not absolute. It permits the government to impose reasonable restrictions in the interest of sovereignty, state security, public order, decency, morality, and other concerns to maintain balance and protect public interest.
Over the past two days, the Supreme Court (SC) heard three cases related to freedom of expression. The circumstances in the three and the redress sought were different, but the SC had one common message.
Five social media influencers, including 'India's Got Latent' host Samay Raina, on Tuesday appeared before the Supreme Court in a case seeking action against them for ridiculing persons suffering from disabilities. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi recorded the presence of the social media influencers and asked them to file their replies to the petition.
The top court asked Attorney General R Venkataramani, appearing for the Centre, to prepare social media guidelines by keeping a balance of freedom of speech and expression and rights and duties of others. It said that the freedom of one person should not violate the rights of others and flagged that enforceability of these guidelines is the most difficult part.
The apex court asked Attorney General R Venkataramani, representing the Centre, to prepare social media guidelines while balancing the freedom of speech and expression and the rights and duties of others. Venkataramani sought time to assist the court on the issue and said the enforceability of guidelines would require detailed consideration. 'What we are doing is for posterity. You have to ensure that not a single word is misused by anyone. You have to ensure balance. We have to protect citizens' rights. A framework must be there that the dignity of anyone is not violated," the bench said.
The top court was hearing a petition filed by M/s Cure SMA Foundation seeking a prohibition on the broadcast of derogatory and denigrating content on the digital media against persons with disability. The SC asked the influencers to appear again in-person on the next date of the hearing of the case.
'Kisi ko kuch bhi bol do': SC on cartoonist Hemant Malviya who uploaded cartoons of PM Modi, RSS workers
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted interim protection from arrest to Indore-based cartoonist Hemant Malviya, who is accused of uploading 'objectionable" cartoons of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and workers of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on social media.
The case was being heard by a bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Aravind Kumar. While granting the cartoonist protection, the Supreme Court remarked that it was not okay to make any statement against anyone. 'Kisi ko kuch bhi bol do (Say anything to anyone). They want to become heroes," the bench said.
Advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for the cartoonist, said, 'The person can have a critical opinion about things, it does not constitute an offence…"
In response, Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj remarked, 'The manner in which he has done, is clearly an offence." Justice Dhulia said one of the posts by the cartoonist is 'very, very offensive". 'What is happening today, all kinds of statements are being made. The language they use. There are some among the lawyer community also doing this. We will have to do something on this," Justice Dhulia remarked.
Denying his request on Monday, the bench had said, 'This freedom of speech is being abused by this cartoonist, stand-up comedians."
'Learn to control tongue and words…else govt will have to intervene': SC on Wajahat Khan
While hearing a case related to Wajahat Khan, the 30-year-old co-founder of the Rashidi Foundation, the Supreme Court on Monday said that there is freedom of speech, but this does not mean that anyone can say anything. 'Every person should learn to control his tongue and his words, especially on social media."
Khan had filed a complaint against social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli over alleged defamatory social media posts. However, as his own old tweets surfaced, cases were filed against him in many states. Khan moved the SC, asking the cases to be clubbed.
Khan's lawyer said that the tweets he made were just a reaction, but the court clearly asked, 'Why did you repeat the same mistake?"
The court was told that he had made objectionable comments about those who worship Kamakhya Devi. The court expressed displeasure over this and said that responsibility is necessary before posting anything on social media. 'At times, people think they have the freedom to say anything on social media, but when it is misused, the matter reaches the court. This increases the pressure on the courts. The police also loses focus from the real cases. If people do not control their words, then the government will have to intervene. Nobody wants the government to keep interrupting every time. If mutual brotherhood and understanding remains in the society, then such hateful talks will reduce."
The Supreme Court gave relief to Khan and has sought a response from the state government, but made it clear that this matter is not limited to just one person, but it is a big issue related to the responsibility of all citizens and the right use of social media.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
freedom of speech freedom of speech and expression Samay Raina supreme court
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
6 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
The racist penalty of Western visa regimes
Sudanese climate activist Roaa should have been leading meetings with other youth advocates at a United Nations climate conference in Germany in June. Instead, the 24-year-old was at home, having wasted hundreds of dollars and nearly two months preparing for a visa that was denied in less than 48 hours. Many of her peers, mostly from the Global North, flew into the city of Bonn without a hitch. 'I was the one who was leading the whole process, but I wasn't on the ground. I cried a lot, like literally every night,' Roaa, who asked that her surname and location not be published, told Context. 'Knowing everyone is there (at Bonn), but you are not there maybe because of your nationality gives you a very bad feeling, like I'm less than those people,' she said from her home in the Middle East after leaving Sudan in 2023 when civil war began. Stricter border and visa rules are increasingly limiting the participation of nationals from the Global South in high-level talks that tackle climate, global health, economic systems, conflicts and other pressing issues, policy researchers say. 'We are the ones who are affected the most, but we are not in the room,' said Roaa, a medical student. 'Most of the conferences happen in Europe and in the US. They are talking on behalf of us.' The rejections also have an economic cost. In 2024, Africans paid some 60 million euros ($70.10 million) for rejected Schengen visa applications, up from nearly 54 million euros in 2023, according to analysis by Britain-based research group LAGO Collective. Despite its lower volume of visa applications compared to other continents, Africa had some of the highest rejection rates from the European Commission, which issues Schengen visas for short visits to the European Union, the data showed. In recent years, far-right and populist parties have made gains in places like Italy, Sweden, Germany and the US, fuelling anti-immigrant policies across Western countries, where most global conferences are held. Underrepresented Nations most vulnerable to climate impacts, from flooding to droughts and rising seas, are often among the poorest, the least polluting and underrepresented at global talks, according to UN climate body, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The UNFCCC, which hosts the Bonn summit and November's COP30 climate conference in Brazil, said it had no sway on visa processes, but had taken steps to diversify participation at its events by boosting the quota for Global South delegates. 'The major international conferences are the places where big decisions are being made with respect to global commitments,' said Kathryn Nwajiaku-Dahou, director of politics and governance at Britain-based think-tank ODI Global. If those who are expected to implement global policies 'are not at the table', it compounds the inequalities they have been campaigning to change, said Nwajiaku-Dahou. Despite providing details of her job, university studies, financial accounts and letters of support to attend the UNFCCC summit, Roaa was told she did not submit sufficient evidence to prove she would return home from Germany. Roaa said she was denied the visa even after an appeal. The European Commission said in emailed comments that cases are assessed according to the 'purpose of stay, sufficient means of subsistence, and the applicants' will to return to their country of residence'. Not fair Ugandan HIV/AIDS youth advocate Joseph Robert Linda said he secured around $4,000 from sponsors to pay for flights, visa and hotel fees to attend last year's International AIDS Conference in Munich, Germany, only for his visa to be rejected. Linda said he was told there were 'reasonable doubts' about the authenticity of his documents and his intention to leave Germany, leading to his visa refusal. 'That was not fair at all to me because they gave me feedback just three to four days before the conference, so there is no way I could appeal,' the 28-year-old said in a phone call. Although the majority of global diseases occur in poorer countries, where around 80% of the world's population live, only 4% of health summits were held in these regions, according to a 2021 paper by Harvard Medical School researchers that reviewed more than 100 conferences spanning three decades. Between 1997 to 2019, just 39% of health conferences analysed had attendees from developing countries, the study published in BMJ Global Health journal added. While Linda was able to attend the conference virtually, he said that option required stable and affordable internet, something not available to people in many parts of the world. He said conference organisers should work more closely with authorities to get visas approved so more people can have their voices heard. Geneva-based group International AIDS Society, which runs the International AIDS Conference, said it has been switching its host city since 2023 after many delegates were unable to attend the year prior in Canada due to visa issues. Large conferences have to prioritise finding safe and welcoming spaces for 'the most marginalised among us', an International AIDS Society spokesperson said. Sudanese medical student Saida, who was refused a visa to attend a medical workshop in Italy this month, said it was ultimately up to Global South citizens to keep demanding change. 'You have to speak up ... This is a pattern that we see happening and that's something that needs to be changed,' said Saida, who also asked that her surname not be published.
India Today
6 minutes ago
- India Today
Trinamool claims Delhi Police called Bengali a Bangladeshi language, BJP retorts
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and her party, the Trinamool Congress (TMC), on Sunday went ballistic against the Delhi Police for allegedly addressing Bangla as a "Bangladeshi" language. She also accused the Centre of using "anti-Constitutional language to insult and humiliate Bengali- speaking people".The Trinamool chief shared a letter purportedly written by the Lodhi Colony Police Station and was addressed to the Banga Bhawan in Delhi with the subject line reading "Translation of documents containing text written in Bangladeshi language-regarding".advertisementThe purported letter was written by the police to apprise the Banga Bhawan about the arrest of eight suspected Bangladeshi nationals illegally living in India without any valid documents. India Today TV could not verify the authenticity of the purported letter."See now how Delhi police under the direct control of Ministry of Home, Government of India is describing Bengali as " Bangladeshi" language! Bengali, our mother tongue, the language of Rabindranath Tagore and Swami Vivekananda, the language in which our National Anthem and the National Song (the latter by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay) are written, the language in which crores of Indians speak and write, the language which is sanctified and recognised by the Constitution of India, is now described as a Bangladeshi language!!" the West Bengal Chief Minister sent out a scathing the Delhi Police's alleged reference "scandalous, insulting, anti- national, unconstitutional", the Trinamool Congress Supremo added, "This insults all Bengali-speaking people of India. They cannot use this kind of language which degrades and debases us all. We urge immediate strongest possible protests from all against the anti-Bengali Government of India who are using such anti-Constitutional language to insult and humiliate the Bengali- speaking people of India".The picture of the letter shared by Mamata Banerjee also had another part of it highlighted in yellow, which read, "The identification document contains texts written in Bangladeshi and are needed to be translated to Hindi and English. Now for the investigation to proceed further, it is requested that an official translator/interpreter proficient in Bangladeshi national language may kindly be provided for the aforesaid purpose".Calling the purported letter an attempt to "defame Bengal", Trinamool MP Abhishek Banerjee also attacked the Centre, saying, "For months now, Bengali-speaking people have been targeted, harassed and detained across BJP-ruled states. Now, in a shocking escalation, @DelhiPolice has officially referred to Bangla, as a "Bangladeshi language" in an official letter".He accused the government of trying to undermine the Bangla cultural identity and equate West Bengal with Bangladesh for "narrow political propaganda".advertisementEchoeing her senior party leaders, Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra lashed out at the BJP government in the Centre, demanded an apology by the Delhi Police and sought strict action against the officer concerned. She also attacked the Central and Delhi governments over the crackdown against illegal said it was not a clerical mistake but a calculated action by the BJP and the Centre to delegitimise Bengali and Bengal's linguistic REBUTS TRINAMOOL'S CLAIMSThe BJP reacted strongly to the Trinamool Congress's claims and accused Mamata Banerjee of fanning enmity between people of different cultures by "weaponising language"."It is beyond shameful that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is defending a lawful police action against illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators by weaponising language and stoking sentiment. Let us be absolutely clear: all illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators and Rohingyas will be dealt with strictly, as per the law of the land," BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya tweeted."No political grandstanding or vote-bank politics will come in the way of protecting India's sovereignty and national security. Of all people, Mamata Banerjee should know this," he added.- Ends
Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Journalist Sneha Barve gets fresh death threats, CPJ urges CM Devendra Fadnavis to act against accused
Three weeks after the brutal assault while reporting on illegal construction near Pune, journalist Sneha Barve has received fresh death threats. The threats were reportedly issued on July 24. Now, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has urged Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to take immediate action to protect the journalist. 'It is outrageous that journalist Sneha Barve, who was nearly killed for exposing wrongdoing, has been threatened once again, while the main suspect in her assault walks free,' said Kunāl Majumder, CPJ's India representative, reported 'Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis must urgently guarantee Sneha Barve's safety to send a clear message that attacks on the press will not be tolerated and ensure those responsible are swiftly prosecuted,' Majumder also said. According to CPJ report, Prashant Pandurang Morde – an accused in the assault case, accosted Barve outside her office in Manchar, Pune district and threatened her, saying: 'This time, we should finish the matter for good.' On July 18, Prashant Morde - son of key accused Pandurang Sakharam Morde, went to the office of Barve's father and threatened to harm the entire family, the journalist told CPJ. Barve is the founder of YouTube-based news channel 'Samarth Bharat Pariwar'. On July 4, she was attacked by a group of men while she was reporting on alleged illegal construction on disputed land in Manchar. The incident was caught on camera. Its viral video sparked outrage among the people. The National Commission for Women (NCW) had taken suo motu cognisance of the shocking incident. NCW Chairperson Vijay Rahatkar strongly condemned the attack and directed the concerned police officials to conduct a fair and time-bound investigation into the matter. She had also instructed authorities to ensure that the main accused is arrested and that the survivor is provided with appropriate medical and psychological assistance.
