
Where Is The Inflation We Feared From Tariffs?
This week's CPI report showed a modest uptick in the Core number, which excludes volatile food and energy categories. On one hand, at 3.1%, it's the highest reading since February and above any level seen in the 25 pre-pandemic years between 1995 and 2021, and it's still not close to the Fed's 2% target. But this is hardly runaway inflation. The subsequent PPI report sparked slightly more concern coming higher than expected, but it was growing at even higher annual percentage changes last December through February, well before the tariffs.
So, are tariffs as bad as analysts first feared? The answer: not quite, and not yet. But this may be because tariffs are nowhere close to the very high levels that make headlines.
The Effective Tariff Rate Tells The Story
Tariffs actually paid by U.S. importers are far lower than the headline rates set by the administration. In June, U.S. Customs collected $23.6 billion in duties on $258 billion in imports for consumption (which excludes imported goods still in warehouses). This works out to an effective tariff rate of about 9%. This is higher than the 2.3% rate from a year ago but still well below the official rates set for any country. Goods from China, for example, have a current rate of 30%, Mexico 25% and Canada 35% - the nominal rates at the time of this writing for the U.S. main trading partners. This may reflect the fact that some goods are exempt, such as USMCA-compliant goods and certain steel products and auto parts.
Timing and Inventory Strategies
More importantly, many importers are absorbing the costs of tariffs rather than passing them on to consumers—at least for now. That may not last long, and ultimately the public will bear the cost. In addition, some importers stockpiled goods ahead of tariff implementation, leading to a visible spike and subsequent drop in imports before and after 'Liberation Day.' And yet others may be holding off on imports until negotiations reach a definitive outcome, because the process has certainly been halting and confusing.
These three factors don't affect the effective tariff rate, but they do influence when and how costs show up in consumer prices.
The Debate: One-Time Shock or Persistent Inflation?
Economists also disagree on whether tariffs fuel ongoing inflation or simply cause a one-time price jump. James Bullard, former St. Louis Fed president and another name in the growing list of possible candidates to succeed Fed chair Jerome Powell, favors the one-time shock view. If a $100 import now costs $120 due to tariffs, prices have jumped, but they're not rising continuously.
But, if wages don't rise to match those jumps, consumer spending could fall and slow the economy. This, incidentally, could lead to more persistent inflation if demand for higher wages (to keep up with the higher costs) drives up the cost of labor. This is how wage-price spirals start and represent a big headache for the Fed.
Bottom Line
It's too soon to declare that tariffs won't cause inflation. The current effective tariff rate is still low, and that suggests that more price pressures lies ahead. Pre-tariff inventories will eventually run out, and companies absorbing costs are unlikely to keep doing so. And if tariffs only cause a one-time jump in prices, weaker purchasing power could slow the economy.
For now, stock markets remain optimistic, buoyed by modest inflation and a still-strong economy. But history shows that such optimism can fade quickly. It would not be the first time that investors find themselves disappointed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dialog Group Berhad (KLSE:DIALOG) Could Be Struggling To Allocate Capital
If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. Although, when we looked at Dialog Group Berhad (KLSE:DIALOG), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. The formula for this calculation on Dialog Group Berhad is: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.019 = RM132m ÷ (RM8.6b - RM1.7b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). So, Dialog Group Berhad has an ROCE of 1.9%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Energy Services industry average of 11%. View our latest analysis for Dialog Group Berhad In the above chart we have measured Dialog Group Berhad's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Dialog Group Berhad . How Are Returns Trending? On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Dialog Group Berhad doesn't inspire confidence. Over the last five years, returns on capital have decreased to 1.9% from 9.2% five years ago. And considering revenue has dropped while employing more capital, we'd be cautious. If this were to continue, you might be looking at a company that is trying to reinvest for growth but is actually losing market share since sales haven't increased. In Conclusion... In summary, we're somewhat concerned by Dialog Group Berhad's diminishing returns on increasing amounts of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 49% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere. If you'd like to know about the risks facing Dialog Group Berhad, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should be aware of. If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BNP Paribas Exane Upgrades Novo Nordisk (NVO) to Neutral from Underperform
Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) is one of the top cheap stocks that will go to the moon according to Reddit. On August 13, BNP Paribas Exane upgraded Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) to Neutral from Underperform with a $54 price target. An elderly couple receiving insulin from a pharmacist, representing healthcare company's successful pharmaceutical products. The firm told investors that it sees a more balanced risk/reward now that the company's 'reality' is better reflected in the shares. Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) announced results for the January 1 to June 30 period on August 6, reporting an operating profit growth of 25% in Danish kroner and 29% at constant exchange rates (CER) to DKK 72.2 billion. Management also stated that sales in US Operations rose by 16% in Danish kroner (17% at CER), while sales in International Operations grew by 16% in Danish kroner (19% at CER). Novo Nordisk A/S (NYSE:NVO) is a global healthcare company specializing in diabetes care. It develops, discovers, manufactures, and markets pharmaceutical products. Its operations are divided into two business segments: biopharmaceuticals and diabetes and obesity care. The latter segment covers GLP-1, insulin, and other protein-related products. While we acknowledge the potential of XXXX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says no imminent plans to penalize China for buying Russian oil
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks." Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. The president last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, Trump has not taken similar action against China. He was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. "Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Chinese President Xi Jinping's slowing economy will suffer if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Xi and Trump are working on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data