Hungary set to restrict constitutional rights in 'Easter cleanup'
Since his return to power in 2010, Hungary's nationalist leader has widely restricted the rights of the LGBTQ community, the media, courts and academia.
In mid-March, he referred to critics as "stink bugs", vowing that an "Easter cleanup" was coming.
The constitutional amendment -- which proclaims that people can only be male or female -- to be voted on Monday echoes moves on gender by Orban's "dear friend", US President Donald Trump.
The amendment also allows the "temporary" stripping of citizenship from some dual or multiple nationals, which could target billionaire George Soros, a Hungarian-American and a regular subject of populist conspiracy theories.
Lawmakers are scheduled to vote shortly after 5:00 pm (1500 GMT), with Orban's Fidesz and its smaller coalition partner holding a comfortable two-thirds majority.
Small liberal party Momentum has called for the parliamentary building to be blockaded, and scheduled a protest for after the vote.
Thousands of people have already protested recent legislative changes to facilitate the banning of an annual Pride Parade this June.
- Raft of changes -
Besides the provision proclaiming that people can only be male or female, another declares that children's rights for their "proper physical, mental and moral development take precedence over all other fundamental rights," except the right to life.
That provision is seen as a way to strengthen the legal foundations for the prohibition of the Pride march.
Another prominent provision empowers the government to temporarily strip Hungarian citizenship from dual or multiple nationals -- even if they acquired their naionalities by birth.
The governing party suggested the move is aimed at "speculators" financing "bogus NGOs, bought politicians and the so-called independent media" from abroad.
A related piece of legislation -- to be voted on at a later date -- specifies that Hungarian citizenship can be suspended for a maximum of 10 years and those affected can be expelled from the country.
Nationals from other EU member states would be exempt, together with a few other countries in Europe, according to the proposal.
Last week, more than 30 prominent Hungarian legal experts castigated the measure as "an unprecedented construction in international law" that could be contrary to binding human rights conventions.
- 'Soft Putinism' -
Critics say the proposed legal changes further erode democratic rights in the central European country, moving the EU member state even closer to the kind of authoritarianism seen under Russia's President Vladimir Putin.
"You could consider this soft Putinism," Szabolcs Pek, chief analyst at the think tank Iranytu Intezet, told AFP.
"People are not falling out of the window, but the government is increasingly limiting the space for opposition politicians, journalists and civil society," he said.
Politically, the measures are seen as an effort to shore up dwindling support for the ruling coalition, divide the opposition along ideological lines, and court the far right ahead of next spring's parliamentary election.
Orban's legislative "boisterousness" is a bid to take back control of the public agenda, according to Pek.
"In this respect, he has been successful, because public discourse is no longer about the failing public services or the weak economy," Pek said.
Since last year, Orban has faced an unprecedented challenge from former government insider-turned-opposition leader Peter Magyar, with his TISZA party eroding Fidesz's longtime solid lead, according to several opinion polls.
Pek stressed the Pride ban is a "trap" for Magyar: standing up for LGBTQ rights could lose him conservative supporters, but his current silence might drive left-wing and liberal voters to other opposition parties.
ros/jza/rlp/gv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House sending social media teams with FBI on some arrests in D.C., sources say
By Sarah N. Lynch WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House has dispatched social media teams alongside FBI agents executing arrest warrants in the nation's capital to generate videos that promote U.S. President Donald Trump's crackdown on crime in the District of Columbia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The highly unusual arrangement runs afoul of longstanding Justice Department norms which seek to insulate criminal investigations from political influence. It could hamstring prosecutors' ability to try their cases by generating pre-trial publicity and raise constitutional questions about suspects' rights to privacy in cases involving arrests carried out in non-public areas, legal experts say. The White House has been playing an outsized role in the FBI's operations since Trump announced on August 11 that he was initiating a federal takeover of the District of Columbia's police department and calling in the National Guard to help patrol the streets. Critics have decried his actions as an authoritarian-like abuse of power. The White House posted a highly produced promotional video on its X account on Thursday documenting the arrest of Sean Charles Dunn, a now-former Department of Justice employee who is facing an assault charge after he hurled a Subway sandwich at a federal agent. In the video, armed agents can be seen storming Dunn's apartment and putting him in handcuffs. The video was taken by a social media team sent by the White House, one of the sources said, speaking anonymously to discuss personnel matters. According to X, it has received 2.4 million views. The social media team that filmed Dunn's arrest remained embedded with the same FBI squad throughout the evening, the source said. Reuters could not determine whether the people who produced the video are White House employees, nor could it determine on how many occasions the White House has sent people to film arrests since the operation began. The White House declined to answer those questions. "This is not a standard law enforcement posture because this is action directed by the president deeming what is necessary and appropriate under the law. Of course the White House is involved in highlighting our hugely successful efforts to stop violent crime in Washington, DC," a White House official said. "As the most transparent administration in history, we will continue sharing these efforts with the press and the American people," the official added. Spokespeople for the FBI declined to comment. Dunn's attorney Sabrina Shroff declined comment about the White House's role in filming the arrest, which took place just outside the doorway of Dunn's residence inside what appears to be an apartment-style building. "These are political media influencers who are there for a sole purpose, which is to document things in a light most favorable to a political agenda," said defense attorney Bradley Moss. "It has nothing to do with law and order." CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS The White House has also stationed employees inside the FBI's command post overseeing the federal operation who are tasked with reporting back with arrest numbers, the two sources said. A social media post from the Drug Enforcement Administration on Saturday featured Stephen Miller and White House Deputy Homeland Security Advisor Tony Salisbury appearing at the command post alongside Justice Department officials. In recent days, the FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have referred media inquiries about arrests involving federal agents to the White House. Legal experts said embedding social media teams who are not employed by law enforcement agencies to film arrests could in some instances run afoul of people's Fourth Amendment right to privacy during the execution of a criminal warrant. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1999 that deputy federal marshals and local sheriffs seeking publicity for their actions violated a suspect's constitutional rights when they invited members of the media to witness an arrest inside the person's home. "It's just kind of an outrageous tactic for promotional purposes, but it does cross the line in terms of constitutional and ethical conduct by police," said Bennett Gershman, a former New York state prosecutor who teaches at Pace University School of Law. The FBI has sometimes allowed the media to do ride-alongs, generally for recruitment purposes, said James Davidson, a former FBI agent who has since formed the nonprofit The FBI Integrity Project, which aims to safeguard the bureau from undue political influence. Both Davidson and Stacey Young, a former Justice Department lawyer who founded the group Justice Connection to advocate for current and former DOJ employees, expressed concerns that filming arrests could undermine confidence in the FBI. 'It erodes the FBI's integrity and the perception of impartiality, which are required for the bureau to maintain any credibility," Young said.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Ranger fired for hanging transgender flag in Yosemite and park visitors may face prosecution
Advertisement Joslin said their firing sends the opposite message: 'If you're a federal worker and you have any kind of identity that doesn't agree with this current administration, then you must be silent, or you will be eliminated.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Park officials on Tuesday said they were working with the U.S. Justice Department to pursue visitors and workers who violated restrictions on demonstrations at the park that had more than 4 million visitors last year. The agencies 'are pursuing administrative action against several Yosemite National Park employees and possible criminal charges against several park visitors who are alleged to have violated federal laws and regulations related to demonstrations,' Advertisement Joslin said a group of seven climbers including two other park rangers hung the flag. The other rangers are on administrative leave pending an investigation, Joslin said. Flags have long been flown from El Capitan without consequences, said Joanna Citron Day, a former federal attorney who is now with the advocacy group Public Employees For Environmental Responsibility. She said the group is representing Joslin, but there is no pending legal case. On May 21, a day after the flag display, Acting Superintendent Ray McPadden signed a rule prohibiting people from hanging banners, flags or signs larger than 15 square feet in park areas designated as 'wilderness' or 'potential wilderness.' That covers 94% of the park, according to Yosemite's website. Park officials said the new restriction was needed to preserve Yosemite's wilderness and protect climbers. 'We take the protection of the park's resources and the experience of our visitors very seriously, and will not tolerate violations of laws and regulations that impact those resources and experiences,' Pawlitz said. It followed a widely publicized instance in February of demonstrators hanging an upside down American flag on El Capitan to protest the firing of National Park Service employees by the Trump administration. Among the climbers who helped hang the transgender flag was Pattie Gonia, an environmentalist and drag queen who uses the performance art to raise awareness of conservation issues. For the past five years, Gonia has helped throw a Pride event in Yosemite for park employees. She said they hung the transgender flag on the iconic granite monolith to express that being transgender is natural. This year, Trump signed an executive order changing the federal definition of sex to exclude the concept of gender identity. He also banned trans women from competing in women's sports, removed trans people from the military and limited access to gender-affirming care. Advertisement Gonia called the firing unjust. Joslin said they hung the flag in their free time, as a private citizen. 'SJ is a respected pillar within the Yosemite community, a tireless volunteer who consistently goes above and beyond,' Gonia said. Jayson O'Neill with the advocacy group Save Our Parks said Joslin's firing appears aimed at deterring park employees from expressing their views as the Trump administration pursues broad cuts to the federal workforce. Since Trump took office, the National Park Service has lost approximately 2,500 employees from a workforce that had about 10,000 people, Wade said. The Republican president is proposing a $900 million cut to the agency's budget next year. Pawlitz said numerous visitors complained about unauthorized demonstrations on El Capitan earlier in the year. Many parks have designated 'First Amendment areas' where groups 25 or fewer people can protest without permits. Yosemite has several of those areas, including one in Yosemite Valley, where El Capitan is located. Park service rules on demonstrations have existed for decades and withstood several court challenges, said Bill Wade, executive director of the Association of National Park Rangers. He was not aware of any changes in how those rules are enforced under Trump. Associated Press journalist Brittany Peterson contributed reporting from Denver.
an hour ago
Trump administration revokes security clearances of 37 current and former government officials
WASHINGTON -- The Trump administration said Tuesday that it was revoking the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials in the latest act of retribution targeting public servants from the federal government's intelligence community. A memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accuses the singled-out individuals of having engaged in the 'politicization or weaponization of intelligence' to advance personal or partisan goals, failing to safeguard classified information, failing to 'adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards" and other unspecified 'detrimental" conduct. The memo did not offer evidence to back up the accusations. Many of the officials who were targeted left the government years ago after serving in both senior national security positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some worked on matters that have long infuriated Trump, like the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf. And several signaled their concerns about Trump by signing a critical letter in 2019 that was highlighted on social media last month by right-wing provocateur and close Trump ally Laura Loomer. The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries, and reflects the president's continued distrust of career intelligence officials he has long seen as working against his interests. The revocation of clearances has emerged as a go-to tactic for the administration, a strategy critics say risks chilling dissenting voices from an intelligence community accustomed to drawing on a range of viewpoints before formulating an assessment. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. He called it hypocritical for the administration to 'claim these individuals politicized or weaponized intelligence.' Gabbard on Tuesday sought to defend the move, which she said had been directed by Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right," she wrote on X. "Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' The security clearance suspension comes amid a broader effort by Gabbard and other Trump administration officials to revisit the intelligence community assessment published in 2017 on Russian election interference, including by declassifying a series of years-old documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of its findings. Multiple government investigations have reached the same conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping fashion, including through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails and a social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But Trump has long resisted the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in his favor, and his Justice Department has authorized a grand jury investigation that could bring fresh scrutiny to Obama-era officials. Security clearances are important not only for current government workers but also former ones whose private-sector jobs require them to retain access to sensitive information. Stripping clearances from such employees could make it hard for them to do their jobs, though it's unclear how many of the former officials still have or require one. On his first day of office, Trump said he would revoke the security clearances of the more than four dozen former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a 'Russian information operation.' He's also revoked the clearances of , and he attempted to do the same for .
