Italy OKs US$15.5 billion project to build world's longest suspension bridge from mainland to Sicily
The Strait of Messina Bridge will be 'the biggest infrastructure project in the West,' Transport Minister Matteo Salvini told a news conference in Rome, after an interministerial committee with oversight of strategic public investments approved the project.
Premier Giorgia Meloni said that the bridge 'will be an engineering symbol of global significance.'
Salvini cited studies showing the project will create 120,000 jobs a year and accelerate growth in economically lagging southern Italy, as billions more in investments are made in roads and other infrastructure projects accompanying the bridge.
Preliminary work could begin between late September and early October, once Italy's court of audit signs off, with construction expected to start next year. Despite bureaucratic delays, the bridge is expected to be completed between 2032-2033, Salvini said.
Bridge could count toward NATO spending target
The Strait of Messina Bridge has been approved and canceled multiple times since the Italian government first solicited proposals in 1969. Premier Giorgia Meloni's administration revived the project in 2023, and this marks the furthest stage the ambitious project-- first envisioned by the Romans -- has ever reached.
'From a technical standpoint, it's an absolutely fascinating engineering project,' Salvini said.
The Strait of Messina Bridge would measure nearly 3.7 kilometres (2.2 miles), with the suspended span reaching 3.3 kilometres (more than 2 miles), surpassing Turkiye's Canakkale Bridge, currently the longest, by 1,277 metres (4,189 feet).
With three car lanes in each direction flanked by a double-track railway, the bridge would have the capacity to carry 6,000 cars an hour and 200 trains a day -- reducing the time to cross the strait by ferry from up to 100 minutes to 10 minutes by car. Trains will save 2/12 hours in transit time, Salvini said.
The project could provide a boost to Italy's commitment to raise defence spending to 5% of GDP targeted by NATO, as the government has indicated it would classify the bridge as defense-related, helping it to meet a 1.5% security component. Italy argues that the bridge would form a strategic corridor for rapid troop movements and equipment deployment to NATO's southern flanks, qualifying it as a 'security-enhancing infrastructure.'
Salvini confirmed the intention to classify the project as dual use, but said that was up to Italy's defense and economic ministers.
A group of more than 600 professors and researchers signed a letter earlier this summer opposing the military classification, noting that such a move would require additional assessments to see if it could withstand military use. Opponents also say the designation would potentially make the bridge a target.
Concerns over organized crime
Environmental groups have lodged complaints with the EU, citing concerns that the project will impact migratory birds, noting that environmental studies had not demonstrated that the project is a public imperative and that any environmental damage would be offset.
The original government decree reactivating the bridge project included language giving the Interior Ministry control over anti-mafia measures. But Italy's president insisted that the project remain subject to anti-mafia legislation that applies to all large-scale infrastructure projects in Italy out of concerns that the ad-hoc arrangement would weaken controls.
Salvini pledged that keeping organized crime out of the project was top priority, saying it would adhere to the same protocols used for the Expo 2015 World's Fair and the upcoming Milan-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympic Games. 'We need to pay attention so that the entire supply chain is impermeable to bad actors,' he said.
The project has been awarded to a consortium led by Webuild, an Italian infrastructure group that initially won the bid to build the bridge in 2006 before it was later canceled. The Canakkale Bridge, which opened in 2022, was built using an engineering design similar to the one devised for the Messina bridge, including a wing profile and a deck shape that resembles a fighter jet fuselage with openings to allow wind to pass through the structure, according to Webuild.
Addressing concerns about building the bridge over the Messina fault, which triggered a deadly quake in 1908, Webuild has emphasized that suspension bridges are structurally less vulnerable to seismic forces. It noted that such bridges have been built in seismically active areas, including Japan, Turkiye and California.
Webuild CEO Pietro Salini said in a statement that the Strait of Messina Bridge 'will be transformative for the whole country.'
Colleen Barry, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
15 minutes ago
- CTV News
Argentina's copper dreams need infrastructure - but who will build it?
Workers labor as the machines roll up copper rods at a metal melting facility in Yuexi County, central China's Anhui Province on July 11, 2025. (Chinatopix via AP) SAN JUAN -- Argentina holds rich copper deposits in the mountainous north along the Chilean border, but, unlike its mining powerhouse neighbour, has not built power lines and roads needed for new projects backed by miners such as BHP and Rio Tinto. President Javier Milei's austerity campaign to clamp down on inflation and debt means the South American country is up against bigger challenges than most countries to build the infrastructure needed by mines worldwide. Unconventional ideas, such as sharing infrastructure between miners or paying for it with royalties, will likely be part of the solution. 'The government said it won't provide any funding, but that doesn't mean it isn't responsible for getting things done,' said Roberto Cacciola, president of Argentina's mining chamber, who is urging authorities to step up efforts to ensure infrastructure gets built. Argentina exports gold, silver, and lithium but has not produced copper since 2018. Milei's administration, as well as governors who control local development, are banking on copper to help stabilize the country's volatile economy, just as mining companies worldwide seek to boost output to cover a looming supply gap for the metal widely used in construction and electric vehicles. A federal official said the government is assessing infrastructure needs nationwide and identifying ways the private sector could play a role. Eight copper projects in Argentina could bring total mining export value to US$15.4 billion by 2030, according to a government forecast. That would more than triple last year's figure and make the sector one of the country's largest net foreign exchange earners. Copper projects alone could reel in $5.2 billion by 2030, if they reach the government's projection of producing 521,000 metric tons a year. The copper projects are concentrated in the northern province of San Juan, which some call the 'Vaca Muerta of copper,' an allusion to Argentina's shale oil and gas field the size of Belgium. San Juan enacted a compensation program in 2022 that could help get infrastructure built. It allows mining companies that develop road or energy infrastructure to be repaid with mining royalties if provincial legislators deem the project a 'public utility.' Miners normally pay royalties to governments. The Vicuna project, from global miner BHP and Canada's Lundin, hopes to use the provision, said Vicuna's Argentina director Jose Morea. 'That speeds up investments that the private sector is currently in a position to make ... which the provincial government would probably have to defer otherwise,' he said in an interview. Vicuna consists of two mines, Filo del Sol and the more advanced Josemaria, which could become one of the region's first projects to start production. The $5-billion mine will need a 220-kilometre (137-mile) road - a distance of about two or three hours by car - to reach operations at an altitude of 4,200 metres (13,780 feet) in the Andes Mountains. It will also require a high-voltage power transmission line at a scale that could support a large city. Sharing infrastructure Some miners are exploring other ways to reduce costs. McEwen Mining's Los Azules is looking at sharing infrastructure with nearby projects and has consulted the Inter-American Development Bank about infrastructure loans. Some business leaders want the government to turn over more projects, such as railways and road maintenance, to the private sector through public tenders or public-private partnerships, said Nicolas Munoz, a copper supply analyst at consultancy CRU. 'It's feasible to think that private companies will assume these costs and see a business opportunity,' Munoz said. There are already signs of interest from the mining sector, such as global miner Rio Tinto, which recently took over U.S.-based Arcadium's lithium mines in Argentina and is developing another of its own in the country. According to a public register of lobbyist meetings, Rio held a meeting with Argentina's mining secretary in June after expressing interest in bidding for the state's Belgrano Cargas railway, which the government said in February it would privatize. Rio Tinto did not have an immediate comment. Rio Tinto is also backing McEwen's Los Azules and Aldebaran's Altar copper projects through shares owned by its leaching technology arm, Nuton. Some governors are still looking to the federal government to take part of the burden. Governor Gustavo Saenz of Salta, where Canada's First Quantum Minerals wants to develop the Taca Taca copper mine, said aqueducts, roads, and gas pipelines will pay off. 'We need them to give us ... everything necessary so that those who want to come and invest can do so,' he said this week at the Argentina Copper 2025 conference in San Juan. Reporting by Lucila Sigal, Writing by Daina Beth Solomon, Editing by Rod Nickel, Reuters
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What to know about past meetings between Putin and his American counterparts
Bilateral meetings between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his U.S. counterparts were a regular occurrence early in his tenure. But as tensions mounted between Moscow and the West following the illegal annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 and allegations of meddling with the 2016 U.S. elections, those became increasingly less frequent, and their tone appeared less friendly. Here's what to know about past meetings between Russian and U.S. presidents: Putin and Joe Biden Putin and Joe Biden met only once while holding the presidency –- in Geneva in June 2021. Russia was amassing troops on the border with Ukraine, where large swaths of land in the east had long been occupied by Moscow-backed forces; Washington repeatedly accused Russia of cyberattacks. The Kremlin was intensifying its domestic crackdown on dissent, jailing opposition leader Alexei Navalny months earlier and harshly suppressing protests demanding his release. Putin and Biden talked for three hours, but no breakthroughs came out of the meeting. The two exchanged expressions of mutual respect, but firmly restated their starkly different views on all of the above. They spoke again via videoconference in December 2021 as tensions heightened over Ukraine. Biden threatened sanctions if Russia invaded Ukraine, and Putin demanded guarantees that Kyiv wouldn't join NATO –- something Washington and its allies said was a nonstarter. Another phone call between the two came in February 2022, less than two weeks before the full-scale invasion. Then the high-level contacts stopped cold, with no publicly disclosed conversations between Putin and Biden since the invasion. Putin and Donald Trump Putin met Trump met six times during the American's first term -– at and on the sidelines of G20 and APEC gatherings — but most famously in Helsinki in July 2018. That's where Trump stood next to Putin and appeared to accept his insistence that Moscow had not interfered with the 2016 U.S. presidential election and openly questioned the firm finding by his own intelligence agencies. His remarks were a stark illustration of Trump's willingness to upend decades of U.S. foreign policy and rattle Western allies in service of his political concerns. 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today,' Trump said. 'He just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be.' Putin and Barack Obama U.S. President Barack Obama met with Putin nine times, and there were 12 more meetings with Dmitry Medvedev, who served as president in 2008-12. Putin became prime minister in a move that allowed him to reset Russia's presidential term limits and run again in 2012. Obama traveled to Russia twice — once to meet Medvedev in 2009 and again for a G20 summit 2013. Medvedev and Putin also traveled to the U.S. Under Medvedev, Moscow and Washington talked of 'resetting' Russia-U.S. relations post-Cold War and worked on arms control treaties. U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton famously presented a big 'reset' button to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at a meeting in 2009. One problem: instead of 'reset' in Russian, they used another word meaning 'overload.' After Putin returned to office in 2012, tensions rose between the two countries. The Kremlin accused the West of interfering with Russian domestic affairs, saying it fomented anti-government protests that rocked Moscow just as Putin sought reelection. The authorities cracked down on dissent and civil society, drawing international condemnation. Obama canceled his visit to Moscow in 2013 after Russia granted asylum to Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor and whistleblower. In 2014, the Kremlin illegally annexed Crimea and threw its weight behind a separatist insurgency in eastern Ukraine. The U.S. and its allies responded with crippling sanctions. Relations plummeted to the lowest point since the Cold War. The Kremlin's 2015 military intervention in Syria to prop up Bashar Assad further complicated ties. Putin and Obama last met in China in September 2016, on the sidelines of a G20 summit, and held talks focused on Ukraine and Syria. Putin and George W. Bush Putin and George W. Bush met 28 times during Bush's two terms. They hosted each other for talks and informal meetings in Russia and the U.S., met regularly on the sidelines of international summits and forums, and boasted of improving ties between onetime rivals. After the first meeting with Putin in 2001, Bush said he 'looked the man in the eye' and 'found him very straightforward and trustworthy,' getting 'a sense of his soul.' In 2002, they signed the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty -– a nuclear arms pact that significantly reduced both countries' strategic nuclear warhead arsenal. Putin was the first world leader to call Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attack, offering his condolences and support, and welcomed the U.S. military deployment on the territory of Moscow's Central Asian allies for action in Afghanistan. He has called Bush 'a decent person and a good friend,' adding that good relations with him helped find a way out of 'the most acute and conflict situations.' —— Associated Press writer Yuras Karmanau contributed.
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
PM Carney to make military announcement, tour facility in Trenton today
Prime Minister Mark Carney stands with Minister of National Defence David McGuinty as he talks to service personnel following an announcement at Fort York Armoury in Toronto on Monday June 9, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney heads to Trenton, Ont., today, where he is expected to make an announcement related to the Canadian Armed Forces. On Thursday, Carney told reporters that he planned to spend the day with the Canadian Armed Forces 'building security and defence.' While in Trenton, Carney will also tour a military facility. Canada and its NATO allies agreed at their annual summit in June to substantially hike their members' defence spending target to five per cent of annual GDP by 2035. NATO members agreed on a plan to invest 3.5 per cent of their national GDP in core defence needs — like jets and other hardware — and another 1.5 per cent in related areas, such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. Carney said at the time that the new NATO agreement will see Canada's annual defence budget increase to roughly $150 billion. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 8, 2025.
