Solid Rock Caught Flowing 1,700 Miles Beneath Surface in Experimental First
Seismic waves unexpectedly speed up as they pass through the boundary of the D" layer, and a 2004 study seemed to find the answer: it showed that extreme pressures and extreme temperatures could turn the lower mantle mineral perovskite into a different form labeled 'post-perovskite', somewhere around the D" layer boundary.
However, it was later found that this new phase isn't enough on its own to explain the acceleration of seismic waves.
For the new study, scientists in Switzerland and Japan ran computer simulations and lab tests to determine that the crystals in post-perovskite all need to be pointing in the same direction for seismic waves to speed up.
"This discovery not only solves the mystery of the D" layer but also opens a window into the dynamics in the depths of the Earth," says geoscientist Motohiko Murakami, from ETH Zurich in Switzerland.
"We have finally found the last piece of the puzzle."
The researchers essentially recreated the deep layers of Earth in their lab, on a much smaller scale. They found that the alignment of the post-perovskite crystals determines its hardness, and thus the movement of waves rippling through it.
They found something else, too: that the solid rock above the D" layer can flow in a convection pattern. This type of movement, which varies across different parts of Earth's layers, determines the alignment of post-perovskite crystals.
It's driven by a combination of cooler material, which is sinking, and hotter material, which is rising. It's the first experimental evidence we have of such movement in this region of Earth's insides – though of course direct observations are impossible.
"These findings indicate that the texture of the post-perovskite phase can explain most of the key features of the D" discontinuity," write the researchers in their published paper.
This all feeds into our knowledge of the complex interplay of heat, pressure, and movement that's happening way down deep under Earth's surface. Having a better understanding of these forces then tells us more about everything from volcanic eruptions to Earth's magnetic field.
The core-mantle boundary (CMB), which is where the solid mantle hits Earth's liquid outer core, is of particular interest to scientists. It represents a huge switch between materials in terms of density, composition, conductivity, and other measures – making it vital to the most fundamental forces driving our planet.
"Our discovery shows that the Earth is not only active on the surface, but is also in motion deep inside," says Murakami.
While the study helps answer some questions, there are still a lot of mysteries left down there.
The research has been published in Communications Earth & Environment.
Hundreds of Mysterious Giant Viruses Discovered Lurking in The Ocean
Scientists Just Solved a 100-Million-Year-Old Mystery About Platypus Sex
Deep-Sea Wonderland Found Thriving Where Humans Have Never Been
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starlink and Astronomers Are in a Light Pollution Standoff
Satellite streaks are ruining astronomical images. Can scientists and space companies find solutions before it's too late? There's a space battle brewing just under our noses (and above our heads). On one side are astronomers who use ground-based observatories to gather starlight from the depths of the universe. On the other are technologists, military planners and captains of industry who are rapidly cocooning our planet in ever growing swarms of starlight-spoiling satellites. When a satellite passes through the view of a ground observatory, it can reflect sunlight back to the telescope, creating bright streaks in the resulting pictures that can obscure—or even masquerade as—astrophysical phenomena. This is especially problematic for state-of-the-art facilities such as the new Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which uses giant mirrors and the world's largest digital camera to capture ultrahigh-resolution panoramic views of the sky from a remote mountaintop in Chile. It's a 'collision of two beautiful technologies,' says Tony Tyson, the Rubin Observatory's chief scientist and an astronomer at the University of California, Davis. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] As the satellites increase in number, with proposals for more than a million new ones currently pending, tensions are rising between those who see the sky as a wellspring of cosmic knowledge—and others who view it as a new, scarcely tapped realm of economic activity. There are currently more than 13,000 spacecraft orbiting Earth, and more than half of them are satellites built, launched and operated by SpaceX as part of the company's sprawling Starlink megaconstellation. Starlink exists to fill the lingering gaps in global Internet connectivity, offering high-speed broadband service to customers essentially anywhere on Earth—and while it's by far the biggest player in this domain, it's not the only one. Others include Amazon's Project Kuiper (with more than 3,200 planned satellites), Eutelsat's OneWeb (with nearly 650 satellites) and a host of Chinese projects such as Guowang, Qianfan, and Honghu-3 which each call for thousands of satellites. There's even a Starlink spin-off, Starshield, custom-built by SpaceX for the U.S. Department of Defense. Starlink's dominance makes it the poster child for megaconstellations, however—the chief target of astronomers' ire and the test case for carving out a peaceful coexistence. (In response to a request for comment, a representative from SpaceX pointed to regular updates on the company's website.) From the beginning, Starlink engineers collaborated with astronomers to reduce the optical impacts of their satellites. Their first-generation design used dark materials and sun visors to absorb more sunlight and reduce visibility of the satellites from Earth. But the sun visors created too much drag and were scrapped in the second-generation design. In the satellites' second iteration, instead of having them absorb the light, SpaceX focused on strategically reflecting it away from Earth using a dielectric mirror film on any flat surfaces. The second-generation satellites also used a specially developed black paint to reduce the possibility of glints from other components where possible. In a recent preprint paper posted on the co-authors, who included Tyson and two SpaceX employees, analyzed the impact of these developments on the optical interference of the satellites and found that they reduced the optical interference, though even more improvements could be made. While the Starlink satellites typically operate at a height of around 550 kilometers, Tyson and his colleagues also simulated the satellites' optical interference in orbits as low as 350 km. In the simulations, the lower altitude resulted in about a 40 percent reduction in the number of satellites entering the view of the telescope, with only a 5 percent increase in brightness (objects that are higher up can be viewed from Earth at more locations and remain in the telescope's view for longer periods). But making a satellite orbit too low can cause undue trouble for the operators, Tyson says. A satellite in very low-Earth orbit experiences more atmospheric drag, which, if not counteracted, will hasten its orbital decay and subsequent atmospheric reentry. At this time, the Rubin Observatory's official recommendation remains that satellites orbit below 600 km, rather than at some much lower altitude. The International Astronomical Union's Center for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference (IAU CPS) has been reaching out to various satellite companies asking them to reduce their optical (as well as radio) interference. 'Most of the folks that we've talked to that I've interfaced with have actually been pretty open,' says Meredith Rawls, an astronomer at the University of Washington and a co-leader of the IAU CPS's SatHub initiative, 'but it doesn't scale.' CPS can't possibly reach out to all the relevant players to raise concerns and continue to follow up about their proposed solutions and their impacts. On top of that, even companies that are receptive to the CPS's concerns may not be willing to make significant changes—such as lowering satellite orbits—that would harm their bottom line. To broadly and consistently protect the astronomical sky, governing bodies may need to pass restrictive policies. 'I don't think anyone wants zero satellites,' Rawls says, 'but at the moment, it is a pretty unregulated kind of Wild West situation that we find ourselves in.' Initiatives such as the U.S. National Science Foundation's (NSF's) satellite coordination agreements, where government agencies broker deals directly with satellite operators, could be a happy medium. So far, the NSF has signed deals with U.S. satellite companies such as Project Kuiper, OneWeb, Starlink and AST SpaceMobile to ensure these companies follow certain guidelines and avoid, to the extent possible, interfering with partner observatories. One complication is that astronomical observations are not only affected by satellites produced in the countries they're based in. 'No single nation or entity can drive meaningful change without the coordinated action and cooperation of governments, satellite owner-operators or manufacturers, and astronomers from around the world,' wrote the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) in a conference room paper. COPUOS has yet to propose any regulations or standards for broad adoption. Instead it has recommended that member nations encourage and support collaborations between satellite manufacturers and astronomers. With growing numbers of satellite operators worldwide, however, experts believe this may not be enough. Rubin and similar observatories are 'still going to do good science,' Rawls says. She describes the optical interference from satellites as 'bugs on the windshield': difficult and irritating—not devastating. Tyson describes the interference more like bright headlights from an approaching car, obscuring important details with a burst of light. The legacy of the Rubin Observatory, he says, will be to 'discover the unexpected'—to find things in space that astronomers never knew to look for that will 'blow everybody's mind.' But these discoveries are made less likely by the 'foreground haze' of satellite constellations. 'The scientific community will be giving up something,' Tyson says. 'I hope it isn't too much.' It's Time to Stand Up for Science Before you close the page, we need to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and we think right now is the most critical moment in that two-century history. We're not asking for charity. If you become a Digital, Print or Unlimited subscriber to Scientific American, you can help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both future and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself often goes unrecognized. Click here to subscribe. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Yes, the ‘Alien' timeline is confusing. Before you dig into the franchise's first TV series, here's some clarity
Deep space Movies TV showsFacebookTweetLink Follow In space, no one can hear you scream, but they can sure hear you scratching your head as you try to make sense of the sprawling 'Alien' universe. While Ridley Scott's 1979 haunted-house-in-the-cosmos horror story 'Alien' may have kicked things off — and reinvented science fiction as we know it in the process — that film is now but a midpoint in the multi-chaptered timeline that tells the Xenomorph's story. Noah Hawley, the Emmy-winning mastermind behind TV's 'Fargo' anthology series, is set to unveil 'Alien: Earth,' the latest entry in the franchise and its first foray into television, on Tuesday. The films span decades in real time and centuries in the 'Alien' universe, but Hawley isn't too worried about how the series seamlessly – or not – fits into the world's timeline. 'We haven't literally calendared it out,' he said at a press event for the series this spring. And while we know a fair amount about the aliens themselves, the decision to bring the action to Earth for the first time opened up 'a grey area that we can play in,' he said, since not much is known about Earth in the world of 'Alien.' 'It was gift to get a franchise this big with very little mythology to it.' Nonetheless, the show's premiere provides the perfect moment to map out the slimy, menacing world of Ellen Ripley and company in their epic battle against one of the galaxy's fiercest creatures. Below is a list of the franchise's films and new TV show, in order of when they happen in the chronology of the 'Alien' universe. Note: Since there are debates about what even IS 'canon' to this world, for purposes of brevity and simplicity, this list omits projects that cross over with the 'Predator' franchise, namely 2004's under-appreciated 'Alien vs. Predator' and its sequel three years later. It's pretty mind-boggling to think that anything from the crazy and threatening world of 'Alien' could take place in this century, but that's just what happens in this sort-of prequel from original 'Alien' director Ridley Scott. The movie essentially offers a possible glimpse into the very beginnings of various species depicted in the original 1979 film, including humans. Anyone looking for a neat way for this movie to fit into the events established by 'Alien' won't be very satisfied. This film and its 'Covenant' sequel below raise many more questions than answers, and are largely part of why Hawley has previously said he is choosing not to focus on the stories presented in them as part of his new project. The prequel confusion continues in this followup to 'Prometheus' that takes place 11 years later and follows in the footsteps of the classic sequel 'Aliens,' following a crew who field a distress call and land on a mysterious planet with disastrous results. Other than a chilling performance from Michael Fassbender as the android David. Hawley set out to present the titular creatures 'within a larger ecosystem,' as he described it to members of the press, and also place them in a shocking place they've never before been seen – right here, on Earth. The show takes place two years before the events depicted in the original 'Alien' and features competing global corporations – which include Weyland-Yutani, the unscrupulous 'company' cited in the very first film – and a hierarchy of human and humanoid beings who vie for control after a spaceship crash-lands on Earth holding incredibly valuable, and dangerous, cargo. Like Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) herself, this is the mother of it all. Following the fateful encounter of the Nostromo's crew – a ragtag group of space truckers – with the razor-toothed, face-hugging, chest-bursting, acid-for-blood Xenomorph, 'Alien' provided the blueprint for not only the others films to follow in this franchise, but in all other sci-fi and creature feature titles that came next. An installment meant to revitalize the franchise after a period of dormancy, 'Romulus' takes place between the first two films in the franchise, while Ripley is stranded in hypersleep after the harrowing events of the first movie. This James Cameron-directed entry famously broke the mold by ramping up the horror and action while also fashioning a compelling human drama, resulting in an acting Oscar nomination for Weaver, a rare feat for a genre film. The movie takes place over a half-century after 'Alien,' with Ripley learning that her escape pod went undetected and all those she knew back home on Earth have since died of old age. Things only get worse from there. The only entry to take place immediately following the events of the previous installment, 'Alien 3' starts when Ripley's latest escape vessel crashes into a prison planet – with a dangerous critter aboard. Ripley can't catch a break with her escape pods, and the end of this film features an astonishing demise to one of cinema's greatest heroines. A zany entry that gets a little better with each watch, this futuristic vision (from Jean-Pierre Jeunet of 'Amélie' fame) brings Ripley back as a clone whose DNA is fused with the Xenomorph. While we get to see the aliens swim in this one (impressive!), the story takes place so far in the future that – similar to the prequels – Hawley said he didn't concern himself with it while constructing the new series. 'Alien: Earth' premieres Tuesday on FX and streams on Hulu.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Perseids meteor shower 2025 peaks tonight: Where and what time to watch the year's brightest shower
The Perseids is considered the best, most visible meteor shower of the year, according to NASA. The Perseids meteor shower will peak Tuesday night into Wednesday morning, with up to 100 streaks visible every hour. The Perseids shower, which has been active since July 17, is 'considered the best meteor shower of the year,' according to NASA. Experts note that the moon may impact some visibility, but viewers will still be able to watch the shower if they're in a dark area away from city lights and their phones. Here's what to know to prepare for the year's biggest meteor shower. What is a meteor shower? Meteoroids are falling pieces of debris from comets and asteroids that, as they enter the Earth's atmosphere, turn into meteors, according to NASA. As meteors vaporize, their trails are visible from Earth, which is what we call 'shooting stars' or 'falling stars.' A meteor shower is what happens when there's a higher-than-usual number of meteors falling across the sky in a short period of time. Meteor showers happen at certain times throughout the year because comets also orbit the sun, so when a comet and the Earth cross paths, the Earth encounters a lot of the comet's debris, or meteoroids. What to know about the Perseids meteor shower The Perseids meteors leave particularly long, bright trails as they fall through Earth's atmosphere, with about 50 to 100 streaks expected to be visible every hour at its peak. The Perseids shower comes from comet 109/Swift-Tuttle, a comet that takes 133 years to orbit the sun and crosses the Earth's orbit once a year. The shower's name comes from the constellation Perseus, NASA explains, which is the point in the sky from which the Perseids meteors are visibly falling. Fireballs are also anticipated to appear throughout Tuesday night into Wednesday. 'Fireballs' is an astronomical term used by NASA to describe meteoroids that burst into bright colors while in the Earth's atmosphere, becoming more visible than average meteors. How to watch the Perseids meteor shower Northern Hemisphere residents will have the best Perseids views, NASA reports. But this year's shower does coincide with the rise of a waning gibbous moon, the phase between a full moon and a half moon, which could impact visibility, warned. To find the best time to see the Perseids shower where you are, check the Global Meteor Network's meteor-tracking meter.
