Trump signs order imposing new tariffs on a number of trading partners that go into effect in 7 days
The order was issued shortly after 7 p.m. on Thursday evening. It came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in the last several days, as the White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonized, according to a senior administration official who spoke to reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity.
The order capped off a hectic Thursday as nations sought to continue negotiating with Trump. It set the rates for 68 countries and the 27-member European Union, with a baseline 10% rate to be charged on countries not listed in the order. The senior administration official said the rates were based on trade imbalance with the U.S. and regional economic profiles.
On Thursday morning, Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on trade. As a result of the conversation, the U.S. president said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners, with the current 25% tariff rates staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier.
"We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue," Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Trump that he referred to as "very successful" in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better.
The unknowns created a sense of drama that has defined Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months, with the one consistency being his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by U.S. consumers and businesses.
"We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country," Trump told reporters on Thursday afternoon without detailing the terms of those agreements or nations involved. The senior administration official declined to reveal the nations that have new deals during the call with reporters.
Trump said that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had called ahead of 35% tariffs being imposed on many of his nation's goods, but "we haven't spoken to Canada today."
Trump imposed the Friday deadline after his previous "Liberation Day" tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates unveiled in April led to recession fears, prompting Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals.
Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's "Hannity" that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict.
Going into Thursday, wealthy Switzerland and Norway were still uncertain about their tariff rates. EU officials were waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported autos and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Trump had announced a deal Sunday while he was in Scotland.
Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period.
He said Mexico would end its "Non Tariff Trade Barriers," but he didn't provide specifics.
Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term.
But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to impose tariffs on goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year.
U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country.
The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA, as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Cambodia to Nominate President Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, Official Says
Cambodia's government will officially nominate U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, following his efforts to broker a ceasefire in the country's border conflict with Thailand. Speaking to reporters in the capital Phnom Penh on Friday, Deputy Prime Minister Sun Chanthol thanked Trump for bringing peace and said he deserved to be nominated for the prize. Later, a journalist from Reuters asked him via text message whether this meant Cambodia would nominate the U.S. leader, to which he responded, 'Yes.' Similar calls have since echoed across Cambodian social media. Chanthol's comments came shortly after Trump's updated tariff announcement, which saw Cambodia's import duty dropped to 19 percent, down from the 36 percent threatened in July and the 49 percent initially announced in April. Chanthol headed the negotiation team that engaged in economic talks with the Trump administration. In Malaysia on July 28, Cambodia and Thailand agreed to a ceasefire to end a fierce, five-day border conflict that killed at least 43 people and displaced more than 300,000 people in both countries. According to a report by Reuters that interviewed numerous officials on both sides, a phone call from Trump was crucial in breaking the 'deadlock' between the two nations and getting them to agree to the meeting in Malaysia. In particular, Trump reportedly threatened to cut off trade talks with both nations if they did not cease hostilities. Cambodia is not the first nation to suggest that Trump should be awarded the illustrious prize. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month that he had nominated Trump for the award for helping bring his nation's war with Iran to an end. Pakistan also said that it would recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve its short conflict with India in May. Trump has a seeming obsession with winning the Nobel Peace Prize, which may have something to do with his long-standing rivalry with former President Barack Obama, who was infamously awarded the prize in 2009, in the first year of his first term in office, seemingly in advance payment for achievements that never eventuated. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week that 'it is well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.' Since his inauguration, Trump 'has brokered, on average, one peace deal or ceasefire per month,' Leavitt said. In addition to the Cambodia-Thailand conflict, she mentioned conflicts between 'Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia.' While it is hard to see the Norwegian Nobel Committee taking seriously a Trump nomination, even if he has arguably done more to deserve it than Obama, the prize has a decidedly ambiguous history. In a classic article from 2009, Christopher Hitchens noted the prize's long history of being awarded 'for service to cynicism, opportunism, and hypocrisy.' Under this roll of names, he wrote, could be found those of Yasir Arafat and Henry Kissinger, and their Israeli and North Vietnamese counterparts, who were 'garlanded for 'peace' agreements that were not intended to hold and that led to later outbreaks of lethal violence.' The absurdity of Trump being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize is seemingly not an insuperable bar. In any event, whether the peace between Cambodia and Thailand is a lasting one remains to be seen. For now, the ceasefire appears to be holding, but the situation remains far from settled, with both nations making claims and counterclaims that have kept the temperature elevated. Thailand continues to hold 18 Cambodian prisoners that it reportedly captured on Tuesday morning, shortly after the ceasefire came into effect. Meanwhile, Cambodia's Ministry of National Defense yesterday claimed that Thailand was preparing to launch an 'imminent' attack along the border last night, and urged the world 'to act swiftly to prevent any escalation.' No attacks took place, and the situation along the border remained calm as of this morning, as officials from both nations gathered in Malaysia for a four-day meeting of the General Border Committee, aimed at de-escalating tensions.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Top Trump Aide Accuses India of Financing Russia's War in Ukraine
WASHINGTON, Aug 3 (Reuters) – A top aide to President Donald Trump on Sunday accused India of effectively financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, after the U.S. leader escalated pressure on New Delhi to stop buying Russian oil. 'What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,' said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Trump's most influential aides. Miller's criticism was some of the strongest yet by the Trump administration about one of the United States' major partners in the Indo-Pacific. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact,' Miller said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' The Indian Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday that New Delhi will keep purchasing oil from Moscow despite U.S. threats. A 25% tariff on Indian products went into effect on Friday as a result of its purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia. Trump has also threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Miller tempered his criticism by noting Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as 'tremendous.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Texas Democrats to Flee State, Blocking Plan to Pad Gop's Control of Congress
Democrats in the Texas legislature said they were fleeing the state Sunday to block a redistricting plan backed by President Donald Trump aimed at preserving the GOP's slim House majority, escalating tensions as a broader fight over congressional district lines unfolds throughout the country ahead of the 2026 midterms. Texas Democrats have twice deployed the same tactic to combat legislation in the 22 years since Republicans have controlled all of state government, but their efforts ultimately failed. This time, Democrats plan to stay away for two weeks to run out the clock on a special legislative session called by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to draw a map that would give Republicans five more House seats. The Texas House can conduct business only when two-thirds of its 150 members are present. At least 51 of the chamber's 62 Democrats will need to boycott the session to prevent Republicans from acting on the new map. The lawmakers could return a couple of days before the special session ends Aug. 19 and use other stall tactics, but any success could be short-lived as Abbott can immediately call another 30-day session. The Democrats, who said they were flying to Chicago, are making a risky bet. They could each face $500 daily fines and political blowback. As part of the special session, lawmakers are considering legislation to respond to last month's deadly floods, and blocking action on that issue will likely be unpopular. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) has threatened to arrest legislators who break quorum, but he won't have jurisdiction over them if they stay out of state. 'We're not walking out on our responsibilities,' Texas Rep. Gene Wu, chairman of the Democratic caucus in his chamber, said in a statement. 'We're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent. As of today, this corrupt special session is over.' The fight in Texas and a looming GOP-led redistricting effort in Ohio have kicked off a national battle, with Democrats in California, Illinois and New York threatening to retaliate by tilting their states' congressional districts further in favor of their party. The Democrats' embrace of an all-or-nothing gerrymandering strategy comes after many of them spent years backing plans to strip politics from the map-drawing process to ensure voters have fair, competitive districts. While states such as Arizona and Michigan have adopted nonpartisan systems for drawing maps, Texas and many other states have not, and partisans there have free rein to give themselves as much power as possible. Texas Republicans unveiled a map last week under pressure from Trump and Abbott that would shift five districts sharply to the right. A committee approved the map Saturday and the Texas House was expected to take it up Tuesday. Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 congressional districts and under the new map they could take 30 next year. Trump won all 30 of the proposed districts by 10 points or more last year. Before Texas lawmakers unveiled their map, Trump said he favored 'a very simple redrawing' that would give Republicans more seats. 'We pick up five seats [in Texas] but we have a couple other states where we'll pick up seats also,' he told reporters last month. Texas Rep. Todd Hunter (R), the sponsor of the legislation to draw the new map, called the GOP proposal 'a good plan for Texas' that would give his party more seats in Congress. 'The primary changes … are focused on five districts for partisan purposes,' he said in committee. DNC Executive Director Ken Martin applauded Texas Democrats' response, saying their actions showed real leadership. 'Republicans thought they could just rig the maps and change the rules without the American people taking notice,' he said in a statement. 'They were dead wrong.' All states must draw new district lines at the beginning of each decade to account for population shifts identified by the U.S. Census. Where they place the lines can greatly favor one party over the other. Most states give legislators the power to draw the districts, but eight states use independent commissions in hopes of preventing partisan power grabs. After the 2020 census, Texas Republicans focused on keeping incumbents safe. The plan to redraw district lines in the middle of a decade is unusual and Republicans are open about using their power to stave off potential losses during the midterm elections, which historically have gone against the sitting president's party. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the House with four vacancies, and any cushion could protect their ability to deliver on Trump's agenda. His signature tax and immigration bill, for example, squeezed through the chamber last month, 218-214. Trump has signaled he will be heavily involved in the midterms, hosting fundraising dinners at his resorts and weighing in on social media with plans to target lawmakers with whom he disagrees. MAGA Inc., a super PAC aligned with Trump, raised a hefty $177 million in the first half of the year, according to a filing last week with the Federal Election Commission. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), a frequent target of Trump's ire and a potential candidate for president in 2028, has said he is working on a plan to shift Republican districts in his state to the left if Texas adopts a new map. In a dig at the GOP, Newsom reposted a map Friday on X from another user that showed all 52 of the state's congressional districts could be drawn to favor Democrats – likely wiping out the reelection chances of the nine Republicans who represent the state. Enacting a new map in California is not as easy as it is in Texas because the California Constitution requires that a nonpartisan commission establish districts. Newsom has said he wants to call a special election in November to get approval from voters to change the state's map for 2026, 2028 and 2030 if Texas acts. Republicans and Democrats alike engaged in gerrymandering in some states in the most recent round of redistricting. Illinois, the new temporary home for Texas Democrats, has a map that received an F from the Princeton Gerrymandering Project because it is so heavily skewed toward Democrats. Other Democrats have spent years calling for removing politics from map drawing. In recent weeks, those voices have died down as Democrats say they cannot disarm if Republicans in states like Texas are going to strengthen their numbers. Eric Holder, who served as President Barack Obama's attorney general, has championed nonpartisan redistricting for years but said Sunday on ABC that Democrats might 'have to do things that perhaps in the past I would not have supported' in response to Texas Republicans. Democratic governors echoed that notion, saying they opposed partisan gerrymandering but needed to retaliate if Texas Republicans carry out their plans. 'I think we need to respond in kind,' said Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, the chair of the Democratic Governors Association. If Texas changes its map, Democrats need to do the same wherever they can, said Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), the Democratic nominee for vice president last year. 'It is a terrible spot we're in as a country, but not responding is going to make it even worse,' he said. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers (D) campaigned on ending gerrymandering, but he said he backs having states led by Democrats draw maps that favor their party if Texas acts. '[When] you're up against the wall, you have to do whatever you can to stop it,' he said. But changing maps in states led by Democrats is difficult. Kelly, Walz and Evers appeared at an event with the governors of Kentucky and Rhode Island, and all five governors are in charge of states where there appear to be few options for adding Democratic seats. Walz said Minnesota's courts would not allow gerrymandering in his state, and Republicans hold majorities in the legislatures of Kansas, Kentucky and Wisconsin. Democrats control all of Rhode Island's state government, but both of the state's two congressional districts already belong to Democrats.
