Australia bans YouTube accounts for children under 16 in reversal of previous stance
YouTube was listed as an exemption in November last year when the Parliament passed world-first laws that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X.
Communications Minister Anika Wells released rules Wednesday that decide which online services are defined as 'age-restricted social media platforms' and which avoid the age limit.
The age restrictions take effect Dec. 10 and platforms will face fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for 'failing to take responsible steps' to exclude underage account holders, a government statement said. The steps are not defined.
Wells defended applying the restrictions to YouTube and said the government would not be intimidated by threats of legal action from the platform's U.S. owner, Alphabet Inc.
'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube,' Wells told reporters, referring to government research. 'We will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids.'
YouTube said the government's decision 'reverses a clear, public commitment to exclude YouTube from this ban.'
'We share the government's goal of addressing and reducing online harms. Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube statement said, noting it will consider next steps and engage with the government.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would campaign at a United Nations forum in New York in September for international support for banning children from social media.
'I know from the discussions I've had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations,' Albanese said. 'It is a common experience. This is not an Australian experience."
Last year, the government commissioned an evaluation of age assurance technologies that was to report last month on how young children could be excluded from social media.
The government had yet to receive that evaluation's final recommendations, Wells said. But she added the platform users won't have to upload documents such as passports and driver's licenses to prove their age.
'Platforms have to provide an alternative to providing your own personal identification documents to satisfy themselves of age,' Wells said. 'These platforms know with deadly accuracy who we are, what we do and when we do it. And they know that you've had a Facebook account since 2009, so they know that you are over 16."
Exempt services include online gaming, messaging, education and health apps. They are excluded because they are considered less harmful to children.
The minimum age is intended to address harmful impacts on children including addictive behaviors caused by persuasive or manipulative platform design features, social isolation, sleep interference, poor mental and physical health, low life-satisfaction and exposure to inappropriate and harmful content, government documents say.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Wisconsin man pleads guilty to smuggling lab equipment to Russian companies
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin man pleaded guilty Tuesday to smuggling lab equipment to Russian companies in violation of trade sanctions the United States imposed after Russia invaded Ukraine. Federal prosecutors charged Andrew Pogosyan, a 68-year-old Russian-born U.S. citizen who lives in Madison, in June in a four-count information with conspiracy to defraud the United States and smuggling goods out of the country. According to the information, Pogosyan started using his company, Omega Diagnostics LLC, in September 2022 to ship lab equipment to Russian companies, including one that that performed chemical research for the Russian military. The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security imposed sanctions in February 2022 on exports to Russia in response to the Ukrainian invasion. The sanctions require exporter to obtain special licenses to ship technology and goods to Russia, particularly products that could help Russia produce chemical and biological weapons. According to prosecutors, Pogosyan did not obtain a license and tried to conceal his exports' ultimate destination by sending them to third-party countries, including Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, Latvia, and Lithuania. The products were then forwarded on to the Russian companies. 'He has accepted responsibility,' Coffield said, 'and is working to make amends.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Gen Xer is qualified but can't land a job — he thinks this is the bizarre reason why: ‘I may never ever get hired again'
He's too old for this. A Gen Xer sparked a fiery conversation about ageism in the workplace — and many agreed with his sentiment. 'I may never ever get hired again,' Bradley Richardson, a 58-year-old who now peddles 'adulting' courses online, said in an Instagram video. He claimed that despite having skills and experience, he believes his age now disqualifies him from traditional employment. 'I will make money, but I may never be an employee or get a job ever again because of my age,' he said. His post quickly gained traction with nearly 30,000 likes and over 4,000 comments. Richardson's concerns resonated with many Gen Xers and Boomers, who echoed his sentiment that ageism is a real barrier in today's job market. Some pointed to the added challenges faced by older workers from marginalized communities, where their race, gender, and sexuality further worsen the discrimination. A survey conducted by resume-building site Resume Now proved all of their worries to be true. It pointed out that, sadly, 90% of workers over the age of 40 have experienced ageism in the workplace, and almost half of the respondents witnessed their employer hiring predominantly young workers. Many people empathized with the Gen Xer in the comment section of his viral video. 'I'm 46 and I'm already feeling it in my industry.' 'I'm 42 and I feel this hard.' Many people in the comment section of his video also believe ageism in the workplace is a real thing. Prostock-studio – Others insisted their skills remain valuable and said they continue to find work with companies that prioritize experience and reliability. 'I was thinking the very same at the age of 58 I needed to find work. Took a few months but it happened. Best company ever. I'm old enough to be everyone's father but they love me and I love them.' Many others in the comment section had encouraging words for the Gen Xer. Prostock-studio – 'I just hired a 60 and 63 yo because they were amazing candidates. Age doesn't matter.' 'I got a job at 62. I just turned 65, told the company I think I want to retire. They told me 'you can't leave us' and handed me an 8% raise. Good people can always get a job at any age!' If you think you are experiencing ageism where you work — maybe you got laid off due to your age or passed up for a promotion by a younger colleague — Midtown East attorney Albert Rizzo suggests speaking to an employment attorney. 'An attorney will want to understand what actions the employer has taken and whether those actions were based on the employee's age,' said Rizzo. 'Any adverse action may create a viable claim. These actions can include failure to promote, denial of privileges given to other employees, exclusion from meetings and projects.'
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge extends migrant status protections for 60,000 people from Central America and Nepal
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge in California extended on Thursday temporary protected status for 60,000 people from Central America and Asia, including people from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem determined that conditions in their home country no longer warranted protections. Temporary Protected Status designations for an estimated 7,000 from Nepal was scheduled to end Aug. 5. And protections allowing 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans to reside and work lawfully in the U.S. for more than 25 years were set to expire Sept. 8. The secretary said both Honduras and Nicaragua had made 'significant progress' in recovering from 1998's Hurricane Mitch. Temporary Protected Status is a temporary protection that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary to people of various nationalities who are in the United States, which prevents them from being deported and allows them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively been seeking to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal. The terminations are part of a broad effort by the Republican administration to deport immigrants en masse, by going after people who are in the country illegally but also by removing protections that have allowed people to live and work in the U.S. on a temporary basis. Noem can grant Temporary Protected Status to people of various countries already in the U.S. if conditions in the home country prevent a safe return, such as natural disaster or political instability. The Trump administration has already terminated TPS for about 350,000 Venezuelans , 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan, Nepal and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits at federal courts. Lawyers for the National TPS Alliance argue that Noem's decisions were not based on objective analysis of conditions at home countries, but predetermined by President Donald Trump's campaign promises and motivated by racial animus. They say designees usually have a year to leave the country, but in this case, they got far less. 'They gave them two months to leave the country. It's awful,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for plaintiffs at a hearing Tuesday. The government argues that Noem has clear and unreviewable authority over the TPS program and that her termination decisions reflect the administration's objectives in the areas of immigration and foreign policy. Justice Department attorney William Weiland said it is not a pretext to have a different view of a program that provides temporary safe harbor. 'It is not meant to be permanent,' he said Tuesday. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
