&w=3840&q=100)
Syria clears Druze fighters from Sweida, govt says tribal clashes halted
Druze from Syria and Israel protest on the Israeli-Syrian border, in Majdal Shams in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, amid the ongoing clashes between Syrian government forces and Druze armed groups in the southern Syrian city of Sweida.Photo | AP
Fighting in Syria's Sweida 'halted' on Sunday, the government said, after the southern city was recaptured by Druze fighters and state forces redeployed to the region where more than 900 people have been killed in sectarian violence.
Druze fighters had pushed out rival armed factions from the city on Saturday, a monitor said, after the government ordered a ceasefire following a US-brokered deal to avert further Israeli military intervention.
Sweida was 'evacuated of all tribal fighters, and clashes within the city's neighbourhoods were halted', Syria's interior ministry spokesman Noureddine al-Baba said in a post on Telegram.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel had bombed government forces in both Sweida and Damascus earlier this week to force their withdrawal after they were accused of summary executions and other abuses against Druze civilians during their brief deployment in the southern province.
More than 900 people have been killed in Sweida since last Sunday as sectarian clashes between the Druze and Bedouin drew in the Islamist-led government, Israel and armed tribes from other parts of Syria.
Earlier Saturday, an AFP correspondent saw dozens of torched homes and vehicles and armed men setting fire to shops after looting them.
But in the evening, Bassem Fakhr, spokesman for the Men of Dignity, one of the two largest Druze armed groups, told AFP there was 'no Bedouin presence in the city'.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor also said 'tribal fighters withdrew from Sweida city on Saturday evening' after Druze fighters launched a large-scale attack.
Fighting nonetheless persisted in other parts of Sweida province, even as the Druze regained control of their city following days of fierce battle with armed Bedouin supported by tribal gunmen from other parts of Syria.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel sceptical
The deal between the Islamist-government and Israel had been announced by Washington early Saturday.
US pointman on Syria Tom Barrack said interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'have agreed to a ceasefire' negotiated by the United States.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later called on the Syrian government's security forces to prevent jihadists from entering and 'carrying out massacres', in a post on X.
He also urged the Syrian government to 'hold accountable and bring to justice anyone guilty of atrocities including those in their own ranks'.
Barrack, who is the US ambassador to Ankara, said the deal had the backing of Turkey, a key supporter of Sharaa, as well as neighbouring Jordan.
'We call upon Druze, Bedouins and Sunnis to put down their weapons and together with other minorities build a new and united Syrian identity in peace and prosperity with its neighbours,' he wrote on X.
Barrack later held a meeting in Amman with the Syrian and Jordanian top diplomats, during which they 'agreed on practical steps to support Syria in implementing the agreement', the US envoy said in a later post on X.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US administration, which alongside Turkey and Saudi Arabia has forged ties with the Islamist president despite his past links with Al-Qaeda, was critical of its Israeli ally's recent air strikes on Syria and had sought a way out for Sharaa's government.
Sharaa followed up on the US announcement with a televised speech in which he announced an immediate ceasefire in Sweida and renewed his pledge to protect Syria's ethnic and religious minorities.
'The Syrian state is committed to protecting all minorities and communities in the country… We condemn all crimes committed' in Sweida, he said.
The president paid tribute to the 'important role played by the United States, which again showed its support for Syria in these difficult circumstances and its concern for the country's stability'.
But Israel expressed deep scepticism about Sharaa's renewed pledge to protect minorities, pointing to deadly violence against Alawites as well as Druze since he led the overthrow of longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In Sharaa's Syria 'it is very dangerous to be a member of a minority – Kurd, Druze, Alawite or Christian', Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted on X.
- Humanitarian corridors -
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said at least 940 people had been killed in the violence since Sunday.
They included 326 Druze fighters and 262 Druze civilians, 165 of whom were summarily executed, according to the Observatory.
They also included 312 government security personnel and 21 Sunni Bedouin, three of them civilians who were 'summarily executed by Druze fighters'.
Another 15 government troops were killed in Israeli strikes, the Observatory said.
Syria's Information Minister Hamza al-Mustafa on Saturday evening said that after the first phase of the ceasefire, which began on Saturday and involved the deployment of security forces to the province, a second phase would see the opening of humanitarian corridors.
According to the United Nations, the fighting has displaced least 87,000 people.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump to shut down NASA missions that monitor carbon dioxide and plant heath
The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers. NASA said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the missions were "beyond their prime mission" and being terminated "to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities".(AP File Photo) President Donald Trump's budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are growing. NASA said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the missions were "beyond their prime mission" and being terminated "to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities". But the missions -- a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope -- still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a "national asset" that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development. They helped scientists discover, for example, that the Amazon rain forest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, while boreal forests in Canada, Russia and places where permafrost is melting absorb more than they emit, Crisp said. They also can detect the "glow" of photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine, he said. "This is really critical," Crisp said. "We are learning so much about this rapidly-changing planet." The decision to end the missions is "extremely shortsighted", said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan. "The observations provided by these satellites ... (are) critical for managing growing climate change impacts around the planet, including in the US," he said. Looking to Congress Crisp and others hope Congress will vote to preserve funding for the missions, which are funded through the fiscal year that ends on September 30. A bill in the House closely aligns with the president's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. But with Congress in recess, it is unclear whether a budget will be adopted before the new fiscal year that begins on October 1. If it does not, Congress could adopt a resolution to continue current funding until a budget is passed, though some lawmakers fear the Trump administration could try to delay or withhold that money. Congressional Democrats warned acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy last month that it would be illegal to terminate missions or impound funds already appropriated by Congress. Experts said the administration's move to eliminate funding aligns with other actions to cut or bury climate science. "The principle seems to be that if we stop measuring climate change, it will just disappear from the American consciousness," said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. Backup plan Crisp and others also are trying to put together a coalition of outside partners -- including from Japan and Europe -- that could fund and operate the instrument attached to the space station. NASA said it will accept outside proposals through August 29. The free-flying satellite, though, is at risk of being brought down, meaning it would burn up in the atmosphere. National Public Radio first reported that NASA employees were making plans to end the missions. Crisp said advocates are hoping NASA also allows outside control of that satellite, which covers more of the globe, but there are legal hurdles to overcome because it would mean giving control of a US satellite to a group that could include foreign partners. "We are going out to billionaires. We are going out to foundations," Crisp said. 'But ... it is a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just does not make sense.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
'It's personal': Analyst says Modi's pushback on Op Sindoor ceasefire claim sparked Trump's tariff fury
The analyst was referring to India's firm rejection of Trump's claims that he played a pivotal role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following Operation Sindoor read more US President Donald Trump looks on as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi speaks during a 'Howdy, Modi' rally at NRG Stadium in Houston, Texas, US September 22, 2019. (Photo: Reuters) The recent decision by US President Donald Trump to impose additional tariffs on India, citing the purchase of Russian oil, has sparked debate about the motivations behind this move. Michael Kugelman, a prominent South Asia analyst and Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington DC, argues that the tariffs are less about economic strategy and more about personal resentment. In an interview with news agency ANI, Kugelman described the situation as the 'worst crisis' in US-India relations in the past two decades, suggesting that Trump's actions stem from taking India's independent stance as a personal slight. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Kugelman pointed out a perceived double standard in Trump's approach, particularly when compared to his treatment of China. When asked why Trump was targeting India but not China, Kugelman explained: '…China has not stood out there and refused to let President Trump take credit for his role in the ceasefire. China has not had its leader have a long conversation with Trump on the phone and essentially dictate to him what's right and what's wrong. These are things that happened with India. So, I think that's why perhaps President Trump would reserve some of his greatest ire on the trade and tariff front for India and for the Indian government. Indeed, it's a double standard. It's hypocritical, whatever you want to say…' The analyst was referring to India's firm rejection of Trump's claims that he played a pivotal role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following Operation Sindoor. Trump has repeatedly attributed the halt in hostilities to trade incentives offered by the US, a narrative that India has consistently debunked. Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar has previously dismissed any suggestion of external mediation, but it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement in Parliament that drove the point home. 'We had said from day one that our action was non-escalatory. No leader in the world asked us to stop Operation Sindoor,' Modi declared from the Parliament, directly challenging Trump's version of events. However, Kugelman's analysis has drawn criticism from some quarters in India. Former Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal questioned why Modi has refrained from directly confronting Trump's misleading claims. In a post on X, Sibal expressed frustration: 'Why play the charade of giving false credit for a ceasefire based on trade threats and one announced over the head of India's leader, creating thereby impression India was pressured to agree? Trump can keep assailing India as a tariff king, threaten tariffs, talk of his interest in mediating the Kashmir issue but Modi dare not tell him what's right and what's wrong? India has sovereign interests which it has to defend.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sibal also highlighted what he sees as Trump's inconsistent approach toward China. He noted, 'Chinese spokespersons day in and day out speak disparagingly of the US, talk down at it, express defiance. Yet, Trump is delaying imposing tariffs on China.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump increases India's tariffs to 50%: How this will hurt us
First 25 per cent, now another 25 per cent. Trump has gone on the offensive against India, with the total tariff now standing at a whopping 50 per cent. Experts point out that nearly $64 billion worth of goods are now threatened accounting for more than half of India's exports to the US read more The US has now imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on India for its purchase of Russian oil. This takes India's total tariffs to 50 per cent, on par with Brazil. File image/AFP Donald Trump has intensified his trade war with India. On Wednesday (August 6), the US president announced sweeping and substantial tariffs on India, which is also one of America's foremost trading partners. In addition to a 25 per cent tariff, which comes into effect today (August 7), he has levied another 25 per cent tariffs, which will come into effect on August 27, as punishment for its oil trade with Russia. This takes the total tariff on Indian goods to 50 per cent, making it the highest tariffs in the world, alongside fellow Brics member Brazil. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Responding to the Trump's latest move, India said it was 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that Washington 'targeted' its oil imports from Russia and that it will 'take all actions' necessary to protect national interests. But as many wake up to this news and try to wrap their minds around it, we examine what would be the impact of such a move on India. What would it mean for the country's economy and trade? What did Trump announce on India tariffs? After making ultimatums to India on its purchase of Russian oil, Trump finally announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on India on Wednesday, marking an escalation of his trade battle with New Delhi. He signed an emergency executive order titled 'Addressing Threats to the US by the Russian Federation', in which he invoked his constitutional powers to claim that Russia and Russian products posed an 'unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States'. He singled out India for its continued imports of Russian oil directly or indirectly. This 25 per cent penalty on India for buying Russian oil comes on top of the 25 per cent tariff he imposed on India late last month. This effectively takes India's cumulative tariff rate to a whopping 50 per cent. Notably, the new, Russia-related tariffs will take effect in 21 days — August 27, while the other 25 per cent tariff comes into effect today (August 7). Trump's penalty on India is a follow-up to the US president's earlier threats, saying India was helping Russia wage war in Ukraine. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine,' he wrote on social media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's Wednesday tariff of 25 per cent is a punishment for India's oil trade with Russia, that the US president claims is funding the war against Ukraine. File image/AFP How has India reacted to the tariffs? India responded to the tariffs, defending its purchase of Russian oil and stating that it would take all actions necessary to protect its national interests. 'We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India,' said the MEA, adding, 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Shashi Tharoor also slammed Trump's tariffs on India. Gandhi termed the 50 per cent hike an 'economic blackmail'. 'Trump's 50 per cent tariff is economic blackmail — an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal. PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people,' Gandhi said in a post on X. Tharoor also called out the tariffs, saying it was a blow to India. 'Uranium, Palladium, there are various things they (US) are importing from Russia. There is, unfortunately, a certain double standard involved. They have given the Chinese a 90-day break, but the Chinese are importing far more Russian oil than we are. So clearly this has not been a particularly friendly gesture from a country we thought was well disposed towards us, an administration that we thought was well disposed.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We will have to learn our lessons from this experience. I think there is certainly a likelihood that there will be some pressure within India now to impose comparable reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. So I think we're going to have to really start looking at other trading partners much more in these circumstances,' Tharoor added. US President Donald Trump's decision to impose 50% tariffs on goods imported from India could hit the country's growth prospects. File image/Reuters What do Trump's tariffs mean for India? The move by the US president has sent shockwaves through India — as New Delhi considered America as a strategic ally. Many also fear the true impact that such high tariffs will have for India. Analysts fear that Trump's 50 per cent tariff could cause a multi-billion dollar hit to the Indian economy, as the additional tariffs obviously means a much higher cost for Indian exports in products like auto parts, textile, and electronics. Many noted that steel, chemical and pharma industries will be affected and may face a huge setback. As per UBS, $8 billion worth of exports are most vulnerable, including gems and jewellery, apparel, textiles, and chemicals. Experts pointed out that the tariff hike will impact nearly 60 per cent of India's $91 billion exports to the US — amounting to around $63.5 billion in vulnerable trade. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Indian exporters also fear that the 50 per cent tariff would reduce their products competitiveness. The tariff on India is much higher than other Asian nations such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, Pakistan and the Philippines all of whom have been assigned lower duty rates of 19–20 per cent. As India's tariff is now 50 per cent, it would eat into India's competitiveness in sectors such as apparel, home furnishing and other labour-intensive goods. Rahul Ahluwalia of the Foundation for Economic Development think-tank, explained to BBC, 'A 25 per cent tariff plus additional penalties will leave India worse off relative to other Asian economies like Vietnam and China, the main countries we are competing against for investment and industrialisation.' Some trade and economic experts said that if sustained these tariffs could even impact India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Sakshi Gupta, principal economist at HDFC Bank, was quoted as telling Reuters: 'While Trump's order gives another 21 days for a deal to breakthrough, in case it does not we will have to significantly lower FY26 GDP growth forecast to below six per cent, baking in a 40-50 bps hit. This would be double our earlier estimates (of GDP hit from higher tariffs).' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Echoing similar sentiments, Gaura Sen Gupta, economist at IDFC First Bank, told Reuters, 'Post this order bilateral tariffs will rise to 50 per cent, which would be the highest applied from August onwards. This definitely increases the downside risk to the 2025-26 GDP estimate. For now, if the tariffs persist till March 2026, total downside risk is estimated at 0.3 per cent to 0.4 per cent.' Apart from this, many Indian MSME exporters have expressed concern over layoffs. Israr Ahmed, former vice president of Federation of Indian Export Organisations, in a Moneycontrol report warned of massive job losses, particularly in sectors like apparel, textiles, marine products, and footwear, calling them 'employment-heavy and margin-thin.' But its not just Indians who are worried about the impact of Trump's tariffs. Some Americans fear the move could backfire on them and US customers would eventually have to pay more for Indian products What comes next? And it seems that Trump isn't done yet with India; he's warned of more secondary sanctions on India over its continued purchase of oil from Russia. 'It's only been eight hours. So, let's see what happens,' Trump told reporters when asked why India was being singled out while countries like China also continue to buy Russian oil. 'You're going to see a lot more. You're going to see so many secondary sanctions.' Indian officials remain hopeful of a resolution in the form of a trade deal. A government source told News18 that the 21-day window is an indicator that Trump is still open to talks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the meantime, India is exploring domestic relief measures for exporters, including interest subsidies and credit guarantees. But economists warn of the impact of these tariffs, noting that GDP growth would fall below six per cent this year. With inputs from agencies
