logo
Trump increases India's tariffs to 50%: How this will hurt us

Trump increases India's tariffs to 50%: How this will hurt us

First Post3 days ago
First 25 per cent, now another 25 per cent. Trump has gone on the offensive against India, with the total tariff now standing at a whopping 50 per cent. Experts point out that nearly $64 billion worth of goods are now threatened accounting for more than half of India's exports to the US read more
The US has now imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on India for its purchase of Russian oil. This takes India's total tariffs to 50 per cent, on par with Brazil. File image/AFP
Donald Trump has intensified his trade war with India. On Wednesday (August 6), the US president announced sweeping and substantial tariffs on India, which is also one of America's foremost trading partners.
In addition to a 25 per cent tariff, which comes into effect today (August 7), he has levied another 25 per cent tariffs, which will come into effect on August 27, as punishment for its oil trade with Russia. This takes the total tariff on Indian goods to 50 per cent, making it the highest tariffs in the world, alongside fellow Brics member Brazil.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Responding to the Trump's latest move, India said it was 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that Washington 'targeted' its oil imports from Russia and that it will 'take all actions' necessary to protect national interests.
But as many wake up to this news and try to wrap their minds around it, we examine what would be the impact of such a move on India. What would it mean for the country's economy and trade?
What did Trump announce on India tariffs?
After making ultimatums to India on its purchase of Russian oil, Trump finally announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on India on Wednesday, marking an escalation of his trade battle with New Delhi.
He signed an emergency executive order titled 'Addressing Threats to the US by the Russian Federation', in which he invoked his constitutional powers to claim that Russia and Russian products posed an 'unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States'. He singled out India for its continued imports of Russian oil directly or indirectly.
This 25 per cent penalty on India for buying Russian oil comes on top of the 25 per cent tariff he imposed on India late last month. This effectively takes India's cumulative tariff rate to a whopping 50 per cent.
Notably, the new, Russia-related tariffs will take effect in 21 days — August 27, while the other 25 per cent tariff comes into effect today (August 7).
Trump's penalty on India is a follow-up to the US president's earlier threats, saying India was helping Russia wage war in Ukraine. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine,' he wrote on social media.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump's Wednesday tariff of 25 per cent is a punishment for India's oil trade with Russia, that the US president claims is funding the war against Ukraine. File image/AFP
How has India reacted to the tariffs?
India responded to the tariffs, defending its purchase of Russian oil and stating that it would take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.
'We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India,' said the MEA, adding, 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.'
Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Shashi Tharoor also slammed Trump's tariffs on India. Gandhi termed the 50 per cent hike an 'economic blackmail'. 'Trump's 50 per cent tariff is economic blackmail — an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal. PM Modi better not let his weakness override the interests of the Indian people,' Gandhi said in a post on X.
Tharoor also called out the tariffs, saying it was a blow to India. 'Uranium, Palladium, there are various things they (US) are importing from Russia. There is, unfortunately, a certain double standard involved. They have given the Chinese a 90-day break, but the Chinese are importing far more Russian oil than we are. So clearly this has not been a particularly friendly gesture from a country we thought was well disposed towards us, an administration that we thought was well disposed.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We will have to learn our lessons from this experience. I think there is certainly a likelihood that there will be some pressure within India now to impose comparable reciprocal tariffs on American exports to India. So I think we're going to have to really start looking at other trading partners much more in these circumstances,' Tharoor added.
US President Donald Trump's decision to impose 50% tariffs on goods imported from India could hit the country's growth prospects. File image/Reuters
What do Trump's tariffs mean for India?
The move by the US president has sent shockwaves through India — as New Delhi considered America as a strategic ally. Many also fear the true impact that such high tariffs will have for India.
Analysts fear that Trump's 50 per cent tariff could cause a multi-billion dollar hit to the Indian economy, as the additional tariffs obviously means a much higher cost for Indian exports in products like auto parts, textile, and electronics. Many noted that steel, chemical and pharma industries will be affected and may face a huge setback. As per UBS, $8 billion worth of exports are most vulnerable, including gems and jewellery, apparel, textiles, and chemicals.
Experts pointed out that the tariff hike will impact nearly 60 per cent of India's $91 billion exports to the US — amounting to around $63.5 billion in vulnerable trade.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indian exporters also fear that the 50 per cent tariff would reduce their products competitiveness. The tariff on India is much higher than other Asian nations such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, Pakistan and the Philippines all of whom have been assigned lower duty rates of 19–20 per cent.
As India's tariff is now 50 per cent, it would eat into India's competitiveness in sectors such as apparel, home furnishing and other labour-intensive goods. Rahul Ahluwalia of the Foundation for Economic Development think-tank, explained to BBC, 'A 25 per cent tariff plus additional penalties will leave India worse off relative to other Asian economies like Vietnam and China, the main countries we are competing against for investment and industrialisation.'
Some trade and economic experts said that if sustained these tariffs could even impact India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Sakshi Gupta, principal economist at HDFC Bank, was quoted as telling Reuters: 'While Trump's order gives another 21 days for a deal to breakthrough, in case it does not we will have to significantly lower FY26 GDP growth forecast to below six per cent, baking in a 40-50 bps hit. This would be double our earlier estimates (of GDP hit from higher tariffs).'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Echoing similar sentiments, Gaura Sen Gupta, economist at IDFC First Bank, told Reuters, 'Post this order bilateral tariffs will rise to 50 per cent, which would be the highest applied from August onwards. This definitely increases the downside risk to the 2025-26 GDP estimate. For now, if the tariffs persist till March 2026, total downside risk is estimated at 0.3 per cent to 0.4 per cent.'
Apart from this, many Indian MSME exporters have expressed concern over layoffs. Israr Ahmed, former vice president of Federation of Indian Export Organisations, in a Moneycontrol report warned of massive job losses, particularly in sectors like apparel, textiles, marine products, and footwear, calling them 'employment-heavy and margin-thin.'
But its not just Indians who are worried about the impact of Trump's tariffs. Some Americans fear the move could backfire on them and US customers would eventually have to pay more for Indian products
What comes next?
And it seems that Trump isn't done yet with India; he's warned of more secondary sanctions on India over its continued purchase of oil from Russia. 'It's only been eight hours. So, let's see what happens,' Trump told reporters when asked why India was being singled out while countries like China also continue to buy Russian oil. 'You're going to see a lot more. You're going to see so many secondary sanctions.'
Indian officials remain hopeful of a resolution in the form of a trade deal. A government source told News18 that the 21-day window is an indicator that Trump is still open to talks.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In the meantime, India is exploring domestic relief measures for exporters, including interest subsidies and credit guarantees. But economists warn of the impact of these tariffs, noting that GDP growth would fall below six per cent this year.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine Strikes ‘Industrial' Facility in Russia's Saratov Region
Ukraine Strikes ‘Industrial' Facility in Russia's Saratov Region

Mint

time10 minutes ago

  • Mint

Ukraine Strikes ‘Industrial' Facility in Russia's Saratov Region

Ukrainian drones struck an 'industrial enterprise' in the Saratov region of southwest Russia overnight, the local governor said, causing temporary flight delays and killing at least one person on the vicinity. The target was the large Saratov oil refinery according to Ukrainian media and Russian Telegram channels, in what would be the latest strike on a major Russian refining enterprise. Videos posted on Russian social media showed fires and clouds of black smoke in the area of what was said to be the Rosneft PJSC-operated refinery. The incident can't be independently verified, and Ukrainian officials haven't commented. Rosneft didn't immediately reply to a request for comment on Sunday sent via WhatsApp. Governor Roman Busargin, in a Telegram post, confirmed damage to an unspecified 'industrial enterprise' near the Volga River, and said emergency services were on site. Flight restrictions were imposed and later lifted at Saratov airport, Interfax reported, citing the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency. The Saratov refinery, about 530 miles southeast of Moscow, has a design processing capacity of about 140,000 barrels of crude a day. With the Kremlin's war against Ukraine almost halfway through its fourth year, Kyiv's forces have recently stepped up hits on Russia's energy infrastructure in a move to curtail Moscow's ability to send fuel to the front line and derive revenue from oil sales. A week ago, Ukraine said it hit the the Ryazan refinery, with a processing capacity of about 340,000 barrels of crude a day, and the Novokuibyshevsk plant in the Samara region, which has a design processing capacity of over 177,000 barrels a day. The Ryazan facility, one of the country's largest, has significantly reduced oil intake since Aug. 2, when Ukrainian drones attacked the plant, Bloomberg reported. Russia's defense ministry reported intercepting 121 Ukrainian drones overnight. Ukraine said it shot down 80 of some 100 Russian drones. Two people were killed in Russian attack in Kherson region, Ukraine said. The exchange of fire comes days ahead of a planned meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed at brokering an agreement to end the war in Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Saturday that Ukraine won't cede territory to Russia to end the war, and was backed by European leaders pledging continued support for Ukraine's sovereignty. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Indian refiners can do without Russian oil, but with trade-offs
Indian refiners can do without Russian oil, but with trade-offs

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Indian refiners can do without Russian oil, but with trade-offs

Indian refiners, the world's biggest user of Russian oil, can operate without supplies from Moscow from a technical standpoint, but the shift would involve major economic and strategic trade-offs, analysts said. Russian crude supports high distillate yields - the share of crude converted into fuels like petrol, diesel, and jet fuel through distillation. Replacing Russian crude, which accounts for up to 38 per cent of India's refinery intake, with alternatives will shift yields, resulting in lower middle distillates (diesel and jet fuel) and higher residue outputs, according to global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. US President Donald Trump last week announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on US imports from India -- raising the overall duty to 50 per cent -- as a penalty for the country's continued imports of Russian oil. Since the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 27 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia. "Indian refiners can operate without Russian crude from a technical standpoint, but the shift would involve major economic and strategic trade-offs," Kpler said in a report, 'US Tariffs on Indian Imports: Implications for Energy Markets & Trade Flows'. India turned to purchasing Russian oil sold at a discount after Western countries imposed sanctions on Moscow and shunned its supplies over its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Consequently, from a mere 1.7 per cent share in total oil imports in 2019-20 (FY20), Russia's share increased to 35.1 per cent in FY25, and it is now the biggest oil supplier to India. In terms of volume, India imported 88 million tonnes from Russia in FY25, out of the total shipment of 245 million tonnes. In July, India received 1.6 million barrels per day of crude from Russia, ahead of China's nearly 1 million bpd and Turkey's around 5,00,000 bpd. Kpler said deep discounts and strong compatibility with India's refining systems led to a surge in imports of Russian Ural crude oil. "Russian crude supports high distillate yields (diesel and jet fuel) and is ideally suited to India's advanced refining infrastructure. It has enabled both state-owned and private refiners to operate above nameplate capacity while maintaining strong margins. "A reversal of this will result in a mild yield shift (lower middle distillate yields, higher residue yields) and probably a small reduction in primary throughput rates, as margins will no longer command a sizeable premium against regional benchmarks, considering existing discounts on Russian oil," Kpler said. The Indian government has issued diplomatic but firm responses to the US tariffs, emphasising the importance of maintaining energy security. "Should Russian oil become inaccessible, India could face an additional USD 3-5 billion in annual import costs (based on a USD 5 per barrel premium on 1.8 million bpd). If global prices rise further (a scenario in which Russian crude exports are being curtailed, in the absence of sufficient buying interest from India), the financial burden could increase significantly," the report said. This may prompt the government to cap retail fuel prices, which could strain fiscal balances. A spike in the import bill could even lead to a reduction in overall crude purchases. India's limited storage capacity further constrains its ability to manage such disruptions. While Russian flows to India continue under a 'business-as-usual' stance, the escalating US rhetoric has reopened conversations about supply diversification, with some Indian refiners reportedly booking increased volumes of Middle Eastern crude. According to Kpler, replacing 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude would require a multi-regional approach. The Middle East remains the most viable option operationally, grades such as WTI Midland from the US could contribute 2,00,000-4,00,000 bpd. These (US crude) are lighter and yield less diesel, a disadvantage for India's distillate-heavy demand. Long-haul freight and cost considerations will also restrict scalability, it said. West Africa and Latin America (LatAm) crudes offer moderate potential. "A balanced replacement strategy may involve 60-70 per cent of substitute volumes from the Middle East, with US and African/LatAm crudes serving as tactical fillers. Nevertheless, none match Russian barrels in cost, quality, or reliability (some of the Russia-to-India barrels have already been contracted under term agreements)," it noted. According to Kpler, Indian refiners can technically adapt to the loss of Russian barrels, but with significant economic consequences. "Replacing 1.7-2.0 million bpd of discounted, medium-sour crude would erode refining margins and misalign product yields. Lighter substitutes like WTI or West African grades produce more gasoline and naphtha, reducing diesel output and hurting both domestic and export economics." Even Middle Eastern grades, while closer in quality, are priced tightly to official selling prices (OSP), leaving limited arbitrage opportunities. "In addition to higher feedstock costs, Indian refiners would face elevated freight and credit charges," it said. "The transition is commercially painful, even if technically feasible."

The ‘Turnberry system' – what the US' new global economic order looks like
The ‘Turnberry system' – what the US' new global economic order looks like

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

The ‘Turnberry system' – what the US' new global economic order looks like

Last week, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra touted India's 'bright prospects in the changing world order' in the medium term, adding that 'opportunities are there for the taking'. But will India be able to get its hands on any of these opportunities? Turnberry, of course, is a Trump-owned hotel and resort on the western coast of Scotland where in late July the US President and his European Commission counterpart, Ursula von der Leyen, announced their bilateral trade agreement. As part of the deal, goods from the European Union (EU) will face a tariff of 15 per cent when entering the US. However, it did not end there: by 2028, the EU will buy $750 billion of American energy products and invest $600 billion in the US. The deal has been called a 'capitulation' and humiliating for the EU. According to Julian Hinz, head of Research Center Trade Policy at Berlin-based Kiel Institute for the World Economy, it was an 'appeasement' and abandoned the World Trade Organization's (WTO) principles. 'Under WTO rules, member countries must apply the same tariffs to all other members. Deviations are only permitted under free trade agreements in which both sides reduce their tariffs to zero. The current deal clearly violates these principles and sets a dangerous precedent,' Hinz warned on July 28, adding that Trump's strategy of 'pitting other economies against each other' had only been strengthened. Greer's New York Times column, however, made no bones about abandoning the WTO and its doctrines. According to Greer, the legacy of the Bretton Woods system lived on in the form of an arrangement dominated by the WTO he said was 'untenable and unsustainable' – while the US lost industrial jobs and economic security, others did not undertake key reforms. China, meanwhile, was the winner. But now, 'reform is at hand', with the US-EU deal 'oriented toward serving concrete national interests rather than vague aspirations of multilateral institutions'. Multilateral institutions such as the WTO, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund have been criticised for decades for their policy suggestions, especially when it comes to debt-laden developing nations, as shown by the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the European debt crisis. Momentum to meaningfully reform them has gathered pace in recent years. Greer, however, has a more US-centric world order in mind. 'It took over 50 years from that first meeting at Bretton Woods until the creation of the WTO. It has been 30 years since. Fewer than 130 days from the beginning of the Trump Round, the Turnberry system is by no means complete, but its construction is well underway,' Greer concluded, calling the current round of global trade negotiations as the 'Trump Round' of discussions – a reference to the several rounds of talks held between countries that led to the formation of the WTO at the Uruguay Round in 1994. But what exactly is the Turnberry system? Going by Greer's column, the Turnberry system involves nations aligning on economic and national security interests and rebalancing trade in a 'more sustainable direction' such that the US' manufacturing sector is back on its feet. This, he said, warrants a 'generational project to re-industrialize America'. The era of the US getting other countries to lower their trade barriers by removing the tariffs that defended its own manufacturing sector is over; in its place, the removal of foreign trade barriers is being done 'while ensuring sufficient tariff protection at home'. This system also intends to enforce these new priorities in a far more telling manner than 'drawn-out dispute settlement process'. Should the US detect non-compliance, there will be swift retribution in the form of higher tariffs – the 'formidable stick' to the 'mighty carrot' that is the opportunity to sell your goods in the 'world's most lucrative consumer market', Greer said. Clearly, the Turnberry system is one which serves only one country. The US gets its pound of flesh in the form of re-industrialisation, while foreign companies get the opportunity to have access to the world's richest consumers. Or at least that's what the US government thinks. Leading academics have repeatedly warned that Trump's tariff war will not solve the country's problems. For instance, Robert Z Lawrence of the Peterson Institute of International Economics and a professor of trade and investment at Harvard University has said it is a 'fool's errand' to make the US economy go through a massive disruption just to create a relatively small number of manufacturing jobs. Moreover, dealing with bilateral deficits individually does not balance overall trade and without policies that cut American expenditure relative to its output, Trump's tariffs will only result in the shifting of its trade deficit from targeted countries to non-targeted ones, Lawrence has argued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store