Who is buying TikTok? Trump promises answers in 'two weeks'
"I think [Chinese] President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it," Mr Trump told Fox News on Sunday. When asked who could buy TikTok, he said he would have more details in "two weeks".
Prof Mark MacCarthy, a senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law in Washington, expressed scepticism over Mr Trump's recent TikTok claims.
"I'll believe it when I see it," he said, noting the ambiguity of the statement.
Prof MacCarthy had previously called the battle between ByteDance and US legislators a "compelling conflict between First Amendment jurisprudence and the national security state.".
Several weeks ago, for a third time, Mr Trump made a decision to extend a deadline that would have caused TikTok to go dark in the US.
That deadline stems from legislation passed in 2024 by US Congress that sought to force ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, to divest from the platform and find a US-based owner.
The motivations for that law are rooted in concern from some elected officials in the US that user data generated and stored by TikTok could ultimately be vulnerable to compromise by the Chinese government.
TikTok has repeatedly denied accusations of user data being vulnerable, but those denials have done little to soothe the nerves of Democratic and Republican US legislators at state and federal levels.
After a loss at the US Supreme Court where ByteDance tried to challenge the TikTok ban legislation, the company has not indicated that it is interested in divesting the social platform from its portfolio, nor has it mentioned that it is willing to sell to any US investor.
In April it was reported that US venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz was in talks to buy a stake in TikTok, and a month earlier, former US Treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin announced he was also trying to put together a group of investors to buy the platform.
TikTok has not responded to The National's requests to comment on this story.
Its last correspondence with media about the company's negotiations with Mr Trump was on April 4, when he decided to give ByteDance a second deadline extension.
"ByteDance has been in discussion with the US government regarding a potential solution for TikTok US," read the emailed response in April.
"Any agreement will be subject to approval under Chinese law," ByteDance added.
Under the new deadline, ByteDance has until September 17 to come up with a deal that satisfies the law and keeps the platform running in the US.
In Mr Trump's "big, beautiful bill", there are provisions that would limit the ability of state governments to make local regulations related to AI and other areas of technology.
Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell was critical of Mr Trump's handling of the issue.
'I have no idea why the President of the United States has not protected the American people or the American military from the Chinese scams that are happening on Tiktok," Ms Cantwell said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
26 minutes ago
- Dubai Eye
US Senate passes Trump's tax-cut, spending bill; sends to House
The Republican-controlled US Senate passed President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill on Tuesday, signing off on a massive package that would enshrine many of his top domestic priorities into law while adding $3.3 trillion to the national debt. The bill now heads back to the House of Representatives for final approval. Trump has pushed lawmakers to get it to his desk to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Trump's Republicans have had to navigate a narrow path while shepherding the 940-page bill through a Congress that they control by the slimmest of margins. With Democrats lined up in opposition, Republicans have had only three votes to spare in both the House and Senate as they wrangled over specific tax breaks and healthcare policies that could reshape entire industries and leave millions of people uninsured. Yet they have managed to stay largely unified so far. Only three of the Senate's 53 Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the package, which passed 51-50 after Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The vote came after an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. It was not immediately clear what changes had been made to the massive package to resolve those concerns. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close as well. An initial version passed with only two votes to spare in May, and several Republicans in that chamber have said they do not support the version that has emerged from the Senate, which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates will add $800 billion more to the national debt than the House version. The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives who repeatedly threatened to withhold their support for the tax bill, is pushing for deeper spending cuts to reduce its total price tag. "That's not fiscal responsibility. It's not what we agreed to," the group said on Monday. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, object to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. 'I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on,' Representative David Valadao, a California Republican, said during the weekend debate. Still, House Republicans are likely to face enormous pressure to fall in line from Trump in the days to come. The bill would make permanent Trump's 2017 business and personal income tax cuts, which are due to expire at the end of this year, and dole out new tax breaks for tipped income, overtime and seniors that he promised during the 2024 election. It provides tens of billions of dollars for Trump's immigration crackdown and would repeal many of Democratic President Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The bill would also tighten eligibility for food and health safety net programmes, which nonpartisan analysts say would effectively reduce income for poorer Americans who would have to pay for more of those costs. The CBO estimates the latest version of the bill would add $3.3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion debt pile. That increased debt effectively serves as a wealth transfer from younger to older Americans, nonpartisan analysts say, as it will slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the decades to come. The bill also would raise the nation's borrowing limit by $5 trillion, postponing the prospect of a debt default this summer that would roil global markets. Republicans rejected the cost estimate generated by the CBO's long-standing methodology. Nonetheless, foreign bond investors see incentives to diversify out of US Treasuries as deficits deepen. Republicans say the bill will help families and small businesses and put benefit programmes like Medicaid on a more sustainable path, and they have broadly agreed on its main contours. But they have struggled to agree on the Medicaid funding mechanism and a tax break for state and local tax payments that is a top priority for a handful of House Republicans from high-tax states including New York, New Jersey and California. Others worry that a crackdown on a funding mechanism for the Medicaid health programme could lead to service cutbacks in rural areas. Some on the party's right flank, meanwhile, have pushed for deeper Medicare cuts to lessen its budgetary impact. Trump has singled out those Republican dissenters on his Truth Social network and excluded them from White House events, and few have been willing to defy him since he returned to office in January. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of the three Republicans who voted against the bill, said on Sunday he would not run for re-election next year. Republican senators Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky also voted against the bill.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Jerome Powell maintains wait-and-see policy as Trump ramps up pressure for rate cuts
Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell on Tuesday repeated his wait-and-see approach towards cutting US interest rates despite mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump. 'As long as the US economy is in solid shape, we think that the prudent thing to do is to wait and learn more and see what those effects might be,' Mr Powell said during a panel discussion at a European Central Bank forum in Portugal. 'We're simply taking some time,' he told delegates. The Fed last month held its target range for interest rates between 4.25 and 4.50 per cent – the fourth consecutive time it has left rates unchanged. When asked if July's meeting was too soon for a rate cut, Mr Powell said the Fed is going 'meeting by meeting'. 'I wouldn't take any meeting off the table or put it directly on the table. It's going to depend on how the data evolve.' Two Fed officials have indicated a willingness to cut rates in July because they believe tariffs will have a one-time inflationary impact, while others have backed Mr Powell's cautious approach. Projections from the Fed's June meeting showed a majority of officials expect to cut rates twice this year. The Fed has maintained a cautious approach towards setting rates since Mr Trump's inauguration, with the president's shifting tariff policy causing economic uncertainty. And Mr Powell said the Fed could have cut rates more by now were it not for tariffs, in a similar message he said during congressional testimony last week. 'In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs, and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs,' he said. Most economists argue tariffs will lead to higher inflation and slower growth, although data in recent months was mixed. A Commerce Department report last week showed the inflation picture has changed little, with the Fed's preferred metric rising by 2.3 per cent annually. Core inflation, which strips food and energy, came in higher than expected at 2.7 per cent. But signs of tariff-related pressures are beginning to appear. Meanwhile, an ISM survey on manufacturing on Tuesday showed manufacturing remained sluggish last month, although at a more modest pace. 'But worries about tariffs continue to crimp supply, leaving manufacturers fraught with trade-offs for holding inventory as pricing pressure builds,' Wells Fargo economists Shannon Grein and Tim Quinlan wrote in a note to clients. Mr Powell on Tuesday said he expects to see higher inflation readings in the coming months, repeating a similar warning he has cautioned in recent weeks His comments come a day after Mr Trump further escalated his attacks. On Monday, he sent a note to the Fed chairman written over a list of countries' interest rates. 'Jerome – You are, as usual, 'Too Late'. You have cost the USA a fortune – and continue to do – you should lower the rate – by a lot!,' the note read. On the same missive, Mr Trump said US interest rates should be between 0.50 per cent and 1.75 per cent. Mr Trump has said he wants the Fed to lower rates to help service US debt. Mr Powell has so far deflected the pressure coming from the White House. 'I'm very focused on just doing my job,' he said when asked if Mr Trump's attacks make his job more difficult. 'The things that matter are using our tools to achieve the goals that Congress has given us: maximum employment, price stability, financial stability. That's what we focus on – one hundred per cent,' he said. Separate data released on Tuesday showed US job openings unexpectedly rose to a six-month high in May, but a decline in hiring showed there were some signs of a slowing labour market. Still, that is unlikely 'to shake the Federal Reserve out of its wait-and-see mode', Oxford Economics lead economist Nancy Vanden Houten said.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump says he would consider deporting Elon Musk
President Donald Trump on Tuesday issued several warnings to Elon Musk and suggested he would consider deporting the tech mogul, in a widening rift between the former allies over a contentious spending bill that could heap trillions of dollars to America's national debt. Speaking on the White House lawn before visiting Florida for the opening of a new migrant centre, Mr Trump said he could consider deporting Mr Musk, the South African born billionaire. 'I don't know, we'll have to take a look,' Mr Trump said. Mr Trump said he believed Mr Musk's criticism of his so-called Big Beautiful Bill was due to measures that cut subsidies and support for electric vehicles. 'He's losing his EV mandate. He's very upset about things, but you know, he could lose a lot more than that, I can tell you right now. Elon can lose a lot more than that,' he said. Mr Trump then said the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), which Mr Musk led before stepping down in May, may be turned on the companies he runs – Tesla and SpaceX – which receive government subsidies. 'We might have to put Doge on Elon,' Mr Trump said. 'Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.' Mr Musk shot back on X: 'So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.' Mr Trump put Mr Musk in charge of Doge and tasked him with cutting government spending. The billionaire enlisted the help of 'tech bros' who put a chainsaw to thousands of government projects and jobs. Mr Musk, the world's richest man, was Mr Trump's largest donor in the election last year. Early in the administration, he was constantly at the White House at Mr Trump's side. But they had a public and acrimonious fallout last month – much of it playing out over social media – over Mr Trump's tax and spending bill. On Monday, Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social that 'without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa'.
