logo
Why did bbno$ blur Asmongold from his latest music video: Uncovering Twitch drama, video erasure and more

Why did bbno$ blur Asmongold from his latest music video: Uncovering Twitch drama, video erasure and more

Time of India2 days ago

(Image via YouTube/bbno$)
The new music video from bbno$, the Canadian rapper, was released on May 29, 2025. With it came an unexpected turn, sparking widespread discussions, as the fans noticed Asmongold, the popular Twitch streamer, being mysteriously blurred out from it.
The track mary poppins features many popular streamers from the group OTK. However, the face of Asmongold was replaced with the cartoon reptile. The deliberate visual censorship with the pointed opening message fuelled questions and debates across social media platforms, with many questioning if this was a moral statement or a personal jab.
Why was Asmongold censored from mary poppins?
BBNO$ Censored Asmongold Out Of His Music Video
The censorship was not subtle. In the place of Asmongold, right alongside the other fellow OTK personalities, like Esfand, Mizkif, Emiru, and others, a cartoonish lizard image appeared.
The lizard image took the place of Asmongold, and it was not a technical glitch but a clear and intentional choice, which signalled right from the opening seconds of the video.
As soon as the video begins, the text disclaimer explicitly states the rationale of the artist. It read, "
At the time of recording, I was unaware of certain individuals' ethical beliefs. As a result, I've chosen to censor those whose values I do not support
."
Asmongold gets Face Censored from Entire bbno$ Music Video
The statement framed blurring as the direct consequence of the values misalignment that was discovered after the video was filmed. No specific details were offered by Canada rapper bbno$ about the nature of the conflicting beliefs in the message. But bbno$ decision doesn't seem to be random. It can be traced back to the controversial remarks made by the streamer in late 2024 about the Israel-Palestine conflict that led to a significant backlash.
The other layer of the disclaimer concluded the statement by saying,
"Additionally, all funds generated by this video will be donated to the PCRF (www.pcrf.net)."
The donation that is supposed to be made to the Palestinian Children's Relief Fund has further hinted at the disagreement's potential nature and a direct response to Asmongold's past statements without explicitly calling him out.
Uncovering the Twitch drama which forced Asmongold's edit
The context of bbno$ decision could be traced back to last year.
It was in October 2024, when Asmongold during a livestream made a controversial comment. It was about the Palestine-Israel conflict and his remarks were perceived by many to not just be dehumanizing but also inflammatory. It ignited significant backlash across the online community against him. Asmongold's fallout was huge. He even faced a temporary ban from Twitch and subsequently stepped down from the leadership position in OTK.
The incident fundamentally altered Asmongold's perceptions in some circles. While mary poppins' video was filmed before (in May 2024, reportedly), before the comments and the bans, Canada rapper bbno$ did know about them before the release of the video. The public stance of the rapper, emphasized by PCRF donation, contrasted directly with Asmongold's past statements. The clash within the ethical beliefs led bbno$ to implement censorship and effectively erase the visible participation of the streamer to avoid association with the views he rejected explicitly.
How did Asmongold react to being censored from mary poppins?
addressing the controversy..
The situation was addressed by Asmongold on May 30, 2025, on social media and during the Twitch stream. The reaction was notably measured. It lacked public dispute or personal anger. On X, he took it easy and posted the reptile graphic, covering his face. His post read, "
Very generous of them to give me more teeth in post production, never had someone care like that before"
During the stream, he even elaborated further and showed an understanding of the position of bbno$. He stated,
'There's no ill will or any negativity about it.
I just think that he doesn't want to be involved with my politics."
Asmongold even acknowledged that his controversial online persona and the resultant hate, along with widespread discussion, have created pressure for others. He explained,
'This is why I moved a lot away from collabing and doing anything with anybody else"
He further added, "
I'm not going to expect people to put their career on the line
." Asmongold, with this, ensured to express feeling bad about potentially wasting the time of those involved in the shoot.
However, he did accept the artist's rights to make the final call.
Either way, Asmongold's calm reaction suggests he expected this, but the fans are undivided. While some argue that Canada rapper bbno$ took a principled stand, others see it as virtual signalling. The incident, though, highlights the growing trend that artists and streamers are distancing themselves from the polarizing figures to avoid any backlash. Asmongold controversy 2024 is not isolated. There are other creators who have faced exclusions over their past remarks, and these incidents highlight that old controversies truly never faced.
They just get blurred out.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal experts warn of increasing IP infringement as AI and digital platforms proliferate
Legal experts warn of increasing IP infringement as AI and digital platforms proliferate

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Legal experts warn of increasing IP infringement as AI and digital platforms proliferate

With the Delhi High Court granting interim protection to the intellectual property rights of the 1994 Hindi filmAndaz Apna Apnato prevent the unauthorised use of its characters, title, dialogues and artistic elements, entertainment industry experts say there is gradual recognition of the increasing threat to intellectual property (IP) ownership, especially with the proliferation of digital platforms and AI technologies. These rights are being infringed upon in new and sophisticated ways, particularly in the case of older, iconic films through unauthorised use in derivative works, stage plays, YouTube series, or even web content that tries to bank on the popularity of the original. The emergence of social media has led to a surge in clipped movie scenes, fan edits, dubbed Reels, and remixed dialogues, often circulated for ad revenue or to boost influencer engagement. Legal experts say these practices frequently border on or cross into infringement, especially when the content is monetised. As AI technologies make unauthorised use more rampant and accessible, filmmakers who may have earlier relied on reputation or informal industry norms to protect their work are now formally enforcing their rights through innovative legal means. Also Read: How Zakir Khan, Bhuvan Bam and Kusha Kapila hit the big time Last month, the Delhi High Court restrained over 30 individuals and entities from "reproducing, using, or commercially exploiting content related to the film (Andaz Apna Apna) without permission." Vinay Pictures, represented by Shanti Vinaykumar Sinha, the legal heir of the film's late producer, Vinay Sinha, filed the lawsuit. 'Popular films from the past are often commercially exploited without authorisation. Iconic dialogues are printed on merchandise, clips are used in YouTube compilations and social media Reels, and songs are reused in digital content without proper licensing," Aishwarya Kaushiq, partner, disputes practice, BTG Advaya, said. Securing sequels, remakes In some cases, creators produce remakes, sequels, or adaptations—both online and offline—without acquiring rights. AI tools are increasingly used to recreate well-known characters or scenes, and mobile games often incorporate elements that resemble those from classic films, all of which infringe on the original IP, she added. On the monetisation aspect, the apparent objective here is to capitalise on the nostalgia and enduring popularity of these films. By leveraging recognisable characters, quotes, or visuals, infringers aim to drive engagement, boost product sales, or increase views—without sharing revenue with the rightful IP holders. Gaurav Sahay, founder partner, Arthashastra Legal pointed out that AI has further complicated this by enabling the recreation of actors' faces, voices, and iconic scenes, which can then be used in spoof videos, tribute content, or even digital advertising, all without needing any actual footage or consent from the rights holders. 'AI tools can produce content that closely mimics or even recreates the original work, often without needing access to the actual source files, with startling accuracy. The low barrier to entry has democratised creativity, but it has also opened the floodgates to infringement," Sahay said. Also Read: Independent producers, boutique studios veer towards regional cinema for big gains He added that such content spreads rapidly across digital platforms, from YouTube to Instagram, generating views, engagement, and even revenue for creators who have not contributed to the original work. In many cases, viewers may not even realise that what they are watching is AI-generated, blurring the line between original creation and synthetic imitation. AI has accelerated and anonymised the infringement process. It has empowered a new class of content creators who may not fully understand or respect IP boundaries. Enforcing rights 'The use of Gen AI for infringing copyright is a significant legal issue and will only grow with time. It is being used to duplicate film characters and music by amateurs as well as increasingly by businesses in the context of product or business endorsements on social media. This is seen generally in moment marketing campaigns conducted by many brands despite the legal risk associated with such unlicensed or unauthorised use," Ameet Datta, founder and managing counsel, ADP Law Offices, said. To be sure, filmmakers who may have earlier relied on reputation or informal industry norms to protect their work are now formally enforcing their rights. Sahay said proactive IP audits are conducted to identify and consolidate ownership over various elements of films to ensure they have a legally enforceable foundation in place. Where a single viral clip or AI-generated parody can damage or dilute a brand, filmmakers are recognising the need to future-proof their IP through vigilant legal oversight, contracts that reflect modern realities, and timely enforcement when their rights are breached. Filmmakers are now assigning digital rights for their past works or negotiating new licensing deals with OTT platforms and music streaming services, ensuring they maintain control over how their content is distributed and reused. Changing clauses Many are now amending clauses in their existing contracts that account for newer forms of exploitation, including AI-generated adaptations, derivative content, or non-fungible token (NFT) usage. There is also an emphasis on digital watermarking and blockchain-based copyright tracking, which allows filmmakers to prove ownership in cases of online infringement. Also Read: Old hits and IPL screenings offer buzz, but not cash for cinemas 'We're seeing a clear shift in how filmmakers, including veterans, are approaching IP protection. Many are now taking proactive legal steps to not just seek registration of their IP but also seek enforcement of copyright, trademarks, and moral rights," Essenese Obhan, managing partner, Obhan & Associates, said. 'Legal teams are also being engaged for continuous monitoring, takedown requests, and litigation wherever needed," Obhan said, adding that the recent interim stay in theAndaz Apna Apnacase signals an encouraging trend of courts recognising and enforcing these rights, despite the complexities introduced by new technologies.

Fans call it 'Sanders Nation,' but Shedeur Sanders isn't convinced — here's how he reacted
Fans call it 'Sanders Nation,' but Shedeur Sanders isn't convinced — here's how he reacted

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Fans call it 'Sanders Nation,' but Shedeur Sanders isn't convinced — here's how he reacted

Shedeur Sanders breaks silence on viral 'Sanders Nation' comment (Getty Images) When Shedeur Sanders entered the 2025 NFL Draft, projections placed him among the top five picks. For months, analysts praised his college résumé, his arm strength, and his high football IQ. Some even had him as a potential No. 1 overall selection as late as December. But when his name was finally called—on Day 3, as the 144th pick in the fifth round by the Cleveland Browns—the football world was stunned. What followed was not just widespread criticism of his slide but also questions about his readiness for the NFL and why he dropped so dramatically. Shedeur Sanders shrugs off ' Sanders Nation ' nickname and shares his real thoughts on fan culture But if you expected Sanders to respond with bitterness, you don't know Shedeur. The former Colorado Buffaloes quarterback has instead taken the high road, acknowledging the noise but refusing to let it dictate his mindset. In a now-viral clip shared on X by @JaKiTruth, a reporter brought up the idea of 'Sanders Nation'—an unofficial name for his growing fanbase. Her intent seemed innocent, but the exchange turned revealing. 'It's about Sanders Nation. Sanders Nation is a loud fan base that you have, right?' the reporter asked. Shedeur's reply? A blend of humility and clarity. 'What is 'Sanders Nation'?' he said with a laugh. 'I don't call them that. It's a group of individual people who have their own thoughts. I can't control nobody.' When pressed further, he stood his ground. 'I don't even pay attention, I don't pay attention to it for real. I'm thankful, though, but I focus on the main thing.' And that "main thing" is clear—earning his place on a crowded Browns quarterback depth chart. With Deshaun Watson, Joe Flacco, Kenny Pickett, and fellow rookie Dillon Gabriel all vying for snaps, Sanders has no time to dwell on branding or public perception. He's laser-focused on the grind. Despite the draft-day tumble, Shedeur's support remains immense. His jersey shot to the top of the rookie sales chart, even outselling No. 1 pick Cam Ward and former Buffaloes teammate Travis Hunter. That kind of love isn't bought—it's earned. And his fans have continued to rally around him, especially as some in the media attempt to craft unfavorable narratives. One fan's response to the 'Sanders Nation' clip summed it up perfectly: 'She wants us to be labeled so they can accuse us of being a cult next.' Another noted that Shedeur's decision to livestream on Twitch was intentional—'so she couldn't twist his words.' Some fans even took aim at the reporter directly, suggesting she had an agenda. While those claims remain unverified, they do speak to the kind of scrutiny Sanders has faced—not just as a player, but as the son of NFL legend Deion Sanders. But Shedeur isn't biting. He's not interested in the clickbait or the back-and-forth. Growing up in the spotlight has prepared him well for these moments. His calm demeanor, thoughtful responses, and grounded approach reveal a maturity that will serve him well both on and off the field. For now, Shedeur Sanders isn't worried about names like 'Sanders Nation.' He isn't concerned with media games or Twitter chatter. His focus is singular: climb the depth chart, earn the respect of his teammates, and show the league that being picked at No. 144 was a mistake. Because if there's one thing Shedeur has proven time and time again—it's that he's more than just a name. He's here to compete. Also Read: From dating rumors to 'I do': Inside Hailee Steinfeld and Josh Allen's intimate fairytale wedding

Geopolitics scores but other influencer contents take a hit amid Bangla turmoil
Geopolitics scores but other influencer contents take a hit amid Bangla turmoil

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Geopolitics scores but other influencer contents take a hit amid Bangla turmoil

1 2 3 4 Kolkata: From a noticeable dip in viewership from Bangladesh to a marked increase in hate comments, Bengal's content creators have encountered significant changes amidst the ongoing volatility in Indo-Pak and Indo-Bangladesh relations. During the Aug uprising, content creators observed a drop in viewership from Bangladesh. While some managed to regain their audience, many continue to report persistent declines. In a bid to attract more engagement, several creators recently pivoted to producing more content focused on geopolitics. The escalating cross-border tensions have led to a surge in hate comments. Interestingly, this phenomenon has resulted in heightened viewership, greater audience engagement, and increased revenues for the creators. For many YouTubers, political tensions often lead to restrictions on the flow of media and content, directly affecting the reach and accessibility of creators and their material. Digital creator Zeeshan Ali, who runs a channel with 71K subscribers on Instagram, was badly hit. "I have a good following in Bangladesh, and they would visit the food joints I recommended once they visited Kolkata. After the uprising, the reach went. According to the trend, I should have 90K subscribers by now. Unfortunately, people from Bangladesh started unfollowing me. They are not keen on watching entertainment at all and are busy surfing content related to politics and conflict," he said. Actor and content creator Aparajita Ghosh, who presents podcasts on YouTube, expressed certainty that the viewership of her content would be double if the Indo-Bangladesh relationship had not become strained. "Any content I shared earlier would receive so much love from Bangladesh. People would generously comment. After the uprising, I hosted a podcast called Off Screen With Aparajita Ghosh. I am surprised that there is not a single comment from Bangladesh. I am sure the viewership would have been double, had this podcast been shared at least a year back," Ghosh stated. Aritra Banerjee, who has 176K subscribers on YouTube, faced the heat when the watch hours of his videos dipped during the Aug uprising in Bangladesh. "Bangladesh is a big market in terms of our viewership. The internet services were down during the Aug uprising. While my subscriber base remained the same, the watch hours dipped by 25% then. Once the internet connections resumed, the viewership was back," Banerjee said. "My show is about ghosts, and their viewership in Bangladesh remains steady at 11% regardless of any political developments. Ghosts are a different ballgame altogether, but I noticed several content creators who never engaged in geopolitics previously now produced three videos instead of one per day to take advantage of the increased viewer interest.," said Gourab Tapadar, whose 'Pretkotha' channel has 883K subscribers. Recent times have seen a surge in the number of hate comments for Indian content, with hyperactive trolls having a field day. Sharmila Maiti, who currently has 1.1 million subscribers on YouTube, experienced a 60% increase in hate comments on her channel. "People often watch content which they absolutely hate. They watch it to ridicule or troll. Last week, I posted a vlog with an interview of a meritorious student. Among the 600 comments I got, 550 were from Bangladesh. Most of them were very critical," Maiti stated. Such hate comments are not overtly detrimental for a channel as they help generate the engagement necessary for revenue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store