House panel to make Epstein files public after redactions to protect victim identities
Ted Barrett
,
Sarah Ferris
for CNN
This undated trial evidence image obtained 8 December 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Photo:
CNN/US District Court for the Southern District of New York
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform intends to make public some files it subpoenaed related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, though it will first redact them to shield victims' IDs and other sensitive matters, a committee spokesperson says.
The panel is expected to start receiving materials from the Justice Department on Friday, though it appears the public release will come some time after that. The spokesperson said the committee would work with the Justice Department on the process.
"The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations," the spokesperson said.
Democrats on the committee complained that Comer was slow walking the release of the material by allowing the Justice Department to miss the Tuesday deadline that had been set by the panel and instead turn over the materials to the committee gradually over time starting Friday. They said DOJ had already been directed by the House subpoena to redact material related to victims' identities and child sexual abuse - questioning the need for further delay to do so.
"Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up. The American people will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files," said Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the panel. "In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena. Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago."
Many Republicans have called for more transparency surrounding the case and the release of records related to the matter - and the issue has roiled the House.
Speaker Mike Johnson took steps to delay until September a vote of the full House to publicly release the DOJ's Epstein files. The Louisiana Republican has said he supports transparency in the case but wants to give the administration room to handle the matter.
House Republicans are on track to be forced to take a major vote over the release of information related to Epstein when they return to DC next month.
Earlier on Tuesday, the chair of the powerful House Rules Committee - whose panel has run into drama over Epstein - was staying mum on whether GOP leadership will try to kill that vote altogether.
Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx told reporters Tuesday that she believes the Epstein issue might be "resolved" before the House is forced to take that vote, pointing to the ongoing investigation by the Oversight Committee.
"Chairman Comer has mentioned that he's getting the material that he's asked for from the Department of Justice. I'd really like to see this resolved, if possible, before we get back, as much information as possible to come out," Foxx said.
- CNN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
US to screen for ‘anti-Americanism' in immigration applications
By Jessie Yeung, CNN People wave US flags to celebrate becoming US citizens after taking the oath of allegiance during a naturalization ceremony . Photo: AFP / Joseph Prezioso People applying to live or work in the United States will now be screened for "anti-Americanism," including having their social media checked, authorities announced on Tuesday, in a tightening of restrictions that has alarmed immigration advocates and lawyers. Immigration officers will be able to look at whether applicants have had "any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations," or whether there is any "evidence of antisemitic activity," said the policy update by US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS). Social media vetting, already introduced into immigration screening in June by the Trump administration, will be expanded to include searches for any "anti-American activity," it said. It's the latest step in the administration's crackdown on immigration regulations, with many new actions likely to deter immigrants and international students from coming to the US. The State Department has revoked more than 6000 student visas this year, an official said on Monday. And in June, the State Department said embassies and consulates must vet student visa applicants for "hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles". "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser in a news release on Tuesday. He added that the immigration agency was "committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible." The policy update did not give a specific definition for "anti-Americanism," only saying this included those who supported "antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organizations, and antisemitic ideologies". But it pointed to a section of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) for examples of "anti-American" ideologies. The section in the Act, the US' overarching legal framework for immigration, bans certain people from becoming naturalized citizens - including members of various Communist parties, those who advocate for "world communism," those who write or distribute materials opposing "all organized government," or those who wish to overthrow the US government by force or violence. The announcement immediately stoked confusion and alarm, with online forums debating what counted as "anti-American." Many worried that the vague wording and lack of clear definition would give immigration officers the power to crack down further on immigration, regardless of a genuine threat. "Is being against the recent strike in Iran or being in favor of a cease fire in Gaza anti-American or antisemitic?" read one Reddit post in an immigration discussion. "What if you personally don't like Trump as a President or you shared a post on the recent South Park episodes making fun of him (and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi) Noem?" "The term (anti-Americanism) has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump (administration)," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, in a post on X. He added that the move was reminiscent of McCarthyism - the period of the 1950s also known as the Red Scare, when authorities prosecuted left-wing individuals amid a widespread public panic over communism and its influence on American institutions. Steven Brown, an immigration attorney based in Houston, also posted on X that so-called American values were "a subjective standard not found in the INA." "For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, according to the Associated Press. "It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards," Lopez said. - CNN
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Musk quietly puts brakes on plans for new political party, WSJ says
Elon Musk. Photo: Beata Zawrzel / NurPhoto via AFP Billionaire Elon Musk is quietly putting the brakes on plans to start his new political party, telling allies he wants to focus on his companies, the Wall Street Journal has said, citing people with knowledge of the plans. Musk unveiled the 'America Party' in July after a public dispute with President Donald Trump on the tax cut and spending bill. He has recently been focused in part on maintaining ties with Vice President JD Vance, the paper said, and has acknowledged to associates that forming a political party would damage his relationship with Vance. Musk, the world's richest man, and his associates have told people close to Vance that the billionaire is considering using some of his financial resources to back Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028, the paper said. The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX spent nearly $300 million (NZ$514m) in 2024 to help Trump and other Republicans get elected, exerting enormous influence in the first few weeks of Trump's term as head of the newly created efficiency department (DOGE). Reuters could not immediately verify the Journal report. Tesla and the White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside regular business hours. Vance, who had called for a truce following Musk's all-public feud with Trump, reaffirmed his position this month and said he had asked Musk to return to the Republican fold. Tesla shares are down more than 18 percent this year after it posted in July its worst quarterly sales decline in more than a decade and profit that missed Wall Street targets, though its profit margin was better than many had feared. Musk also warned of "a few rough quarters" after the end of support for electric vehicles by the Trump administration. Investors worry whether he will be able to devote enough time and attention to Tesla after locking horns with Trump over his ambitions for a new political party. -Reuters Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
House panel to make Epstein files public after redactions to protect victim identities
By Ted Barrett , Sarah Ferris for CNN This undated trial evidence image obtained 8 December 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein. Photo: CNN/US District Court for the Southern District of New York The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform intends to make public some files it subpoenaed related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, though it will first redact them to shield victims' IDs and other sensitive matters, a committee spokesperson says. The panel is expected to start receiving materials from the Justice Department on Friday, though it appears the public release will come some time after that. The spokesperson said the committee would work with the Justice Department on the process. "The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations," the spokesperson said. Democrats on the committee complained that Comer was slow walking the release of the material by allowing the Justice Department to miss the Tuesday deadline that had been set by the panel and instead turn over the materials to the committee gradually over time starting Friday. They said DOJ had already been directed by the House subpoena to redact material related to victims' identities and child sexual abuse - questioning the need for further delay to do so. "Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up. The American people will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files," said Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the panel. "In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena. Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago." Many Republicans have called for more transparency surrounding the case and the release of records related to the matter - and the issue has roiled the House. Speaker Mike Johnson took steps to delay until September a vote of the full House to publicly release the DOJ's Epstein files. The Louisiana Republican has said he supports transparency in the case but wants to give the administration room to handle the matter. House Republicans are on track to be forced to take a major vote over the release of information related to Epstein when they return to DC next month. Earlier on Tuesday, the chair of the powerful House Rules Committee - whose panel has run into drama over Epstein - was staying mum on whether GOP leadership will try to kill that vote altogether. Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx told reporters Tuesday that she believes the Epstein issue might be "resolved" before the House is forced to take that vote, pointing to the ongoing investigation by the Oversight Committee. "Chairman Comer has mentioned that he's getting the material that he's asked for from the Department of Justice. I'd really like to see this resolved, if possible, before we get back, as much information as possible to come out," Foxx said. - CNN
