Home Secretary says ‘gap in law' on violent attackers will be closed
Yvette Cooper said the new tools will enable the criminal justice system to 'close the gap' between terror suspects, who can be jailed for life for planning attacks, and individuals not driven by a particular ideology.
Police would be given powers to apprehend them before they carry out attacks.
Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's State of Terror series: 'There is a gap in the law around the planning of mass attacks that can be just as serious (as terrorism) in their implications for communities, their impact, the devastation that they can cause and the seriousness of the crime.
'We will tighten legislation so that that is taken as seriously as terrorism.'
She said legislation would be similar to that which allows police to arrest terror suspects for steps taken to prepare for an attack, such as research, which is not currently available without links to an ideological cause.
'We've seen cases of growing numbers of teenagers potentially radicalising themselves online and seeing all kinds of extremist material online in their bedrooms,' she said.
'We have to make sure that the systems can respond while not taking our eye off the ball of the more long-standing ideological threats.'
Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana, who killed three girls at a dance class, is among the individuals who could have been covered by the legislation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Torture survivors condemn new rules from UK Home Office
TORTURE survivors and charities in Scotland have condemned the UK Government's citizenship ban for refugees, arguing it means people with the legal right to live here are now 'second-class' citizens living in fear of deportation. New Home Office rules mean thousands of people who have come to the UK in small boats or hidden in lorries will normally be refused citizenship – even if their claim for political asylum is granted. Most people who enter the UK on small boats to claim political asylum, having escaped war and persecution, are eventually granted refugee status and many claim British citizenship. The new ban could affect at least 71,000 people and it prompted 148 organisations and individuals to write to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, urging her to reverse the decision. READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech Signatories to the letter claim the new rules break international law and discriminate against refugees, thousands of whom will be denied rights and left living their lives in 'limbo'. Campaigners also argued the ban makes it more difficult for refugees to integrate into society and risks 'playing into toxic politics' which is 'manipulated by the far-right to bring hate and disorder to our streets'. Last summer, rioters in England attacked mosques and tried to burn down hotels housing asylum seekers, and in recent days, protests down south turned violent again after crowds targeted a hotel in Epping, Essex, which houses people seeking sanctuary in the UK. The Government faces a 'powder keg' situation, amid fears that far-right violence targeting migrants could erupt across England again in coming days and weeks. People in Scotland affected by the citizenship ban spoke to The Ferret following debates this month at Westminster over the government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Borders Bill) which is making its way through the UK Parliament. The UK Government's bill – a response to the small boats crossing issue – is designed to 'strengthen UK border security'. Peers supportive of refugees, however, have tabled amendments to the bill and, if accepted, they would change the new Home Office guidance on citizenship. Citizenship applications The new guidance for Home Office visa and immigration staff update the 'good character' requirement for British citizenship applications. Anyone who arrived without valid entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation after undertaking a 'dangerous journey' – such as crossing the English Channel in small boats or concealed in vehicles – will almost certainly be refused citizenship, critics said. These changes apply to applications made on or after February 10, 2025, but people who came to the UK prior to then are still affected, even though they could have lived in the UK legally for years. The new guidance says: 'A person who applies for citizenship from February 10, 2025 who has previously arrived without a required valid entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation, having made a dangerous journey will normally be refused citizenship.' Critics of the ban say most refugees have no choice but to take irregular routes to reach the UK due to the lack of safe and legal alternatives. They claim the guidance breaches international law, because Article 31 of the UN Refugee Convention protects refugees from penalties for irregular illegal entry. Seeking UK citizenship costs £1735 an application, and there is no right of appeal against a refusal. Borders bill THE Government's Borders Bill has passed through the House of Commons and is now with the House of Lords for consideration. An amendment – tabled by the Bishop of Chelmsford with support from Baroness Lister of Burtersett, Lord German and Lord Kerr of Kinlochard – aims to mitigate the 'most damaging impacts' of the citizenship ban. The new clause would ensure the good character requirement is not applied contrary to the UK's international legal obligations. With Westminster now in summer recess, the bill won't be debated again until September/early October. Once peers have finished examining the draft legislation, any amendments made will be sent back to the House of Commons for agreement or further negotiation – a political process often referred to as 'ping pong'. Reaction Those affected by the ban include Yahya Fasi, a youth football coach with the St Mirren football club charitable foundation who is a refugee from Syria. A former professional football player in Damascus, he has lived in Rothesay, Bute, since 2020, where his family has a barbershop, beautician business and a patisserie. He told The Ferret that he and his family have 'worked hard' towards getting citizenship, and did everything asked of them, adding that the ban is 'heartbreaking'. (Image: SNS) 'To now be told we can't even apply is deeply disappointing. We've built our lives here from nothing. We've always tried to give back to the community and to contribute in any way we can, because Bute feels like home,' Fasi said. 'It's where we finally felt safe, where our children are growing, and where we've started to heal. We don't want to go back to Syria. We have no one left there, no family, no home. Everything we had was destroyed. Even speaking about it brings back painful memories we try to forget.' Gulan, a refugee who came to Scotland with her two children to escape torture in Iraq, said she faced 'horrible and unbearable violence' at home and had 'no choice but to leave', adding that the journey was 'extremely dangerous'. She said: 'Over the years, we have integrated into the community and found happiness. With our skills and experiences, we deserve to be treated with dignity and respect as any citizen. 'We haven't done anything wrong; we shouldn't be punished for taking the only option we had left when other legal ways to survive just weren't available.' Ahlam Souidi, a senior community development worker at Freedom from Torture, a charity in Glasgow that helps refugees, said many of the torture survivors she works with took 'extraordinarily dangerous journeys, compelled by desperation' and with no 'viable alternatives'. 'If the Government really follows through with blocking refugees from getting citizenship, the UK will be taking a huge step backwards,' she argued. 'This approach doesn't align with our values as a compassionate society and will only cause further distress to the survivors I work with every day. We urge the Government to immediately reconsider.' Her views were echoed by Sabir Zazai, chief executive at the Scottish Refugee Council, who claimed the policy change will have a 'significant long-term impact' on many people already in Scotland, who are 'working and contributing' to the economy and culture. 'This change doesn't discriminate between refugees, victims of trafficking, or children,' he said. 'It doesn't consider the unique vulnerabilities and complex backgrounds of people seeking protection, many of whom have fled unthinkable circumstances. 'British citizenship is the beginning of many people's integration journey. Without it, people do not have the right to vote in UK elections. They do not have the freedom to travel, or work in many government jobs. But worst of all, they remain at risk of detention or deportation.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Citizenship applications will continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis.' Syrian asylum claims resume It emerged this month that the UK Government would start processing Syrian asylum claims again. Last December, decisions were suspended after President Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by an Islamist militant group called Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, after years of civil war. This left in limbo more than 7000 Syrians in the UK waiting for a decision on an asylum claim. In parts of Syria, the security situation remains unstable and there has been fighting in the province of Suweida between Druze and Bedouin militias, as well as government forces, in recent weeks. The latest violence started last week. A few days later, Israel got involved and launched air strikes, saying it was protecting the Druze against government forces. At time of writing, more than 1100 people are reported to have been killed in Suweida, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is based in the UK. Meanwhile, the UK Government has published updated guidance for officials to make decisions on Syrian asylum claims. It says that about 60% of the population suffers from food insecurity, millions live in inadequate accommodation, roughly half of the hospitals are non-functional, and millions face issues accessing sufficient clean water and safe sanitation systems. The guidance continues: 'There are approximately 7.4 million internally displaced persons in Syria, with more than two million living in temporary shelter arrangements such as camps, which suffer from severe overcrowding and poor living conditions.' However, there is a caveat that 'the general humanitarian situation in Syria is not so severe that there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk of serious harm' if someone is returned. 'All cases must be considered on their individual facts, with the onus on the person to demonstrate they face persecution or serious harm,' the guidance adds. The Home Office has been asked to comment.
Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A warning from Trump that Britain and Europe simply cannot ignore
Acting as if he was President of the world, Donald Trump marked his latest arrival in Britain by delivering a lecture to Europe on immigration. He proclaimed: 'You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe any more. You got to get your act together… you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe.' He also made a tremendous claim that 'last month we had nobody entering our country. Nobody. Shut it down'. We will wait for the research before accepting that assertion. But there is no doubt that Mr Trump has, by decisive action, significantly reduced illegal arrivals in the United States. No doubt it helps to have weak, compliant neighbours. And this policy has followed more than 30 years during which America has been transformed by colossal mass migration, legal and illegal. But the President is right that Europe cannot indefinitely sustain migration at current levels. And that warning, of course, includes this country. Whatever will he say about this when he meets his friend Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow in Scotland? The two men have an unlikely but undoubted rapport. But how will it survive if their conversation turns to the subject of migration? The Mail on Sunday reports today the latest plans of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to find some way of restricting the cross-Channel boat traffic on the justified basis that these vessels are profoundly unsafe, especially for women and children. This is plainly well-intentioned but it is hard to see it as a game-changer. Those who pay small fortunes to board these boats are frighteningly ready to take grave risks. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister has inflicted a very serious wound on himself by his absurd claim – which will haunt him for years to come – that 'there is lots of housing and many local authorities that can be used, and we're identifying where it can be used', to accommodate both rising numbers of homeless people and migrants. His statement is disastrously wrong and out of kilter with years of official claims that we must build new housing in great numbers at all costs. It casts doubt on his awareness of the problems before him and on his knowledge of the true state of the country. He really said this, unlike France's Queen Marie Antoinette who never actually said 'let them eat cake' about starving peasants unable to afford bread. Even some on the Left are beginning to see that the social pressures created by the housing of migrants in hotels in towns across the country are dangerous. They simply cannot dismiss objections as bigotry. And while nasty troublemakers will no doubt do all they can to exploit these events, many of the protesters in such places as Epping are non-violent, respectable, open-minded people who have simply had enough of being treated as if they did not exist and their concerns don't matter. It is people very much like them, in the USA, who have upended politics in that country. They have cast aside old parties and played-out politicians who ignored them for too long. All the established British parties and their leaders should take note, and do so soon.
Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Home Secretary to make crowding more than 80 migrants into small boats a criminal offence – but critics say it'll do nothing to stem the tide
Yvette Cooper will use new laws to prosecute migrants who dangerously overcrowd small boats and put women and children at risk. The Home Secretary has ordered officials to expand the 'endangering lives at sea' offence, currently going through Parliament, to specifically include cases where up to 100 passengers can pack on to a single dinghy. It comes as the number of people per small boat has reached record levels this year, with insiders warning it is 'a matter of time' before one sinks from overcrowding. Ms Cooper is worried about women and children being 'crushed at sea' and told this newspaper: 'If you storm a boat, trampling over the bodies of tiny children, you are complicit in putting other people in danger.' She wants to use the new powers in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill to tackle migrants who overcrowd the dinghies. But critics suggested the plan was 'pathetic tinkering' that will not make a difference in stemming the flow of illegal migrants to Britain. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The only way we're going to stop the boats is to do what America are doing. Deport every single illegal immigrant upon arrival – either to their home country or a third country like Rwanda.' And The Mail on Sunday can reveal the second-most overcrowded boat crossed the Channel on July 18 – with 97 on board, including 22 women and 17 children. The dinghy spent around ten hours limping towards the Channel's midpoint before eventually being rescued by a Border Force catamaran. The number of boats carrying 80 or more people has spiked in the past six months, helped by French officials doing nothing to stop smugglers bringing 'taxi boats' close to shore. By contrast, five years ago the dinghies typically had about 15 on board, sources said, and smugglers have been driven by greed to cram more people on amid helpful calmer seas. In the six years since the small-boat crossings began, up to the end of April 2024, only 20 boats crossed with 80 or more people on board. There have been 50 such dinghies after that point, and more than a third of those have arrived in the past two months. Ms Cooper's proposals would allow the Government to prosecute anyone found to be enabling boat overcrowding, or endangering passengers' lives by refusing help from French lifeguards (which would involve them not crossing the Channel). A Home Office official said: 'If the smuggling gangs carry on cramming 80, 90 or even 100 people on to these flimsy dinghies, it is simply a matter of time before the bottom falls out of one of them, and we will see a mass casualty event in the Channel. 'We should not have to wait for that to happen before we take action, which is why we need to get this endangerment law on the statute books and start enforcing it against anyone responsible for putting the lives of women and children at risk.' Tony Smith, former director general of the Border Force, said that anything combatting the 'vile' people-smuggling trade was welcome. But he added the 'devil would be in the detail' of Ms Cooper's powers, warning that pilots of small boats try to conceal themselves among other migrants as their dinghies approach the authorities. All migrants who come to the UK on small boats breach the law of illegal arrival, but usually seek asylum immediately – which makes prosecution harder as they wait for their applications to be processed. Only 1 per cent of all those who entered illegally since Labour came to power have been charged. Ms Cooper is also pushing for French police to start targeting such boats at the moment when smugglers bring them to shore, and force migrants wading through water before boarding to turn back. The Home Secretary said: 'We won't stand by as lives are put at risk and our border security is so badly undermined. That is why we are making it much easier to prosecute those who act in this callous and dangerous way.' She added: 'Vile people smugglers are increasingly cramming more and more people into these flimsy boats to inflate their profits with no regard for the lives they put at risk. Women and children are put into the centre of the boats where we have even seen people crushed to death.' But Opposition frontbenchers claimed the plan would not be enough to tackle overcrowding. Mr Philp said: 'It's pathetic. A piece of tinkering that will make absolutely no difference whatsoever. The Government promised to smash the gangs but has totally failed to do that. The gangs are using bigger boats and cramming more in just so they can make more money. 'It is already a criminal offence to facilitate illegal immigration with a long prison sentence. They need to start enforcing that, not replicating existing legislation.'
