Pride 2025: Why we don't have a month dedicated to 'straight pride'
Pride 2025: Why we don't have a month dedicated to 'straight pride'
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Pride flag colors, explained: Meanings behind the rainbow colors
The rainbow Pride flag has become a symbol for the LGBTQ+ community. Here's how the flag came to be and what its colors represent.
For the second year in a row, a bar in Ohio is offering deals for "Heterosexual Awesomeness Month," and lawmakers from the state have proposed a "natural family month" that explicitly excludes LGBTQ+ families and celebrates only families led by straight men with children. Utah passed a bill to become the first state to ban Pride flags from flying on any government property, though Nazi flags were allowed, and Idaho passed a similar one.
More than 500 bills targeting the LGBTQ+ community have been proposed in 2025 alone, about 2 in 5 corporations are decreasing recognition of Pride Month out of fear of retaliation from the Trump administration and hate crimes against the LGBTQ+ community, especially transgender people, are on the rise.
In 2023, the Human Rights Campaign declared a National State of Emergency for LGBTQ+ Americans for the first time in its over 40-year history and the FBI reported its highest number of gender identity-based hate crimes to date. Several countries have begun warning their LGBTQ+ citizens about traveling to America and in March, the U.S. was added to the Global Human Rights Watchlist due to declining civil liberties, in part because of the treatment of the LGBTQ+ community.
Still, more conservative groups are pushing for a "straight pride" month as an answer to the traditional celebration of Pride Month.
The LGBTQ+ community celebrates Pride Month during June to commemorate the Stonewall uprising. But amidst a political and social environment that has become increasingly hostile towards queer people, events and promotions celebrating heterosexuality seem to push back on the celebration.
Heterosexuality is the norm, and experts say that creates the need to dedicate a month to LGBTQ+ visibility. Here is more about why America celebrates Pride as a month and why there isn't a month to celebrate straight people.
Why don't we have a month dedicated to straight people?
Imara Jones, a journalist and founder of non-profit news organization TransLash Media, said we have dedicated months, including Pride, Black History Month and others, because those communities have been historically marginalized.
"People have been systemically written out of history and excluded and made invisible," she said. "One of the antidotes to that has been the idea that we will make people more visible and that there needs to be increased visibility in order to counteract that."
She also pointed out that the majority of people in the U.S. identify as heterosexual. According to December 2023 data from the UCLA Williams Institute, 5.5% of adults, or 13.9 million people, in the U.S. identify as LGBT.
The norms of heterosexuality are widely reflected in mainstream media, she said, mentioning shows like "Bridgerton" and "The Bachelor."
She said Pride is about declaring, "This is who I am."
Pride Month commemorates Stonewall riots, celebrates community
Pride Month commemorates the 1969 Stonewall Uprising in New York and celebrates the LGBTQ+ community and the fight for equal rights.
The Stonewall Uprising began on June 28, 1969, when police raided the Stonewall Inn, a prominent gay bar in Manhattan's Greenwich Village. The protests that followed are credited with a shift in LGBTQ+ activism in the U.S.
The following year saw some of the first Pride parades in Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York. Despite the pivotal role transgender people and women of color played in the riots, including trans activist Marsha P. Johnson, they were largely excluded from early Pride celebrations.
Today, Pride Month presents an opportunity for visibility and community. In addition to celebrating LGBTQ+ love and joy, it's also a time to highlight important policy and resource issues the community faces.
Anti-LGBTQ+ hate, legislation on the rise
The last few years have seen waves of legislation targeting the LGBTQ+ community.
In 2024, more than 500 bills were introduced in state legislatures and 49 of those were signed into law, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). This year, at least 588 anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been introduced and 57 have been signed into law as of May 30.
In 2024, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) saw a 13% increase in the number of anti-LGBTQ+ groups from the previous year and in 2023, it identified an approximately 30% increase in anti-LGBTQ+ hate groups, more than they had ever listed.
FBI crime data from 2022 and 2023 showed that anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes were also on the rise, with 2023 data showing that 2,800 incidents reported by the FBI were classified as bias against the victims' sexual orientation or gender identity, accounting for nearly one in four (22.8%) of total hate crimes committed that year. In 2022, the Human Rights Campaign "sounded the alarm" when FBI data showed a 13.8% increase in reports based on sexual orientation and a 32.9% jump in reported hate crimes based on gender identity.
And in 2024, GLAAD documented 110 anti-LGBTQ+ incidents in June 2024 alone, while the SPLC recorded at least 74 bomb threats targeting LGBTQ people and events in the same month.
Anti-trans bills have specifically been on the rise as the Trump administration has relied on that small population as a major scapegoat in his presidential campaign and, said SPLC, with Texas alone having filed 32 anti-trans bills for the 2025 legislative session.
Jones said the political pushback against diversity, equity and inclusion trickles down into Pride celebrations. She has seen intense anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric online seep into real life with real consequences for the community.
"We can't ignore... the role of intimidation in all of this, to be quite frank about it," she said.
Contributing: Ahjané Forbes, USA TODAY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
LGBTQ+ Marketing Playbook: How Pride Drives Growth Amid DEI Backlash
Pride Month, LGBTQA Ally branded packaging for Oreo Cookies, Walgreens, Queens, New York. (Photo by: ... More Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) June 1 came and went without the usual cascade of rainbow logos. Meta, Pepsi, and Ubisoft — brands that embraced LGBTQ+ marketing with Pride colors just two years ago — stayed monochrome, betting that neutrality equals safety. For a decade, we criticized these brands for 'rainbow washing,' accusing them of performative LGBTQ+ marketing that appeared in June only to vanish in July. Now they've vanished in June too. In today's polarized climate, there is no neutral ground - it's Pride or Prejudice. Silence is a stance, and LGBTQ+ consumers are taking notes. They'll remember who stood with them when it got tough and who looked out for themselves. When these brands inevitably return waving rainbow flags, that $1.4 trillion market won't be as forgiving. The stakes are clear: 9.3% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ+, wielding buying power that grows three times faster than the general market. Among Gen Z, that number soars to nearly 25% - your future customer base is fundamentally more diverse than ever before. Yet 39% of Fortune 1000 executives plan to reduce Pride visibility this year, colliding with research showing 80% of LGBTQ+ adults ready to boycott brands that retreat. This isn't just American - multinational brands face the same reckoning globally, where LGBTQ+ consumers demand year-round authenticity over seasonal gestures. For CMOs who recognize that authentic engagement beats fearful silence, here are five strategic directives to navigate Pride when the stakes have never been higher. Your biggest risk isn't backlash - it's misalignment between what you say and what you do. The credibility gap kills brands faster than controversy. Use the Tightrope Table below to assess your alignment across five executive pressure points:c The LGBTQ+ Tightrope Framework: Five Balance Points Every CMO Must Align Before Pride Goes Live This is the Growth × Good equation, where authentic inclusion drives both revenue and reputation. The LGBTQ+ market demonstrates 2.3x higher brand loyalty when authentically engaged but punishes retreat equally, as Bud Light discovered when it shed 6.5% market share and over $1 billion in equity value. Here's what your competitors miss: Employee engagement and talent retention also hinge on authentic LGBTQ+ support. Companies with inclusive policies see 20% lower turnover rates and attract top-tier talent who increasingly evaluate employers on DEI commitments. When you factor in both consumer loyalty and workforce stability, the ROI calculation becomes undeniable. When 39% of brands retreat, those who stay capture disproportionate returns. It's portfolio theory: as the field narrows, authentic players gain an outsized share in a community starved for genuine support. For the sixth year running, SKITTLES®, the Mars Wrigley candy, stripped its own rainbow, partnered with GLAAD, and doubled its donation cap to $200,000 - all without a measurable sales dip. OREO adds a family‑friendly blueprint. Through its ongoing #ProudParent partnership with PFLAG National (launched 2020), the country's best‑selling cookie releases limited‑edition rainbow packs, produces ally‑focused shorts like 'Proud Parent,' and contributes at least $ 50,000 a year to PFLAG's allyship programs - all while maintaining category‑leading sales. The brand frames inclusion around family support, sidestepping partisan turf yet still generating high social engagement. Both brands prove sustained commitments outperform seasonal splash, contrasting with Target's slimmed-down 2025 Pride capsule that drew boycott calls on TikTok before reaching shelves. Two lessons follow: LGBTQ+ adults spend 48% more daily time with podcasts than the general market. On social platforms, micro-influencers under 10,000 followers drive 2.1% engagement rates - double that of macro creators. Pre-emptive retreat doesn't buy peace. Des Moines' Capital City Pride lost $75,000 when sponsors paused DEI budgets. Major events nationwide face similar exits, citing "political sensitivity." Meanwhile, activist groups like People's Union USA now publish boycott schedules year-round, proving that organized consumer pressure operates year-round with scheduling precision CMOs can literally mark on their calendars. Your crisis response requires three elements: These metrics separate authentic allies from seasonal performers. With audits complete, crisis plans locked, and proof points funded, you've turned Pride from minefield to growth driver. The rainbow calendar spans 30 days, but consumer memory lasts all year. ROI Reality — A $1.4 trillion market growing three times faster than the general population: 24 million U.S. consumers with the highest loyalty scores when authentically engaged. Risk Reality — 80% boycott‑ready consumers + 39% of brands retreating = a perfect storm. Pull back under pressure and join the companies taking an immediate revenue hit. Monday‑Morning Reality — Audit today or apologize on tomorrow's earnings call. Approve the fixes, lock the crisis tree, and shift 20 % of Pride spend from paint to proof. The LGBTQ+ market is larger, louder, and more digitally concentrated than ever, but its patience for performative allyship is gone. Treat Pride as a 12‑month strategy, deliver CARES outcomes, and capture the upside—while sleeping at night. Ignore the audit and the social‑threat spiral will hit faster than your next quarterly call. Ask yourself: When June's budget zeroes out, what's left of your LGBTQ+ marketing commitment - and will that investment still be visible come December?
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Key Takeaways From The CBO's Report On The One Big Beautiful Bill
WASHINGTON - JUNE 5: The U.S. Capitol is shown June 5, 2003 in Washington, DC. Both houses of the ... More U.S. Congress, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives meet in the Capitol. (Photo by) The CBO estimates that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. While these are only estimates, the group's analysis is responsible for helping shed light on the economic impacts of proposed legislation. However, many do not know what this group is and what exactly their estimates mean. This comes as Trump publicly disagrees with the estimate and questions the groups assumptions and qualifications. This article discusses what is the CBO. It then provides three key takeaways from their latest report estimating the economic impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The CBO was established under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. A primary focus of this group is to 'provide objective, nonpartisan information to support the Congressional budget process and to help the Congress make effective budget and economic policy.' The office works with Congressional committees, particularly the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, to help determine the economic impact of their bills. Each year, the CBO produces about a thousand cost estimates and publishes reports about the economy and economic-related issues. The office employs approximately 275 individuals who often have significant work experience and skills in economic forecasting and modeling. While Congress sets the CBO's priorities, the group prides itself on being objective, impartial, and nonpartisan. It does not make any policy recommendations and employs a rigorous set of checks and balances to ensure its estimations are fair and unbiased. As ABC News reported, the headline of the CBO's report was that the impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. The way that this works is that the CBO estimates that tax revenues will decline by $3.7 trillion due to, among other things, the renewal of the tax provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, as well as enhanced deductions like a higher state and local income tax deduction for individuals. Despite these lower tax collections, the CBO estimates that the bill will not pay for itself as spending will only decrease by $1.3 trillion. Many of these spending decreases are coming from making cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, as I previously discussed on Forbes. The combination of the $3.7 trillion in lost tax revenues and the $1.3 trillion in lower expenses leads to the CBO's estimate of the $2.4 trillion net effect on the deficit. The CBO estimates the impact over the next decade for major budgetary legislation like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. While a $2.4 trillion net impact may seem large, it is important to point out that the projected impacts are over many years. The reports generated by the CBO also break down the impact by provision, allowing policymakers and taxpayers to understand the impact of specific pieces of legislation more directly. For instance, the CBO estimates that the lost tax revenues from not taxing tips will be about $39 billion, whereas the lost revenue from not taxing overtime will be about $124 billion. While many pieces of this legislation will be costly, the provisions that appear to have the most significant price tag are those extending the tax cuts for individual taxpayers that were passed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, and the estimated impact can be seen in their report each year over the next 10 years. According to The Hill, the administration believes the CBO underestimates the economic growth among bills like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In particular, Trump has criticized the CBO for using a 1.8% growth rate, and he even publicly suggested that the group should be using a rate up to five times higher than that. If the CBO underestimates growth, tax revenues may not decline as much as estimated, resulting in a more favorable set of economic outcomes than the CBO predicted. However, not everybody feels as positive about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's financial prospects as Trump. Newsweek reports that Senators like Chuck Schumer and Jodi Ernst have given the bill the nickname the We're All Going To Die Act (in reference to the removal of many key healthcare programs). Even Trump's associate, Elon Musk, took to X to call for the bill to be voted down due to its costs, as reported by The New York Times. Thus, while Trump disagrees with the estimate, it appears as though there are plenty who are looking at the CBO report with heightened skepticism about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's prospects.
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
What to Know About Trump's New Travel Ban
President Trump on Wednesday announced a travel ban on citizens of 12 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, aiming to prevent or severely limit their entry to the United States. The policy is similar to a ban that Mr. Trump implemented in 2017, during his first term. It is the latest move in the administration's crackdown on immigration, and was set to take effect on Monday. What countries are on the list? A full travel ban will affect citizens of the following countries: Afghanistan Chad Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Myanmar Somalia Sudan Yemen Partial restrictions will apply to citizens of other countries, meaning they cannot come to the country permanently or apply for certain visas. They are: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela What is the administration saying? Mr. Trump, who announced the ban in a proclamation, said it was intended to protect 'the national security and national interest of the United States and its people.' It is his latest effort to further restrict immigration since returning to office in January, coming after his administration blocked asylum seekers at the Southern border, barred international students from Harvard University and ordered immigration raids across the country. Cabinet officials in April had identified a list of countries where vetting and screening information surrounding visa applicants was 'deficient' enough to warrant a full or partial suspension, the action said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
