logo
GOP bill to bar immigrant kids without legal status from Tennessee public schools advances

GOP bill to bar immigrant kids without legal status from Tennessee public schools advances

Yahoo12-03-2025

Sylvia, who came to the Tennessee Legislature from Knoxville on Tuesday, cries as lawmakers on the House K-12 Subcommittee vote in favor of a bill to exclude children without legal immigration status from public schools. She asked that her name not be used out of fear of reprisal. (Photo: John Partipilo)
A bill allowing Tennessee public schools to exclude children without legal immigration status cleared a House subcommittee Tuesday as protestors gathered outside the hearing room chanting 'stop hurting kids' and 'shame on you.'
The bill by Republican House Majority Leader William Lamberth would give public K-12 and charter schools the option of enrolling or refusing to enroll a child who cannot offer proof of legal immigration status.
It differs substantially from its companion bill in the Senate, carried by Sen. Bo Watson, a Hixson Republican. Amended last week, the Senate version would require public schools to verify student immigration status. Schools could then opt to charge tuition for children unable to prove they lawfully reside in the United States.
As chanting protestors clogged the hallway outside the House K-12 Subcommittee meeting, inside Giselle Huerta pleaded with lawmakers to vote against the bill.
'Is this the Tennessee we want to be, a state that turns its back on children who pledge allegiance to our flag every morning?' said Huerta, co-founder of the child advocacy group, Hijos de Inmigrantes.
Tennessee GOP bills target public school education for immigrant children without legal status
'Think about the message we are sending to young children who have known no other home but Tennessee — that they don't deserve an education, that they don't belong in a classroom alongside their friends and neighbors,' she said in her testimony before lawmakers.
Knoxville sixth grader Damien Felipe Jimenez told lawmakers he dreamed of one day owning his own restaurant or perhaps becoming a scientist.
'I am the son of immigrant parents who have shown me to respect and value everyone,' he said. 'Just like me and all the kids in this country, we have the right to dream and make those dreams come true. The right to an education should not be taken away from us because of our immigration status,' he said.
Lamberth called it 'false hope' to provide an education to children who would go on to face barriers to their professional dreams as adults as a result of their immigration status.
'It is false hope to give children the best education available in the world and then tell them they can be licensed professionals, they can be licensed doctors, they can be lawyers, they can be accountants, they can run for office, because it is not true,' Lamberth said.
'If they are illegally present, their dreams at some point will have a ceiling and that is inappropriate,' Lamberth said.
The bill's sponsors have said they intend for the measure to serve as a test case of whether the Supreme Court will revisit its 1982 Plyler v. Doe decision establishing the right to a public education regardless of a child's immigration status. If enacted, the measure faces a certain legal challenge.
Tennessee public schools could exclude immigrant children without legal status in GOP-backed bill
Lamberth noted the bill was discretionary and stressed it was about local control.
'With this bill there is nobody that will force any school district to disenroll even one child,' he said. 'It is entirely their decision.'
Some counties grappling with education budget shortfalls or overcrowded classrooms may decide that there's 'just no more' children they want to admit and begin excluding children without legal status, while others may opt out of the law — and likely make their communities a 'magnet' for immigrant families, he said.
'With this bill there is nobody that will force any school district to disenroll even one child,' he said. 'It is entirely their decision.'
Opponents of the measure have countered the argument that educating immigrant children is a burden to Tennessee taxpayers, noting that immigrants without legal status pay the same taxes on gas, groceries and retail purchases that help fund public schools as every state resident.
The bill was approved 5-3 Tuesday, with the committee's two Democrats — Rep. Yusuf Hakeem of Chattanooga and Rep. Sam Mackenzie of Knoxville joined by Republican Rep. Mark White dissenting.
In a previous vote on the Senate version of the bill last week, three Republicans also joined the lone Democrat on the presiding committee in voting against the bill.
'Sometimes I think we don't look at human beings as human beings but as numbers or not like us,' Hakeem said Tuesday.
'I look at the parents, the road they've taken to try to improve the lives of their children and, here we are, talking about taking that away,' he said.
The bill will be heard next in the House Education and the Senate Finance, Means and Ways Committees. Those hearings have not yet been scheduled.
A crowd outside the committee room for the House K-12 Subcommittee meeting Tuesday. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
A mother, holding her child, enters a committee room to hear debate on a measure that could prevent immigrant kids from being denied a public education. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Tears roll down Rep. Yusuf Hakem's face after the House K-12 Education Subcommittee meeting on March 11, 2025. Hakeem, a Chattanooga Democrat, was one of three lawmakers to vote against bill that could strip the right to public education from children not in the U.S. legally. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout) Photographs by John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout ©2025
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns
Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Monday, President Donald Trump was asked about Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom's remarks that his Republican administration wants "civil war on the streets" amid ongoing protests against raids by Los Angeles Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The president was asked by a reporter, "What do you make of the fact that [Newsom] says you want a civil war?" Trump responded, "No, it's the opposite. I don't want a civil war. Civil war would happen if you left it to people like him." REPORTER: Gavin Newsom says you want a Civil War. TRUMP: "It's just the opposite, I don't want a Civil War. Civil War would happen if you left it to people like him." — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 9, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'
Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

President Donald Trump on Monday endorsed the idea of arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's resistance to federal immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles, intensifying a clash that has already drawn legal challenges and fierce rebukes from Democratic leaders. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Tom Homan, his border czar, who over the weekend suggested that state and local officials, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, could face arrest if they interfered with immigration raids. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. Trump's remarks signal a sharp escalation in the administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions and a willingness to target political opponents in unprecedented ways. Newsom responded swiftly, calling Trump's words a chilling attack on American democratic norms. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Tensions escalated sharply after Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following days of civil unrest related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The deployment marked the first time a president has federalized a state's National Guard without the governor's consent since 1965. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced plans to sue Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging the deployment was unlawful. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law,' Bonta said at a press conference. 'There is no invasion. There is no rebellion.' Meanwhile, David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was charged with felony conspiracy to impede an officer after his arrest during the L.A. protests. Despite the furor, legal experts note that Homan lacks the authority to arrest elected officials, and his role remains advisory. Still, Trump's rhetoric has raised alarms among critics who view his comments as part of a broader pattern of undermining democratic institutions. 'This is a preview of things to come,' Newsom warned in an interview with Brian Taylor Cohen that he shared on social media. 'This isn't about L.A., per se,' the Democratic governor added. 'It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching tomorrow. This guy is unhinged. Trump is unhinged right now, and this is just another proof point of that.' At a news conference held by lawmakers in Sacramento to discuss the protests in Los Angeles, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Trump's threat to arrest Newsom is a 'direct assault on democracy and an insult to every Californian.'

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign all 14 bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House voted 68-65 to send the bill to the Senate, where Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, had already said she would supply the necessary Democratic vote to pass it. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store