News Analysis: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences
Amid the noise, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has recently championed an unlikely game plan: Forget the high road, fight fire with fire and embrace the very tactics that virtue-minded Democrats have long decried.
Could the dark art of political gerrymandering be the thing that saves democracy from Trump's increasingly authoritarian impulses? That's essentially the pitch Newsom is making to California voters with his audacious new special election campaign.
As Texas Democrats dig in to block a Republican-led redistricting push and Trump muscles to consolidate power wherever he can, Newsom wants to redraw California's own congressional districts to favor Democrats.
His goal: counter Trump's drive for more GOP House seats with a power play of his own.
It's a boundary-pushing gamble that will undoubtedly supercharge Newsom's political star in the short-term. The long-game glory could be even grander, but only if he pulls it off. A ballot-box flop would be brutal for both Newsom and his party.
The charismatic California governor is termed out of office in 2026 and has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions.
But the distinct scent of his home state will be hard to completely slough off in parts of the country where California is synonymous with loony lefties, business-killing regulation and an out-of-control homelessness crisis. To say nothing of Newsom's ill-fated dinner at an elite Napa restaurant in violation of COVID-19 protocols — a misstep that energized a failed recall attempt and still haunts the governor's national reputation.
The redistricting gambit is the kind of big play that could redefine how voters across the country see Newsom.
The strategy could be a boon for Newsom's 2028 ambitions during a moment when Democrats are hungry for leaders, said Democratic strategist Steven Maviglio. But it's also a massive roll of the dice for both Newsom and the state he leads.
'It's great politics for him if this passes,' Maviglio said. 'If it fails, he's dead in the water.'
The path forward — which could determine control of Congress in 2026 — is hardly a straight shot.
The 'Election Rigging Response Act,' as Newsom has named his ballot measure, would temporarily scrap the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission.
Under the proposal, Democrats could pick up five seats currently held by Republicans while bolstering vulnerable Democratic incumbent Reps. Adam Gray, Josh Harder, George Whitesides, Derek Tran and Dave Min, which would save the party millions of dollars in costly reelection fights.
But first the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote to place the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot and then it must be approved by voters.
If passed, the initiative would have a 'trigger,' meaning the redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own gerrymandering effort.
'I think what Governor Newsom and other Democrats are doing here is exactly the right thing we need to do,' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin said Thursday.
'We're not bringing a pencil to a knife fight. We're going to bring a bazooka to a knife fight, right? This is not your grandfather's Democratic Party,' Martin said, adding that they shouldn't be the only ones playing by a set of rules that no longer exist.
For Democrats like Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who appeared alongside Newsom to kick off the effort, there is "some heartbreak" to temporarily shelving their commitment to independent redistricting. But she and others were clear-eyed about the need to stop a president "willing to rig the election midstream," she said.
Friedman said she was hearing overwhelmingly positive reactions to the proposal from all kinds of Democratic groups on the ground.
"The response that I get is, 'Finally, we're fighting. We have a way to fight back that's tangible,'" Friedman recounted.
Still, despite the state's Democratic voter registration advantage, victory for the ballot measure will hardly be assured. California voters have twice rallied for independent redistricting at the ballot box in the last two decades and many may struggle to abandon those beliefs.
A POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll found that voters prefer keeping an independent panel in place to draw district lines by a nearly two-to-one margin, and that independent redistricting is broadly popular in the state.
(Newsom's press office argued that the poll was poorly worded, since it asked about getting rid of the independent commission altogether and permanently returning line-drawing power to the legislators, rather than just temporarily scrapping their work for several cycles until the independent commission next draws new lines.)
California voters should not expect to see a special election campaign focused on the minutia of reconfiguring the state's congressional districts, however.
While many opponents will likely attack the change as undercutting the will of California voters, who overwhelmingly supported weeding politics out of the redistricting process, bank on Newsom casting the campaign as a referendum on Trump and his devious effort to keep Republicans in control of Congress.
Newsom employed a similar strategy when he demolished the Republican-led recall campaign against him in 2021, which the governor portrayed as a "life and death" battle against "Trumpism" and far-right anti-vaccine and antiabortion activists. Among California's Democratic-heavy electorate, that message proved to be extremely effective.
"Wake up, America," Newsom said Thursday at a Los Angeles rally launching the campaign for the redistricting measure. "Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing. Wake up to his assault. Wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health, his war against the American people."
Kevin Liao, a Democratic strategist who has worked on national and statewide campaigns, said his D.C. and California-based political group chats had been blowing up in recent days with texts about the moment Newsom was creating for himself.
Much of Liao's group chat fodder has involved the output of Newsom's digital team, which has elevated trolling to an art form on its official @GovPressOffice account on the social media site X.
The missives have largely mimicked the president's own social media patois, with hyperbole, petty insults and a heavy reliance on the 'caps lock' key.
"DONALD IS FINISHED — HE IS NO LONGER 'HOT.' FIRST THE HANDS (SO TINY) AND NOW ME — GAVIN C. NEWSOM — HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS 'STEP,' " one of the posts read last week, dutifully reposted by the governor himself.
Some messages have also ended with Newsom's initials (a riff on Trump's signature "DJT" signoff) and sprinkled in key Trumpian callbacks, like the phrase 'Liberation Day,' or a doctored Time Magazine cover with Newsom's smiling mien. The account has garnered 150,000 new followers since the beginning of the month.
Shortly after Trump took office in January, Newsom walked a fine line between criticizing the president and his policies and being more diplomatic, especially after the California wildfires — in hopes of appealing to any semblance of compassion and presidential responsibility Trump possessed.
Newsom had spent the first months of the new administration trying to reshape the California-vs.-Trump narrative that dominated the president's first term and move away from his party's prior "resistance" brand.
Those conciliatory overtures coincided with Newsom's embrace of a more ecumenical posture, hosting MAGA leaders on his podcast and taking a position on transgender athletes' participation in women's sports that contradicted the Democratic orthodoxy.
Newsom insisted that he engaged in those conversations to better understand political views that diverged from his own, especially after Trump's victory in November. However, there was the unmistakable whiff of an ambitious politician trying to broaden his national appeal by inching away from his reputation as a West Coast liberal.
Newsom's reluctance to readopt the Trump resistance mantle ended after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid immigration sweeps and ensuing protests in June. Those actions revealed Trump's unchecked vindictiveness and abject lack of morals and honor, Newsom said.
Of late, Newsom has defended the juvenile tone of his press aides' posts mocking Trump's own all-caps screeds, and questioned why critics would excoriate his parody and not the president's own unhinged social media utterances.
"If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president," Newsom said last week. "So to the extent it's gotten some attention, I'm pleased."
In an attention-deficit economy where standing out is half the battle, the posts sparkle with unapologetic swagger. And they make clear that Newsom is in on the joke.
'To a certain set of folks who operated under the old rules, this could be seen as, 'Wow, this is really outlandish.' But I think they are making the calculation that Democrats want folks that are going to play under this new set of rules that Trump has established,' Liao said.
At a moment when the Democratic party is still occupied with post-defeat recriminations and what's-next vision boarding, Newsom has emerged from the bog with something resembling a plan.
And he's betting the house on his deep-blue state's willingness to fight fire with fire.
Times staff writers Seema Mehta and Laura Nelson contributed to this report.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
Orlando officials denounce removal of rainbow crosswalk near Pulse nightclub mass shooting site
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Orlando officials on Thursday denounced the overnight removal by Florida transportation workers of a rainbow-colored crosswalk outside the Pulse nightclub where 49 people were gunned down, saying it was part of an attack on LGBTQ lives by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration. Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer called the painting over of the crosswalk with rainbow colors often associated with LGBTQ pride a 'callous' and 'cruel political act.' The massacre at the LGBTQ-friendly nightclub in 2016 was the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history at the time. 'This crosswalk not only enhanced safety and visibility for the large number of pedestrians visiting the memorial, it also served as a visual reminder of Orlando's commitment to honor the 49 lives taken,' Dyer said. State Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, a Democrat from Orlando, called the overnight removal work a cowardly act. 'They did this in the middle of the night because they were scared of the resistance because they know what they did was wrong,' said Smith, who is openly gay. The Florida Department of Transportation did not respond to an emailed inquiry seeking comment. The rainbow crosswalk originally was installed in 2017 by the state, Dyer said. The state transportation agency had been notifying cities around Florida in recent months that they must remove rainbow-colored crosswalks and intersections or they could face the withholding of transportation funds. Among the cities notified were Delray Beach and Key West. Will Watts, an assistant secretary for the Florida Department of Transportation, issued a memo in June prohibiting 'surface art' on crosswalks, sidewalks, intersections, travel lanes or shoulders. The memo prohibited 'surface art' associated with 'social, political or ideological messages or images and does not serve the purpose of traffic control.' The Pulse nightclub shooting during a Latin night celebration on June 12, 2016, killed 49 people and wounded 53 others. The attacker, Omar Mateen, who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group, was killed after a three-hour standoff with police. At the time, it was the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history. But that number was surpassed the next year when 58 people were killed and more than 850 were injured among a crowd of 22,000 at a country music festival in Las Vegas. Smith, the lawmaker, promised that if the state gets its way, the LGBTQ community won't be erased at the site where a permanent memorial is planned. 'There will be a rainbow mural nearby that is even bigger, queerer and more colorful than they ever imagined,' Smith said. ___ Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @


Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Playbook PM: Texas nears approval on new maps
Presented by THE CATCH-UP ANYBODY HAVE A MAP? Texas' redistricting rodeo is hurtling toward the final buzzer today with Republicans in the Texas Senate set to greenlight the White House-backed redistricting plan that would create five new GOP congressional seats, after the state House rubber-stamped the effort yesterday.. This morning, members of the Texas Senate's Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting voted 5-3 to send the proposed maps for a final vote in the chamber. The state Senate is set to convene at 8 p.m. Eastern to take up the proposal and send it to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's desk. Though the new maps have been fated to pass in the deep-red state, it's not all a wash for state Democrats. The group used their highly publicized two-week quorum break to spotlight the rare mid-decade redraw as a partisan power grab by Republicans. And though Abbott has promised legal punishments for the lawmakers who bucked against the special legislative session, Democrats have also threatened to challenge the new maps in court. And the map debate has spread out beyond the Lone Star State: INSIDE 1600 PENN: The White House's redistricting push is serving as a major test of President Donald Trump's grip on the Republican Party and whether his well-honed negotiating skills translate beyond the beltway, POLITICO's Lisa Kashinsky, Daniel Desrochers and Holly Otterbein report. 'The more-stick-than-carrot approach has delivered Trump major wins in Washington by helping him barrel through initial GOP resistance,' and now 'that machine is whirring into gear again.' HOOSIER DADDY: So far, the Hoosier State is proving to be the most significant challenge to Trump's pressure campaign, with Republicans 'resisting a more intensive — and public — push' to redraw state lines, our colleagues write. Though Republican Gov. Mike Braun remains undecided on whether to call a special session, the administration 'shows no signs of letting up' and is 'planning to court more than four dozen Indiana Republicans' at the White House next week. GOING TO CALIFORNIA: Golden State Democrats are gearing up to push their own redistricting effort forward today to counter Texas Republicans, creating five new seats for their party. State lawmakers gathered today to consider a referendum that would allow a special election on Gov. Gavin Newsom's proposed maps and two related bills. But the Democrat-centric redistricting effort faces a less certain future in the Golden State, which requires that voters — not lawmakers — decide to overturn the current district lines. SHOWING UP IN THE SHOW-ME STATE: Missouri Republican Party Vice Chair Jennifer Bukowsky said proposed maps drawn in D.C. have been floating around among lawmakers and she 'expects a special session when district lines are decided by national Republicans,' The Missouri Independent's Rudi Keller reports. 'Republican members of the Missouri House have been told there will be two caucus meetings scheduled to coincide with the annual veto session, which starts Sept. 10,' with one meeting likely focused on redistricting. Trump is already counting Missouri in the win column. The president signaled on Truth Social this morning that Missouri Republicans are moving ahead with their redistricting gambit. 'The Great State of Missouri is now IN. I'm not surprised,' Trump wrote. 'I won it, all 3 times, in a landslide. We're going to win the Midterms in Missouri again, bigger and better than ever before!' Good Thursday afternoon. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Have thoughts on the White House's redistricting campaign? Drop me a line at birvine@ 9 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW 1. RUSSIA-UKRAINE LATEST: Russia overnight launched over 500 drones and 40 missiles in an aerial attack on Ukraine — marking one of the heaviest bombardments in recent weeks. Part of the attack focused on the U.S.-founded electronics manufacturer near the Ukrainian border, per Reuters' Dan Peleschuk and Anastasiia Malenko. 'One person was killed and 22 were wounded, most of them in the attack that damaged storage facilities at the electronics manufacturer in Ukraine's far-Western Zakarpattia region.' The Russian attack comes just days after Trump led a series of diplomatic meetings in an effort to negotiate a ceasefire. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy noted the attack on the American-owned business 'is very telling' of Russia's motives, urging Western allies to respond in a post on X. 'The Russians carried out this attack as if nothing has changed at all, as if there are no global efforts to stop this war. This requires a response,' Zelenskyy wrote. 'There is still no signal from Moscow that they truly intend to engage in substantive negotiations and end this war. Pressure is needed. Strong sanctions, strong tariffs.' The view from the Kremlin: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters today that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'has repeatedly said' he's prepared to meet with Zelenskyy, but stressed 'all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out' beforehand, Reuters reports. Lavrov also added that questions must be resolved about Zelenskyy's authority to officially sign a peace deal. 2. IMMIGRATION FILES: The Ugandan government has reached a temporary deal with the U.S. to take in so-called third-country deportees, per WaPo's Victoria Craw and Rael Ombuor. Ugandan Foreign Ministry's permanent secretary, Bagiire Vincent Waiswa posted on X that the country will accept: 'Third Country Nationals who may not be granted asylum in the United States but are reluctant to or may have concerns about returning to their countries of origin.' It's unclear how many migrants will be accepted or when the deal will take effect. The announcement comes after a Ugandan senior official denied to Reuters reporting from CBS on Tuesday that the country had struck a deal, citing internal documents. And the huddled masses shift: A Pew Research Center analysis of Census data found that between January and June, the foreign-born population in the U.S. declined by nearly 1.5 million — the 'experts predict looming negative economic and demographic consequences for the United States if the trend persists,' NYT's Miriam Jordan reports. 3. NO PLACE LIKE HOME (RULE): Trump is planning to join law enforcement and National Guard troops on patrol tonight, 'the latest in a series of high-profile photo ops by the administration to broadcast the strength of its crackdown on the nation's capital,' POLITICO's Irie Sentner writes. 'I'm going to be going out tonight … with the police and with the military of course,' Trump told conservative radio host Todd Starnes this morning. A White House official said more details would 'be forthcoming.' The next phase: Trump may be eyeing another layer to his takeover of Washington and bypass the city's traditional process to transform the local judicial system, POLITICO's Daniel Barnes reports. Under D.C.'s Home Rule Act, 'the president is restricted to choosing from a roster of potential [D.C. judicial] candidates recommended by a seven-member panel known as the Judicial Nomination Commission.' But last week Trump 'indicated that senior Justice Department officials had already given him judicial recommendations for Washington's local courts, potentially bypassing the panel's selections.' Do you hear the people sing?: Washington is no stranger to large protests. But as Michael Schaffer writes in his latest Capital City column for POLITICO Mag, 'the nation's capital has been weirdly quiet' in response to Trump's police crackdown — and no one can seem to agree on why: 'Some cited the season … Others cited exhaustion and even fear,' while '[p]eople involved in planning protests against the takeover chalk some of it up to tactical choices.' 4. MAYBE THIS TIME: A New York appeals court tossed out New York AG's Letitia James' $500 million civil fraud case against the president's family business today — but the court declined to overturn James' case against Trump himself, POLITICO's Erica Orden reports. The verdict leaves the door open for Trump to 'seek to appeal the verdict to New York's highest court. And the three separate opinions issued Thursday by the appeals court revealed disagreement within the five-judge panel that one judge described as 'profound.'' What they said: 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judge Peter Moulton wrote. 5. ANOTHER HUNDRED PEOPLE: 'Trump's hometown train station renovation could be first fruits of South Korean trade deal,' by Just The News' Steven Richards and John Solomon: 'The South Korean government and its leading industry association have expressed interest in making significant investments in a complete renovation of New York City's Pennsylvania Station … The Korean government is prepared to invest $15 billion in the [a renovation] project and become the group's partner in constructing the new station and a new sports arena to replace Madison Square Garden.' 6. HOW TO SUCCEED IN BUSINESS: Tiffany Trump's husband, businessman Michael Boulos, and his family have reaped some dubious financial gains from marrying into the Trump dynasty, according to a new NYT investigation. Boulos was said to have overcharged his future brother-in-law, Jared Kushner, $2.5 million dollars for a yacht while his family's brokerage firm 'worked to conceal the true price from him.' Meanwhile, Boulos' cousin also negotiated with a Saudi businessman to get him access to Trump during his wedding: 'Everyone involved denies wrongdoing, and both deals went bad. … But Mr. Boulos received about $300,000 from the yacht sale, his cousin says, and $100,000 from the Saudi businessman.' 7. NEW YORK, NEW YORK: The former top aide to NYC Mayor Eric Adams is now facing four separate counts of bribery from the Manhattan DA's office, POLITICO's Jeff Coltin reports. Adam's former chief adviser, Ingrid Lewis-Martin, allegedly 'overrode other City officials' expertise and decision making to ensure that certain required actions were accomplished for the benefit of her co-conspirators,' according to a summary of the indictments. 'Jesse Hamilton, a deputy commissioner at the Department of Citywide Administrative Services, is being charged with Lewis-Martin in one case where the pair is accused of promoting a real estate developer's projects in exchange for more than $5,000 worth of home renovations.' 8. OLD FRIENDS: The Texas AG's office may be getting a new sheriff in town. After weeks of rumors, four-term Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) officially launched an attorney general campaign today, The Texan's Brad Johnson reports. Roy, a former staffer for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and House Freedom Caucus member, is aiming to replace AG Ken Paxton — who remains locked in a heated GOP primary against Sen. John Cornyn. Roy has had a rocky relationship with Paxton for years, calling for him to step down in 2020 during a federal investigation and subsequent impeachment effort. Roy's reputation as a fiery conservative could certainly help him as he joins a busy field that already includes GOP state Sens. Mayes Middleton and Joan Huffman, and former DOJ appointee Aaron Reitz. '[R]epresentatives should not be permanent,' Roy said in a release. 'And my experience watching Texans unite in response to the devastating Hill Country floods made clear that I want to come home. I want to take my experience in Congress, as a federal prosecutor, and as First Assistant Attorney General to fight for Texas from Texas.' Watch his launch video 9. ME AND THE SKY: Reps. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) are launching an official investigation into Paramount's $7 billion merger with fellow media conglomerate Skydance, The Hill's Dominick Mastrangelo scoops. The pair sent a 'letter to Paramount leadership on Wednesday demanding documents, communications and detailed answers' on the merger and noted concerns about 'troubling' statements from Trump regarding a possible financial agreement. 'Paramount has denied any such agreement with Trump exists and insisted its settlement with the president only includes a $16 million payment to his foundation, which was announced as the deal was struck.' TALK OF THE TOWN SPOTTED: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Jeanine Pirro having lunch at The Hamilton yesterday. Pic Matt and Ginger Gaetz welcomed a son, Luckey Louis Gaetz. AND THE AWARD GOES TO — The Congressional Management Foundation announced winners of the 2025 Democracy Awards, including multiple categories honoring one Republican and one Democratic congressional office as well as chiefs of staff. Honorees for excellence in congressional management include Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) and Nikki Budzinski's (D-Ill.) offices. Honorees for chief of staff of the year include J.T. Jezierski of Sen. Shelley Moore Capito's ( office, Tricia Russell of Sen. Chris Van Hollen's (D-Md.) office, Chris Crawford of Rep. Buddy Carter's (R-Ga.) office and Mitchell Rivard of Rep. Jason Crow's (D-Colo.) office. Winners will be formally recognized at the 2025 Democracy Awards Ceremony on Sept. 18. See the full list of awardees Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath


Vox
a few seconds ago
- Vox
Stephen Miller is undercutting Trump's war on democracy
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy,, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here. In the public imagination, Stephen Miller is the dark heart of the Trump administration — a pulsing mass of anti-immigrant hatred behind its most aggressively authoritarian moves. But what if there's a different story to be told — that Stephen Miller's obsession with deportations isn't helping President Donald Trump secure control over the country, but actively undermining it? Take Trump's militarization of Washington, DC, as an example. The move is puzzling, in that it's authoritarian in principle but ineffective in execution. While seemingly designed to expand Trump's ability to control the American public, the on-the-ground deployments are doing nothing to repress protest — in fact, they're assuredly generating far more resistance than they're suppressing. So what's going on? The best answer I've found is a recent piece from Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council (and Vox alum). Looking granularly at the details of the operations in DC, Lind found they heavily focused on immigration enforcement — things like forcing DC police to cooperate with ICE and setting up checkpoints to try and trap people they think look like migrants. 'Every day since the federal takeover, DC residents have posted videos of federal agents — often with a mix of uniforms or no official badges at all — in patrols, staffing checkpoints, or going after people. And the people they've been going after have largely been (apparent) immigrants,' Lind writes. (Her findings are supported by recent on-the-ground reporting from the Wall Street Journal.) This is, I think, a viciously cruel policy (not to mention a waste of federal resources). But it is also a very ineffective policy when it comes to consolidating authoritarian control. Undocumented migrants do not vote, but the administration's ceaseless efforts to deport them en masse is galvanizing street protests and tanking GOP support among Latino voters. This is Miller's influence on policy made manifest: obsessed with deportations, he has done everything he can to turn the federal government into a deportation machine. And it's actually hurting the overall Trumpist cause. Stephen Miller is doing authoritarianism wrong I wrote a book about how democracies become autocracies. One of my central findings is that, for would-be autocrats, it is exceptionally important to maintain democratic appearances. If you are too openly authoritarian before consolidating enough power, you're likely to galvanize a potent wave of popular resistance. The paradigmatic recent example is South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's attempted power grab in December. Instead of subtly chipping away at Korean democracy, Yoon simply declared martial law overnight and tried to arrest opposition leaders. The result was an immediate street uprising and a parliamentary vote nullifying the martial law declaration. Yoon was impeached and is currently on trial for insurrection, a crime punishable by life imprisonment or death. The paradigmatic counter-case is Hungary under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. After winning power in 2010, Orbán and his Fidesz party made a blizzard of confusing changes to Hungarian law designed to make elections less competitive and bring the courts to heel. They then spent years expanding their power, using financial and regulatory pressures to take control over the press and civil society. Today, the electoral deck is so stacked in the ruling party's favor that even a wildly popular opposition leader may not be able to win the 2026 elections. Yoon and Orbán represent poles we can use to evaluate the Trump administration's authoritarian effectiveness. The more Trump acts like Yoon, attempting to nakedly assert the powers of a police-state ruler in a democracy, the more likely he is to generate meaningful pushback. The more he acts like Orbán, hiding behind a legalistic veneer, the more insidious the threat becomes. By this metric, the most dangerous developments of the Trump administration have been his attacks on universities, his successful shakedown of CBS, his push to get Republican states to do pre-midterm gerrymandering, and the Supreme Court's willingness to bless his mass firings of federal employees (at least temporarily). All of those developments tangibly affect American democracy. Each chips away at a key institution — civil society, the free press, fair elections, and limits on executive power — that prevent authoritarian consolidation. Each moves Trump meaningfully closer toward building an Orbán-style regime (even if the United States is still pretty far off from the terminus). But the militarized immigration crackdown championed by Miller doesn't advance that goal in any meaningful way. It combines the optics of authoritarianism — sending masked, unidentified armed men into the streets of American cities — with a lack of actual repressive capacity. Look, for example, at this recent video of DC residents (in my old neighborhood) chasing off unidentified federal agents. The feds are armed and masked, but the protesters are totally fearless. Why? Because unlike an outright authoritarian state, where demonstrators are repressed with deadly force, Trump's guys aren't authorized to fire indiscriminately on crowds. Their show of force is just that — a show. And people on the ground, in DC and LA before it, are calling their bluff. Miller's crackdown is good at two things: deporting undocumented people and terrorizing the communities they live in. I find this abhorrent: he is hurting innocent people, and the US writ large, for no good reason. But the fact that Miller's policy is morally terrible does not mean it is contributing to Trump's broader authoritarian project. In fact, its naked cruelty and thuggishness are the best reasons to think it's counterproductive. Back in November 2019, Stephen Miller said in a meeting that deporting immigrants was his reason for living. 'This is all I care about,' he said, per the New Yorker. 'I don't have a family. I don't have anything else. This is my life.' That same month, Miller got engaged to his now-wife Katie. The level of monomania on display there, an obsession with immigration so total that it erased his own fiancée, has been even more vividly on display in this administration — where he has personally redirected ICE officers responsible for disrupting organized crime to arresting random construction workers at Home Depot. I don't think Miller is thinking carefully about whether his deportation campaign is contributing to Trump's authoritarian consolidation of power. I think he just wants to deport people, and the consequences be damned. Mostly, those consequences are horrific. But if there's any silver lining, it's this: Miller is helping awaken millions of Americans to the true nature of their current government.