The truth about Colorado's new transgender rights law
State Rep. Brandi Bradley speaks on the Colorado House floor during the last day of the 2025 legislative session, May 7, at the Colorado Capitol. Bradley is a vocal opponent of House Bill 25-1312's transgender protections. (Lindsey Toomer/Colorado Newsline)
Of all the bills introduced this year at the Colorado Capitol, one came to define the legislative session for much of the right in Colorado. Even now that the session is over and the bill has become law, it is taking on new life as opponents exercise their outrage in schoolyard-bully social media posts, depraved sermons and a legal challenge in federal court.
The legislation, House Bill 25-1312, enacted several new protections for transgender people. Though the law was a reasonable response to escalating attacks against a besieged segment of the population, especially since the start of the Trump administration and its extreme anti-trans bias, the backlash it prompted is disproportionate, sinister and full of misinformation.
The first thing to understand about the trans rights law is that, while it contains several technical passages and underwent extensive debate and revision, the source of opposition to it has very little to do with the bill's actual provisions. It's about hate. It's about bigotry against transgender people.
That's all.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Opponents have become adept at advancing talking points that might sound superficially plausible — rhetoric about threats to women in sports, supposed adverse medical outcomes to minors who transition, parental rights infringements — but these arguments have the inconvenient quality of withering under evidence and counterpoints, and, worse, they're a cover for the ultimate justification bigots use for discrimination against trans people: Christian scripture.
Many of the most virulent activists against the law have ties to or are pastors at politically right-wing churches. They justify every other point of opposition by their interpretation of the Bible, which in their reading says trans people are dangerous and beset by evil. Opposition to the law is simply a repugnant form of Christian sanctimony that serves little more than hate of a very recognizably human kind.
Many of the most contested provisions of the bill were amended out of the final version, yet some anti-trans activists continue to allude to those passages as part of their denunciations. View with extreme skepticism any criticism that discusses whether anti-trans parents could be disadvantaged in child custody cases or a shield provision against anti-trans laws in other states. Language around those issues were in the bill at one time but later stripped.
If they see me get frustrated and angry, they'll just use it against me. I can't let them ... I can't show any kinks in the armor, so to speak, because otherwise they'll try to slay me, and I can't let that happen.
– State Rep. Brianna Titone
The provision of the governor-signed HB-1312 that has drawn the most negative attention boosts anti-discrimination protections for transgender people in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act.
Republican state Rep. Brandi Bradley in a social media post and video after passage of the bill told her audience that anti-trans parents could lose custody of their trans children if they discriminate against them, that private schools, churches and other places of public accommodation could be sued for anti-trans discrimination, and that there's no telling when someone deadnames or misgenders a trans person at what threshold discrimination liability kicks in.
This is all misleading. CADA has always prohibited discrimination and harassment against certain protected classes, and the protected classes have always included 'gender identity' and 'gender expression.' All HB-1312 does is clarify that gender expression could involve a 'chosen name' and pronouns.
'Their claim that it's now illegal is false,' state Rep. Lorena García, an Adams County Democrat who sponsored the bill, told Newsline this week. 'It's always been illegal.'
And it's fearmongering to suggest that someone is liable to a discrimination allegation the moment they misgender or deadname someone. CADA covers particular settings, including employment, housing, and places of public accommodation. Churches and other places used for religious purposes are excluded. Incidental or accidental acts do not qualify as discrimination.
'Within CADA already, it's already like discrimination has to be intentional,' García said. 'So the fact that this is just being wrapped into gender identity, we're not changing the threshold of when something is actually considered discrimination.'
But discrimination, it turns out, is exactly what some of the most outspoken 1312 critics intend. Many are Christian leaders and pastors, including Jeff Hunt, conservative radio host and former director of the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University; Chris Goble of Ridgeline Community Church in Castle Rock; J. Chase Davis of The Well Church in Boulder; and Aaron Carlson of New City Church in Highlands Ranch. Each one of these bullies has singled out state Rep. Brianna Titone, an Arvada Democrat who is the first transgender woman to serve in the Colorado Legislature, to intentionally deadname and misgender her.
The only plaintiff named as an individual in the lawsuit against HB-1312 is Travis Morrell, a Grand Junction dermatologist who online broadcasts faith-based motivations. A social media account called Fight1312 has become a primary source of anti-trans sentiment. Its posts make it clear that behind every variety of opposition to transgender rights is essentially one complaint, that God, as conceived by 1312's opponents, commands them to hate transgender people.
'Our good God does not make mistakes,' Goble said in a video of a recent sermon, facing the camera and addressing Titone directly. He aggressively misgendered her and called on her to 'repent.'
Titone herself detects an additional motivation among anti-trans activists, noting there have been other episodes throughout history when transgender people faced persecution.
'The big difference now, because of all the social media and everything else, they're making money off of it,' she said. 'So it's not just finding an enemy and a scapegoat you can pick on, to gang up on and get people to come along with you for the kicking fest, but they're actually making money off of it.'
But hate does real harm.
'Kids are scared,' Titone said. 'I've heard from kids. They're like, 'I don't know what I'm going to do. I'm afraid my grandfather's not going to like who I am and they're going to not want to talk to me anymore.''
Her own response to bigots is public poise, legislative fortitude and personal resilience.
'If they see me get frustrated and angry, they'll just use it against me. I can't let them,' she said. 'I can't show any kinks in the armor, so to speak, because otherwise they'll try to slay me, and I can't let that happen.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Man jailed for sexual assaults at Christian pilgrimage site
A man who sexually assaulted five women at a Christian pilgrimage site in the Republic of Ireland has been jailed for a total of four years. Tomas Gallagher, 42, of Rathanlacky, Dunkineely, County Donegal, was handed a five-year prison sentence, with the final 12 months suspended, for a range of offences committed in 2022 at St Patrick's Purgatory on Lough Derg. Appearing before Letterkenny Circuit Court, the court heard Gallagher deceived his victims into helping him fix washing appliances in a laundry room before subjecting them to a series of sexual acts. In sentencing Gallagher, the judge described his crimes as "egregious acts of violence in a sacred place of pilgrimage". Judge John Aylmer said an aggravating feature in the case was the ages of some of the victims, two of whom were teenagers, as well as the breach of trust involved. He described the incidents against the women, who cannot be named to protect their identities, as "deceitful and premeditated". Gallagher pleaded guilty to a total of seven charges involving five different women at St Patrick's Purgatory, which was recently designated a national pilgrimage site. He pleaded guilty to six charges of sexual assault. He also admitted that, during the same period and at the same location, he attempted to invite, induce, counsel or incite a child to engage in sexual touching. A prosecuting barrister and senior garda (Irish police officer) outlined the details of Gallagher's offending when he worked both as a maintenance man at the retreat and a boat driver, taking pilgrims to and from the island. Statements given to police by his victims described how Gallagher had approached them, asking them to help him in the laundry room as he needed help fixing various machines, such as washing machines and and tumble dryers, before he sexually assaulted them. One woman eventually came forward and told a person in charge what had happened to her, which led to others coming forward with complaints of a similar nature against Gallagher. Gallagher was interviewed by Gardaí (Irish police) on three occasions and initially denied anything untoward had happened. However, he later admitted the offences and entered a guilty plea. Victim impact statements from three women were read out in court, while two of the victims chose to read their own statements. One fought back tears as she spoke of how, despite being the victim, she felt ashamed and disgusted by what had happened. Another victim said she was made to feel vulnerable and intimidated but was afraid to speak up sooner, fearing she would not be believed. The court heard from a woman who said she failed exams because of Gallagher's depraved acts. She said she later completed the exams, was proud of herself and was determined not to allow her attacker to ruin her life further. A teenage victim said she had to attend counselling, while another woman, who gave her evidence by video link, said Gallagher's attack had made her distrusting of men as a result of his actions. Gallagher took to the witness stand and said he "truly regretted" his actions and was sorry for the hurt and pain he had caused his victims and their families. The judge said Gallagher came before the court on an early plea and appeared genuinely remorseful. He said the accused man was fully cooperative with the probation service and had undergone counselling. In relation to the charges against the children, Gallagher was sentenced to five years in prison. He was given a sentence of three-and-a-half years on the other charges with the sentences to run concurrently. The last 12 months of the sentence was suspended for a period of 12 months on condition that Gallagher enter a bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for 12 months following his release from prison and on condition that he continue under the supervision of the probation service. In a statement from the Diocese of Clogher, the Prior of Lough Derg, Monsignor La Flynn, apologised to Gallagher's victims "unreservedly for the hurt they have suffered". He said that, along with the then operations manager at Lough Derg, he was made aware of allegations of sexual assault in 2022. "In accordance with safeguarding policies and procedures, the allegations were immediately reported to An Garda Síochána (Irish police) for investigation," Monsignor La Flynn said. "The member of staff was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. He has since voluntarily resigned from his employment. "The Diocese of Clogher, of which Lough Derg is a constituent part, and the management of Lough Derg are fully committed to adhering to the highest standards, practices, policies, and procedures for safeguarding, and to cooperating fully with the statutory authorities in all such cases." He urged anyone with "a concern or complaint, either now or from the past" to come forward and speak to the diocese and statutory authorities.


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Man kills 40-year-old who testified against his son at trial, NM officials say
A 46-year-old man is heading to prison in connection with a revenge killing in New Mexico, prosecutors said. Theodore Toney was sentenced to life behind bars after being convicted of first-degree murder in Kenneth Ellis' April 2024 death, the Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office said in a June 3 post on Facebook. The fatal shooting during an Albuquerque dance event came about eight years after Ellis gave testimony against Toney's son during a homicide trial, prosecutors said, adding that 'Toney threatened Ellis and his family after Ellis testified.' Toney's attorney, Jonathan Schildgen, said in a June 4 email to McClatchy News that 'Mr. Toney is innocent and looks forward to his appeal.' Schildgen added, 'We object to the imposition of a life sentence as cruel and unusual punishment.' In an online obituary, Ellis was described as 'a die hard New England Patriots fan' and a Christian with 'a very good relationship with the lord and savior.' He played semi-professional football for years and coached youth sports, the obituary said. The 40-year-old married father 'touched so many peoples lives in such positive ways,' the obituary said. '(He) was so full of life, he always had a smile on his face and would tell people life is too short to be angry all the time.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Homeland Security hits back at claims ICE agent at Martha's Vineyard has ‘white supremacist' tattoo
The Department of Homeland Security has hit back at claims that an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent has a 'white supremacist' tattoo after footage circulated online during an arrest operation in Martha's Vineyard. An ICE officer was spotted on the Massachusetts island last week with what appeared to be a Valknot tattoo, a Nordic symbol of the god Odin. Charlie Giordano confronted the ICE agents and posted the footage on Instagram, the Martha's Vineyard Times first reported. 'When reviewing the images I made of 'ICE Agents' on Martha's Vineyard yesterday, I noticed several had the 'Valknot' tattooed on their arms,' Giordano posted on Instagram. 'It's a symbol often used by white supremacy groups.' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin characterized the claim as a 'smear' in a post on X Tuesday and said the officer was 'a combat veteran.' 'His tattoo is a tribute to fallen warriors —a pretty common tattoo in the military among combat veterans who embrace the Nordic Viking warrior culture,' McLaughlin said. 'Attempting to smear this ICE officer and pretend his tattoo is meant to be a tribute to White Supremacy is false, pathetic, and insulting to veterans.' The symbol has been appropriated by white supremacists, the Anti-Defamation League says on its website. 'Some white supremacists, particularly racist Odinists, have appropriated the Valknot to use as a racist symbol.' However, the organization also noted that 'non-racist pagans may also use this symbol,' so it should be 'carefully examine[d] it in context rather than assume that a particular use of the symbol is racist.' Jacob Chansley, dubbed the 'QAnon Shaman' for his role in 'spearheading' the January 6 Capitol riot, has the symbol tattooed on his chest. ICE acknowledged the symbol had been 'co-opted by racist organizations,' according to the Martha's Vineyard Times, but a spokesperson said that the agent is 'absolutely not connected with white supremacism in any way.' According to the outlet, an ICE spokesperson said that the officer had the tattoo before joining the agency, and that he was a combat veteran. Last week agents arrested 40 people on the popular vacation island, which has a large Brazilian population. The incident surrounding the agent's tattoo follows previous concern over Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's 'Christian motto' tattoo, which some perceived as a white nationalist dog whistle. Hegseth, an Army National Guard veteran, has the words 'Deus Vult' tattooed on his bicep, which has been associated with white supremacist groups. 'Deus Vult' is a Latin phrase meaning 'God Wills It,' and was a rallying cry for Christian crusaders in the Middle Ages. Vice President JD Vance said the uproar over the tattoo was 'disgusting anti-Christian bigotry' at the time.