
Trump's tariff threatens India's emerging tech momentum
In a sharp escalation of trade tensions, U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered a significant increase in tariffs on Indian goods, raising them to 50% in response to India's continued purchase of Russian oil. This decision has triggered intense backlash from India and marks a deepening rift with a major Asian ally.
Trump signed an executive order on August 6, imposing an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, on top of the 25% announced the previous week. The combined 50% duty—highest among Asian countries and at par with Brazil—is set to take effect from August 27, leaving a narrow window for potential negotiations to avert economic fallout.
In a separate announcement, Trump revealed plans to introduce a 100% tariff on semiconductors and computer chips, excluding only those manufactured domestically. This sweeping measure is expected to sharply increase the prices of electronics, vehicles, appliances, and other technology-based products, potentially disrupting global supply chains.
'The recent announcement by the U.S. to impose a [50%] tariff creates serious headwinds for India's emerging technology sector, particularly in hardware and infrastructure. The increased cost of importing critical components is likely to slow the growth of hardware startups and data center expansion,' said Denys Peleshok, chief international growth officer at MD Finance, a technology company providing financial services.
'As global competition intensifies, Indian tech companies must diversify their markets, boost operational efficiency through automation, and strategically leverage AI [artificial intelligence] to maintain resilience and drive long-term value,' Peleshok told CoinGeek.
Sectors like artificial intelligence (AI), data centers, the Internet of Things (IoT), and semiconductor manufacturing—all heavily reliant on U.S.-made hardware and cloud services—could face rising costs and supply chain disruptions. Indian startups, particularly those dependent on American chipmakers or cloud platforms, may see reduced profit margins, delayed scaling plans, and a tightening of investor confidence.
More importantly, the tariff signals a deeper shift in U.S. policy: a turn toward protectionism that could erode the trust required for international technology collaboration. For India, a country whose digital economy depends on stable, cross-border partnerships, this kind of economic brinkmanship creates a dangerous level of unpredictability. Emerging sectors like Web3, already navigating murky domestic regulations, could face even greater uncertainty as U.S. venture capital hesitates in the face of geopolitical turbulence.
'With [50%] tariff on India, the parent companies may slow down spending considering tariff on services export and deteriorating India–U.S. trade relations,' Ritesh Verma, a mentor at Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), told CoinGeek.
Clients may start worrying about possible future tariffs, which could raise the cost of IT development and maintenance, Verma pointed out. As a result, they might consider moving projects to other countries or spreading them across different locations to ensure business continuity and keep costs under control.
'For data centres, tariffs can indirectly effect and lead to cost elevation due to increase in material cost of building and maintaining data centres. This cost will eventually be passed on to users and affect the end-to-end supply chain, challenging the objective of cost effectiveness,' Verma added.
Tech startups need to rethink strategy, funding
Startups in the technology and Web3 sector will face both direct and indirect impacts. Those operating in sectors hit by tariffs will need to revisit their profit and loss, funding plans, and go-to-market strategies, Verma pointed out. Even startups not directly affected must evaluate potential indirect impacts, especially on current or future collaborations. The uncertainty around future tariffs makes it harder to create reliable business plans and adds a layer of risk to strategic decisions.
'For Web3 startups in India, the picture becomes even more precarious. Already facing regulatory uncertainty at home, they could now witness cooling investor sentiment from the U.S. VCs [venture capitalists] wary of geopolitical noise,' Raj Kapoor, founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), told CoinGeek.
'The data centre ecosystem may also feel the tremors. U.S. cloud giants investing billions in Indian infrastructure may continue their bets, but with more risk filters and due diligence around policy stability. More broadly, innovation partnerships depend not just on declarations, but on operational trust—shared R&D (research and development), co-development, and open standards,' Kapoor added.
On February 13, Trump, recognized as the first president to openly support 'cryptocurrency,' welcomed Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Washington, D.C., for an official working visit. During the meeting, both countries reaffirmed their ambition to increase bilateral trade to over $500 billion by 2030. The leaders also announced plans to negotiate the first tranche of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by the fall of 2025. However, former Indian Finance Secretary Subhash Garg has cast serious doubt on the prospects of a U.S.-India trade agreement, citing deep and unresolved differences on critical issues. He emphasized that the chances of reaching any meaningful reconciliation are negligible.
'I don't think the situation is right at all to have a deal. You can keep the pretense of talking that will not lead anywhere. You have to weather this storm for the time being. Try to contain your damage. You can't give in to all kinds of demands,' Garg told CNBC International.
Tariffs cloud future of US-India tech partnerships
In February, India and the U.S. launched the U.S.-India TRUST initiative (Transforming the Relationship Utilizing Strategic Technology) to strengthen cooperation among government agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector. This partnership aims to promote joint efforts in key emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, semiconductors, quantum computing, biotechnology, defense, energy, and space. A key component of the initiative is a shared commitment to using trusted technology providers and safeguarding sensitive technologies, according to a joint announcement from both nations.
Under the TRUST initiative, President Trump and Prime Minister Modi committed to working with industry leaders from both nations to develop a joint roadmap for expanding AI infrastructure. According to their joint statement, this plan will address key obstacles, such as financing, construction, energy supply, and connectivity, for establishing large-scale AI systems built with U.S. technology in India. It will also lay out clear milestones and next steps. The partnership aims to encourage private sector investment in advanced data centers, improve access to AI computing resources and processors, and promote the development of AI tools and applications that tackle real-world challenges. Additionally, the initiative will emphasize creating safeguards and minimizing regulatory hurdles to support innovation and responsible growth.
However, initiatives, such as the U.S.-India TRUST partnership, depend not just on joint declarations but on policy stability, research funding, talent mobility, and mutual alignment. A tariff move shakes the very foundation of these collaborative efforts, raising concerns about visa policies, tech transfers, and export controls.
'The imposition of tariffs may not immediately derail strategic initiatives like the U.S.-India TRUST partnership, but it casts a shadow over their trajectory. TRUST, which includes cooperation on AI, quantum computing, and semiconductors, relies on a stable policy environment and mutual goodwill. A tariff move undercuts that foundation, prompting stakeholders on both sides to reassess the political will backing these ventures,' Kapoor of IBA told CoinGeek.
'The tariff threatens to undercut momentum built through bilateral initiatives like the U.S.-India iCET and TRUST programs, which were designed to foster deep collaboration in critical and emerging technologies,' Kapoor added.
The U.S.-India TRUST initiative, once hailed as a cornerstone of their expanding collaboration in cutting-edge technologies, now faces growing uncertainty as trade tensions escalate. The imposition of tariffs has introduced an element of instability that threatens to undermine the mutual confidence necessary for such high-stakes partnerships.
This shift in the geopolitical climate could have broader implications beyond diplomatic strain. With increased unpredictability in policy, American venture capital firms and infrastructure providers may hesitate to commit new investments in the Indian tech ecosystem. Rather than moving forward with funding and expansion plans, they may adopt a more cautious, wait-and-watch approach. As a result, India's emerging role as a global innovation and technology hub could be called into question, potentially slowing momentum in strategic initiatives and delaying crucial financial and operational support.
'First and foremost, the TRUST initiative has become a symbol of deepening technological partnership, and now it is at risk due to tariffs. This could also lead to delays in funding or a review of India's status as a regional hub. This could force U.S. venture capital funds and infrastructure providers to take a wait-and-see approach, leading to delays in funding cycles or a review of India's status as a regional hub,' Peleshok pointed out.
Even a largely symbolic tariff dispute can inject significant uncertainty into the landscape of future investments and bilateral agreements, particularly in emerging technology sectors that depend on stability, long-term planning, and investor trust. These sectors, such as advanced technology and next-generation manufacturing, require not only substantial capital but also the assurance of a predictable policy environment. When trade tensions rise, it undermines that confidence, making it harder for stakeholders to commit to long-term projects. Potential investors may hold back, fearing abrupt policy shifts or retaliatory measures. As a result, vital funding streams could slow down or be redirected, stalling the growth of sectors that rely on sustained international collaboration and financial continuity.
'A tariff is a loud signal of divergence. Joint R&D labs, cross-border research funding, and talent mobility in critical sectors [such as AI and quantum tech] could hit friction points, especially in visa policies, export controls, and tech transfer limitations,' Kapoor of IBA added. 'The question we must now consider is this: can countries truly collaborate on frontier technologies while playing tug-of-war over trade?'
Watch: India is going to be the frontrunner in digitalization
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House orders a review of exhibits at Smithsonian museums ahead of nation's 250th birthday
The White House is ordering a wide-ranging review of the Smithsonian museums and exhibitions ahead of the country's 250th birthday with a goal of aligning the institution's content with President Donald Trump 's interpretation of American history. In a letter sent Tuesday to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, the White House laid out in detail the steps it expects the organization to take as part of the announced review. The examination will look at all public-facing content, such as social media, exhibition text and educational materials, to 'assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals,' according to the letter. 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the letter said. The Smithsonian said it remained committed to 'scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history." 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents,' it said in a statement. The review, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, is the latest attempt by the president to bring the country's cultural institutions in line with his vision. In March, Trump signed an executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which accused the Smithsonian of coming under the influence of a 'divisive, race-centered ideology' and called upon it to 'remove improper ideology' from the institution's museums. In February, Trump removed the Kennedy Center's Board of Trustees, replaced them with his supporters and named himself chairman. He vowed to end events featuring performers in drag, indicating he would take on a larger role in dictating the institution's programming schedule. The review of the Smithsonian will initially focus on eight museums — the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The letter said additional museums would be reviewed in subsequent phases. Civil rights leaders have criticized the administration's particular focus on the National Museum of African American History and Culture as efforts to minimize Black Americans' contributions to the country and to recast the obstacles they faced throughout history. The Smithsonian has repeatedly denied allegations that it has changed or removed exhibit details in response to pressure from the administration. Recently, the institution removed references to Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit on the American presidency. A spokesman for the museum said the references, which were added in 2021, were intended to be a temporary measure and said a future exhibit would include details on all presidential impeachments. The review ordered by the White House directs the museums to submit materials from exhibits and drafts for upcoming events within 30 days. Within 120 days, the letter said, museums will be expected to take corrective action, 'replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions."


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Trump family has raked in an astonishing $3.4 billion over his two presidencies, new report claims
President Donald Trump and his family may have made billions off his two presidencies, a new report claims. The New Yorker reports that Trump and his family have pocketed an estimated $3.4 billion thanks to his two terms as president. Its tally includes profits from cryptocurrencies, the president's MAGA-branded merchandise and his Mar-a-Lago estate. The outlet estimated that, thanks to Trump's two presidencies, the family has made $2.37 billion from cryptocurrency; $339.6 million from financial ventures; $270.8 million from hospitality; $116 million from media; and $277.7 million across other sources, including his private jet, legal fees and merchandise. In response to this report, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Independent: ' The claims that this President has profited from his time in office are absolutely absurd — in comparison to what he could have made if he didn't have to deal with the fake news and corrupt political opponents, the President has lost hundreds of millions of dollars to serve this country.' 'The American people love him precisely because he is a successful businessman, not in spite of it,' Leavitt added. 'The Trump Family is highly respected for always conducting their dealings by the book, unlike past presidents, such as the Biden Crime Family. President Trump has always practiced integrity and transparency, which is why he is and has been forthcoming in sharing his financial disclosures.' Much of the Trump family's estimated earnings have come from various cryptocurrency ventures, The New Yorker reports. This includes an estimated $385 million in profit from the coins $TRUMP and $MELANIA, which he launched just before Trump took office in January, according to the outlet. The Independent has reached out to the Trump Organization and Trump Media for comment. While the president has embraced cryptocurrency, so have his allies. About one in five of Trump's high-level cabinet picks hold significant assets in cryptocurrency, according to a July analysis by The Washington Post. At the time, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said these figures reflected the success Trump's picks had in the private sector and insisted there were no conflicts of interest. In addition to his cryptocurrency ventures, The New Yorker estimates Trump has made an estimated $27.7 million from his Trump Store merchandise. The outlet noted that Trump is the first Presidential candidate to run a private online store, which competes with his campaign to sell MAGA merchandise. The New Yorker's total included an estimated $1.3 million from Trump's 'God Bless the USA' Bibles and $2.8 million from Trump-branded watches. These figures were previously reported in Trump's 2024 financial disclosure report, which was released in June. Trump reported more than $600 million in income on the form, according to Reuters. The New Yorker estimates Trump's presidencies have also generated an extra $125 million in profit from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. This estimated extra profit came, in part, from Trump's own campaign events at the club, as well as events held by other GOP candidates, organizations and high-profile figures, the outlet reports. In its estimate, The New Yorker also included an estimated $100 million from supporters' contributions that Trump reportedly used to pay for legal fees. While a political campaign fund can't be used for a candidate's personal legal battles, a loophole allowed him to convert campaign funds into political action committees, which are subject to looser restrictions, the outlet claimed. This cash funded his defense across several cases, including Trump's historic hush money trial last year, according to the report. In that case, a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up a payoff to adult film star Stormy Daniels during his 2016 campaign. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and is appealing the conviction.


The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Your security check at the airport might get faster — just need to scan your face first
Travelers in U.S. airports may be able to move through the security line a little faster now — if they're willing to let the government scan their faces. The Department of Homeland Security is now using facial recognition software in its TSA PreCheck Touchless ID lines. Those lanes are separate lanes from the typical PreCheck lanes, which have reportedly become slow as more travelers take advantage of the service, according to the Washington Post. The program started in 2021 at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, but is now available in 15 airports. Those airports include: Chicago O'Hare; Dallas-Fort Worth; Denver; Detroit Metropolitan; Harry Reid; Hartsfield-Jackson in Atlanta; JFK; LaGuardia; LAX; Newark; Portland International in Oregon; Ronald Regan; Salt Lake City; San Francisco and Seattle-Tacoma International Airports. Some lanes are only available with certain airlines at certain airports. Travelers hoping to jump into the supposedly faster lines should check before traveling if their airport and airline use the service. For travelers who don't mind letting the fed scan their faces, they have to first be a TSA PreCheck member with a valid Known Traveler Number and an active airline profile — like a loyalty program — as well as a valid passport. The facial recognition lanes can be faster than other security lines. For one, travelers don't have to stop to hand over their IDs to TSA officials. They simply walk through the line dividers until the reach the luggage X-ray machines. The other reason is that the line is relatively new and hasn't been inundated with travelers — yet. Reporters at the Washington Post that tried the new program reported that during one attempt the facial recognition machine was under maintenance, and during the second, a Touchless ID symbol did not print on their boarding pass, and they were not able to time how long going through the line without issue would take. The major question looming about facial recognition technology is Americans' privacy and how that data will be stored and used. Critics of the technology cited a 2019 incident in which a DHS data breach compromised the photos of American travelers. The information was accessed through one of the DHS's subcontractors, according to the Washington Post. The TSA said that its databases are encrypted and that traveler information is protected from breaches. A new bill in the Senate would allow for airport officials to scan travelers' faces, but only if they opt-in to the technology. It would ban using the tech for anything other than verifying people's identities, and require the agency to immediately delete the facial scans once the check is complete. Right now, travelers can opt out of facial recognition scanning by telling airport security you'd prefer a "standard ID check."