What Wall Street's brightest minds think about the US-China trade deal
The US-China trade deal is giving markets a huge boost on Monday, but progress on tariffs over the weekend still leaves some risks to stocks and the economy intact, top Wall Street commentators say.
US stocks climbed on Monday after the US announced its trade agreement with China. The US will lower the tariff rate on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China will cut its tariff rate on US goods from 125% to 10% for a period of 90 days while negotiations continue.
Investors, who have been closely watching for signs of progress on the deal in recent weeks, are relieved. Yet, the reaction is varied among some of Wall Street's top voices, who see an improved outlook for the US economy but are still eyeing risks to the market ahead.
Here's what some of Wall Street's brightest minds have to say.
Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor, Allianz
The trade deal isn't signaling an all clear for markets, according to the Allianz chief economic advisor. That's partly because tariffs will still stoke inflationary pressures in the economy, even though a lower tariff rate on imports will allow for "some" economic activity between the US and China.
"It's not a straight line. And you're going to be really frustrated when you hear the opinion of economists like me," El-Erian said of his market outlook when speaking to CNBC on Monday.
El-Erian said economic activity will likely be higher than expected for the next 90 days due to short-term optimism on the trade agreement. Still, he saw the Fed issuing fewer rate cuts in 2025 and pushing them further down the road as the central bank monitors inflation.
"My own gut feeling is we will get some slowing in the economy. We will get some higher inflation. But most CEOs will remain in the wait-and-see," he added, noting that there was still uncertainty around the economic, political, and national security implications of the deal.
Mike Wilson, chief investment officer, Morgan Stanley
The Morgan Stanley CIO said he believes stocks already hit a "trough" after Trump's Liberation Day tariffs fueled a historic sell-off. He also doubled down on his forecast that the S&P 500 will reach 6,500 by the end of the year, a gain of about 12%.
Tariffs being dialed back could give the Fed more room to cut interest rates this year, Wilson added, a move that will boost risk assets like stocks.
"If tariffs aren't going to be as onerous, they can now start looking at this dual mandate again, and saying, hey, the growth picture is maybe a little bit better, but if we're going to err on the side of policy, probably to help the growth side than maybe the inflation side, if the tariffs aren't going to be as bad," Wilson said, speaking to CNBC.
He added that the risk of a recession has also "come down meaningfully," assuming that negotiations with China hold true. That, along with a weaker US dollar, brightens the outlook for corporate earnings.
"I feel better that the second half now, from a rated change standpoint, can be better than what people were expecting, because the first half was actually worse than what people were expecting," Wilson said of his outlook on stocks.
Torsten Sløk, chief economist, Apollo
Apollo's top economist said the trade agreement could easily boost the US economy's growth. That's because the trade deal has removed a "major tail risk" from the economy, Sløk said, referring to fears that trade between the US and China would shut off completely under the original tariffs.
The trade deal could cause consumers, corporations, and foreigners to regain confidence in the US economy and markets, which could provide a tailwind to growth.
Markets are starting to focus more on the potential impact of inflation stemming from tariffs. Traders are now pricing in two rate cuts for the year, down from three to four cuts the prior week, Sløk noted. Still, investors appear confident that the more positive outlook for growth will outweigh the inflationary impact of tariffs, he said.
"So it's very clear that by removing this tail risk and the risk of a recession, we now have the markets saying, 'Well, maybe the growth outlook is not that bad.' And maybe therefore, yes, inflation will still go up, but if we still have that GDP growth is going to be still okay, at least for now, we will eventually get a tailwind as a result of removing this tail risk," he added.
Roger Altman, founder, Evercore
According to Evercore founder Roger Altman, the main issue with the trade deal is that the terms aren't final yet.
"It's encouraging. It's very encouraging. But it's preliminary," Altman said, speaking to CNBC. "It's essentially a 90-day pause on the ultra-high tariffs in order to negotiate to try to get a permanent framework, permanent tariff reduction framework, and other progress."
The US and China still have to negotiate on several "tough" issues, Altman noted, pointing to the fact that many of China's products are heavily subsidized by the government. If the costs for those goods were "objectively set" for the US and European markets, prices in those nations could rise, he said.
Meanwhile, the overall US tariff rate is still sharply higher than it was before April 2. Even considering the 90-day pause and framework for trade negotiations with China, the US's overall tariff rate will likely be pushed up to around 14%, Altman estimated, up from around 3%-4% during President Biden's term.
"That will still be a drag, when we all know what tariffs do. As Chairman Powell said, they raise prices, reduce consumption, raise inflation."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lemonade (LMND) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say
Lemonade (LMND) reported $151.2 million in revenue for the quarter ended March 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 27%. EPS of -$0.86 for the same period compares to -$0.67 a year ago. The reported revenue represents a surprise of +5.05% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $143.93 million. With the consensus EPS estimate being -$0.94, the EPS surprise was +8.51%. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance. Here is how Lemonade performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: In force premium (end of period): $1.01 billion compared to the $999.35 million average estimate based on four analysts. Premium per Customer (end of period): $396 versus $394.15 estimated by four analysts on average. Customers (end of period): 2,545,496 versus the four-analyst average estimate of 2,535,658. Net loss ratio: 82% versus the four-analyst average estimate of 89%. Gross loss ratio: 78% compared to the 80.8% average estimate based on four analysts. Net investment income: $9.50 million versus the four-analyst average estimate of $8.45 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +25%. Ceding commission income: $26.90 million versus $22.06 million estimated by four analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +28.1% change. Commission income: $10.50 million versus the four-analyst average estimate of $8.02 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +72.1%. Net earned premium: $104.30 million compared to the $105.18 million average estimate based on four analysts. The reported number represents a change of +23.6% year over year. View all Key Company Metrics for Lemonade here>>>Shares of Lemonade have returned +6.7% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +11.5% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lemonade First Quarter 2025 Earnings: Beats Expectations
Revenue: US$151.2m (up 27% from 1Q 2024). Net loss: US$62.4m (loss widened by 32% from 1Q 2024). US$0.86 loss per share (further deteriorated from US$0.67 loss in 1Q 2024). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 4.3%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 7.5%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 22% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 5.2% growth forecast for the Insurance industry in the US. Performance of the American Insurance industry. The company's shares are up 4.6% from a week ago. You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 3 warning signs for Lemonade you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
34 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The 911 presidency: Trump flexes emergency powers in his second term
An analysis by The Associated Press shows that 30 of Trump's 150 executive orders have cited some kind of emergency power or authority, a rate that far outpaces his recent predecessors. The result is a redefinition of how presidents can wield power. Instead of responding to an unforeseen crisis, Trump is using emergency powers to supplant Congress' authority and advance his agenda. 'What's notable about Trump is the enormous scale and extent, which is greater than under any modern president,' said Ilya Somin, who is representing five U.S. businesses who sued the administration, claiming they were harmed by Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Because Congress has the power to set trade policy under the Constitution, the businesses convinced a federal trade court that Trump overstepped his authority by claiming an economic emergency to impose the tariffs. An appeals court has paused that ruling while the judges review it. Advertisement Growing concerns over actions The legal battle is a reminder of the potential risks of Trump's strategy. Judges traditionally have given presidents wide latitude to exercise emergency powers that were created by Congress. However, there's growing concern that Trump is pressing the limits when the U.S. is not facing the kinds of threats such actions are meant to address. Advertisement 'The temptation is clear,' said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program and an expert in emergency powers. 'What's remarkable is how little abuse there was before, but we're in a different era now.' Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who has drafted legislation that would allow Congress to reassert tariff authority, said he believed the courts would ultimately rule against Trump in his efforts to single-handedly shape trade policy. 'It's the Constitution. James Madison wrote it that way, and it was very explicit,' Bacon said of Congress' power over trade. 'And I get the emergency powers, but I think it's being abused. When you're trying to do tariff policy for 80 countries, that's policy, not emergency action.' The White House pushed back on such concerns, saying Trump is justified in aggressively using his authority. 'President Trump is rightfully enlisting his emergency powers to quickly rectify four years of failure and fix the many catastrophes he inherited from Joe Biden — wide open borders, wars in Ukraine and Gaza, radical climate regulations, historic inflation, and economic and national security threats posed by trade deficits," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Trump frequently sites 1977 law to justify actions Of all the emergency powers, Trump has most frequently cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to justify slapping tariffs on imports. The law, enacted in 1977, was intended to limit some of the expansive authority that had been granted to the presidency decades earlier. It is only supposed to be used when the country faces 'an unusual and extraordinary threat' from abroad 'to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.' Advertisement In analyzing executive orders issued since 2001, the AP found that Trump has invoked the law 21 times in presidential orders and memoranda. President George W. Bush, grappling with the aftermath of the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil, invoked the law just 14 times in his first term. Likewise, Barack Obama invoked the act only 21 times during his first term, when the U.S. economy faced the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. The Trump administration has also deployed an 18th century law, the Alien Enemies Act, to justify deporting Venezuelan migrants to other countries, including El Salvador. Trump's decision to invoke the law relies on allegations that the Venezuelan government coordinates with the Tren de Aragua gang, but intelligence officials did not reach that conclusion. Congress has ceded its power to the presidency Congress has granted emergency powers to the presidency over the years, acknowledging that the executive branch can act more swiftly than lawmakers if there is a crisis. There are 150 legal powers — including waiving a wide variety of actions that Congress has broadly prohibited — that can only be accessed after declaring an emergency. In an emergency, for example, an administration can suspend environmental regulations, approve new drugs or therapeutics, take over the transportation system, or even override bans on testing biological or chemical weapons on human subjects, according to a list compiled by the Brennan Center for Justice. Democrats and Republicans have pushed the boundaries over the years. For example, in an attempt to cancel federal student loan debt, Joe Biden used a post-Sept. 11 law that empowered education secretaries to reduce or eliminate such obligations during a national emergency. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually rejected his effort, forcing Biden to find different avenues to chip away at his goals. Advertisement Before that, Bush pursued warrantless domestic wiretapping and Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered the detention of Japanese-Americans on the West Coast in camps for the duration of World War II. Trump, in his first term, sparked a major fight with Capitol Hill when he issued a national emergency to compel construction of a border wall. Though Congress voted to nullify his emergency declaration, lawmakers could not muster up enough Republican support to overcome Trump's eventual veto. 'Presidents are using these emergency powers not to respond quickly to unanticipated challenges,' said John Yoo, who as a Justice Department official under George W. Bush helped expand the use of presidential authorities. 'Presidents are using it to step into a political gap because Congress chooses not to act.' Trump, Yoo said, 'has just elevated it to another level.' Trump's allies support his moves Conservative legal allies of the president also said Trump's actions are justified, and Vice President JD Vance predicted the administration would prevail in the court fight over tariff policy. 'We believe — and we're right — that we are in an emergency,' Vance said last week in an interview with Newsmax. 'You have seen foreign governments, sometimes our adversaries, threaten the American people with the loss of critical supplies,' Vance said. 'I'm not talking about toys, plastic toys. I'm talking about pharmaceutical ingredients. I'm talking about the critical pieces of the manufacturing supply chain.' Vance continued, 'These governments are threatening to cut us off from that stuff, that is by definition, a national emergency.' Republican and Democratic lawmakers have tried to rein in a president's emergency powers. Two years ago, a bipartisan group of lawmakers in the House and Senate introduced legislation that would have ended a presidentially-declared emergency after 30 days unless Congress votes to keep it in place. It failed to advance. Advertisement Similar legislation hasn't been introduced since Trump's return to office. Right now, it effectively works in the reverse, with Congress required to vote to end an emergency. 'He has proved to be so lawless and reckless in so many ways. Congress has a responsibility to make sure there's oversight and safeguards,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who cosponsored an emergency powers reform bill in the previous session of Congress. He argued that, historically, leaders relying on emergency declarations has been a 'path toward autocracy and suppression.'