logo
South Korea counts on shipbuilding to ease US tariff woes

South Korea counts on shipbuilding to ease US tariff woes

France 244 hours ago

Already hit by sector levies on steel and car exports, Seoul is laser-focused on negotiations over a 25 percent country-specific tariff that has been suspended until July 8.
AFP takes a look at what's going on:
Why shipbuilding?
In the 1970s, South Korea's military leader president Park Chung-hee accelerated the country's heavy industry, designating sectors such as steel and shipbuilding "strategically important" and rolling out state subsidies.
At the same time, POSCO was founded -- now one of the world's largest steel producers -- and conglomerate Hyundai built its shipyard in southeastern Ulsan, which started to grow rapidly.
European rivals struggled to keep pace.
Sweden's Kockums Shipyard filed for bankruptcy in 1987 -- and in a symbolic shift of global shipbuilding power, Hyundai acquired its 140-metre (460-foot) Goliath crane for one dollar. It now towers over southern Ulsan.
In the 1990s and 2000s, South Korean shipbuilders such as Hyundai Heavy Industries and Samsung Heavy Industries ramped up investment in research and development, backed by generous government subsidies.
The country secured a competitive edge in high-value-added vessels, including LNG carriers, very large crude carriers, and offshore platforms.
Now, South Korea ranks as the world's second-largest shipbuilding nation, trailing only behind China.
Is it important?
South Korea's exports hit a record high in 2024, with analysts pointing to shipbuilding as one of the key drivers.
The sector accounted for nearly four percent of total exports and grew by almost 20 percent from the previous year -- reaching $25.6 billion.
Shipbuilding directly employs around 120,000 workers -- roughly one percent of the country's total workforce -- with indirect employment significantly higher in industrial hubs like Ulsan.
Industry data shows so far this year, new orders have exceeded 13 trillion won ($9.4 billion).
In March, Hanwha Ocean secured a landmark $1.6 billion contract to build LNG carriers for Taiwan's Evergreen Marine, one of the largest single orders in the sector this year.
- Why is it a 'bargaining chip'? -
Trump has showed "significant interest in South Korea-US shipbuilding cooperation," said South Korea's trade, industry and energy minister Ahn Duk-geun in April.
Like the Europeans, the US shipbuilding industry has lagged behind South Korea and China, and as a result, the sector is seen as a "highly important bargaining chip in trade negotiations," he added.
At an APEC finance ministers' meeting in South Korea in May, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer met Chung Ki-sun, vice chairman of HD Hyundai, the country's largest shipbuilder, before he met Seoul's top officials.
"South Korea's shipbuilding and defence industries see a window of opportunity," said Kim Dae-jong, a professor at Sejong University.
How does it help the US?
Greer also met with the CEO of Hanwha Ocean, the first non-American company authorised to carry out a dry-dock maintenance of a US Navy vessel.
The move last September was seen as significant as it signalled that Washington sees South Korea, where it already has 28,000 US troops stationed, as a strategic defence hub.
With worries growing about China's expanding naval fleet and potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait, the US has begun seeking reliable overseas shipyards to support its operations in the Asia-Pacific region.
The global market for ship maintenance, repair, and overhaul is projected to exceed $60 billion annually, according to industry estimates.
Any problems?
Despite multi-billion-dollar contracts, data suggests South Korea's shipbuilding industry is losing ground in the global race.
China dominates with South Korea's market share dropping, according to industry data.
Demand for eco-friendly vessels is rising, and the government need to overhaul regulations "to support the development of next-generation eco-friendly vessels," Rhee Shin-hyung, a professor at Seoul National University, told AFP.
South Korea's woeful demographics also make staffing hard. In Geoje -– home to Samsung Heavy Industries -– the number of residents in their 20s and 30s has nearly halved in recent years.
Orders are down in 2025 which hints that "the shipbuilding boom may end sooner than the market anticipated," warned Rhee.
Global ship orders between January and April fell by almost half the volume recorded during the same period last year.
Shipbuilders have been enjoying a "supercycle" but unfortunately the "peak is expected to be lower and the boom shorter-lived compared to the past," Nam Chul, vice president at HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, told AFP.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US operation against Iran in detail: bombs, planes and missiles used
US operation against Iran in detail: bombs, planes and missiles used

Euronews

time32 minutes ago

  • Euronews

US operation against Iran in detail: bombs, planes and missiles used

The operation, which marks a significant escalation in tensions, has resulted in Iran's nuclear programme being hit "substantially" with full details to emerge. The US attack was executed with military precision using B-2 Spirit strategic bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from naval platforms. According to information provided by Fox News' reporter Sean Hannity, following direct conversations with President Donald Trump, the operation employed between five and six bunker buster bombs dropped from B-2 bombers, exceeding initial estimates of only two bombs for the mission. The facilities attacked included the nuclear facilities at Natanz and Estefan, which were neutralised by 30 Tomahawk missiles launched from a distance of approximately 640 kilometres. The main target was the Fordow plant, which is considered a cornerstone of Iran's nuclear programme and which, according to sources quoted by Fox News, "was completely destroyed". This information was backed up by US President Trump himself, who tweeted that "Fordow is gone". US military deployment In the weeks leading up to the attack, the US deployed a considerable military force to the Middle East. This deployment included the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz, Air ForceF-16, F-22 and F-35 fighters, in addition to the B-2 bombers that took part in the operation. Several B-2 bombers took off for the Pacific after completing the mission, having left Iranian airspace by the time of the official announcement. President Trump has been clear about US targets in the region. In remarks reported by Fox News, he said: "We're not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for total and complete victory. I repeat, you know what the victory is: no nuclear weapons". This statement underscores the US' determination to completely eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities, beyond seeking temporary agreements or ceasefires. Military arsenal used: Technical analysis of missiles and bombs The bunker buster bombs used in the operation represent the latest technology in deep penetration weaponry. These weapons are specifically designed to neutralise fortified underground targets, such as Iranian nuclear facilities. Technical characteristics: The 30 Tomahawk missiles used in the attack represent the gold standard in long-range cruise missiles for the US Navy. Tomahawk specifications: The use of five to six bunker buster bombs indicates the involvement of three B-2 Spirit bombers, each capable of carrying two high-penetration bombs. B-2 capabilities: Regional and global implications This strike marks a turning point in US foreign policy towards Iran and sets a significant precedent in the fight against nuclear proliferation. The destruction of key facilities such as Fordow represents a significant setback for Iran's nuclear programme, which has been the target of international sanctions and nuclear diplomacy for more than a decade. The operation also demonstrates the US' ability to execute long-range precision strikes against highly defended targets, using its most advanced military technology. At this point Iran could either escalate its attacks into war or sign a peace and nuclear technology non-proliferation agreement as Trump initially sought.

The US had been moving B-2 planes to Guam for several days before striking Iran
The US had been moving B-2 planes to Guam for several days before striking Iran

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

The US had been moving B-2 planes to Guam for several days before striking Iran

22/06/2025 At least 430 Iranian civilians killed this week according to the health ministry Middle East 22/06/2025 Israel kills 3 top Iranian officers in Shiraz strike before US bombing Middle East 22/06/2025 US enters war against Iran, bombing three nuclear sites Middle East 22/06/2025 France 24 reports on Iran's reaction to US air strikes on its territory Middle East 22/06/2025 No further US strikes on Iran planned, France 24 reports from Washnigton Middle East 22/06/2025 Trump says US forces bombed Iran nuclear sites Americas 22/06/2025 US President Donald Trump's White House speech on US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites Middle East 21/06/2025 Iran's foreign minister says aggression must stop so diplomacy can resume Middle East 21/06/2025 Israeli strikes kill Iranian commander: the latest on the ground in Tehran Middle East

Gulf states begin diplomatic scramble to end Israel-Iran conflict
Gulf states begin diplomatic scramble to end Israel-Iran conflict

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

Gulf states begin diplomatic scramble to end Israel-Iran conflict

As Iran and Israel trade strikes and the US weighs joining in, wealthy Gulf states on the conflict's doorstep are engaged in frantic diplomacy to halt the war – but solutions remain elusive. A spillover of the conflict or the Iranian government's collapse are both worrying outcomes for the energy-rich region, which hosts several major US military bases. Peace and stability have been central to the rise of Gulf powers including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who are pivoting their economies towards business and tourism. Hoping to avert the crisis, Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, has been talking to Iran and the United States since "day one", Ali Shihabi, an analyst close to the royal court, told AFP. "But it does not look promising that something will happen very soon," he added. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto Saudi ruler, and the UAE's President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, have both spoken to Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian in recent days. The Emirati president also held a phone call on Wednesday with Russia's President Vladimir Putin, an ally of Iran, who offered to mediate in the conflict. Israel's launching of the war scuppered Oman-brokered talks between Tehran and Washington that were supported by Gulf nations, who have been pursuing a détente with their giant neighbour after years of strained ties. 'Reckless and miscalculated' On Tuesday, US President Donald Trump demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and warned it could easily assassinate its supreme leader, fuelling fears of American intervention. Hours later, the UAE's Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan said the Gulf country's president had "conducted intensive diplomatic calls ... to de-escalate tensions and prevent the conflict from spreading". Sheikh Abdullah warned against "reckless and miscalculated actions that could extend beyond the borders of the two countries", in a strongly worded statement published by the official WAM news agency. Trump had initially urged Iran to come to the negotiating table, but an official briefed on talks said Tehran told Qatar and Oman that it "will not negotiate while under attack". Oman, Iran's traditional intermediary, said it was engaged in diplomatic efforts as the daily strikes continue. Meanwhile Qatar, a key mediator in the Israel-Hamas war and a negotiator with Iran in the past, has also been "engaging daily" with the US, its foreign ministry spokesperson said on Tuesday. Former Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani warned on X that "it is not in the interest of the Gulf states to see Iran ... collapse", adding that they would be "the first to be harmed" by the war's repercussions. 'Almost no influence' An Arab diplomat told AFP: "Everyone in the Gulf is going to say we are better off making sure we have a deal with Iran, a diplomatic solution with Iran." Shihabi, the Saudi analyst, echoed the sentiment, saying the best outcome was "obviously an agreement between Iran and (the) US". Diplomatic intervention by Saudi Arabia, once a fierce critic of Iran, comes two years after they restored ties. The UAE, which recognised Israel in 2020, has also patched up relations with Tehran since 2022. "Whereas the Saudis may have once called for 'cutting off the head of the snake', their approach toward Iran has shifted dramatically," said Hasan Alhasan, a senior fellow for Middle East policy at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. However, "the Arab Gulf states have almost no ability to shape Israel's or Iran's behaviour or influence the outcome of this war", he told AFP. "It is difficult to see how Israel's military campaign against Iran, whose objectives seem to have quickly metastasised from eliminating Iran's nuclear and missiles programmes to overthrowing the regime, ends well for Iran's Arab Gulf neighbours," Alhasan added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store