Sad reason so many beloved movies and TV shows are being remade
This week came news we didn't realise we needed so badly, that a sequel to 2002's surprise hit rom-com Bend It Like Beckham is in the works.
The original made more than $100 million at the box office and only added to the Brand Beckham aura, so it seems impossible that Golden Balls himself won't good-naturedly sign on for some sort of guest part.
Unfortunately, while Becks himself reapplies a certain teak deck-like shade of self-tanner, if you're looking for a sign the world is distinctly not okay right now, then ta da. The world's 90s and early aughts obsession is a massive red flag.
The number of movie and TV remakes from that era has now reached a comical level.
Just this week, photos surfaced showing the cast of The Devil Wears Prada sequel on set, looking like the last 19 years never happened as they shimmy back into their characters' costumes.
There are sequels or reprisals of Clueless, The Bodyguard, Ghost, The Thomas Crown Affair, An Officer and A Gentleman, Anaconda, Ghost, The Hand That Rocks the Cradle and Single White Female in the pipeline.
New I Know What You Did Last Summer, Final Destination, Freaky Friday and The Naked Gun are wither out or coming to cinemas soon. The Mean Girls and Twister follow-ups did brisk business. On TV screens, we are getting new Murder She Wrote, Malcolm In The Middle, One Tree Hill, Desperate Housewives and Buffy The Vampire Slayer.
The obvious move is to put it down to Hollywood laziness or the bankability of misty-eyed nostalgia. But I think it's actually a symptom of just how f**ked the world is right now. What this week's Bend It news confirms isn't that Hollywood ran out of ideas about the time they swore off gluten but how badly, how desperately, audiences are craving comfort right now. The characters, the formats and the worlds of Prada, of Clueless, of Buffy, are safe, familiar and unchallenging. To watch any of these is to catch up with old friends; it feels like slipping back on a favourite old pair of Levi 501s (they're back too). What these remakes are is perfectly-worn-in entertainment.
You have to go back to the dark days of the 1930s to find a time in history when the world felt this bleak. It's impossible to open a news site or social media feed without being immediately immersed in horror, extreme suffering, unthinkable starvation, and unspeakable cruelty and violence. To learn about how AI is about to fillet the job market and whole economies. To read about the loneliness epidemic that no one has any idea how to treat. Is it any wonder then that we want the simple, uncomplicated pleasure of seeing a cow sucked up by a twister again? To see Andy Sachs being dressed down by a deliciously imperious Miranda Priestly once more? To spend two hours with soccer-mad Jess as she unironically makes her dreams come true?
Emotionally, this tranche of 2.0 movies and TV shows is the equivalent of snuggling back down under the covers in your childhood bedroom and letting out a long slow exhale. We want - need - to cocoon ourselves in thoroughly known, uncomplicated plots and characters that don't demand anything of us; we want to be frictionlessly and immediately whisked away from reality. What also unites all these remakes is not just that they are sure-fire, bang-up, will-definitely work bits of IP but that they all hark back to a very particular period where the world looked golden.
In about 2000 when Bend It writer Gurinder Chadha was sitting down at her computer - let's imagine it's a bulbous coloured plastic iMac - and started clacking out a script about a Sikh girl torn between her family's expectations and her love of soccer, Tony Blair was Prime Minister. Bill Clinton and his saxophone were still in the White House. The Camp David accord was being hashed out, the Good Friday agreement had created peace in Ireland after centuries of Troubles, and in New York's financial district the Twin Towers stood tall. Breakthrough AIDs drugs had hit the market, broadband had arrived and the Nokia 3310 was the hottest ticket. A GFC? Never heard of her.
The world was fine, innit? Peace and stability reigned supreme. Economies were going gangbusters and the Iron Curtain had long since been torn down by the time Blair was covertly playing Snake in between budgetary briefings. No wonder the world is obsessed with the 90s and early 2000s right now. We all want to time-travel back to a period when the world felt safer, saner, and easier.
This impulse goes far beyond movies and TV too. Low slung jeans, halter tops and platform thongs are back. Oasis has just sold out a stadium tour. In the US, staple 90s retailers like Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch are experiencing sales resurgences, in the UK there has been a boom in sales in 90s chip flavours and in Australia, Allen's is bringing back single serve Killer Pythons. Data from taste.com.au from May showed an uptick in interest in throwback recipes like rissoles, beef stroganoff and pumpkin soup. Cheaper yes in a time of cost-of-living belt-tightening but, with the world looking in such a terrible way, who wants to sit down to sprouted buckwheat with a turmeric tahini drizzle? Pass the safe, soothing, uncomplicated stroganoff. More sour cream and Sarah Michelle Gellar? Yes please.
Recently J urassic World Rebirth director Gareth Edwards talked about making the seventh outing in the dinosaur franchise and said, 'I wanted it to feel like a film they'd discovered from the early 90s.' Which is exactly how we want to feel too. Yes, with all the movies, there is also the base economics of it all too.
Post pandemic, post 2023 Hollywood strike and in the age of the streaming wars, studios only want bankable surethings. Casual, movie-going has fallen away and getting bottoms onto cinema seats now increasingly means having to create a cultural moment or some sort of special event viewing. However, our appetite for remakes actually says something far bigger about our psychological needs right now.
The day after the Bend It news broke came the absolute cherry-on-top, piece de resistance: Channel Ten is bringing back Big Brother. Bust out the bunny ears. Don't understand the reference? Ask your parents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
17 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Meghan's ex-BFF Jessica Mulroney ‘regrets' friendship amid marriage split: report
IN LONDON The Duchess of Sussex's former BFF Jessica Mulroney 'somewhat regrets' their friendship, according to a new report. It emerged this week that the Canadian stylist, 45, is divorcing her husband, Ben, after 16 years of marriage – and according to the Daily Mail, the scrutiny that came with her association to the Duchess of Sussex had 'later caused tensions … in her marriage'. The two women had been best friends for years after meeting in Canada, where Jessica had introduced Meghan – who was then based in Toronto while filming Suits – to the city's glittering social scene. They remained close during the early stages of her relationship with her future husband, and Jessica and Ben's children – twins Brian and John and daughter Ivy – even served as page boys and bridesmaid at their royal wedding in 2018. However, the friendship appeared to sour following Jessica's 'white-privilege' scandal in 2020, where the stylist was axed from both her TV gigs following her racially charged spat with black lifestyle blogger Sasha Exeter. Amid the rampant online — and professional — backlash, Jessica issued an apology and Ben quit his job as a television presenter to help her. 'If [Jessica] could go back, a part of her wishes she was never part of [Markle and Prince Harry's 2018] wedding,' an insider alleged to the Mail on Friday. 'While she enjoyed all the exposure it brought her at the time, that same exposure is what caused her social media rift to blow up in the way it did and led to the end of her friendship with Meghan and her marriage.' Sources further alleged that while Jessica 'did consider Meghan family' at one point, she now reportedly 'sees that whole time as a 'dark cloud.' Back when the scandal broke, it was reported that Meghan reacted with shock after hearing of Jessica's 'tone deaf' threats to sue Exeter, and swiftly decided she can 'no longer be associated with her'. 'Meghan is absolutely mortified that she's been dragged into this complete mess. She said Jessica is in no way a racist, but the way she handled the situation was tone deaf and heartbreaking,' a friend of Meghan's told the Daily Mail at the time. In 2020, Exeter publicly blasted Jessica in an emotional 12-minute Instagram video, describing how she had threatened her during an argument about 'speaking up' against racism and had left her feeling 'paralysed in fear'. Exeter claimed that Jessica had 'taken offence to a very generic call to action' posted online, causing the women to engage in an argument about racism and white privilege. Exeter then claimed that Jessica had sent her a series of offensive messages, which ended with a threat to her livelihood. Jessica herself commented on the video to apologise, and alluded to her friendship with Meghan, who has been at the centre of racist attacks since she began dating Prince Harry in 2016. 'I am unequivocally sorry for not doing that with you and for any hurt I've caused. As I told you privately, I have lived a very public and personal experience with my closest friend where race was front and centre,' she wrote. 'It was deeply educational. I learned a lot from that. I promise to continue to learn and listen on how I can use my privilege to elevate and support black voices.' However, Exeter then shared a screenshot on her Instagram story of a private message sent by Jessica shortly after her public apology, which appeared to confirm her intent to sue for 'liable' (sic). Jessica was subsequently dropped from featuring as an expert on a daytime lifestyle show and Meanwhile, Page Six reported on Tuesday about Jessica and Ben's split, alleging they'd broken up 'some time ago'. The publication added that Jessica shared the news with fellow guests at a recent Toronto wedding, with a source claiming she 'seemed sad, but also relieved to have some clarity'.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Tyra Banks makes shocking confession about ‘disgusting and erotic' addiction
Tyra Banks knows how to pick 'em. The supermodel revealed her 'disgusting and erotic' habit of popping pimples and picking dirt from other people's toes during Thursday's episode of US show Today With Jenna & Friends. 'I like to pick. I like the toe, and if it has some stuff in it, I don't mind digging it out,' Banks, who is co-hosting this week, told Jenna Bush Hager. 'But I have a kit. You have to have a kit. Some alcohol, you know. Some stuff!' When Bush Hager asked who she targets with these rituals, the America's Next Top Model alum admitted that anyone in her household is fair game, reports Page Six. 'Anyone that wants it — my mum, my friends, my man, my son,' Banks confessed, referencing her beau, Louis Bélanger-Martin. 'And then, a pimple? If you had a pimple, I would be staring at you.' Banks labelled her 'addiction' as 'disgusting and erotic at the same time,' explaining, 'It touches those parts of me.' However, the TV personality, 51, does have her limits. 'Nether regions. I'm not picking up in those,' Banks said. 'If somebody's like, 'Oh, can you check this?' I'm like, 'No … that's where I draw the line.' Chest up and knees down? It's on. I'm not popping and picking nothing [outside of] there.' The model further grossed out Bush Hager as she explained that her foot-focused obsession can get quite stinky at times. 'The toenail, because there's been stuff in there. The jam. The toe jam is up in the nail, and then you pick, and sometimes it's different colours. Sometimes it's brown, sometimes it's green,' she described. Banks has been romantically linked to Canadian businessman Bélanger-Martin since August 2018. In November 2019, we exclusively reported that the pair was taking the next step in their relationship by moving in together. 'Tyra and Louis live together but Louis always moves around a lot for business reasons,' an insider told us, adding that he and his ex-wife, Valérie Martin Scraire, have an apartment in England, a house in Barbados, and a home in Magog, Quebec. 'Louis also spends some time with his own child in England and around the world for business,' said the source. 'Tyra's child has his own room at Louis [and] Valerie's house in Magog and Tyra moved some of her stuff — clothes, jewellery — there too.'

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Startling rise of the super wedding
The British village of Great Tew, population 162, is nearly universally described as 'sleepy'. The surrounding area might be home to the UK's best pie (pheasant and ham) and starriest new titleholders (Sir David and Lady Victoria Beckham) but still, it's a generally snoozy part of the world. Unless, that is, you were visiting last weekend. Dozens of American Secret Service agents swarmed about the place, blacked out SUVs were parked outside a quaint pub and former military personnel were busy putting up screens around a church. Inside the 11th century Saint Michael and All Angels lavish floral arrangements involving tree branches along with Persian rugs and 'tentlike' red curtains were reportedly being installed. For a good 72 hours there Great Tew was the stage for the latest billionaire must-have – the super wedding. The last six weeks have seen the emergence of something wholly new, uber 'I do's, which would have once only been covered by the society pages have instead become mass showbiz events in and of their own right like Oscars night or Glastonbury. They are power statements. Since mid June there have been three super weddings in three countries costing an estimated $96 million, impossible-to-avoid, grand multi-day festival-like demonstrations of wealth and connections, modern power statements of seven figure rose arches so extravagant they can probably be seen by orbiting satellites, and all of which has been breathlessly covered by the entertainment press. These nuptials have brought together concentric circles of extreme clout (Hollywood, Wall Street, Washington) while the multi-billionaire brides and grooms have demonstrated Kardashian-ish social media tendencies and the Daily Mail, Hello and People panted to keep up. We are in a strange place right now where billionaires now seem to want to be influencers and reality stars are becoming billionaires and us regular Joe Blows can watch live from our daggy sofas getting minute-by-minute updates about weddings of people who use Davos as a verb. Rich people a hitchin' is nothing new but this crop of 'I do's' is something different, bringing together tech royalty, fashion designer royalty, real royalty, the obscenely rich, Oscar winners, Victoria's Secret models, billionaire nepo babies, Olympic athletes, US presidential candidates, a former President, a former Vice President, a former US Secretary of State, five Kardashian/Jenners and Anna Wintour and engulfing social media feeds. First in mid-June, Alex Soros, son of George Soros, wed former Hillary Clinton right-hand-woman and Democrat powerbroker Huma Abedin in the Hamptons. The groom's family are worth $11 billion (and have donated $28 billion to their foundation) and invitees included Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Mariska Hargitay, Jimmy Fallon, Adrien Brody, Nicky Hilton Rothschild, Diane von Furstenberg, Tory Burch, Karlie Kloss, three Clintons (Bill, Hilary and Chelsea), former Vice President Kamala Harris and La Wintour herself. Vogue ran the exclusive. Then, two weeks later, the love-in moved to Venice where Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos walked down the aisle. The groom has about $200 billion and their guest list included Oprah Winfrey, Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Brady, Bill Gates, four Kardashian/Jenners, Usher, Orlando Bloom, Queen Rania of Jordan, Sydney Sweeney, Jessica Alba, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Ellie Goulding, and Von Furstenberg and Kloss again. Vogue? They got the exclusive of course. And most recently, we arrive in Great Tew where Eve Jobs, daughter of the late Steve Jobs, whose mother Laurene Powell Jobs is worth about $17.5 billion, married British Olympic gold medal winning equestrian star Harry Charles, with Jennifer Gates Nassar (daughter of Bill), Jessica Springsteen (daughter of Bruce), Kourtney Kardashian and Harris watching on. (Kloss, Harris and Von Furstenberg must be foot sore from dancing to The Nutbush and entirely sick of slices of elderflower sponge by about now.) Billionaires have, just like us, always found love. They have dated, mated up and decided to lock it down since fortunes were being measured in nice shells or a few chunky bronze ingots. Also, displays of wealth are as old as time. (Have I mentioned how many ingots I have?) However, these weddings feel like something different entirely. Not that long ago the I do's of business elites would not have registered outside of the highest social and finance echelons and yet now these couples are being feted and obsessed over like regular flavour celebrities: A swarming flotilla of paps tracked the Bezos-Sanchez nuptials and their guests across Venice; Hello devoted a team of four people to live blogging Jobs' big day; and Abedin and Sanchez both enjoyed the lavish Vogue treatment. These billionaire celebrities now wield a certain power over pop culture and the Zeitgeist and are not exactly publicity shy. They are, on their own terms, happy to play at occasionally being stars (either via inviting certain cameras in or at times posting on social media) when once 0.001 percenters would have sniffily scurried away from such showmanship. I'm not sure ever before we've had events that are being simultaneously eagerly covered by The Wall Street Journal and TMZ. What a time to be alive. For us, for Anna Wintour, and for the sugared almond industry.