logo
Social Security To End Paper Checks, Pushes Full Transition To Electronic Payments

Social Security To End Paper Checks, Pushes Full Transition To Electronic Payments

Source: The Washington Post / Getty
The Trump administration is moving forward with a plan to eliminate paper checks for Social Security benefits, aiming to modernize how federal payments are delivered. Beginning September 30, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will stop issuing paper checks to most beneficiaries. This change will affect over half a million people, about 0.8% of all recipients, who must now switch to electronic payment methods.
The SSA announced the move in mid-July, directing recipients who still receive paper checks to choose one of two options: direct deposit into a bank account or a prepaid Direct Express debit card for those without bank access.
The shift is part of a broader federal effort to improve payment security and reduce costs. The U.S. Treasury Department confirmed in May that all federal disbursements — including Social Security, tax refunds, and vendor payments must go electronic by the September deadline, in line with a presidential executive order.
We care about your data. See our privacy policy.
'Paper checks are increasingly the front door for fraud,' the Treasury stated. Electronic payments not only reduce fraud risks but also cut costs — each paper check costs about 50 cents to issue, compared to less than 15 cents for electronic payments.
Despite the mandate, some exceptions will be allowed.
Senator Elizabeth Warren said she received assurances from SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano that people who truly need paper checks will not be left behind. While the SSA hasn't publicly confirmed this, a spokesperson told CNN that beneficiaries will be contacted about their options and that paper checks will continue for those with no viable alternatives.
Waivers for paper checks will be granted only under limited circumstances: recipients with mental impairments, those living in remote areas without electronic infrastructure, or individuals aged 90 or older. Applicants can request a waiver by calling 1-855-290-1545 or by submitting a form available through the GoDirect website.
SEE ALSO
Social Security To End Paper Checks, Pushes Full Transition To Electronic Payments was originally published on wolbbaltimore.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Trump Changes His Mind, Republicans Find a Way to Fall in Line
When Trump Changes His Mind, Republicans Find a Way to Fall in Line

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

When Trump Changes His Mind, Republicans Find a Way to Fall in Line

President Trump and his top aides used to be all too happy to praise the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In February, Mr. Trump displayed a chart in the Oval Office showing that the United States had gained an estimated 10,000 manufacturing jobs. When the bureau's March report came out, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, celebrated the 'GREAT NEWS!' on social media. And as recently as last week, Vice President JD Vance promoted data from the bureau that showed an increase in jobs among U.S.-born residents. That was then. After the bureau put out a less-than-impressive jobs report on Friday, Mr. Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the agency's commissioner, and claimed the figures were rigged. (In the way of proof, he said it was 'my opinion.') Now, many Trump allies who walk in lock step with the president are in an awkward position. They have to justify tarnishing the reputation of the very bureau whose work they had cited freely in the past. Some began arguing that there were too many revisions, long a part of the process in calculating jobs data. Others accused the bureau of lacking transparency. Some simply argued that the president had the right to fire whomever he likes. Still others repeated Mr. Trump's claim of rigged data. Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma, who voted for Ms. McEntarfer's confirmation last year, accused her on Fox News of generating 'fake reports.' 'I'm glad she's out of a job,' he said. Senator Roger Marshall, Republican of Kansas, who also voted for Ms. McEntarfer, accused her of incompetence. 'Legacy media's wrong on why the BLS chief was fired,' Mr. Marshall wrote on social media. 'It's not 'bad numbers' — it's incompetence. She inflated job numbers by 800K pre-election, then missed by 250K last two months. How can the Fed make sound decisions with such flawed data? Trump was right to act.' Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, who in March had hailed the bureau's statistics showing strong job growth, backed Mr. Trump's concerns about Ms. McEntarfer in a post on social media. A spokesman for Mr. Vance — who had promoted the bureau's work the same day that Mr. Trump fired McEntarfer — said he was 'completely aligned with President Trump and was glad to see him dismiss the B.L.S. commissioner.' Appearing on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, declined on Sunday to furnish detailed evidence that would substantiate the president's claims that data had been manipulated. Instead, Mr. Hassett, who in the past has cited staff at the bureau as 'professionals,'said, 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' On CBS's 'Face the Nation,' Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, cited the bureau's use of revisions, even though they are part of a normal process of shoring up statistical data to ensure it is accurate. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways,' Mr. Greer said. 'And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' The White House distributed a document accusing Ms. McEntarfer, a Biden appointee who was confirmed by a vote of 86 to 8 in the Senate, of a 'lengthy history of inaccuracies and incompetence.' 'The fact of the matter is that B.L.S. has had clear problems with the reliability and accuracy of its employment statistics since the start of the Covid pandemic over five years ago,' the White House said in a statement on Monday. Mr. Trump has a pattern of accepting results that benefit him and denigrating those he dislikes as being rigged or part of a scam. He has objected to the results of the Emmys, falsely claimed that President Barack Obama did not win the popular vote and asserted that his erstwhile rival Senator Ted Cruz of Texas 'stole' a primary victory from him in Iowa in 2016. After losing the 2020 election, Mr. Trump spread the lie that the election had been stolen from him. And since returning to office, he has lashed out at the sources of bad news for his administration, including judges who rule against him. In May, when he received a mix of good and bad economic news, Mr. Trump said the 'good parts' of the economy were his, while the 'bad parts' belonged to the previous administration. Stephen J. Farnsworth, political science professor at the University of Mary Washington, said even though much of the economic news Ms. McEntarfer delivered to the Trump White House was positive, 'that wasn't enough.' 'The firing is a warning to other government officials that Trump pays very close attention to whether the news makes him look good or not,' he said. 'The larger issue is what this means for markets and for investors. If we're talking about an environment where the impartiality or accuracy of government statistics is called into question, it's much harder for people to make rational and informed choices.' While it remains to be seen whom Mr. Trump will appoint to the position, the vote will serve as a test for Republican senators. 'The key question for the Congress is: To what extent will they insist on a competent professional to be confirmed for this position going forward?' Mr. Farnsworth said.

Asia markets set to open mixed after Trump vows to significantly raise tariffs on India
Asia markets set to open mixed after Trump vows to significantly raise tariffs on India

CNBC

timea few seconds ago

  • CNBC

Asia markets set to open mixed after Trump vows to significantly raise tariffs on India

Bombay Gate Gateway of India, Mumbai Arutthaphon Poolsawasd | Moment | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets are expected to open mixed after U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to raise tariffs on Indian exports to the country significantly. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits," Trump wrote on social media platform Truth Social. "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he continued. Happy Tuesday from Singapore. Asia markets are poised for a mixed open. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 was set to start the day higher with futures tied to the benchmark at 8,701, compared with its last close of 8,663.70. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open higher, with the futures contract in Osaka last traded at 40,610 against the index's last close of 40,290.70. However, futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index stood at 24,708 pointing to a weaker open compared with the HSI's last close of 24,733.45. — Lee Ying Shan All the three major averages soared into the green on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average recouping its losses from Friday's session. The blue-chip index climbed 585.06 points, or 1.34%, to finish the day at 44,173.64. Additionally, the broad market S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite rocketed higher by 1.47% and 1.95%, ending at 6,329.94 and 21,053.58, respectively. — Sean Conlon

Vast majority of U.S. adults stressed about grocery costs, AP-NORC poll finds
Vast majority of U.S. adults stressed about grocery costs, AP-NORC poll finds

NBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • NBC News

Vast majority of U.S. adults stressed about grocery costs, AP-NORC poll finds

NEW YORK — The vast majority of U.S. adults are at least somewhat stressed about the cost of groceries, a new poll finds, as prices continue to rise and concerns about the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs remain widespread. About half of all Americans say the cost of groceries is a "major" source of stress in their life right now, while 33% say it's a "minor" source of stress, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Only 14% say it's not a source of stress, underscoring the pervasive anxiety most Americans continue to feel about the cost of everyday essentials. Other financial stressors — like the cost of housing or the amount of money in their bank accounts — are also broadly felt, but they weigh more heavily on younger Americans, who are less likely than older adults to have significant savings or own property. The survey also found that about 4 in 10 Americans under age 45 say they've used what are known as "buy now, pay later" services when spending on entertainment or restaurant meals or when paying for essentials like groceries or medical care. Adam Bush, 19, based in Portland, New York, is one of those younger Americans who has used pay-later services for things like groceries or entertainment. Bush works as a welder, fabricating parts for trucks for Toyota, and makes under $50,000 per year. "I just keep watching the prices go up, so I'm looking for the cheapest possible stuff," he said. "Hot pockets and TV dinners." Everyone is stressed about groceries Groceries are one of the most far-reaching financial stressors, affecting the young and old alike, the poll finds. While Americans over age 60 are less likely than younger people to feel major financial anxiety about housing, their savings, child care, or credit card debt, they are just as worried about the cost of groceries. Esther Bland, 78, who lives in Buckley, Washington, said groceries are a "minor" source of stress — but only because her local food banks fill the gap. Bland relies on her Social Security and disability payments each month to cover her rent and other expenses — such as veterinary care for her dogs — in retirement, after decades working in an office processing product orders. "I have no savings," she said. "I'm not sure what's going on politically when it comes to the food banks, but if I lost that, groceries would absolutely be a major source of stress." Bland's monthly income mainly goes toward her electric, water and cable bills, she said, as well as care of her dogs and other household needs. "Soap, paper towels, toilet paper. I buy gas at Costco, but we haven't seen $3 a gallon here in a long time," she said. "I stay home a lot. I only put about 50 miles on my car a week." According to the poll, 64% of the lowest-income Americans — those who have a household income of less than $30,000 a year — say the cost of groceries is a "major" stressor. That's compared with about 4 in 10 Americans who have a household income of $100,000 or more. But even within that higher-income group, only about 2 in 10 say grocery costs aren't a worry at all. Women and Hispanic adults are especially economically anxious Housing is another substantial source of worry for U.S. adults — along with their savings, their income and the cost of health care. About half of U.S. adults say housing is a "major" source of stress, according to the poll, while about 4 in 10 say that about the amount of money they get paid, the amount of money they have saved and the cost of health care. About 3 in 10 say credit card debt is a "major" source of stress, while about 2 in 10 say that about the cost of child care and student debt. But some groups are feeling much more anxiety about their finances than others. Women, for instance, are more likely than men to report high levels of stress about their income, savings, the cost of groceries and the cost of health care. Hispanic adults are also particularly concerned about housing costs and both credit card and student debt. About two-thirds of Hispanic adults say the cost of housing is a "major" source of stress, compared with about half of Black adults and about 4 in 10 white adults. Some people are making changes to their lifestyle as a result of high costs. Shandal LeSure, 43, who works as a receptionist for a rehabilitation hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and makes between $85,000 and $100,000 a year, said she's started shopping for groceries at less expensive stores. "It's an adjustment," she said. "Sometimes the quality isn't as good." Many US adults have used 'buy now, pay later' services As they stretch limited budgets, about 3 in 10 U.S. adults overall say they've used "buy now, pay later" services such as Afterpay or Klarna to purchase groceries, entertainment, restaurant meals or meal delivery, or medical or dental care, according to the poll. Bland, the Washington state retiree, said she's paid for pet surgery with a pay-later plan. Younger Americans are much likelier than older people to have used pay-later plans for entertainment, groceries or restaurant meals, but there's no age gap on medical care. Black and Hispanic people are also especially likely to adopt the plans. An increasing share of "buy now, pay later" customers are having trouble repaying their loans, according to recent disclosures from the lenders. The loans are marketed as a safer alternative to traditional credit cards, but there are risks, including a lack of federal oversight. Some consumer watchdogs also say the plans lead consumers to overextend themselves financially. LeSure said she's used pay-later services for things like new clothes, while she balances debt payments for a car loan, student loans and medical bills. She's also turned to them to cover hotel costs after being evicted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store