
AI Eases the Peril of Transitions in Hospital Care
As such, one of the most tenuous passages along the medical journey for every hospital patient, the discharge process, has been among the first targets in the sights of healthcare technology teams in trying to better patient experience and outcomes while also reducing provider workloads.
There's certainly no one-size-fits-all approach to implementing AI, but there is one statistic around which there's no argument: A 2023 study found that 50% of healthcare providers of all types are suffering from burnout, and similar statistics have been found in a panoply of other research. One of the factors contributing to this situation is a staffing crunch, which was highlighted in a 2024 infection-control study that found nearly 80% of the 390 hospitals in the study were understaffed. With metrics like these, freeing up the time of clinical personnel is a move toward better patient experience.
Here's a look at three approaches to using AI at this important point of care.
Letting AI Assistants Run the Numbers
The 'capacity crisis' troubling the US health systems sparked the creation of Qventus' Inpatient Capacity Solution. First launched in 2012, and freshly updated last year, this system uses AI to predict optimal patient discharge timing as early as the first morning after admission; stage patient orders in a manner that flows toward achieving early discharge in all patients possible as evaluated on a whole-of-hospital basis; and automates discharge planning, relieving overtaxed clinical personnel of that administrative burden.
'In use at dozens of hospitals in a wide variety of categories, this system touches more than half a million patients per year,' said Jason Cohen, Qventus' chief medical officer, inpatient. 'Overall, we see that it drives up a 30% decrease in excess days, and a 10 times return on investment on average.'
Jason Cohen
Cohen also pointed out a 2023 French study that identified a 40% higher risk for death for older adults who had to stay in the emergency department overnight prior to being admitted to the hospital, underscoring the need to ensure beds are available, especially for the most fragile populations.
A More Patient-Centered Approach to Machine Learning
'Transitions of care can be one of the most dangerous, difficult, and uncertain times in a patient's illness,' said Justin Schrager, MD, emergency physician and chief medical officer of Vital, an AI-powered patient experience company. 'You would be hard-pressed to find an experienced clinician without a healthy fear of care transitions.'
Schrager noted that traditionally, most of these transitions have been extremely high touch, usually led by nurses, and focused as much on emotional support and spiritual benefits as empirical issues like medication reconciliation and parsing through discharge instructions. They tend to have a few other components in common, he said.
'Generally, almost all of them require substantial personnel to manage and avoid a tech-first approach. Additionally, most focus on post-discharge optimization rather than pre-discharge interventions,' Schrager said. 'As a technologist-physician, I see this situation as a truly great opportunity for automation that scales. But when I put on my physician-technologist hat, the key to success is personalization and utilization — something that healthcare technology has struggled with over the years.'
Justin Schrager, MD
Vital's discharge planning works to integrate both worlds, taking all available medical data on the patient as well as their personal information and synthesizing it into a web app. The patient receives instructions via a text message, which links them directly over to the app. Arriving there, they fill out some personal information and are then presented with their care instructions in a visually-appealing user interface and written in plain language; next steps, including any referrals needed; name, address, and phone number of the location where medications have been sent; diagnosis information, including educational videos; access to hospital records, access to the hospital's existing patient portal system; and more.
'This technology can be used to ensure that patients and their family members understand what is being provided to them and make sure that the information provided is actually valuable and personalized,' Schrager said. 'User-based design principles can be leveraged to cut (what's normally a) 10-page document down to a single page, accessible in all languages on a patient's or their family member's device, rewritten using AI to be reading-level appropriate and automatically detecting and surfacing care recommendations from the clinical team that should be present front-and-center.'
Sample outcomes in one study of use of the Vital product, at Dignity Health Arizona, a large healthcare provider within the CommonSpirit Health network, included 4.4-star average patient rating across emergency department and inpatient visits and a 50% improvement in patient experience.
Focusing on the Clinical Staff
The hospitals of Northwell Health, headquartered in New Hyde Park, New York, the state's largest health system, had a problem in common with those served by Qventus and Vital: overburdened, overstressed providers.
In focusing on discharge planning, Jill Kalman, MD, Northwell's executive vice president, chief medical officer and deputy physician-in-chief, led the system to hone in on relieving those providers of some of their administrative work, and Northwell Health, in partnership with Aegis Systems, built a platform called Ascertain.
Jill Kalman, MD
'Having started in a health system, Ascertain has a unique understanding of the complexities and needs of health systems and can seamlessly integrate with and reimagine the way their existing workflows operate,' Kalman said. In addition to health systems, Ascertain also has the ability to be deployed with payers and/or independent provider groups to handle administrative tasks such as documentation, prior authorizations, and compliance.
Kalman said that the platform has been generating strong results for Northwell, enabling nurses, case managers, social workers, and ancillary staff to focus more of their time on patient care rather than administrative tasks. At a time when burnout among healthcare professionals reaches almost half of all those working in the field, this is a crucial modification.
'The fact is, healthcare workers are drowning in a sea of administrative burdens…Ascertain is helping enable more streamlined clinical workflows and therefore improving turnaround times, enabling clinicians to focus less on paperwork and more on patients,' Kalman said. 'Ascertain empowers case managers by providing a single interface to manage communications with clinical teams and payers, surfacing the key medical information they need for conversations with patients and their loved ones, and automating time consuming, manual tasks such as form-filling and navigating portals, all to ensure that patients receive the right care at the right time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman in Fight with Roommate Over Whether a Home Needs Both a Roomba and a Regular Vacuum
'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around,' the woman saidNEED TO KNOW A woman moved into a shared apartment with two roommates who agreed to share cleaning responsibilities However, she was left unimpressed when one of her roommates began using a Roomba instead of a regular vacuum cleaner 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she saidA woman who recently moved into an apartment in Boston with three other PhD students is unsure if she 'overstepped' after buying a vacuum cleaner without discussing it first. On Monday, July 28, the woman explained in a post on Reddit's "Am I The A--hole" forum that she is living with two other women in their mid-twenties, whom she didn't know before moving in. She said they all discussed splitting up the responsibility of keeping the apartment clean prior to the arrangement. However, she was unaware that the vacuum one of her roommates would be bringing was a Roomba. The woman said robot vacuums are ideal for light maintenance if used frequently, but are unsuitable for vacuuming the entire apartment. 'It doesn't have a hose, can't clean corners or high surfaces, and doesn't work for any kind of mess,' she explained. Complaining about her roommate, the woman continued, 'She also only wants to run it every other week, which doesn't really keep up with the dust and dirt of three people. 'The Roomba also hasn't mapped the apartment well due to its infrequent use,' she said. 'Most of the time, it just bonks around like a lost toddler at IKEA until someone takes pity on it and turns it around.' The woman said that when she tried to discuss her concerns with her roommate, the Roomba owner disagreed on the need to have a separate regular vacuum cleaner. In an attempt to avoid an argument, the woman said she bought her own regular vacuum that had a bag and an allergy filter to use in her bedroom and shared areas. 'When I brought it home, she was annoyed and said I had gone behind her back and broken our agreement,' the woman said of her roommate. 'I didn't see it that way, and shared that I'm not asking anyone else to use it or share costs. I just wanted to be able to clean the apartment to a level that works for me." 'Our other roommate said she doesn't really have a preference and doesn't care, so it seems like she is currently steering clear of this,' she continued. 'There's no blame or fault to be found in her at all; I totally understand why she might want to stay neutral." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'I don't want to be the problem roommate, but now I'm wondering if I overstepped. AITA [am I the a--hole?],' the woman asked. Responses to the post reassured the woman that her views on the Roomba were fair. One person said her roommate was 'acting like a child,' while another argued there should be no issue with the addition of the vacuum because the Roomba can still be used. 'This is absurd. You are allowed to buy whatever you want for your shared apartment. Roommate sounds like a problem now and future,' someone else chimed in. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword


Time Magazine
30 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
How AI Adoption Is Sitting With Workers
T here's a danger to focusing primarily on CEO statements about AI adoption in the workplace, warns Brian Merchant, a journalist-in-residence at the AI Now Institute, an AI policy and research institute. 'There's a wide gulf between the prognostications of tech company CEOs and what's actually happening on the ground,' he says. Merchant in 2023 published Blood in the Machine, a book about how the historical Luddites resisted automation during the industrial revolution. In his substack newsletter by the same name, Merchant has written about how AI implementation is now reshaping work. To better understand workers' perspectives on how AI is changing jobs, we spoke with Merchant. Here are excerpts from our conversation, edited for length and clarity: There have been a lot of headlines recently about how AI adoption has led to headcount reductions. How do you define the AI jobs crisis? There is a real crisis in work right now, and AI poses a distinct kind of threat. But that threat to me, based on my understanding of technological trends in history, is less that we're looking at a widespread, mass-automation, job-wipe-out event and more at a particular set of logics that generative AI gives management and employers. There are jobs that are uniquely vulnerable. They might not be immense in number, but they're jobs that people think are pretty important—writing and artistic creation and that kind of thing. So you do have those jobs being threatened, but then we also have this crisis where AI supplies managers and bosses with this imperative where, whether or not the AI can replace somebody, it's still being pushed as a justification for doing so. We saw this a lot with DOGE and the hollowing out of the public workforce and the AI-first strategies that were touted over there. More often than facilitating outright job replacement, automation is used by bosses to break down tasks, deskill labor, or use as leverage against workers. This was true in the Luddites' time, and it's true right now. A lot of the companies that say they're 'AI-first' are merely taking the opportunity to reduce salaried headcount and replace it with cheaper, more precarious contract labor. This is what happened with Klarna, the fintech company that has famously been one of the most vocal advocates of AI anywhere. [Editor's note: In May, Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg that the company was reversing its well-publicized move to replace 700 human call-center workers with AI and instead hiring humans again. 'As cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organizing this, what you end up having is lower quality,' Siemiatkowski said.] After all, firms still need people to ensure the AI output is up to par, edit it, or to 'duct tape it' to make sure it works well enough with existing systems—bosses just figure they can take the opportunity to call that 'unskilled' work and pay the people who are doing it less. Your project, 'AI Killed My Job,' is an ongoing, multi-part series that dives deeper into how the AI jobs crisis is impacting workers day-to-day. What themes or patterns are emerging from those stories? I invited workers who have been impacted by AI to reach out and share their stories. The project has just begun, and I've already gotten hundreds of responses at this point. I expected to see AI being used as a tool by management to try to extract more labor and more value from people, to get people to work harder, and to have it kind of deteriorate conditions rather than replace work outright. That's been born out, and that's what I've seen. The first installment that I ran was around tech workers. Some people have the assumption that the tech industry is a little bit more homogeneous in its enthusiasm for AI, but that's really not the case. A lot of the workers who have to deal with them are not happy with AI and the way that AI is being used in their companies and the impact it's having on their work. There's a few people [included in the first installment] who have lost their jobs as part of layoffs initiated by a company that has an AI-first strategy, including at CrowdStrike and Dropbox, and I'm hearing from many people who haven't quite lost their jobs yet, but are exponentially concerned that they will. But, by and large, what you're seeing now is managers using AI to justify speeding up work, trying to get employees to use it to be more productive at the expense of quality or the things that people used to enjoy about their jobs. There are people who are frustrated to see management really encouraging the use of more AI at the expense of security or product quality. There's a story from a Google worker who watched colleagues feed AI-generated code into key infrastructures, which was pretty unsettling to many. That such an important and powerful company that runs such crucial web infrastructure would allow AI-generated code to be used in their systems with relatively few safeguards was really surprising. [Editor's note: A Google spokesperson said that the company actively encourages AI use internally, with roughly 30% of the company's code now being AI generated. They cited CEO Sundar Pichai's estimate that AI has increased engineering velocity by 10% but said that engineers have rigorous code review, security, and maintenance standards.] We're also seeing it being used to displace accountability, with managers using AI as a way to deflect blame should something go wrong, or, 'It's not my fault; it's AI's fault.' Your book, Blood in the Machine, tells the story of the historical Luddites' uprising against rising automation during the industrial revolution. What can we learn from that era that's still relevant today? One lesson we can learn from the Luddites is that we should be seeking ways to make more people and stakeholders involved in the process of developing and deploying technology. The Luddites were not anti-technology. They rose up and they smashed the machine because they had no other choice. The deck was stacked against them, and a lot of them were quite literally starving. Collective bargaining was illegal for them. And, just like today, conditions were increasingly difficult as the democratic levers that people can pull to demand a seat at the table were vanishingly few. (I mean, Silicon Valley just teamed up with the GOP to try and get an outright 10-year ban passed on states' abilities to regulate AI). That leads to strife, it leads to anger, it leads to feeling like you don't have a say or any options. Now, we're looking at artists and writers and content creators and coders and you name it, watching their livelihoods becoming more precarious with worsening conditions, if not getting erased outright. As you squeeze these more and more populations of people, then it's not unthinkable that you would see what happened then happen again in some capacity. You're already seeing the roots of that with people vandalizing Waymo cars, which they see as the agents of big tech and automation. That's a reason employers might want to consider that human element rather than putting the pedal to the metal with regards to AI automation because there's a lot of fear, anxiety, and anger at the way that all of this has taken shape and it's playing out. What should employers do instead? When it comes to employers, at the end of the day, if you're shelling out for a bunch of AI, then you're either hoping that your employees will use it to be more productive for you and work harder for you, or you're hoping to get rid of employees. Ideally, the employer would say it's the former. It would trust its employees to know how best to generate more value and make them more productive. In reality, even if a company goes that far, they can still turn around and trim labor costs elsewhere and mandate workers to use AI to pick up laid-off colleagues' workloads and ratchet up productivity. So what you really need is a union contract or something codified in law that you can't just fire people and replace them with AI. You see some union contracts that include language about the ways that AI or automation can be implemented and when it can't, and what the worker has say over. Right now, that is the best means of giving people power over a technology that's going to affect their working life. The problem with that is we have such low union density in the United States that it limits who can enjoy such a benefit to those who are sort of formally organized. There are also attempts at legislation that put checks on what automation can and can't touch, when AI can be used in the hiring process or what kinds of data it can collect. Overall, there has to be a serious check on the power of Silicon Valley before we can hope to get workers' voices heard in terms of how the technology's affecting them.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Blue Origin's Latest Launch Sends Crypto Billionaire Justin Sun to Space After He Bid $28M for Seat on 10-Minute Flight
"When I look at it from space, Earth is so small and that's our home," Sun said after his brief trip on the New Shepard rocketNEED TO KNOW Blue Origin, founded by Jeff Bezos, brought another crew to space The crew included cryptocurrency billionaire Justin Sun, who bid $28 million for the seat on the rocket, along with five others The mission was the 34th flight for the New Shepard programSix more people have gone to space thanks to Blue Origin. The space technology company, founded by Jeff Bezos, brought another crew to space on Sunday, August, 3, including cryptocurrency billionaire Justin Sun. The mission — known as NS-34 —was the 34th flight for the New Shepard program, according to the Blue Origin website. The crew launched from West Texas on the New Shepard rocket at 8:43 a.m. local time, per Blue Origin's X. Another post confirmed that the flight controllers "confirmed capsule separation" about three minutes later, which means the crew experienced "weightlessness." "Crew Capsule apogee confirmed," Blue Origin wrote at 8:47 a.m., before confirming that the crew had "landed" mere minutes later. Another update stated that the aircraft reached touchdown at 8:53 a.m., after a total of 10 minutes. "Welcome back, NS-34 crew," the company wrote on social media. Blue Origin reported that the company "successfully completed its 14th human spaceflight" following the flight. Along with Sun, the crew included real estate investor Arvi Bahal, Turkish businessman Gökhan Erdem, meteorologist Deborah Martorell, educator Lionel Pitchford and entrepreneur J.D. Russell. Sun won a bid for his seat on the New Shepard in 2021. He bid $28 million for the seat, according to Bloomberg and The outlet reported that he was supposed to be on the landmark flight on July 20, 2021, in recognition of the 52nd anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing, but was unable to make the trip due to a scheduling conflict. "It was an honor to see so many nations represented on our flight today. The view of our fragile planet from space has a unifying effect on all who witness it, and I am always eager to see how our astronauts use this experience for the benefit of Earth," said Phil Joyce, Senior Vice President of Blue Origin, in a statement. Per Blue Origin's website, the New Shepard is a "fully reusable, suborbital rocket system built for human flight from the beginning." During the autonomous aircraft's 11-minute trip, those onboard pass the Kármán line into space. The crew experiences "several minutes of weightlessness and witnessing life-changing views of Earth." Singer Katy Perry, broadcast journalist Gayle King, philanthropist Lauren Sánchez, former NASA rocket scientist Aisha Bowe, bioastronautics research scientist Amanda Nguyen and film producer Kerianne Flynn notably went to space on the New Shepard in April as part of its 31st launch. Sun reflected on his brief journey into space in an interview shared on his Instagram. "For this mission, I've waited for four years but we've finally delivered it. I really appreciate Mr. Bezos and his team for making this possible. And thank you dad and mom for bringing me to Earth," he said. "When I look at it from space, Earth is so small and that's our home. We definitely need to do whatever we can do to protect it," Sun added. The entrepreneur made headlines in November 2025 for buying viral artwork depicting a yellow banana duct-taped to a wall. 'This is not just an artwork; it represents a cultural phenomenon that bridges the worlds of art, memes and the cryptocurrency community,' Sun wrote on X. 'I believe this piece will inspire more thought and discussion in the future and will become a part of history.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "I am honored to be the proud owner of the banana 🍌 and look forward to it sparking further inspiration and impact for art enthusiasts around the world," Sun continued. He later consumed the banana used in the artwork, writing in another X post, "To be honest, for a banana with such a back story, the taste is naturally different from an ordinary one. I could discern a hint of what Big Mike bananas from 100 years ago might have tasted like." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword