.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
Non-Jewish Fox News anchor says she ‘100%' questions faith of Jewish lawmakers who endorse NYC's Mamdani
Meanwhile, the remarks from Faulkner – who herself is not Jewish – sparked pushback from liberal Fox News pundit Marie Harf, prompting the daytime anchor to double down on policing the religious devotion of Jewish Democrats.
'The same way I would question Chuck Schumer, who works against the interests of his own people at times for the politics,' she exclaimed, adding: 'And that's what they're doing here.'
Since his upset victory in the Democratic primary last week, Mamdani – a 33-year-old democratic socialist who energized young voters with his campaign focused on affordability – has been the target of Islamophobic attacks from conservatives due to his Muslim faith.
President Donald Trump has suggested that he would defund New York City if Mamdani is elected, all while claiming 'New York City has fallen' and falsely labeling him a 'communist.'
At the same time, Mamdani's been relentlessly criticized over his positions on Israel amid the brutal war in Gaza, which has seen centrist Democrats and the mainstream news focus on his support for the BDS movement and his stance on the pro-Palestine slogan 'globalize the intifada,' which has been used to describe Palestinian uprising against Israel.
This resulted in NBC News anchor Kristen Welker pushing Mamdani to denounce the phrase multiple times on Sunday's broadcast of Meet the Press, leading him to explain why he was declining to do so.
'That's not language that I use,' he said. 'The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.'
Adding that he's 'heard those fears' from Jewish New Yorkers who feel the phrase is a call to violence against Jews, Mamdani stated that he doesn't 'believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech in the manner' before noting that he'll need to 'not only talk about something but to tackle it and to make clear that there's no room for antisemitism in this city.'
During Monday's broadcast of the Fox News midday roundtable show Outnumbered, the largely conservative panel took turns blasting the mayoral hopeful for 'refusing to condemn' the phrase while outright painting him as a hateful antisemite.
Harf, the lone liberal voice on the couch, pointed out that a number of prominent Jewish Democrats have come out in support of Mamdani's campaign after he defeated scandal-plagued former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and is now slated to face unpopular incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent.
'He has repeatedly said that he abhors antisemitism. Increasing anti-hate crime funding by 800 percent – that's real. That will help in New York,' she noted. 'And don't take my word for it. Prominent Jewish New Yorkers – Jerry Nadler, Brad Lander – they have said they have endorsed him.'
Cutting Harf off, Faulkner insisted that Nadler and Lander were merely taking a pro-party position because Mamdani was now the Democratic candidate, leading to an eye-opening exchange between the two.
'Are you questioning Jerry Nadler and Brad Lander's commitment to Judaism?' Harf wondered aloud.
'100 percent! Yes,' Faulkner boldly declared.
'Wow. I wouldn't question anyone's commitment to their faith,' Harf retorted, causing the Fox News star to seemingly invoke Trump's repeated swipes at Schumer, the Jewish Senate minority leader who has been a staunch supporter of Israel for decades but has expressed criticism for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu amid the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
'The same way I would question Chuck Schumer, who works against the interests of his own people at times for the politics,' Faulkner huffed, adding: 'And that's what they're doing here.'
While Harf continued to explain that Mamdani has gained a significant portion of New York's Jewish voting base, prompting Faulkner to say she's 'not discounting their feelings,' Compagno leveled sweeping allegations against the New York assemblyman.
'I will be candid, I find this person frightening,' she asserted. 'I find him blatantly antisemitic. I find it horrifying that he won't condemn the Holocaust, that he won't condemn that language, that he's fine with hyperbolic language when he said the president puts people in jail for writing op-eds but all of a sudden becomes a ballet dancer with words when it has to do with globalize the intifada.'
Despite Compagno essentially accusing Mamdani of Holocaust denial, which appears to be based on the candidate not co-sponsoring a New York state assembly resolution condemning the Holocaust, he has repeatedly and publicly commemorated International Holocaust Remembrance Day and has supported additional funding for Holocaust survivors.
'I have condemned the Holocaust every year,' Mamdani said at a press conference last month. 'This is something that is very clear to me and every New Yorker, and is something that I've made clear mostly in public statements, which is where most New Yorkers are actually engaging with their politics.'
Compagno would also brush off Mamdani's commitment to increase funding to fight hate crimes, insisting that the additional spending wouldn't be needed if he 'tamped down on the rhetoric' and would 'come out and say directly 'I abhor antisemitism.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Takeaways from AP's investigation into online school for incarcerated teens
No matter the offense, states must educate students in juvenile detention. It's a complicated challenge, no doubt — and success stories are scarce. In Florida, where more than 1,000 students are in long-term confinement, the state last year put those kids' schooling online. That's despite strong evidence that online learning failed many kids during the pandemic. The state juvenile justice system contracted with the Florida Virtual School, one of the nation's oldest and largest online learning systems. State leaders were hoping Florida Virtual School would bring more rigorous, uniform standards across their juvenile justice classrooms. When students left detention, the theory went, they could have the option of continuing in the online school until graduation. But an AP investigation showed the online learning has been disastrous. Not only are students struggling to learn, but their frustration with virtual school also leads them to get into more trouble — thus extending their stay in juvenile detention. Here are key takeaways from the investigation. Detained students say they're getting little support with online school In interviews, students describe difficulty understanding their online schoolwork. In embracing Florida Virtual School, the residential commitment centers stopped providing in-person teachers for each subject, relying instead on the online faculty. The adults left in classrooms with detainees are largely serving as supervisors, and students say they rarely can answer their questions or offer assistance. Students also report difficulty getting help from the online teachers. A dozen letters from incarcerated students, written to lawmakers and obtained by The Associated Press, describe online schoolwork that's hard to access or understand — with little support from staff. 'Dear Law maker, I really be trying to do my work so I won't be getting in trouble but I don't be understanding the work,' wrote one student. 'They don't really hands on help me.' Wrote another: 'My zoom teachers they never email me back or try to help me with my work. It's like they think we're normal kids. Half of us don't even know what we're looking at.' Frustration with school has led to outbursts — adding to students' time in custody When students misbehave in long-term confinement, their stays can be extended. At the low end is a 'level freeze,' when a student can't make progress toward release for a few days. For more serious offenses, students are sent back to county detention centers to face new charges. The weeks they spend there are called 'dead time,' because they can't count toward their overall sentence. And since Florida adopted online school in its residential commitment centers, students' frustration with their learning has led to longer stays. One teen described having trouble passing an online pre-algebra test. The adult supervising the classroom couldn't help him. Frustrated, he threw his desk against the wall. He received a 'level freeze' of three to five days, essentially extending his time at the residential commitment center. Another teen has broken three laptops, his grandmother says — two of them in frustration with not receiving help with online school. Each offense has added to his time in confinement. He initially was sentenced to six to nine months for breaking into a vape store, but now is on track to be locked up at least 28 months. The total number of youth in Florida's residential commitment centers increased to 1,388 in June, the latest data reported by the state, up 177 since July 2024, when the department adopted virtual instruction. That could indicate detainees are staying in confinement longer. 'Correlation does not equal causation,' responded Amanda Slama, a Department of Juvenile Justice spokeswoman. Going back to school after leaving detention is tricky One of the arguments Florida made for using online schooling was that students could continue their studies at Florida Virtual School after leaving detention, when many struggle to re-enter their local public schools. That's not as easy as it seems. One student in AP's investigation was refused entry to his local middle school; officials said he was too old to enroll. When his parents tried to sign up for Florida Virtual, they were told they couldn't sign up so late in the school year. Florida Virtual leaders say they provide a transition specialist for each student who leaves residential commitment to help them find a school. But this family says they were never offered this help. No one told them about a special version of Florida Virtual that would have allowed the student to pick up where he left off in detention. ____ The Associated Press receives support from the Public Welfare Foundation for reporting focused on criminal justice, and AP's education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Glamorous GOP Rep. tells Joe Rogan about experience with UFO while in Air Force
A glamorous Florida congresswoman shared a jaw-dropping UFO encounter she had while serving in the US Air Force on an episode of Joe Rogan 's podcast. Conservative House Representative Anna Paulina Luna sat down with the UFC commentator during an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience aired on Wednesday. During the more than two-hour segment, Luna, 36, detailed what she believed to have been an extraterrestrial experience. She said she spotted an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) while serving as an air manager at the Portland Air National Guard. UAP is a term adapted by the government to broaden the scope of unexplained sightings because UFO specifically refers to flying otherworldly objects. There was an 'airspace incursion' that she feels was oddly swept under the rug. 'I remember talking to some of the pilots about it, and I was like, "what was that?" And they're like, "We can't really talk about it,"' she recalled. 'No one really wanted to address it, and so from what I had gathered, that had been likely a UAP.' A glamorous Florida congresswoman shared a jaw-dropping UFO encounter she had while serving in the US Air Force on an episode of Joe Rogan's (pictured)podcast Luna went on to explain she did not look at the possibility of UFOs or UAPs through a 'crazy lens or perspective.' 'You never know if we're the only ones out there,' she bluntly asserted. Luna has been vocal about her belief that UFOs are 'not of human origin' and has called for more federal government transparency on the matter. She told Rogan that the sentiment that people reporting these kinds of sightings are 'crazy' is a 'disinformation campaign to get people to shut up about it.' 'We know that the US government has not exactly been clean about a lot of what they've done with the American people, specifically to the topic of UFOs,' she said. The MAGA firebrand has been persistent in her pursuit to unveil what she believes to be the truth about UFOs. She is a member of the House Committee on Oversight, which has been probing the possibility of UAPs and urging federal officials for 'transparency.' 'Congress and the American people have fundamental questions on the topic of UAPs and incursions near sensitive military installations,' a November 2024 press release from the committee reads. 'Increased disclosure and transparency are needed to provide security and information.' In August 2023, she even threatened to defund Pentagon bosses' salaries if they refused to cough up their alleged secrets. Luna's threat came just after a congressional hearing where 14-year intelligence veteran David Grusch testified under oath that he had evidence of a secret alien ship crash retrieval program, presenting pictures and interviews with insiders. In February last year, she solidified her stance once again on the Grant Mitt Podcast. After a classified meeting with Air Force whistleblowers, she 'absolutely believes' the aircrafts she and many others have described are 'of non-human origin.' Luna also claimed that at that same meeting she was 'men-in-blacked,' first by officials from the Pentagon who attempted to cancel the visit, and then by CIA agents who were inexplicably shadowing her meeting with the Air Force personnel. Her phrase referred to the pop-culture conspiracy theory image that originated from the 'Men in Black' of government agents in black suits, who are sent to keep people quiet about UFO sightings. 'Being a member of Oversight, we follow up with whistleblowers, and we also can conduct our own investigations,' she said.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Putin faces ‘very severe consequences' if no Ukraine truce agreed, Trump says
Vladimir Putin will face 'very severe consequences' if he does not agree a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine at his summit with Donald Trump in Alaska, the US president said on Wednesday. Speaking after a call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, including Britain's Keir Starmer, Trump also suggested he would push for a second summit if his meeting with Putin goes well – this time including his Ukrainian counterpart. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump told reporters in Washington. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' Trump did not provide a timeframe for a second meeting. He is to meet Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday. The meeting will reportedly be held at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, a military facility crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the height of the cold war. Asked if Russia would face consequences if Putin did not agree to stop the war after the Alaska meeting, Trump said: 'Yes, they will … very severe consequences.' The president's remarks followed what he described as a very good call with European leaders in which he consulted about the goal and strategy for his summit. He pleased Europe's leadership by giving reassurances that a ceasefire was his priority and he would not make any territorial concessions without Kyiv's full involvement. Trump's approach at the video conference, as described by France's Emmanuel Macron, appeared to reassure some of the leaders, who were making a final collective plea to the unpredictable US president that he had a duty to protect Ukraine's sovereignty – and European security – at the talks. The European leaders spoke to Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, in a hastily convened one-hour meeting in an effort to shape Trump's negotiating strategy. Zelenskyy and European leaders have been excluded from the summit and fear that Trump, intent on fulfilling his election campaign guarantee that he could easily end the bloodshed in Ukraine, will make concessions that compromise Ukraine's future sovereignty. But Trump underlined his promise that the summit was not in itself a substantive negotiation and was what he described as a 'feel-out' to test Putin's terms to sign a temporary ceasefire that would then lead to talks with Kyiv. Trump said it had been a very good call, and that he rated it 10 out of 10. Britain, France and Germany, co-chairs of the so-called 'coalition of the willing', later laid out their position on the talks, reiterating that international borders must not be changed by force, and insisting that Ukraine must have 'robust and credible security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity'. The three countries repeated that meaningful negotiations could happen only with a ceasefire in place, and called for Russia to face further economic sanctions if it did not agree to cease hostilities at the summit. Speaking alongside Zelenskyy in Berlin, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said Europe wanted Trump to be successful in Alaska but that it had made clear to the US president that Ukrainian and European interests had to be protected at the summit. Merz called for a 30-day ceasefire, and then substantive talks. Putin has resisted a ceasefire for months. Setting out the key principles on which Europe is united he said: 'Negotiations must be part of a common transatlantic strategy. Then they can ultimately be most likely to succeed. This strategy must continue to rely on strong support for Ukraine and necessary pressure against Russia. This also means, if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should … increase the pressure.' He added that there could not be any Russian legal ownership of Ukrainian territory. 'President Trump knows this position, he shares it very extensively and therefore I can say we have had a really exceptionally constructive and good conversation with each other.' Macron said no serious discussions had taken place about Russian-Ukrainian land swaps involving the ceding of Ukrainian territory, and Trump had anyway underlined that any such discussions could only be negotiated with Kyiv. He said Trump would fight for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US and Russia and that such a meeting would be held in Europe. One European diplomat said: 'Overall the meeting was reassuring in that our points came across, but the question remains whether Trump will stick to the agreed script when he gets into the room with Putin.' Trump met heads of state and government leaders from Germany, the UK, France, Italy, Poland and Finland, as well as the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. The issue of security guarantees for Ukraine was raised in the call with Trump, but no breakthrough was made in the US offering to provide practical support to the coalition. But the Europeans' main objective had been to seek reassurances from the notoriously fickle Trump that he would not be lured into making irretrievable pledges requiring Ukraine to make concessions of land as the price for securing Putin's agreement to a ceasefire. They also tried to extract assurances that Trump was still prepared to deploy as yet unused economic levers that could damage Russian revenues. European leaders have been careful in public to welcome Trump's summit but in private fear Trump is bent on improving US-Russia relations and sees a loss of Ukrainian sovereignty as a necessary and unavoidable price to secure that objective. Trump has been vague about his strategy, including the terms he will offer to induce Putin to agree to a ceasefire. Zelenskyy has vowed that the Ukrainian military will not voluntarily surrender territory in Donetsk and Luhansk, but Russia is insisting at least four Ukrainian regions will become Russian either at the negotiating table or through force. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump vented his fury at media reporting of his meeting with Putin, writing on Truth Social: 'The media is being really, really unfair about my meeting with Putin. They keep quoting fired losers and really stupid people like John Bolton, who just said that even though the meeting is on US soil, 'Putin has already won'. What the hell is this? We win EVERYTHING.' The treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said further sanctions or secondary tariffs could yet be placed on Russia's trading partners if the Alaska meeting did not go well. A confident Moscow dismissed the importance of Europe's consultation with Trump. The foreign ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeyev said: 'We consider the consultations requested by the Europeans to be politically and practically insignificant actions. Verbally, the Europeans support the diplomatic efforts of Washington and Moscow to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, but in reality the European Union is sabotaging them.' Russia says the Alaska meeting is likely to address the full gamut of Russian-American bilateral relations, and not just Ukraine. 'We hope that this meeting will allow the leaders to focus on the full range of issues, from the crisis in Ukraine to the obstacles that hinder normal and constructive dialogue, which is crucial to ensuring international peace and stability,' the spokesperson said. The veteran Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, will be present at the talks.
