Four in 10 Britons think women's equality now discriminates against men
Findings from a major global survey ahead of International Women's Day suggested just over half of men (51%) felt this way, compared with a third of women (33%).
Research, by Ipsos UK and the Global Institute for Women's Leadership at King's College London (KCL), involved surveys conducted across 30 countries including Spain, Australia, Ireland and Japan.
Women and Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson, who is also Education Secretary, is set to discuss the survey findings on Wednesday at an event with former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard.
A greater proportion of adults in Great Britain (42%) agreed with the statement, 'We have gone so far in promoting women's equality that we are discriminating against men', than countries including Canada (40%), the US (39%) and Germany (33%).
Ireland had the same percentage (42%) in agreement with the statement, although more men (56%) felt this way, with 29% of women agreeing.
Taking all countries together, young men were more likely than older age groups to feel women's equality discriminates against men.
Some 57% of Gen Z adults – aged 18 to 29 – felt this way compared with 44% of so-called Baby Boomers (aged 60-80).
Among women, Millennials – aged 30-45 – were most likely to feel this way (39%), with Baby Boomers least likely to (29%).
While the research also suggested around half (51%) of people perceived there to be tension between men and women in their country, younger people were more likely to feel this was the case.
According to the polling, Gen Z were more likely to say this (59%) than Baby Boomers (40%).
Kelly Beaver, Ipsos chief executive, said the ''battle of the sexes' has emerged as a salient force within Gen Z'.
She added: 'Despite a majority of our 30-country sample saying that gender equality is important to them personally, we continue to see divergent attitudes toward gender equality more broadly, particularly among this younger cohort.'
The data 'underscores the urgent need for nuanced conversations and inclusive solutions that address the concerns of all genders', she said, 'particularly when considered against the backdrop of recent elections in the US and Germany, where young men were significantly more likely than young women to back right-wing political parties'.
Professor Heejung Chung, one of the KCL researchers, said 'significant divisions remain in how people perceive gender equality in many societies, including Britain'.
She said the divide 'is often fuelled by politicians and media who capitalise on a zero-sum-game narrative – framing the advancement of women as the cause of broader societal grievances, such as the decline of well-paid, secure jobs'.
She added: 'It is essential to promote a growth mindset, reinforcing the idea that gender equality can benefit everyone. We remain committed to demonstrating how advancing gender equality improves the lives of both men and women, strengthens society, and drives business success.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Three million Australians have their student debt cut
Australia 's parliament has passed a law to cut student loans by 20 per cent, fulfilling a key election promise. This legislation will wipe more than A$16 billion in debt for three million Australians. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated that the measure aims to ease the rising cost of living and ensure education does not lead to a lifetime of debt. Education Minister Jason Clare highlighted that the law would 'take a weight' off young people, acknowledging the significant support from millennials and Generation Z. The changes, backdated from June 1, 2025, also include raising the minimum repayment threshold for student loans from an income of A$54,435 to A$67,000
North Wales Live
9 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP pension changes that could mean people retire later
Sweeping changes to both state and private pensions, overseen by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), have been announced. The modifications form part of extensive reforms to the pensions sector by the Labour government. Among the most significant alterations is the prospect of a substantial rise in the state pension age, which could force people to postpone their retirement. Last week, the government revealed a wide-ranging review of the UK pensions system. An independent commission has been formed to examine a series of controversial matters and put forward recommendations for reform. The Government plans to increase the State Pension age from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028, affecting those born on or after 6 April 1960. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. There are proposals for a further rise, lifting the State Pension age from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046, though this timeline could be brought forward, reports Birmingham Live. "A faster increase is definitely on the cards," says Rachel Vahey, the head of public policy at investment platform AJ Bell. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank caused a stir when it suggested that the State Pension Age may need to climb to 69 by 2049 and 74 by 2069 if the triple lock safeguarding its value remains in place. Australian employers are presently obliged to pay 11.5% of workers' salaries into their pensions, with this figure set to rise to 12% in 2025. In comparison, whilst the overall minimum contribution in the UK sits at 8%, employers need only provide 3%. Pension firms and sector specialists have repeatedly lobbied for this amount to be raised to 12%. Nigel Peaple, director of policy and advocacy at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, has continually maintained the minimum pension contribution should rise from the current 8% of earnings to 12%. He said: "To minimise the impact on savers and employers, the increases should happen gradually, as they did in Australia, with employers paying more so that, by about 10 years from now, both employers and employees would pay the same. "This approach of a 50/50 split between employers and employees would strike a fair balance; it would involve higher contributions for employers compared to the current UK rules but much lower ones than traditional UK pensions in which the employer usually paid around two thirds of the cost." One concept attracting attention is the "sidecar savings" method. There are different ways to structure a "sidecar account". Two proposed models are the dual account and integrated plan frameworks. Within the dual account structure, the worker keeps a workplace pension whilst simultaneously joining a separate savings account via a savings provider. The saver sets a savings ceiling for the sidecar account, and the savings provider directs the employer to contribute to this sidecar until the limit is reached. Once the threshold is achieved, any extra funds are channelled into the pension alongside the standard pension contributions. Should funds be withdrawn from the sidecar, the individual recommences saving into it until the cap is attained once more. In the in-plan model, employees opt to save via their employer. Employers then remit the total sum contributed by an employee to both a workplace pension and an emergency savings account to a pension provider. The pension provider allocates the contribution between the pension pot and the emergency savings account. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, remarked: "Australia, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Africa all permit citizens to leverage their pension savings to buy a first home. "Some have suggested we consider, carefully, similar approaches in some circumstances here in the UK." This week, the government announced its dedication to "committed to both monitoring and narrowing" the gender pensions gap. Recent Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures have revealed that the gender pension gap has escalated to a "stark" 48%. The figures, unveiled as the government declared a 'revival' of the Pensions Commission amid concerns about undersaving, showed that in 2020 to 2022, women aged 55 to 59 had a median wealth of £81,000 compared to £156,000 for men. Approximately 20% of self-employed individuals are contributing to a private pension, with many pointing to the Lifetime ISA as a potential solution. There's talk that ministers may tweak the rules to let over-40s open a Lifetime ISA and boost its appeal by cutting the 25% withdrawal charge. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, commented: "The 25% government bonus acts in the same way as basic-rate tax relief, and any income can be taken tax-free." She added, "There is also the ability to access money early if needed, subject to a 25% exit charge."
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
California Gen-Zers no longer care about social justice issues that were their top priorities in 2020, new poll shows
California 's Gen-Z has abandoned the social justice causes that dominated their top priorities in 2020, according to a new poll. The survey, by non-profit organization Power California, included 1,890 Californians aged 18 to 30 and found that economic worries are now taking priority over social justice issues. The cost of living and inflation have moved to the top of the list of young people's concerns, while issues like police brutality and protecting immigrants didn't even make the top five. 'It's not so much that young people don't care about social issues - because they very much do - [it's] because they're living paycheck to paycheck,' Saa'un Bell, the executive vice president of Power California, told SF Gate. '[Social issues are] very important, but they're not the most urgent thing for young people right now,' Bell said. Economic pressures are taking a severe toll on young Californians. According to the poll, 80 percent said the cost of living has outpaced their wages. Nearly one in three respondents have been forced to take on a second job. Bay Area residents are most likely to work multiple jobs or side hustles. The poll also revealed young Californians' reaction to Donald Trump's second presidency. In the Bay Area, 70 percent disapproved of Trump's first 100 days in office while 59 percent said he has had 'a negative effect on the way things are going in California.' More than half or 56 percent opposed Trump's recent punishment of universities. But Gen-Zers are dissatisfied with more than just the Trump admin. Only 51 percent of Bay Area respondents had a favorable view of the Democratic Party. And 54 percent of young Californians statewide said the state was 'headed in the wrong direction.' That is up six percentage points from last year. The survey was conducted in late spring by Latino Decisions in partnership with Power California. The political opinion firm has previously worked with Hillary Clinton's and Joe Biden's presidential campaigns. Earlier this month, a string of polls revealed President Donald Trump was losing ground fast with Gen-Z, with his approval among young voters plunging to record lows. The YouGov/Yahoo survey found Trump's net approval among Gen Z voters collapsed from -23 in May to a staggering -41 in June, with just 27 percent approving of his job performance. A separate Quantus poll showed his Gen Z approval dropped from 46 percent in June to just 35 percent in early July, and an ActiVote poll found disapproval surged to 62 percent. It comes just months after he made surprising gains in the 2024 election. Experts said the sharp drop reflects frustration with Trump's handling of key issues like the economy, inflation and immigration. On inflation alone, YouGov/Economist data shows his Gen Z approval sank from 32 percent to just 23 percent over the past month. Trump had significantly narrowed the Gen Z gap in 2024, losing 18–29-year-olds to Kamala Harris by just four points. A key part of that push was his teenage son Barron, who became an unlikely asset on the campaign trail.
