Why US market is no longer top priority for Chinese companies building foreign factories
There had been a 'drastic downshift' in inquiries from Chinese companies seeking land to rent or purchase in Mexico, one of their hottest overseas investment destinations in the past, said Jack Lee, an industrial property agent based in the United States whose clients are mostly Chinese firms.
Mexico had become a popular choice since US President Donald Trump's first term, when he began to increase tariffs on made-in-China products, thanks to its proximity to the US and its participation in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The free trade agreement guaranteed that as long as a certain percentage of content was made in North America, products could enter the US market free of taxes.
But amid the escalated trade tensions between the US and China since Trump returned to the White House in January, doubts have been rising about whether products made by Chinese companies in Mexico will continue to enjoy the preferential treatment. USMCA is up for review next year and has already been breached by Trump with tariff increases on items including imported steel and aluminium.
'Nobody was there [in Mexico] to make a decision in the last couple of months because there has been lots of uncertainty,' Lee said. 'For those who already have their investment in Mexico … they are not expanding either; they are just barely making a minimum right now.'
The vacancy rate for industrial property in Monterrey – a major industrial city in northern Mexico that has attracted the most Chinese companies so far – had grown to 5.6 per cent, up from below 1 per cent in the past four years, Lee said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
How Trump's anti-Brics crusade is giving bloc new strength and meaning
At first glance, US President Donald Trump's renewed 'America first' agenda seems aimed at the heart of the Brics bloc of developing nations. With threats of punitive tariffs and direct provocations, Trump has positioned Brics as a target in his second term. Yet rather than splitting the bloc apart, his aggressive policies are fortifying it. His threats are not having the intended effect. Instead, it is the US' own relations with the Brics members that have come under strain. The clearest example is India, a critical 'swing state' within Brics. Despite India's strategic importance to Washington as a counterweight to China, Trump has repeatedly undermined trust between the two nations. He invited Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal General Asim Munir to a private lunch at the White House in June. More recently, after slapping a 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports, Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff over its purchases of discounted Russian oil, a move India's Ministry of External Affairs condemned as 'unjustified and unreasonable'. Trump's relationship with Russia is little better. While he has positioned himself as a would-be peacemaker between Russia and Ukraine – raising the prospect of luring Russia away from China in a reversal of Richard Nixon – in reality he has only heightened the risks of a nuclear war. In response to remarks by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev about Russia's nuclear strike capabilities, Trump said on social media that he had ordered US nuclear submarines to be positioned in 'the appropriate regions'. The Russian foreign ministry followed up by declaring that Moscow was no longer bound by a moratorium on the deployment of short- and medium-range nuclear missiles.
AllAfrica
17 hours ago
- AllAfrica
WWIII without bullets: everyone loses in Trump's trade war
As US President Donald Trump enters his second term, his aggressive trade policy has reignited what many are calling a global economic conflict—a de facto World War III without bullets. New tariffs rolled out in August 2025, with more in the works, are shaking global markets, straining supply chains and threatening livelihoods across continents. Unlike conventional warfare, this trade war is fought with tariffs, retaliation and uncertain trade deals. But the impact is no less severe. From factory workers in Asia to farmers in North America, millions are caught in the crossfire. Trump's latest wave of tariffs has sent shockwaves through the business world. Companies from Detroit to Dhaka are scrambling to adjust to shifting costs, delayed shipments, and volatile demand. Firms are once again hesitating to hire, expand, or invest. Some are already scaling back production. Small and medium-sized enterprises—especially in export-dependent economies—are suffering most. As one supply chain manager in Vietnam put it: ' We've spent the last two years rebuilding after Covid and inflation. Now we're tearing it all down again because of this trade war. ' Rising input costs and shrinking demand are leading many businesses to cut jobs, not create them. The economic promises behind Trump's tariffs—protecting American jobs and revitalizing domestic industries—are clashing with the reality on the ground. US farmers are facing new retaliatory tariffs from China, threatening their already-precarious position in global markets. In developing countries, layoffs are widespread, especially in garment manufacturing, electronics assembly and food processing industries that rely heavily on exports. This trade war is not just a fight between the US and China. Its ripples reach deep into the Global South, where countries that depend on trade with major economies are being dragged into the fray. In Bangladesh, Cambodia and Nigeria, factories are closing. Port activity is slowing. Currencies are destabilizing. Millions who had only recently climbed out of poverty are now seeing their futures collapse. For developing nations, trade is not a chess piece in a geopolitical contest—it's a lifeline. They are the invisible casualties of this economic conflict. Even the US's closest allies haven't been spared. Canada is once again facing U.S. tariffs, particularly on aluminum, solar panels and some agricultural products. While Canada remains a party to the USMCA, the agreement doesn't shield it from unilateral actions by the US president under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act—allowing tariffs on the basis of 'national security.' This proves that even formal trade agreements offer little real protection in a system dominated by unpredictable, politically motivated policies. Trump's ongoing trade war has undermined decades of American leadership in building a rules-based trading system. The US once led the push for open markets, global cooperation, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Now, it has become one of the leading sources of uncertainty—with tariffs as threats, not tools, and agreements treated as optional rather than binding. If the US can impose or ignore rules at will, what incentive do other countries have to stick to them? Once again, the World Trade Organization (WTO) is watching from the sidelines. With its dispute resolution body still crippled and no meaningful reform in sight, the WTO has failed to respond to this growing crisis. Without a functioning enforcement system, the rules of global trade are reduced to suggestions—and global trust is crumbling. At the core of Trump's approach is a zero-sum philosophy: that any gain by another country must be a loss for the US. But that doesn't match how the modern global economy actually works. One country's import is another's export. One company's supplier is another's customer. Disrupting trade damages everyone in the chain, especially workers at the bottom. Trade, when cooperative and fair, is a positive-sum system. But when weaponized for political points, the damage is universal. Trump's second-term tariff war is already causing widespread disruption. If left unchecked, it risks pushing the world economy toward deeper fragmentation, financial instability, and rising inequality. The promise of global trade has always been mutual growth and shared prosperity. But today, it is being twisted into a tool of confrontation. If trade becomes war, everyone loses. Businesses lose clarity. Workers lose income. Developing nations lose hope. It's not too late to turn back. But doing so will require bold leadership, trust in international institutions, and a renewed commitment to trade not as a weapon—but as a bridge.
The Standard
19 hours ago
- The Standard
Trump weighing lawsuit against Fed's Powell over renovations, White House says
U.S. President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speak during a tour of the Federal Reserve Board building, which is currently undergoing renovations, in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 24, 2025. (Reuters)
